Here is something you don’t see every day, Marlon Brando as Napoleon Bonaparte. Tonight’s Saturday Night Cinema feature is Desiree, starring the intense Brando and the luminescent Jean Simmons, and Merle Oberon, who is a bit too long in the tooth to be playing Josephine.

It is story of the rise and fall of Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France. The film has everything except a script, but so what? It’s bloody gorgeous.

https://youtu.be/4fV8T1rn7NA

Director Henry Koster and writer Daniel Taradash speculate mightily in this historical tableau charting the rise and fall of Napoleon (Marlon Brando), all due to his unrequited love for noblewoman Desiree (Jean Simmons). The film takes a chronological view of Napoleon’s reign and posits Napoleon’s love of a woman he wanted to marry as a young general but abandoned for the sake of his career. Both Napoleon and Desiree go their separate ways — he to become Emperor of France and loveless husband to Josephine (Merle Oberon) and she to become Sweden’s disinterested Queen. Napoleon and Desiree meet up again in a whimsical confrontation in which Desiree urges the Little Corporal to surrender and go to St. Helena. The film is based on a novel by Annemarie Selinko that, like the film, takes wild liberties with the truth.

Interested in Desiree? More here.

Desiree’ and Napoleon; Film on Emperor’s Life Opens at the Roxy

A GREAT deal of handsome decoration and two talented and attractive stars have been put into the Cinemascope production of the historical romance “Désirée.” The only essential missing is a story of any consequence.

For almost two hours there is paraded in measured paces on the Roxy’s panel screen, where this picture opened last evening, a vast and varied display of famous figures and courtly behavior in the time of Napoleon. Most of the major stages in the Little Corporal’s spectacular career are mentioned in conversation or covered in elegant scenes that flow as diary entries from the point of a feather-pen.

There is a stunning sequence, for instance, showing a party at the home of Mme. Tallien, wherein the rising Napoleon is first seen in the company of Josephine, There are whimsical scenes briefly tagging the transition through the directory. And there’s a fine, full-scale tableau of the great general crowning himself Emperor of France.

This is a panoramic picture—panoramic in pictorial style and in the material it embraces — which is mainly a chronological review of a famous reign. What there is of personal drama in it is built wholly and very flimsily upon a wild assumption that there was an abiding affection in the heart of Napoleon for a woman whom he wanted to marry when he was a youthful general and then abandoned for the sake of his career.

There is an element of truth in this notion. Napoleon did love a girl named Désirée, whose sister was married to Napoleon’s brother, Joseph. Désirée herself later was married to General Bernadotte and thus became Queen of Sweden when her husband was “adopted” as the successor to that nation’s throne. But how much, if any, feeling Napoleon later had for her is a matter of pure speculation, attractive mainly to romantic minds.

Unfortunately for the impact of this picture, the speculating done by Daniel Taradash, inspired by a novel by Annemarie Selinko, is, if anything, a little too restrained. Mr. Taradash’s script is quite positive in indicating that Napoleon loved the girl in the first flush of his ascendency. But then it permits the amorous passion to appear to die, and there is not much in this line to intrigue the viewer until the end of the film.

Then, out of a long series of tableaus and out of the passionless progression of Napoleon and the girl along separate ways—he to become the Emperor and a loveless husband and she to become Sweden’s indifferent Queen—the script again brings them together for a wistful tête-à-tête. During it Désirée persuades him to surrender and to St. Helena, which is absurd.

The consequence is a static story, so far as the emotions of the individuals are concerned, and a strangely unrevealing presentation of two potentially exciting characters. Only twice in this lengthy progression does the great Napoleon emerge as anything but a beetle-browed buster and a usually pompous poseur. Once when, he is dancing briefly with the guarded Désirée and again when he is sadly telling her, during an unexpected midnight call, of his terrible retreat from Moscow does the glint of a human being appear. For the rest, Marlon Brando’s Napoleon is just a fancy (and sometimes fatuous) facade.

The same must be said for Jean Simmons’ performance as Désirée. It is a pretty but pointless demonstration of a hollow woman getting along without love. Between her and Michael Rennie, in the role of Bernadotte, there appears not a trace of genuine feeling to suggest a matrimonial bond, and certainly there is no sense of passion toward Napoleon.

The others in the cast are mostly robots—Merle Oberon as Josephine, Cameron Mitchell as Napoleon’s brother, and John Hoyt as Talleyrand. They merely fill out the plushy décor of this Twentieth Century-Fox spectacle, which at times Henry Koster has directed as though it were a satire on suburbia. For the most part, however, he has made it what it is—just a colorful vehicle for a pseudo-Napoleonic outing, a streetcar named “Désirée.”

DESIREE, screen play by Daniel Taradash, based on the novel by Annemarie Selinko; directed by Henry Koster; produced by Julian Blaustein for Twentieth Century-Fox. At the Roxy.
Napoleon . . . . . Marlon Brando
Desiree . . . . . Jean Simmons
Josephine . . . . . Merle Oberon
Bernadotte . . . . . Michael Rennie
Joseph Bonaparte . . . . . Cameron Mitchell
Julie . . . . . Elizabeth Sellars
Paulette . . . . . Charlotte Austin
Mme. Bonaparte . . . . . Cathleen Nesbitt
Marie . . . . . Evelyn Varden
Mme. Clary . . . . . Isobel Elsom
Talleyrand . . . . . John Hoyt
Despreaux . . . . . Alan Napier
Oscar . . . . . Nicolas Koster
Etienne . . . . . Richard Deacon
Queen Hedwig . . . . . Edith Evanson
Mme. Tallien . . . . . Carolyn Jones

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

9 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

DemocracyRules

6 years ago

Ouch: FBI Whiner who Quit Because People were Writing Mean Things
– was Comey’s personal assistant
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/figures-sensitive-fbi-snowflake-resigned-cuz-people-write-mean-things-comeys-personal-assistant/

0

Trump can't ban islam

6 years ago

mohammad > napoleon
muslim conquest of constantinople > french revolution
coran > declaration of the rights

0

poetcomic1

6 years ago

Wow! Worst movie you ever chose. I would MUCH prefer the Bowery Boys – far better script anyway (“Nyaaa, you couldn’t fight yer way outta beauty shop!”) I’m totally serious.

0

D

AlgorithmicAnalyst

6 years ago

Interesting premise, but strategic and tactical mistakes were what did Napoleon in. Even at Waterloo it was a very close run thing though. I probably will do some more studying of that battle.

0

Poppey

6 years ago

There are always two ways to depict historical events and the characters involved when depicted in a film, one way to get bums on seats is to ensure the biggest stars as a draw are there playing key roles with enough truth in the script to keep the story on track with the reality, the other way is to choose to portray events which at the time were so definitive and earth shaking that the story tells itself and the “stars are secondary to that, but the screenplay and depiction has to be of the very highest quality.

Of this period, the finest depiction of this man, his ambition and times I’ve seen is in the 1970 film “Waterloo” by Sergei Bondarchuk. The setting represents the real one well, {it was filmed in Yugoslavia} the cast was huge as you would expect, the facts were included and the drama which stopped 20 years of war throughout the greater part of Europe caused by that man spoke for themselves. Europe was given a peace from multi state total warfare for the next century by what that battle and the peace treaty later achieved.

I’ve visited the sites twice in the summer of 2015 in Belgium and the scale of what was tried was truly awesome.

Anyone interested can watch it, Waterloo – the full movie on YT in 9 or 10 minuet sections {carefully overlapped}.

I discharged my obligation to the fallen heroes by taking two wreaths the 250 miles from home, one for the Guards at Hugamont and one for poor General Picton who fought with a bullet wound only his servant and he knew about {suffered at the four ways cross roads two days earlier}. The scars on the buildings can still be seen, the men on all sides are remembered well.

The depiction in this film of those events IS the film, the actors in the lead roles never overpower the events which is as it should be.

0

IzlamDownpressesHumanity

6 years ago

Nappy’s victories were made on top of the bodies of Germanic cannon fodder — especially in his invasion of Russia.

0

R. Arandas

6 years ago

Imagine if they made a film about the Battle of Tours instead….

0

Cellestial Fenner

6 years ago

Embarrassing movie for Marlon Brando. Embarrassing script & acting. I was blushing for everyone involved. Felt like I just ate a box of cheap chocolates

0

IzlamDownpressesHumanity

6 years ago

Reply to  Cellestial Fenner

It’s incredible how much Brando looks like Napoleon though. To tell the truth I always thought Brando tended to the melodramatic in his parts.

0