Students at Barnard College in New York voted to request the administration stop doing business with eight companies tied to Israel.
They wrote in a letter to the school’s top brass that these companies wrongfully “profit from or engage in the State of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.”
The Student Government Association that demanded the divestment made the request, of all times, on the eve of Israel’s Independence Day celebrations.
The Algemeiner has more:
The referendum was endorsed by nearly 65 percent of the 1,153 students who voted in the school, whose undergraduate student population is about a third Jewish.
Zionist students have criticized the voting process for excluding voices opposed to the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaign, which seeks to isolate Israel until it complies with Palestinian demands.
The referendum was first introduced during an SGA meeting on March 19, during which Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine asked representatives to support divestment. The SGA voted instead to launch a student body-wide referendum on the matter, including it in a broader elections ballot.
Members of pro-Israel groups say they were only informed of the meeting the evening before, and did not have an opportunity to present their case before the SGA voted to allow a referendum.
“We had basically a day’s notice to think about what [the presentation] would mean, to make sure that people would feel safe going into that, and to make sure that people would have sufficient counter to [the presentation] even though there wasn’t an opportunity given to present,” Talia Rubin, president of Columbia/Barnard Hillel, told the Columbia Spectator at the time.
The students were allowed to raise their opposition at an SGA meeting the following week, after the referendum was launched.
A representative for Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), Marla Solow, argued however that BDS should not be part of a two-sided debate.
“We don’t want to present the issue as though there are two sides that need to come together because there is such an unequal balance of power,” Solow told the Spectator. “The idea that it can be an equal-sided debate misrepresents the situation and the power dynamics at play. You don’t want to normalize Israel’s violence.”
Aryeh, a non-partisan student group that supports the two-state solution, criticized “the unjust manner” in which the divestment campaign was structured, calling it “dishonest and opaque.”
“The decision to initiate a referendum was made behind closed doors without hearing formally from any pro-Israel students — and in contradiction to repeated assurances that no decision or vote would be made during that session,” the group wrote. “When Aryeh was finally able to speak at SGA, our one request — for a fair and unbiased referendum — was ignored, as SGA elected to put forward an unsourced text that included CUAD’s arguments and propaganda, in many cases word-for-word.”
Aryeh argued that presenting one-sided materials to students who had “no prior knowledge of the conflict” swayed the vote in favor of BDS.
Columbia’s chapter of Students Supporting Israel also expressed its disappointment, noting that “supporting BDS is much more than just requesting to divest from a few companies. It is an attempt to delegitimize and demonize the Jewish State and its People.”
“It has been proven that where BDS passes, an increase in anti-Semitic acts quickly follows,” the group added.
Studies have shown that activity related to BDS and the presence of an SJP branch are each strong predicators that a campus suffers from a hostile climate toward both Jews and Israel.
CUAD celebrate the referendum’s results on social media as an expression of solidarity with Palestinians. “Thank you for standing for justice,” it wrote, “thank you for standing with Palestine!”
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.