Facebook Reverses Decision to Ban Pamela Geller, But What About Everyone Else?

35

A few days back, I was blocked by Facebook for reporting on Muslim anti-Semitism in Germany. This is now common practice. Millions of conservatives and Republicans are banned and blocked on social media platforms for their political opinions.

After Breitbart wrote up the story, Facebook reversed its decision.

Allum Bokhari of Brietbart updated the article:

Story continues below advertisement

“UPDATE: A Facebook representative told Breitbart News that “a block was incorrectly put on [Ms. Geller’s] account on April 25 after a post was mistakenly identified to violate our Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy because it included ‘God Bless Hitler’ and we don’t allow praise for hate figures. We removed the block the next day as soon as we identified that Ms. Geller was raising awareness about this content, which we do allow.”

It’s all well and good that Facebook reversed the block against me, but what about the millions of others who are routinely banned and blocked? Millions of conservative Americans have no recourse, no Breitbart article to call out the leftist authoritarians at Facebook.

This must stop. We need anti-trust legislation to ensure our First Amendment rights on social media. And we need it now.

Read: The Urgent Case for Legislation against Facebook and Google
By Pamela Geller

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago

There will be no change in face book until there is a mass exodus of its well fleeced sheep.

Dorrie
Dorrie
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Unfortunately, that isn’t happening on a large scale like one would imagine after so much private information was sold to outside sources! Instead, Facebook stock has skyrocketed – thru the roof, so to speak! People are clamoring to BUY the stock. It makes ZERO sense after what that asshat Zuckerberg did!

Kathy Brown, Esq.D
Kathy Brown, Esq.
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Correct Mahou. I just nixed it yesterday.

It’s one thing if, against my will, I’m targeted. It’s quite another when I volunteer for that.

I’ve gotten death threats from muslims on FB which were not taken down, and Yucky Zucky nauseated me too much to continue. I’m betting that the “mass exodus” you cite is happening as we speak. And as the Jews say: “From [my] mouth to God’s ear!”.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

It is truly amazing what people will do. But, his empire will not last any longer than any others.

Sunshine Kid
Sunshine Kid
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Left a long time ago. I recognized years ago that there were trackers. Had to be, if the advertisers had a good idea of your likes and dislikes.

Darwin Toivo
Darwin Toivo
5 years ago

So these Facebook folks are engineering wizzes, right? Are they wizzing on the other half of their brains?

SNOWDIN
SNOWDIN
5 years ago

This is just temporary I am sure they will ban her again in the near furture..

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
5 years ago

I don’t have a good understanding of the problem, and Pamela probably could be more informative. My understanding is that jihadi expressions are frequently blocked on FB, so the axe does fall both ways.

I recall one person who commented here declaring forthrightly that a ban on FB requires human oversight, but he was rather coy about how he knew this.

I shouldn’t think it would be too difficult to determine whether or not censorship is applied more rigorously against “conservative” sites. Simply running a few dozen well crafted test cases should suffice. If anyone knows of an online article that discusses such a test, I’d appreciate a reference.

BarleyEducatedD
BarleyEducated
5 years ago

Maybe do one yourself.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago

Pamela is a true fighter, she can never stay banned for long, whether it is Paypal, Twitter, or Facebook! May God bless her! 🙂

VictorMC
VictorMC
5 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

100% agreed Farcebook and Twatter are Muslim arselickers (brown tongues) of the worst sort. Once you get out of the ‘habit’ of these two scumbag sites. it’s amazing how life still goes on. Donald can do no wrong by me BUT for using Twatter.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
5 years ago

Pamela is a true fighter, she can never stay banned for long, whether it is Paypal, Twitter, or Facebook! May God bless her! 🙂

SNOWDIN
SNOWDIN
5 years ago

They can allow Ms. Geller all the space and time that she needs or wants. I still will not use Fecesbook.

CreoleGumbo
CreoleGumbo
5 years ago
Reply to  SNOWDIN

That is how I feel.

VictorMC
VictorMC
5 years ago

That other bunch of ignorant pigs Twatter blocked me for 12 hours for something equally innocuous. I have had enough, I deleted my F******** account years ago and going to delete Twatter today. It’s amazing how life goes on without them. EVERYBODY should do the same. Hurt them and hurt them hard.

Sunshine Kid
Sunshine Kid
5 years ago
Reply to  VictorMC

Done the same. In fact, I don’t bother to go to web sites that use only FarceBook for comments (and the “r” in the word is meant to be there).

jdgalt
jdgalt
5 years ago

We do need antitrust legislation for the Internet, to make sure that blogs like this one are allowed to exist (and efforts such as the attempt to revoke Gab’s domain name are prevented). But that does not mean that conservatives should be entitled to post on FacePlantBook any more than lefties should be entitled to post here. The important thing is to keep the Internet open so that anyone can create a site. “Net Neutrality” regulation, if applied to individual sites rather than top-level services such as DNS, will hinder that, not help it.

There are already new “Facebooks” emerging just as Gab has emerged to replace Twitter. Soon the market will replace the rest. “Social Justice” is all about hate, and the rats are already leaving the sinking ship.

Suresh
Suresh
5 years ago
Reply to  jdgalt

That’s the way. ……… or sue them out of existence……….or they will continue their fasicst intimidation to shut down conservative free speech.

This is how patriots fightback and win http://tinyurl.com/y8yzso88

IronMaidenaregods
IronMaidenaregods
5 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Anti-trust is Marxist.

felix1999
felix1999
5 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

The problem is the little guy doesn’t have a team of sneaky lawyers as the big guys do. The little guys will not have a chance. BREAK THEM UP!

Suresh
Suresh
5 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

If every conservative gives even $5 to fund to get good lawyer not neccessarily the costliest , it can be done.

That is why I said , unite , organise , fund and sue/fightback. They are winning bcoz they funded by petro dollars jihadi lobbyists.

satcatchet
satcatchet
5 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

I’ll give for Perry Mason!

1ST CAV MEDIC 69 ✔Trump Train
1ST CAV MEDIC 69 ✔Trump Train
5 years ago

That’s great news, Pam. There are so many others, and this has to stop.

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
5 years ago

What about the rest of them? They all left, Pamela. You’re the only one left on F*ke book now. That’s why they reversed their decision. 😉

satcatchet
satcatchet
5 years ago

Too many sheeple and snowflakes will keep spybook alive. What is neede is a paradigm shift that will infuriate the masses to the point that spybook will be a thing of the passed. It’s just a fad anyway.

We are in the, “look at me” mentality that is reaching it’s apex and what goes up must come down. FaceBook, what a waist if time.

Gary AW
Gary AW
5 years ago

What hypocrisy – Pam moans about FBs banning yet i’m blocked on her own FB page with no explanation why.

satcatchet
satcatchet
5 years ago
Reply to  Gary AW

Citation needed.

overboosted  ✓ᴰᴱᴾᴸᴼᴿᴬᴮᴸᴱ
overboosted ✓ᴰᴱᴾᴸᴼᴿᴬᴮᴸᴱ
5 years ago
Reply to  Gary AW

There is a difference between banning someone from posting anything on facebook and a user banning ISIS trolls.

Stephen Honig
Stephen Honig
5 years ago

Fk Zuckerberg, the self hating Jew atheist. I’m hoping that another internet site would take its place.

satcatchet
satcatchet
5 years ago
Reply to  Stephen Honig

Without the spyware of course and censoring of free speech.

Art Lowe
Art Lowe
5 years ago

twitter is the same by locking people out of their accounts, as they did myself, it is plain to see these types of social media need new laws on them.. as they use fraud to justify using political correctness to ban people, liberalism is becoming a serious problem everywhere and it needs to be stop. Facebook, Twitter and Reddit have faced criticism for pulling content, blocking accounts and cutting off conversation.

Twitter made headlines when controversial conservative blogger Milo Yiannopoulos was banned after leading racist attacks against actress and comedian Leslie Jones.

Dozens of activist groups and hundreds of thousands of people sent CEO Mark Zuckerberg a letter demanding that Facebook adopt a new “anticensorship” policy. The signers expressed concern about the company’s handling of the standoff Gaines had with Baltimore County police, much of which she broadcast on Facebook and Instagram before the police requested that her accounts be shut down.

The activists have asked that Facebook “stop this dangerous precedent of censoring users and clarify (its) policy on censoring video and other content.” “When you have someone who has an account on a social platform and they’ve put their time and energy into making connections and they know that’s where their audience is, and then they get their account shut down on that service, that absolutely feels like a huge limit on their freedom of expression and can be very disruptive,” But social-media companies have cornered the market on expression.. “They are learning, unfortunately the hard way, that when you occupy a space in our society that allows people to express themselves, you need to let people express themselves equally and fairly, because that is the expectation,” “They have tremendous effect on our lives and have become such a major part of the ecosystem of free expression and public debate that you can’t have a public campaign anymore without a Twitter or Facebook presence, and that makes them quasi-public, more like a power company or a cable company or newspaper.”

Being compared with a public utility — a legal classification that applies to telephone and cable companies — is probably something tech companies want to avoid And that level of government sanction could bind them to the First Amendment’s protection of speech and expression. “A lot of these companies want to have it both ways — when they want to boost usage, they talk about their commitments to free speech and openness and equality; when they want to restrict speech to avoid liability and curate a more welcoming environment, they become more of an editor, more of a censor,” which is why they are being sued

IronMaidenaregods
IronMaidenaregods
5 years ago

No, Pamela, anti-trust is not the answer.

You have some bloody cheek naming your blog after an Ayn Rand story then demanding anti-trust.

Anti-trust is Marxist and the exact opposite of freedom.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
5 years ago

I am sympathetic to your argument and I suspect Pamela also is. But technology has greatly changed the dynamic so that what once was the public square now falls under the private sector. Rand’s analysis could not have foreseen private ownership of what amount to the public square.

I don’t see anti-trust as Marxist. After all, under communism there would be no private sector.

Drifter12
Drifter12
5 years ago

I’ve left…next.

Scott Smith
Scott Smith
5 years ago

I deleted my FB account years ago.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!