A federal judge has ruled that conservative groups on Berkeley campus can go forward with lawsuits alleging bias and discrimination against their planned speakers, who saw their appearances cut by administrators afraid of protests.
The suit refers to conservative talker Milo Yiannopoulos, who was prevented from appearing in the wake of angry uprisings by left-leaning students.
Now, U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney of Oakland says: The campus can be sued for that decision.
As a side note, Berkeley residents injured during the campus riots over Milo’s appearance just launched their own lawsuit against campus officials:
SFGate has more on the most recent judge’s ruling:
Conservative groups at UC Berkeley can sue the school over the restrictions it placed on high-profile speakers after violent protests over the planned appearance of right-wing firebrand Milo Yiannopoulos, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney of Oakland on Wednesday upheld the university’s contention that it was motivated by security, not liberal bias, when it scheduled talks by other conservative luminaries in smaller and more remote campus locations than the speakers preferred. But Chesney said the Berkeley College Republicans and Young America’s Foundation could proceed with their suit over university standards for “high-profile” speakers, imposed after the Yiannopoulos protests and over alleged discrimination in security fees.
Yiannopoulos’ February 2017 speech was canceled after a student demonstration was taken over by masked protesters who smashed windows and set fires. He then spoke for a few minutes on campus in September in an event that conservatives had promoted as “free speech week.”
The conservative groups said two more planned speakers, writer David Horowitz and author and television commentator Ann Coulter, had to cancel their appearances last year because university officials rescheduled their evening talks to daytime hours at buildings far from the center of campus. Radio host Ben Shapiro, supported by the same groups, spoke at UC Berkeley in September after paying a security fee that was challenged in the suit.
The suit alleged that the university adopted an unwritten “high-profile speaker policy” in March 2017 that allowed officials to effectively censor conservative speakers by choosing the time and place of their appearance. The school contends it is entitled to determine the need for security measures, but Chesney said the conservative groups can try to prove that the policy gives officials too much leeway to restrict free expression.
The policy, as described in the lawsuit, contains “no standard for determining what events fall under the policy, at what locations events may be held, and what, if any, security fee may be imposed,” the judge said.
She rejected claims that the university discriminated by allowing former Mexican President Vicente Fox and Maria Echaveste, a former aide to President Bill Clinton, to speak at better locations and more convenient times than the conservatives. Neither of them posed the security concerns that school officials cited for Yiannopoulos and like-minded speakers, and “there are no allegations suggesting those concerns were unfounded,” Chesney said.
But she refused to dismiss a claim of discrimination based on a $9,162 security fee for Shapiro’s talk, compared with a $5,000 fee for a 2011 speech by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The two spoke at the same location, and Sotomayor may have had a larger audience because the balcony was closed for Shapiro’s appearance, Chesney said.
Harmeet Dhillon, a lawyer for the conservative groups, said she was generally pleased with the ruling. “It means the case will go forward,” she said.
But UC Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof said the ruling had upheld the campus’ current policy on speakers and security, adopted publicly last year. He said the university could defend the security fee charged to Shapiro in light of the more than $800,000 the school spent on safety measures for the speech.
As for the allegations of an unwritten policy that gives officials unlimited authority to regulate speakers, Mogulof said, “The campus strongly denies that any such secret policy exists and it will continue to dispute any claims related to that issue.”
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.