News Ticker >
[ August 24, 2019 ]

Saturday Night Cinema: The Roaring Twenties (1939)

[ August 24, 2019 ]

US slams “Palestinian” jihad attack that killed 17-year-old, urges world to rethink terror aid to...

[ August 24, 2019 ]

Rashida Tlaib suggests ‘Israeli occupation’ led to bombing death of Jewish girl, 17

[ August 24, 2019 ]

A Most-Wanted American Jihadi Is Caught in Mexico at Migrant Center

[ August 24, 2019 ]

U.S. Officials Confirm Israel Struck Iranian Targets in Iraq

[ August 24, 2019 ]

NY Israel Consul General Calls Terror TV Al Jazeera Host ‘Bigot’

[ August 24, 2019 ]

Disgraced CNN hires disgraced former FBI head Andrew McCabe

[ August 24, 2019 ]

Muslim Doctor who made DEADLY threats against Jews requests hearing before State Medical Board of...

[ August 24, 2019 ]

Blood Libel: Group Behind Omar-Tlaib Trip Accused Israel of Harvesting Organs from Haiti Earthquake Victims

[ August 24, 2019 ]

2 New York Muslimas Planned Islamic Terror Attack Using Weapons of Mass Destruction

UK: Theresa May’s Government REJECTS Petition for a Free Speech Act

49

The UK is in full appeasement and capitulation mode. They banned me from the country for speaking the truth about Islam. Now the May Government won’t even take the smallest step to defend the freedom of speech. They’re going after anyone in the country who dares say a word against jihad terror, on bogus “hate speech” charges. The recent horrific and heinous attack by a madman at the Finsbury Park Mosque is being blamed on “islamophobia,” as if no one could be concerned about Islam or Muslims except for “islamophobic propaganda,” and all the jihad activity that has taken place at that mosque is being ignored. This is all an attempt to shut down the conversation Britain desperately needs to have about jihad terror.

It was a great civilization. Now it is dying, quickly, before our eyes.

“Tory Government REJECTS Petition for a Free Speech Act,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, January 28, 2018:

The British government has rejected a petition calling for a Free Speech Act and an end to laws against so-called ‘hate speech’.

“For several years now the government has been infringing people’s most basic rights to speak freely on matters, by deeming their speech ‘offensive’ or ‘hateful. and declaring that such speech, even online, warrants being fined or jailed,” the petition suggests.

“We demand the legal right to Free Speech, in an Act which will bring an end to the ludicrous notion that ‘hate speech’ and ‘offensive speech’ deserves people be imprisoned or charged … Ideas must be fought with other ideas, not with force.”

The petition system in the United Kingdom allows citizens to have petitions published on a parliament.uk website, subject to certain conditions. The Government is supposed to respond to petitions which pass 10,000 signatures, and the Backbench Business Committee is supposed to “consider” petitions which pass 100,000 signatures for a parliamentary debate.

The Home Office, led by Amber Rudd MP, responded on behalf of Prime Minister Theresa May’s administration as the Free Speech petition reached around 16,000 signatures — rejecting it out of hand.

“The Government is committed to upholding free speech, and legislation is already in place to protect these fundamental rights,” the statement begins — then immediately contradicts itself, adding: “However, this freedom cannot be an excuse to cause harm or spread hatred.”

The statement explains that British citizens have “a right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)”, but that “This is a qualified right … This means that free speech is not absolute.”

The right to freedom of expression as described by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights is certainly qualified, with the document spelling out in no uncertain terms that free speech rights are “subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”

Critics have pointed out that, far from providing citizens with the right to freedom of expression, the European Convention in fact provides governments with the right to restrict freedom of expression on the flimsiest of pretexts, with the caveats concerning the protections of “morals” and “the reputation or rights of others” appearing particularly open to abuse.

The authorities under have if anything appeared more enthusiastic in cracking down on free speech since the nominally conservative Tory Party returned to office in 2010, with the police dedicated significant resources towards arresting people for making “offensive” online comments despite swingeing budget cuts.

Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that police forces increased arrests under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another”, by up to 877 per cent between 2014 and 2016….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest