News Ticker >
[ August 23, 2019 ]

One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer On An Open Thread

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Desinformatzia Deconstructed: “Muslims Against Antisemitism”?

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Jewhating Terrorist Supporter Marc Lamont Hill Slips into Israel

[ August 23, 2019 ]

WATCH: On 90th anniversary of Hebron massacre, “Palestinian” Authority glorifies terrorists

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Hebron 1929, Tlaib-Omar 2019, and the Jew-Hating, Jihadist-Marxist Alliance

[ August 23, 2019 ]

New Anti-Trump Ploy Is Conjuring A Recession

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Docs Reveal Taxpayer-Funded Islamic Propaganda Forced on Teachers, ‘Islam Glorified, Christianity Disparaged and America Bashed’

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Jewish Girl Murdered, Father and Brother Seriously Wounded in “Palestinian” Jihad Bombing

[ August 23, 2019 ]

‘Many Feared Dead’: Islamic Group ‘Seizes’ Two Nigerian Towns Weeks After Gov’t Declared Group Defeated

[ August 23, 2019 ]

Sanders releases $16 trillion ‘Green New Deal’ plan, promises it will ‘pay for itself’

UK Proposes Seven Years of Jail Time for Criticizing Islam


The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has proposed stringent new guidelines for those who cause “racial hatred.”

“Part 3 of the Public Order Act prohibits activities intended or likely to stir up racial hatred.” according to the draft of changes.  “All offences carry a 7 year statutory maximum sentence.”

The guidelines are not specifically geared towards protecting Islam, but there will likely be few white Protestants gaining protection under the new proposal.

“[A]n offence may involve low level threats of violence that do not cause a victim a high degree of fear, but a high level of racial aggravation may be present which is deeply upsetting for the victim,” the report says.

The Orwellian proposal lacks a necessary element of intent, meaning that the offender’s conduct need not be intentional, but only “likely” to cause racial hatred, which is a purely subjective assessment.

The law applies when “racial or religious aggravation was the predominant motivation for the offence, the offender was a member of, or was associated with, a group promoting hostility based on race or religion, aggravated nature of the offence caused severe distress to the victim or the victim’s family, or the aggravated nature of the offence caused serious fear and distress throughout local community or more widely.”

“The essence of each offence is the intention to stir up hatred, the proposal says. “However, the offences contain an important distinction in that the racial hatred offences can include use of threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, while the offences relating to hatred against persons on religious grounds provide for threatening words or behaviour only, and do not extend to activity which is abusive or insulting.”

Even if the offender does not successfully “stir up hatred,” he or she can still be prosecuted for saying mean things.

There are several “aggravating factors” which are likely to lengthen the sentence of an offender, including “timing of incident – particularly sensitive social climate,” “vulnerable/impressionable audience,” and “use of multiple social media platforms to reach a wider audience.”

The overarching law is the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED). The PSED creates a “legal duty which requires public authorities to have ‘due regard’ to three “needs” or ‘limbs’ when considering a new policy or operational proposal.”

The three needs are:

  1. the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other prohibited conduct
  2. the need to advance equality of opportunity between those who share a “protected characteristic” and those who do not
  3. the need to foster good relations between those who share a “protected characteristic” and those who do not

The new proposal is the nail in the coffin for freedom of expression in the U.K. The authorities are broadening the scope with which they can use force against those who criticize a religious group in public or on social media.

There is a valuable lesson for Americans in the U.K.’s proposal: “Hate speech” codes which are creeping into American society are a slippery slope, and are sure to erode our First Amendment rights.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email

Pin It on Pinterest