News Ticker >
[ April 24, 2019 ]

Italy: Muslim Migrant Stabs Christian After Seeing Crucifix Necklace

[ April 24, 2019 ]

FIRST PICTURES: Luxury life of the Muslim bombers in Sri Lanka Easter jihad

[ April 24, 2019 ]

PolitiFact fact-checker: they lied, Pamela Geller was right

[ April 24, 2019 ]

SLAVERY CONVICTION: Texas: Muslim Couple sentenced a mere 7 years for FORCING GIRL TO BE...

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Paris university moves conference featuring Jewish philosopher over threats and fear

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Iran IRGC Commander has defected to the West

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Muslim Migrant Arrested in Jihad-Terror Plot on Australians and New Zealanders on Anzac Day at...

[ April 24, 2019 ]

3 Muslim Terror Plots Targeted Synagogues in 3 Months

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Muslim League Pledges 100 Million to the Jihad Against the Jews (“Palestinianism”) to “Pay-For-Slay”

[ April 24, 2019 ]

Terror Regime in Iran is putting its hopes on a Democratic president

UK Proposes Seven Years of Jail Time for Criticizing Islam

165

The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has proposed stringent new guidelines for those who cause “racial hatred.”

“Part 3 of the Public Order Act prohibits activities intended or likely to stir up racial hatred.” according to the draft of changes.  “All offences carry a 7 year statutory maximum sentence.”

The guidelines are not specifically geared towards protecting Islam, but there will likely be few white Protestants gaining protection under the new proposal.

“[A]n offence may involve low level threats of violence that do not cause a victim a high degree of fear, but a high level of racial aggravation may be present which is deeply upsetting for the victim,” the report says.

The Orwellian proposal lacks a necessary element of intent, meaning that the offender’s conduct need not be intentional, but only “likely” to cause racial hatred, which is a purely subjective assessment.

The law applies when “racial or religious aggravation was the predominant motivation for the offence, the offender was a member of, or was associated with, a group promoting hostility based on race or religion, aggravated nature of the offence caused severe distress to the victim or the victim’s family, or the aggravated nature of the offence caused serious fear and distress throughout local community or more widely.”

“The essence of each offence is the intention to stir up hatred, the proposal says. “However, the offences contain an important distinction in that the racial hatred offences can include use of threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, while the offences relating to hatred against persons on religious grounds provide for threatening words or behaviour only, and do not extend to activity which is abusive or insulting.”

Even if the offender does not successfully “stir up hatred,” he or she can still be prosecuted for saying mean things.

There are several “aggravating factors” which are likely to lengthen the sentence of an offender, including “timing of incident – particularly sensitive social climate,” “vulnerable/impressionable audience,” and “use of multiple social media platforms to reach a wider audience.”

The overarching law is the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED). The PSED creates a “legal duty which requires public authorities to have ‘due regard’ to three “needs” or ‘limbs’ when considering a new policy or operational proposal.”

The three needs are:

  1. the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other prohibited conduct
  2. the need to advance equality of opportunity between those who share a “protected characteristic” and those who do not
  3. the need to foster good relations between those who share a “protected characteristic” and those who do not

The new proposal is the nail in the coffin for freedom of expression in the U.K. The authorities are broadening the scope with which they can use force against those who criticize a religious group in public or on social media.

There is a valuable lesson for Americans in the U.K.’s proposal: “Hate speech” codes which are creeping into American society are a slippery slope, and are sure to erode our First Amendment rights.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest