Sources: Wasserman Schultz Screamed At House Official About Muslim Spy Mastermind Imran Awan, Admitted Intervening In Pakistan For Him

Top Democrat leadership aided and abetted in this widespread jihad treason.

Longtime Geller Report readers have been hearing about this cybersecurity breach by Muslim IT staffers for well over a year. The Democrat leadership collusion with Muslim spies is the biggest story of treason and espionage in the recent memory, and yet for month after month the media has refused to cover it.

House investigators found the House server was being used for nefarious purposes: the alleged Muslim spies were removing information and sending it for foreign actors. Capitol Police are looking into the massive amounts of data the Awans reportedly downloaded off the congressional system, thousands of illegal log ins made on the official system, possible theft of tens of thousands of dollars in congressional equipment and fraud and sent to foreign governments and groups.

No wonder the Democrats tried to squirrel these jihad spies out of the country.

Sources: Wasserman Schultz Screamed At House Official About Imran Awan, Admitted Intervening In Pakistan For Him

Luke Rosiak, The Daily caller,  on June 4, 2018

Ex-Democratic National Committee head Debbie Wasserman Schultz said she intervened in a Pakistani land deal involving her then–IT aide Imran Awan, according to two House employees. The dispute came after Awan’s father was charged with fraud in relation to the deal, and the mysterious exertion of political influence resulted in Pakistani authorities instead targeting the elderly alleged victims, according to a local report.

And when a House Office of Inspector General cybersecurityinvestigation found that Awan made “unauthorized access”to House servers, including the House Democratic Caucus’ shortly before the election, Wasserman Schultz became “frantic, not normal,” “making the rounds” to House officials in an attempt to kill the investigation, one House employee told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Awan told people Wasserman Schultz chose the name for his daughter, Leza — a Jewish name — and that the Florida congresswoman’s daughter regularly rode a horse that Awan kept at a boarding facility, sources with knowledge of the relationship told TheDCNF.

Wasserman Schultz cornered House Chief Administrative Officer Phil Kiko and called him a “fucking Islamophobe,” saying “you will not so much as take away their parking spots,” the two House employees said Kiko told them.

The congresswoman also told Kiko she had invited Awan’s whole family to her daughter’s bat mitzvah and said she had “helped him with a land deal,” the sources said. A spokesman for Kiko declined to comment on this story.

A 2009 article in the Pakistani publication Dawn, headlined “Influential expat shields father from long arm of law,”said Awan’s father was facing criminal fraud charges involving a land deal, but Awan used political connections to pressure the police into targeting the alleged victims instead.

Awan’s father purchased “huge chunks of land from different farmers in 2008,” but all the checks bounced, the report said. “The police high-ups are ‘ominously’ indifferent to proceed against Awan,” and it’s “noteworthy” how they were “complying with the desires of” Awan, who the paper described as a “White House employee.”

“About a dozen farmers of Chak 7-JB, Panjor, including five siblings — all aged between 57 and 70 — have given up hope of justice after they sold their agricultural lands to Ashraf Awan of Bole De Jhugi, who is father of White House employee Shahid Imran,” Dawn reported. Imran Awan also goes by Shahid Imran Awan, Virginia court records show.

The police harassed the 19 would-be victims, including the five elderly brothers and even their lawyer, and charged them with “frivolous” cases, apparently to get them to stop trying to get the money they say they were owed, the paper said.

“Mohammad Abid, a victim of [Ashraf] Awan’s alleged high-profile swindling, said that [Ashraf] Awan’s son had easy access to the corridors of power and that’s why he was able to [pressure] the police to dance to his tunes,” Dawn reported.

The article details a series of people who say they were then subject to retaliation, including widow Bushra Bibi who said “now Imran was threatening her with dire consequences.”

A third source, who’s familiar with Imran Awan, told TheDCNF that Awan recounted the intervention in the foreign criminal matter and that Awan said it was Wasserman Schultz who intervened. A fourth source — a fellow House IT aide — previously told TheDCNF that Awan said now-Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel was involved.

Dr. Zafar Iqbal, one of the alleged victims, told TheDCNF that “Imran came to Pakistan to get [his father] out of jail, since he had some [connections] in the Congress.”

Ashraf Awan’s business partner in the land deal, Rashid Minhas, told TheDCNF that the elder Awan gave a USB to a Pakistani senator who is a former head of a Pakistani intelligence agency, and that Imran claimed his IT position in Congress gave him the power to “change the U.S. president.” Minhas is in prison for an unrelated fraud charge.

On July 25, 2016, the House Inspector General notified the Committee on House Administration that investigators had detected major cybersecurity violationsby the Awan family. Awan, his wife, two brothers, his brother’s wife, and even his elderly father were all being paid by various Democrats to manage their servers, with many of the members from Wasserman Schultz’s Florida.

The finding came at a critical time for Democrats: It was three days after WikiLeaks published the first emails from a hacked on the DNC, setting the stage for Wasserman Schultz to lose her position as party chair and for Democrats to begin electioneeringon a theme of Russian hacking.

In February 2017, Kiko and the House’s top law enforcement official, Paul Irving, outlined serious violations in a letter to the committee, and the family was banned from the House computer network. The letter also noted that the House Democratic Caucus server disappearedsoon after the IG report named it as key evidence.

But Wasserman Schultz refused to fire Awan, with her spokesman saying he would work on “websites” and “printers,” which a cybersecurity expert previously told TheDCNF would presumably involvenetwork access.

The congresswoman also added Awan’s wife, Hina Alvi, to her payroll in late 2016, after the investigation was in full swing, but before the family was banned from the network. Wasserman Schultz kept paying her until March 17 — 12 days after Alvi went to Pakistan with $12,000 in a suitcase.

Her actions so rattled the Administration Committee’s Democratic staff director, Jamie Fleet, that he planted a negative story in Politico that revealed Wasserman Schultz, his fellow Democrat, was continuing to pay the suspect, two House sources said. The story also said Wasserman Schultz had a “friendly personal relationship” with Awan and Alvi.

Fleet did not respond to a request for comment.

Kiko said in an April 2018 hearing spurred by the scandal that he was powerless to stop members who refused to fire a bad actor. (RELATED: Hearing Reveals Congress Provided ‘No Supervision’ Of IT Aides, Missed Red Flags, But Members Block Proposed Reforms)

“Termination, now it’s the member’s responsibility … We can revoke everything but they could still be employed,” he said. He added that his office should have the authority to override members who would want to keep a rule-breaker on the government network.

Wasserman Schultz became fixated on finding out everything investigators knew about Awan, the House sources said. House investigators briefed her extensively with significant evidence about Awan and his family, including improper computer evidence.

Yet Wasserman Schultz said in a statement,  “my office was provided no evidenceto indicate that laws had been broken, which over time, raised troubling concerns about due process, fair treatment and potential ethnic and religious profiling.” (RELATED: Own Wife Turns, Accuses Him Of Fraud, Violent Threats)

Wasserman Schultz was defending someone investigators allegedly told her was suspected of cybersecurity violations, despite having resigned from her position as DNC head following a devastating hack during the 2016 election.

Despite Wasserman Schultz’s relationship with Awan, in April 2017 — two months after he was banned from the computer network — the IT aide appeared to put the congresswoman at risk. Capitol Police found a laptop with the username RepDWS in a phone boothat midnight along with a copy of Awan’s ID, a letter to prosecutors and a note that said “attorney client privilege,” according to a police report. Awan’s ID caused police to tie it to a criminal suspect and seize it, but the note kept them from looking at it.

That led to a tense exchange recorded on video in May 2017, in which Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the Capitol Police with “consequences”for not returning the laptop. When he refused, she mulled attempting to restructuring the Capitol Police’s entire board so that her committee would have more leverage over it.

House sources told TheDCNF these exchanges were only a public glimpse into numerous such interactions, which were frequently profane, with every official she could buttonhole. One source said she also went to the Department of Justice and “made a stink.”

Wasserman Schultz hired the House’s former top lawyer, Bill Pittard — who had recently quit the House — to try to block prosecutors from seeing evidence, TheDCNF previously reported. Awan obtained legal representation from two lawyers who began their careers in Miami — one with experience in espionage cases and the other a former aide to Hillary Clinton. Wasserman Schultz’ district includes much of Miami.

One of Awan’s lawyers told a judge he felt “very strongly”that prosecutors should not be able to look at the RepDWS laptop, mounting an attorney-client privilege argument. Prosecutors did not challenge the argument before the judge.

In August 2017, Imran and Hina were charged with four felony counts for gathering up money under allegedly false circumstances before wiring $300,000 to Pakistan in January. Prosecutors said the timing suggests that the Awans had learned oftheir investigation, which a spokeswoman for Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, AshLee Strong, told TheDCNF was supposed to be secret. Capitol Police “requested that the shared employees be allowed to continue to use their IT credentials until February [2017] because they didn’t want to tip off the employees,” she said.

Wasserman Schultz’s brother is a prosecutor in the same office handling the case and has tweetedabout it.

Gowen said the wire transfer instead had to do with the land deal, which he told the Washington Examiner was “quickly souring.”

Wasserman Schultz did not respond to a request for comment.

Wajid Ali Syed reported from Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Follow Luke on Twitter. Send tips to [email protected]. PGP key.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2018 Daily Caller News Foundation

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

43 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Kalambong Kalambong

5 years ago

Democrats are selling state secrets to China and Russia

The Clintons gave China secrets to rockets, and they gave Russia the Uranium mine

The House Democrats, through that Pakistani moslem IT spy, siphoned hundreds of thousand national secrets and sent them to China, via Pakistan

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  Kalambong Kalambong

When rapist Bill was President is when they sold out to China. Hillary sniffed out a new source for her insatiable need for money when Huma Abedin was her intern. Then MUSLIM money was another money faucet for her.

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  Kalambong Kalambong

Not to mention valuable hardware, software, and funds.

0

Rick Reynolds

5 years ago

Wow the level of corruption was absolutely unbelievable in Obama’s White House. I bet this is just the tip of the iceberg. Trump needs to have his staff delve deeper, esp. into any Muslim moles who infiltrated the US gov’t at the highest levels. But they can’t allow these demons to escape, catch, prosecute and jail the traitors and their enablers.

Just think of how many innocents and US soldiers could’ve died because of the intelligence they stole and passed onto Islamic terrorist groups. It’s time politicians like Keith Ellison were also investigated for their connections as well. If you have any affiliations with hate groups (like Farrakhan) or terrorist organizations (like Muslim Brotherhood), that should disqualify you from holding any gov’t positions and preferably land you in jail.

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  Rick Reynolds

Jeff Sessions will continue to do nothing.
He will let the Statute of Limitations run out.
Look how he handled the IRS scandal that targeted conservatives and Louis Learner. It’s depressing how justice is no longer being served equally.

0

katzkiner

5 years ago

Reply to  Rick Reynolds

Pelosi put Ellison on the House Intelligence Committee.
Foreign (jihadi) governments do not need to maintain spy operations, the DNC will provide.
Unbeleivable!

0

William Vanwinkle

5 years ago

I think it’s time President Trump declared Marshall law, dissolved the House and Senate, deported ALL the illegals AND muslims according to the McCarran-Walter act. Let We The People amend the constitution with term limits for the House and Senate, outlaw lobbyists, bar lawyers from running for any federal office other than federal judgeship, and investigate all the corruption that has been taking place in D.C. indict and prosecute everyone of the crooks including Obama, Holder, Clinton (all of them), Comey, Sessions, Lynch, Wasserman-Shultz, Pelosi, Waters, and anyone else who happens to turn up. They should all be tried in military tribunals (would have to be under Marshall law) and sent to Gitmo. Any other suggestions?

0

IzlamDownpressesHumanity

5 years ago

Reply to  William Vanwinkle

Martial law, not Marshall law, but I agree with you. The US government is so corrupt its questionable as to whether or not we live in a democracy anymore or an oligarchy.

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  William Vanwinkle

Too late for the McCarran-Walter Act,
It’s gone! They LIKE Communists here. The LEFT won again! Over 20 years too late. Could you seriously see JEFF SESSIONS enforcing that if it was still possible?

MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT REBORN?
By David Cole
November 18, 1990

With a whimper, not a bang, the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act is gone. In one of its last acts, the 101st Congress repealed this embarrassing remnant of the McCarthy era, a law that permitted the exclusion and expulsion of immigrants with politically “incorrect” beliefs and associations. Long criticized, the law appeared especially ludicrous in the wake of the Cold War.

But before we congratulate our representatives for courageously eradicating this 1950s relic, we should ask whether the new law that replaced it is in fact a change for the better. From the perspective of one who has litigated under the McCarran-Walter Act for many years, it looks unfortunately like more of the same. The new law continues to draw ideological lines and may well increase the administration’s ability to exclude and deport aliens for political reasons.

Under the McCarran-Walter Act, aliens could be kept out of the country and expelled after they entered if they advocated Communist ideas, belonged to Communist organizations, or espoused such doctrines as the destruction of property. Moreover, the government could bar entry to those whose presence it deemed “prejudicial to the public interest,” an open-ended phrase that proved handy when spokespersons opposed to administration policies sought to visit. If the government wanted to keep an alien out but didn’t want to reveal its evidence for doing so, it could dispose of the necessity for a hearing before an immigration judge merely by asserting that its decision was based on confidential information.

In short, in the McCarran-Walter Act we applied to aliens a range of principles and practices that we would have considered constitutional anthema if applied to citizens: guilt by association, persecution for one’s beliefs, censorship of anti-government speech and secret “Star Chamber” enforcement proceedings.

The 1990 law has been heralded as a long-awaited repudiation of these principles. It is not. For example, immigrants can still be excluded for mere membership in the Communist Party. As a result, we will continue to require all immigrants to answer a question long ago repudiated for citizens: “Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?” The new law also bars representatives and officials of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the “Communist” party of the 1990s. Thus, guilt by association remains the operative principle.

Two additional grounds for deportation, concerning “terrorism” and “foreign policy,” raise even broader problems. Just as the 1952 Congress responded to the threat of Communism by outlawing a wide range of legitimate but unpopular political activity, so the 1990 Congress has used the threat of “terrorism” to enact similarly sweeping provisions. The new law defines “terrorism” to include, among other things, the use of a firearm or explosive “with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.”

An organization that has engaged in such conduct is a “terrorist” organization. And, according to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the law makes deportable anyone who has raised money or recruited members for such an organization. Under this standard, the government could deport every alien who collected donations for the African National Congress during Nelson Mandela’s recent American visit, and Mr. Mandels himself would be barred from entering.

Still broader is a new “foreign policy” ground. Under this provision, the United States can expel or exclude any alien whose presence poses “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.” The law warns that this judgment generally should not be based on lawful “beliefs, statements or associations,” but even allows that basis if the secretary of state is willing to call the foreign policy interest “compelling.” This gives the secretary virtual carte blanche, for what court will second-guess that Cabinet member’s judgment that an alien’s presence poses “compelling” or even “potentially serious adverse policy consequences”?

To make matters worse, where the government seeks to exclude aliens for “terrorist” or “foreign policy” reasons, it can use the same “confidential information” procedure available for ideological exclusions under the McCarran-Walter Act. The government’s ability to deny all access to the information upon which it bases its decisions greatly exacerbates the potential for unchecked ideological action.

Reports of the McCarran-Walter Act’s death are greatly exaggerated. Its spirit lives on in the 1990 revisions, which continue to deny immigrants the very freedoms of belief and association upon which this nation of immigrants was founded. Far from repudiating the ideological litmus test, Congress merely adjusted it to today’s paranoias. The national pastime of witch hunting did not begin with the McCarran-Walter Act, and unfortunately it will not end with its repeal.

The writer is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and a volunteer staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1990/11/18/mccarran-walter-act-reborn/389a81bf-00ac-434b-b869-3d3e29b13eae/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.08cc06463af5

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  William Vanwinkle

The corruption is truly stomach turning and there is MORE….

Good luck amending the Constitution for term limits. It will NEVER happen. No career politician will allow that. Besides we don’t need that. We need INFORMED VOTERS. That is how TRUMP was elected.

Lobbyists and both houses are fighting Trump on trade because it is so CORRUPT. They ALL benefit selling us OUT. You will not find a better website the is ACCURATE on the corruption going on. Lou Dobs has referenced it…

Not having a recess is not to confirm and do Trump’s agenda. NO it is to destroy it! I;ll post excerpts but you need to get the full picture by reading it. It is sickening how we have been sold out for DECADES. Trump is really pulling for US.

On Cue – Mitch McConnell Welcomes Legislation To Block President Trump Trade Policy…
Posted on June 5, 2018 by sundance
…
There are Trillions At Stake. There is no upper limit to what congress is willing to do to stop President Trump from turning off the lobbyist funding. Without influence in DC there can be no affluence in DC. That’s why McConnell cancelled the recess.

If the president continues to remain focused exclusively on what is in the U.S. best interests, he must be stopped. Politicians in DC cannot just sit-by and allow the U.S. economy to be based on the interests of Americans; it would mean the destruction of years of central planning by DC Lobbyists, multinational banks, Wall Street and multinational corporations.
…
Support among Republicans has grown for legislation backed by Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) that would give Congress power to authorize or reject any new tariffs imposed because of national security concerns.
…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/05/on-cue-mitch-mcconnell-welcomes-legislation-to-block-president-trump-trade-policy/#more-150141

0

William Wilhelm

5 years ago

Reply to  William Vanwinkle

The McCarran-Walter act is no more. It was recinded and reworked in 1990.

0

Moya McNulty

5 years ago

Reply to  William Vanwinkle

William Vanwinkle — any relation to RIP?

AM I DREAMING – IS THIS REAL? MILITARY TRIBUNALS – YES. GITMO – YES. PATRIOTS UNITE! DO IT!

0

IzlamDownpressesHumanity

5 years ago

The US government: rotten and corrupt don’t even begin to describe the actions of the traitorous muslum collaborators there and I’m wondering if Trump is much better w/his happy ramadan greetings.

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  IzlamDownpressesHumanity

He is doing the minimum for Muslims. The only thing I can think of is he is about to bring the hammer down on IRAN and wants other MUSLIM countries to gang up on Iran. North Korea get technology from Pakistan who has nuclear weapons. North Korea than helps IRAN with their nuclear ambitions and China more or less controls North Korea. The ONLY reason Saudi Arabia talks to Israel is their fear of Iran with nuclear weapons.

There is a rumor that Trump will host a Ramadan dinner but with whom and when are sketchy. Trust me though, TRUMP IS ON OUR SIDE. That much I know without a doubt,

Here’s an example of how much he is FIGHTING FOR US. I urge you to read it. It’s not long. What he is doing for us is awesome. I didn’t like his giving Muslims any standing but he has his reasons for it.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/05/on-cue-mitch-mcconnell-welcomes-legislation-to-block-president-trump-trade-policy/#more-150141

0

katzkiner

5 years ago

Reply to  IzlamDownpressesHumanity

Muslim love is deep in the US government thanks to flowing petrodollars.
Our warrior Prince Bush.

0

1PierreMontagne1

5 years ago

Americans seem confused about treason and what it means. Americans are also unable to comprehend the concept of criminal willful blindness that encourages treason. Clearly AG Jeff Sessions is avoiding prosecution of espionage by Muslim IT persons least he be called Islamophobic and a racist. Waaerman Shultz knows this and gives the middle finger to America and Security breaches allowed by the DNC.

0

felix1999

5 years ago

Reply to  1PierreMontagne1

Sessions is USELESS!

0

SK

5 years ago

Reply to  1PierreMontagne1

More than likely Sessions own deep state corruption will be brought to light if he pursues any of this.

0

R. Arandas

5 years ago

Islam and corruption are two sides of the same coin.

0

felix1999

5 years ago

This is so insane that I could really use a FLOW CHART to follow who did what and when they did it. Wasserman is JEWISH! What is she thinking and then letting a MUSLIM do this, is something I can not comprehend.

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  felix1999

That’s why someone coined the acronym JINO. She is a sell-out, like most Democrats and RINOs.

0

Alleged-Comment

5 years ago

Why has not Debbie Wassername been arrested for espionage, besides being a product of what looks like incest?

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  Alleged-Comment

I think she escaped from Dr. Moreau’s island.

0

Beverly

5 years ago

My question is why is Wasserman-Schultz still in office? I would think at the very least she would be suspended until the investigation is complete. What I see is that we have an inept House who is not looking at what is in the best interest of the citizens of the U.S.A.

0

William Wilhelm

5 years ago

Reply to  Beverly

Maybe what was on the thumb drive that was given to the Pakistan intelligence has Democrats in Congress behaving like terrorist within.

0

Robert

5 years ago

As Pamela Geller has so aptly stated in times past the Democrat Party at least in
terms of its national leaders is the treason party. The Democrat Party is the party
that stood against President Trump building a wall on the southern border. The
Democrat is the party that seems most in cahoots with Muslims. Actually there
are some libertarian leading Republicans who are almost as bad. All the things
that Ann Coulter said years ago about Democrats are as true today as they were
back then if not more so.

0

Liatris Spicata

5 years ago

And the good Jews of Miami- and plenty of other people- keep supporting the deeply corrupt DWS.

0

QiPo

5 years ago

Perhaps Hell hath no fury like a woman whose paramour is being scorned, hmmm?

0

Halal Bacon

5 years ago

hmm, sounds like a movie, “Debbie does Pakistan”?

0

MaDeuce

5 years ago

Reply to  Halal Bacon

Among other things that’s about what I suspect. ;-/

0

Ruger 1

5 years ago

I don’t know Why the Republicans Aren’t Using this to Cut the Throats of DWS and the Other DemonRats… Cause Sure as Sh_t if this had happened to the Republicans, the DemonRats Would be Screaming Bloody Murder and Would Definitely Call for Treason Charges!!!!! DWS is a Disgrace to Florida… I Can’t Believe the Idiots in South Florida that Keeps Voting Her Ass into Office!!!!!

0

katzkiner

5 years ago

Reply to  Ruger 1

Peruse below the new Chinese made shipping billionaires for why the republicans are not on the warpath against the treasonous democrats.
Wonder how much the British would charge to sack DC again?

0

katzkiner

5 years ago

Reply to  katzkiner

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  Ruger 1

It’s 2AM at the bar and no amount of booze will get this one an escort.

0

scherado

5 years ago

Is there a link to the scream?

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  scherado

Will a Hillary video do? That glorious Tuesday in November 2016 might be a place to look.

0

scherado

5 years ago

Reply to  JeromefromLayton

Well, I asked as I like to see, as guilty pleasure, a leftist blow a gasket and act badly; other than that, I do not have a high tolerance for seeing her face, and almost no tolerance for seeing or hearing “Her Thighness,” aka, Hillary.

0

alex jervis

5 years ago

Not ONE of those whose Online business was cast to the 4 winds, complained?

0

SK

5 years ago

Obviously these people have a lot to hide. So much corruption.

0

iprazhm

5 years ago

Yet this diabolical criminal remains in office. There is no law for politicians in Fl or the U.S congress unless it benefits the establishment.

0

Covadonga

5 years ago

Let’s hope the Pakistani journalist got “Capitol” mixed up with “White House”, and that this horrible spy Imran Awan did not also have access to the Soetoro White House.

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

Reply to  Covadonga

Dream on…

0

JeromefromLayton

5 years ago

How many $ Millions has “M” spent chasing Russians? Then, compare it to Debbie’s henchmen.

0