Valerie Jarrett Must Explain Her Clinton Foundation Cover-Ups

45

Roseanne Barr’s been fired, her show cut, and her fan-base excoriated for a despicable tweet she made about former Barack Obama insider, Valerie Jarrett. But what about Jarrett’s own scandals?

What about the fact this former White House whisperer helped cover up the corruption that dotted the Clinton Foundation — corruption and funding scandals that are still, to this day, coming to light?

Valerie Jarrett

Jarrett was certainly an enabler.

Story continues below advertisement

And it’s just curious: There’s so much outrage over an onnuous tweet. But there’s dead silence over abject corruption and pay-for-play scheming.

Lifezette has more:

Roseanne Barr’s racially charged Twitter attack on Valerie Jarrett should not immunize former President Barack Obama’s closest confidante from having to explain why she helped cover up and therefore enabled the biggest charity fraud ever, the Clinton Foundation.

The process begins with asking why did Jarrett and Obama push former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination? By July 10, 2015, Hillary Clinton would have been an unelectable candidate had the full truth then been known.

On that day, we have since learned, the FBI opened a full-scale investigation into whether Clinton and her innermost circle of trusted aides mishandled classified information while and after she served as the chief U.S. diplomat. Thousands of pages of FBI and other files concerning this investigation are found here (see especially Part 1 of 21).

A bungler who transacted 100 percent of State Department business over unsecure private servers, using unreliable electronic devices, and who was under robust investigation by the FBI hardly seems the strongest candidate to take on any nominee selected by the Republican Party, let alone an unconventional, wealthy disruptor named Donald J. Trump.

So why did top officials in the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ) and others in the Obama Administration — likely including the 44th president himself — cover up the true extent of defects in Clinton’s record while and after she was secretary of state?

The answer seems obvious and simple. Clinton, if elected, was certain to destroy or bury all evidence in long-running and wide-ranging activities involving public corruption and frauds arranged through main and satellite “charities” connected to the Clinton family, whose origin dates to Oct. 23, 1997, when Bill Clinton was 42nd president of the United States.

Evidence that Clinton might have helped destroy had she won included incriminating emails and other documents proving the extent to which Jarrett and others were aware of Clinton Foundation crimes, chose to ignore these serious infractions, and worked hard to cover them up for more than eight years.

So Jarrett, Obama, and other senior Democrats likely held their noses and worked as hard as possible to anoint Hillary Clinton as 45th president of the United States.

This decision was easy and inescapable. It remains partially inexplicable because complicity in covering up Clinton crimes began months before Obama was inaugurated, by mid-November 2008.

Hiding the crooked books of Clinton “charities.” After Obama won the presidency in 2008, hard work abetting Clinton family charity frauds began in earnest because a global audience of donors and regulators had to be tricked into believing the foundation and numerous affiliated entities were actually charities in good standing, when in truth they were neither organized nor operated lawfully at any moment during 2008, or afterwards.

The final filing deadline for the foundation’s 2007 federal tax returns, for example, was Nov. 17, 2008 (November 15 fell on a Saturday), so Chief Financial Officer Andrew Kessel signed the return Nov. 14, 2008, and posted it to the IRS office in Ogden, Utah, where it was received on Nov. 19, 2008, two days late.

You will not see the complete and incriminating 2007 return on the foundation’s website here. To see the filing that arrived at the IRS office, you need to visit the advanced search portion of ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer website and enter the federal Employer Identification Number (EIN) 31-1580204 in the indicated field, then click through to the 2007 return, which you can download.

But to understand more glaring defects in the foundation’s record, you need to visit state registries in New York and Massachusetts, among many others.

At the New York Charities Bureau Search webpage, punching in the foundation’s EIN lets you find numerous historical annual reports, including the one for 2007. This pivotal report, filed in January 2009 (well past the final filing deadline), includes pages omitted from a purported “audit,” by the accounting firm BKD LLP, that demonstrate an entity called the Clinton Health Access Initiative (the “new” CHAI), which was the foundation’s single largest component in 2007.

To see why this omitted disclosure is so important, visit the Massachusetts Corporation Search webpage, and look carefully at filings for the foundation and particularly for an entity called the “Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative Inc.” (the “old” CHAI). The state of Massachusetts, on March 31, 2008, involuntarily revoked authority for old CHAI to operate there from Dec. 31, 2007, forward.

This means that all during 2008, the largest piece of the foundation evidently operated in bold violation of Massachusetts laws from its headquarters office in Boston. It also means that this serious set of infractions was concealed from regulators in most U.S. states (including New York) and from key foreign regulators.

A public charity like the foundation cannot engage in illegal activities of any kind. Here is dated yet relevant information from the IRS that explains the obvious. An IRS department headed in 2008 by Lois Lerner should have shut down the foundation by November 2008. We can all suspect why that did not happen.

Bad as the Clinton Foundation predicament was by November 2008, Team Obama nonetheless decided Hillary Clinton had to hold a choice appointment in the historic president’s Cabinet.

Swindling colleagues in the U.S. Senate. If senators were to confirm Clinton as secretary of state, a majority had to be satisfied that conflicts and potential conflicts between the international work of the Clinton Foundation and her role as chief diplomat would be avoided or managed, thus protecting the interests of American taxpayers.

Thus was born the memorandum of understanding (MOU) that described a series of measures Clinton agreed to take to reassure senators and the public that there would be no conflicts between her official duties and the interests of the foundation. You can read the real MOU here.

Lawyers will confirm that an MOU is not legally enforceable, and they will note that the Clinton MOU doesn’t even name as one of its parties the former president, the person most likely to have actual conflicts of interest. The MOU is Swiss cheese because it has so many holes you can almost see through it.

Moreover, no portion of the description of any part of the foundation is accurate, as is made clear by the above referenced links. Why, then, did Jarrett affix her signature to the MOU and thereby assent to its terms on Nov. 16, 2008?

Team Clinton, partners in the Obama administration, and allies in the liberal mainstream media have tried at all costs to distract the public from seeing the key elements in the push to install Hillary as the second Clinton in the Oval Office. In return, she was to insulate the Obama team from accountability for criminal acts committed between 2009 and 2017.

Soon, we will learn if DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz (an Obama appointee) has understood the real motives of the previous administration during the chaotic 2015-16 election cycle and its aftermath.

Will Horowitz whitewash evident corruption, fraud, and obstruction of justice, or will he rise to the occasion and uphold U.S. laws? The Constitution and, with it, our republic hang in the balance, awaiting his findings.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

Stop filling space, fill a court room.

Patrick
Patrick
5 years ago

comment image

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  Patrick

That about sizes it up!

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

comment image Hillary;

Tilt
Tilt
5 years ago

The worst thing about VJ (an Iranian herself with deep links to the Current Iranian elite) is the fact that she was effectively lobbying / liaising the Iran deal on behalf of Iran to BHO and his oval office inner circle (+ cabinet deep state traitors) which she was a key part of

Treasonous idiot Kerry and the rest of BHO’s minions, were royally swindled and / or bought by this split tongued viper / Iran

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
5 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

Valerie Jarrett’s family is also involved knee-deep with the muslime brotherhood, probably the relevance in Roseanne’s tweet.

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago
Reply to  Tilt

comment image

What about this one?

mudpuppy
mudpuppy
5 years ago

why does she live with the Obaminations and pretty much is glued to his side?

sofiya
sofiya
5 years ago

why does she live with the Obaminations and pretty much is glued to his side?

chris VN
chris VN
5 years ago
Reply to  sofiya

” ménage à trois ” and obuma is the little bitch in the middle.

turkeychoker
turkeychoker
5 years ago
Reply to  sofiya

Maybe she don`t snore like Moochele, so they keep her in the middle ?

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  sofiya

He doesn’t flush without consulting her.

762x51FMJ
762x51FMJ
5 years ago

Roseanne has always been a Leftist Socialist, her show was created by ABC writers in order to mock all Christian Conservatives..
Some time ago Roseanne tweeted she wished all Christian Conservatives would eat Chick-fill-a and die of cancer…
ABC oversamples Neilsen ratings to claim more Conservative Americans love Roseanne….

ABC approves Roseanne to commit political suicide and send racist tweets and immediately fires her..claiming Roseanne is an example of a RACIST CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN TRUMP SUPPORTER…

Emboldening their Marxist Leftist base they elevate
Valerie Jarrett as now untouchable whether she broke laws or not…Just like, Obama, Holder, Lynch, Maxine Waters, if you dont like their politics then your a racist…
IT WAS ABC WHO APPROVED ROSEANNE’S TWEET.
Roseanne should get an academy award because her ( tweet ) was for Valerie Jarrett to come to the podium and accept her victimship award ( a get out of jail free card), anyone who criticizes Valerie is not only a racist (she is half black) but also islamophobic, Jarrett is a Muslim Brotherhood member.
So like Hillary and the rest of the Swamp they break all laws and can never be charged because you either hate women, are racist or an Islamophobe.
VJ was born in Iran, her parents were both US born residents, she was naturalized and I believe she will pick Keith Ellison as her running mate after she secures the Democratic Nomination for president.
Roseanne’s announcement and constant media focus on Jarret to groom her is why.

Drifter12
Drifter12
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

Very insightful, if true…

Tilt
Tilt
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

There is no conspiracy

Roseanne had a genuine awakening in the last five years or so (leaving the “progressive” dark side and finding the pro American light in the conservative camp), it is the insatiable radicals on the deranged left, that will never miss a chance to fully exploit a good and juicy crisis / blunder / misstep of their mortal enemies on the right (text book, Saul Alinsky)

The silver lining of the Roseanne scandal (she personally, is paying dearly for her less then prudent remark) is that the sheer depth of hypocrisy and double standards from the liberal MSM and Dem politicians is exposed, (yet again…) for all to see!

Cumulatively, the narrative / culture / “facts” war that is waged between the MSM / Democrats and the fearless, anti establishment warrior that is DT, is approaching critical mass after which a majority of Americans will finally realize that they had enough from the rabidly hateful, pathologically obsessed, fraudulent and malicious MSM that made it their (pathetic) life mission, to crucify a duly elected POTUS

If the MSM / Democrats will continue with this unadulterated, visceral hate to Trump and his administration, it looks like the Democratic traitors will be kissing the mid terms good bye

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  762x51FMJ

Jarrett’s Father was a communist as well.
How is it that we have communists inside the US Government?
Obama was completely influenced by his communist mother (either of his supposed fathers – take your pick – Obama Sr. or FMDavis?). His Grandparents and all his mentors.
He then hired Communist Brennan…
Can you spell “Manchurian Candidate”?….

turkeychoker
turkeychoker
5 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

see Allan Dullas book ” Red Spies in the UN “

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  turkeychoker

I wasn’t a big fan of the Dulles brothers either, but for entirely different reasons.
They were a mixed bag. Some of the true members of what we know to be the deeply entrenched, “Deep State”. Sometimes I would agree with their tactics and positions, other times not.

turkeychoker
turkeychoker
5 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

It`s been decades since I read that book. The author was a former director if the CIA, if I remember right. Last name may have been Dallas. The book is in a box in amongst about 15-20 other boxes of books. My library makes me almost cry when I need a book.

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  turkeychoker

Allan and John Foster Dulles….. a very mixed bag.
They threw the Democratically elected socialist out of Iran and replaced him with the Shah and then came Khomeini…. Not a pretty picture all around.
Persians have always needed a “strong man” or at least they’ve allowed themselves to be ruled that way.

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago
Reply to  Fromafar

muslim is how you spell thatcomment image

CrustyB
CrustyB
5 years ago

I wish I were half-black so I could do anything I wanted, no matter how corrupt, stupid or evil, and blame any criticism of me on “racism.”

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago
Reply to  CrustyB

half black, half white, everything obola did stunk! Thats a skunkcomment image

Drifter12
Drifter12
5 years ago

So Roseanne has to apologize to Jarrett for making a fringe racist comparison. It has nothing to do with race…I have always thought of Jarrett as Progressive septic tank slime. All you have to do is look at her treasonous deceitful record to know exactly what she is…

Clear Sky
Clear Sky
5 years ago

If that is Valerie Jarrett, no wonder that Roseanne did not know that she is black. The whole Roseanne scandal has no merit.

Pashta
Pashta
5 years ago
Reply to  Clear Sky

I called it. I watched it all go down live on Twitter. Roseanne didn’t know Valerie Jarrett was black. I didn’t, either! I bet lots of folks didn’t know until this happened… We all knew she was born in Iran and looks “iranian”, not “black”. Roseanne got a raw deal and I’m not even a fan.

Cai
Cai
5 years ago
Reply to  Pashta

If she doesn’t look ‘black’ (and she doesn’t) then she is as much ‘white’ as ‘black thereby nullifying the ‘racist’ card, except that is, if it is a handy and invisible get out of jail free, shut up all truth/criticism, P/C card.

robert v g
robert v g
5 years ago

Hard to fathom the illegalities.And this is first mention of crooked Clinton “charities” being started way back in oct.’97. So they’ve been crooks over 20 yrs.and Jarrett covered it up all along. But somebody critical of her gets punished.

Cai
Cai
5 years ago
Reply to  robert v g

Typical.

aebe
aebe
5 years ago

All this stuff has been known for years , so why isn’t the clintoon in prison ?

Validate your 2nd Amendment Rights…….. Carry !

VictorMC
VictorMC
5 years ago

IF you think you will get one word of truth from this appalling treasonous woman – you are the one who wants locking up.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
5 years ago

Say what you will but what with there still being a First Amendment, Roseanne’s tweet about Valerie Jarrett being the result of a mating between the Muslim Brotherhood and “Planet of the Apes” was funny as hell.

BTW, just exactly how was her tweet “racist” since muslime is not a race and “Planet of the Apes” is pure fantasy?

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago

that insults baboons

Beverly
Beverly
5 years ago

I would like to know how deeply the Bushes were involved in the coverup. Maybe that is why George W. Bush has never been critical of Clinton or Obama. “The Clinton Bush Haiti Fund was a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization founded on January 16, 2010, by former US Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, to aid the victims of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. The organization was formed in response to the request of President Barack Obama for the former Presidents to assist in the Haitian rescue effort.”

Fromafar
Fromafar
5 years ago
Reply to  Beverly

Go back to his Grandfather, Prescott Bush and his WW2 dealings and it might become reasonably clear.
This from the Left Wing “Guardian” no less….. About as “Deep State” as they came.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

 Tradewinds
Tradewinds
5 years ago

The enemy within..

linda goudsmit
linda goudsmit
5 years ago

The Left is too infantile to distinguish the difference between saying and doing. What Valerie Jarrett DID in covering up the Clinton Foundation corruption is far more egregious than what Roseanne Barr SAID.

DVader
DVader
5 years ago

The FBI has been running a criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation for about 2 years now. Evidently they haven’t found anything (so far?) because if they had Trump would have leaked it and Hannity triumphantly announced it.

Pashta
Pashta
5 years ago

Um, Pam? What is “onnuous”? I think that’s a typo.

Kwitcherbellyakin
Kwitcherbellyakin
5 years ago

I guess I have x-Ray vision. It is either that, or the world won’t acknowledge what I see, a double standard. Word is out that Michelle Obama called ABC-TV execs and insisted Roseanne had to go. She made several calls before Barr made her statement, and then another just before Barr was fired.
Most Americans do not realize VJ is black, or halfway, like Obama. But we do know she supported Iran, like Obama, and they are close friends. So, if you have a problem, and you know an Obama, they will handle it for you. Does anybody remember when a Harvard law professor got arrested for breaking into his own home? Well, it is a simple mistake to lock yourself out of your home, and any reasonable policeman would investigate. But this professor had Obama on his cell phone, and the next thing you knew, the officer, the professor, and Obama were sharing a beer at the White House. This officer may have been the last white man invited there, but it was only to prop up the professor and embarrass the officer. That is how Obamas work.
Remember when Bill Clinton left office and Hillary was “supposed” to take his place? Not so fast, as Obama pushed her aside and told her it was his turn, but he would support her when her time came. We all got pooped on for 8 years, followed by over a year of explaining why she lost.
We have clowns in the Congress. Many of them are minorities, and even when they say something ridiculous, like Maxine Waters does regularly, her constituents don’t shut her up. And, if I can see all of this, why can’t America?

Cain Abel
Cain Abel
5 years ago

“Hypocrites” is a minority?

Hypocrite-American?

Lowell Parlow
Lowell Parlow
5 years ago

Valerie Jarrett Must Explain Her Clinton Foundation Cover-Ups

Quoted as saying, ” That’s how we do it back home. I didn’t know it was illegal.”

scherado
scherado
5 years ago

V. Jarret must explain? To whom? The woman was the “right-hand man” to The Big O-Mo and, we are led to believe, the continue to cahoot as the whining continues over their historical flouting of the law. The “Chicago Way,” rules the day and the night. Translation: She is “protected”, while her detractors are threatened.

Patrick of Atlantis
Patrick of Atlantis
5 years ago

Jarrett and Obama conspired with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the U.S. Ambassador in Benghazi.
The plan was to kidnap the Ambassador and exchange him for the ‘Blind Sheikh’, Omar Abdel Rahman, and all of the rabble in Gitmo, and tons of cash.
The plan was brilliant. If the CIA contractors had obeyed their orders to stand down, we would have seen Ambassador Steven’s father in the Rose Garden reciting the Bismallah, with a joyous Obama looking on. But the CIA contractors disobeyed their orders to stand down, and we saw instead, Bowe Bergdahl’s father in the Rose garden reciting the Bismallah, with a joyous Obama looking on. comment image

dad1927
dad1927
5 years ago

Jar head said when they get in the second time, they had a bunch of judges ready to go and payback was going to be a beach!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!