Hill is right: it is “fundamentally wrong” to use the phrase “Islamist terrorism,” because it is actually “Islamic terrorism,” no steps removed from Islam as such. Can Max Hill refute that assertion with references from the Qur’an and Sunnah? Why, of course not. I’m certain he has never read the Qur’an or Hadith; if he cares to prove me wrong, I’ll be right here, but of course he will take no notice of the writings of an “Islamophobe.”
In other news, meanwhile, Philadelphia Islamic jihad terrorist Edward Archer, who shot a Philadelphia police officer multiple times, explained: “I follow Allah. I pledge my allegiance to the Islamic State, and that’s why I did what I did.”
Will Hill rebuke Archer for equating Islam with terrorism? Of course not. Hill, like other brainwashed non-Muslim lemmings, wants non-Muslims to stop equating Islam with terrorism — which is also, incidentally, the agenda of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). When Muslims equate Islam with terrorism, Hill doesn’t say a word, and neither does the OIC.
The underlying agenda, although it is unlikely that a dhimmi fool such as Hill realizes this, is to silence all honest analysis of the motivating ideology behind jihad terror. That will allow the jihad to advance unopposed and unimpeded. For Islamic jihad terrorists worldwide, Max Hill QC is an extremely Useful Idiot, and Britain is, as is obvious, finished.
“Don’t refer to ‘Islamist terrorism’, says watchdog,” by Martin Bentham, Evening Standard, February 1, 2018:
The Government’s terror watchdog has declared that it is “fundamentally wrong” to use the phrase “Islamist terrorism” to describe attacks carried out in Britain and elsewhere.Max Hill QC said that the word terrorism should not be attached “to any of the world religions” and that the term “Daesh-inspired terrorism” should be used instead.
His comments put him at odds with Prime Minister Theresa May and the Home Secretary Amber Rudd, who have both spoken about the threat posed by “Islamist terrorists”.
The head of MI5, Andrew Parker, also linked Islamism with terrorism when he warned of an “intense UK threat from Islamist extremists”. But in evidence to Parliament’s joint committee on human rights, Mr Hill said that such language was wrong as he responded to a question from Labour MP Karen Buck.
She said that Mr Hill’s recent report on the operation of terrorism legislation had acknowledged that “Daesh and Daesh-inspired terrorism is the greatest threat” but asked him, in light of dangers posed by Irish and far-right terrorism, “whether there is any downside that the current debate does tend to focus largely on Islamic terrorism”.
Mr Hill replied the legal definition of terrorism “mentions religion but mentions no particular religion nor sect within a religion”.
He then overlooked Ms Buck’s reference to “Islamic terrorism” and told her: “You are accurate in using the phrase ‘Daesh-inspired terrorism’ where many other commentators use the words ‘Islamist terrorism’.
“It is fundamentally wrong to attach the word terrorism to any of the world religions. Put that another way round: those who adhere to any of the great religions or none can be terrorists within the definition.”…
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
It is the conflict of our age, yet no one dares talk about it. The true story of the Islamic Supremacist war on free speech as told by those on the front lines fighting for our First Amendment rights,
Pamela Geller tells her own story of how she became one of the world's foremost activists for the freedom of speech,
individual rights, and equality of rights for all. "It's my story, it's what happens when someone fights for freedom in America today,"
Today Islamic supremacists are demanding more accommodation of Islamic principles
and practices than ever, and daily growing more aggressive in eroding our freedoms – with politically
correct public officials only too happy..