Sheikh of Al-Azhar Ahmed Al-Tayeb: People Blame Us for Terrorism, But If Not for Israel, There Would Be No Problem

Hey Sheikh, is that donkey ball ectoplasm on your chin?

These lying pieces of sh*t are so cute sometimes.

“Sheikh of Al-Azhar Ahmed Al-Tayeb: People Blame Us for Terrorism, But If Not for Israel, There Would Be No Problem, the Region Would Have Prospered”. The opposite is also true, if there were no muslims, the entire world would be a peaceful pleasant prosperous place. It is the qur’an and it’s forcing muslims to fail at everything is what keeps muslims as subhuman primitives.

Another instance of muslims demonstrating that they are liars and idiots. One thing muslims are far too stupid to figure out, is that they cannot control every situation, but they can control their reaction to it. Due to the chronic ignorance of islam as stated in the qur’an, there is no such thing as self control to a muslim, it is the cult of animals with vague human like tendencies. muslims are always the victim, no matter what happens, it is someone else fault, a muslim murders a Jewish child in its bed, it is the child’s fault for not being a muslim. When dealing with stupidity of islamic magnitude, it is almost incomprehensible to grasp.

Idiot, you were madmen before there was a Israel.

I walked down the street in Barcelona , and suddenly discovered a
terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz … We killed six million
Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned
a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen
people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people
who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science,
art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the
world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to
ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our
gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance,
religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to
an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities
into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they
plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical
hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for
backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their
talent for a better future for their children, their determined
clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for
people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for
our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

–
–
–

As C.S. Jarvis, the British governor of the Sinai, wrote, “The Arab is
sometimes called the Son of the Desert, but as Palmer said, this is a
misnomer as in most cases he is the Father of the Desert, having
created it himself and the arid waste in which he lives and on which
practically nothing will grow is the direct result of his appalling
indolence, combined with his simian trait of destroying everything he
does not understand.”

“A great part of the country in which he now ekes out his haphazard
existence was at one time fairly productive and prosperous and, by
failing to repair damage done by wear and tear of weather and by
wantonly wreaking conduits and cisterns he was too lazy to use, he has
succeeded in creating a sun-scorched treeless desert which will remain
wilderness as long as he encumbers the land,” he added.

Jarvis wrote that the Bedouin likes rocks, but that the “sight of a
tree appears to incense him and he is not happy until he has destroyed
it utterly by snapping off its branches and burning its trunk through
to the core.” The same thing is happening today with Bedouins and
Jewish trees in the anti-tree Jihad.

Or as the poet Joseph Brodsky wrote, “The East is a catastrophe of
dust. Green is found only on the banners of the prophet. Nothing grows
here, except mustaches… all these turbans and beards, uniforms for
heads possessed by only one idea… massacre… ‘I massacre, therefore
I exist.’”

–
–
–

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity
of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement;
the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law
every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either
as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction
of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power
among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith:
all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the
social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde
force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a
militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout
Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it
not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the
science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of
modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
― Winston S. Churchill, The River War

–
–
–

“…But the Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the
fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and
ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all
other creeds, to this form of madness. In a moment the fruits of
patient toil, the prospects of material prosperity, the fear of death
itself, are flung aside. The more emotional Pathans are powerless to
resist. All rational considerations are forgotten. Seizing their
weapons, they become Ghazis—as dangerous and as sensible as mad dogs:
fit only to be treated as such. While the more generous spirits among
the tribesmen become convulsed in an ecstasy of religious
bloodthirstiness, poorer and more material souls derive additional
impulses from the influence of others, the hopes of plunder and the
joy of fighting. Thus whole nations are roused to arms. Thus the Turks
repel their enemies, the Arabs of the Soudan break the British
squares, and the rising on the Indian frontier spreads far and wide.
In each case civilisation is confronted with militant Mahommedanism.
The forces of progress clash with those of reaction. The religion of
blood and war is face to face with that of peace.”
― Winston S. Churchill, The Story of the Malakand Field Force