Antifa Terrorist-Activist Yvette Felarca Ordered to Pay $11,000 for Filing False Restraining Orders

33

Real justice for a “social justice warrior” (this century’s Hitler youth).

Geller Report readers are familiar with Yvette Felarca’s anti-free speech thuggery. Yvette Felarca is the Northern California Coordinator of radical leftist group By Any Means Necessary and former Berkeley middle school teacher who was arrested last summer on charges of inciting and participating in a riot and assault likely to cause great bodily injury during a 2016 protest. She was one of the leaders of the protests against Free Speech Week at Berkeley that Milo, Mike Cernovich and I were scheduled to speak at before it was canceled by a lame and craven administration.

Story continues below advertisement

Court orders Antifa activist to pay $11k for frivolous claims

Anthony Gockowski, Campus Reform, Jan 05, 2018 (thanks to Dangerous):

A prominent Antifa activist has been ordered to pay $11,100 in attorney fees to the former president of the Berkeley College Republicans for filing a frivolous restraining order against him.

Troy Worden had been seeking up to $100,000 in damages, arguing that Yvette Felarca had abused the justice system by “filing baseless and vexatious lawsuits” designed to intimidate her political opponents.

 A California court has ordered noted Antifa activist Yvette Felarca to pay over $11,000 in damages to former Berkeley College Republicans President Troy Worden.

The ruling, issued Wednesday, comes after a restraining order filed against Worden by Felarca was dropped in October, prompting Worden and his lawyer, Mark Meuser, to sue Felarca for damages and attorney fees, as Campus Reform first reported.

“The award of attorney fees should send a strong signal that she cannot abuse the court system to silence speech.”   

Worden, who has made numerous appearances on national media in his capacity as a Campus Reform correspondent to discuss his ongoing battles with the Berkeley administration and who was voted a winner of Campus Reform’s 2017 Higher Ed Heroes Award, remarked at the time that “Felarca’s frivolous legal actions were meant to intimidate [him] and hinder [his] political activism.”

[RELATED: Antifa leader arrested after scuffle in Berkeley]

Harmeet Dhillon of the Dhillon Law Group, through which Meuser is representing Worden, said  that Felarca has a history of “filing and dismissing utterly frivolous cases against innocent targets” and pledged to hold her and her lawyers “accountable.”

“Felarca and her fellow travelers in BAMN [By Any Means Necessary]/Antifa need to learn that the California courts are not their personal plaything to use and abuse at will by filing baseless and vexatious lawsuits,” she added, with Worden noting that the restraining order prevented him from exercising his free-speech rights on campus.

Now, Commissioner Thomas Rasch of the Superior Court of Alameda County has ordered Felarca to pay Worden $11,100 in attorney fees, according to a Thursday press release, which says Rasch determined that the order “had not been filed in good faith.”

Additionally, the press release notes that Felarca, whom it identifies as a Berkeley Middle School teacher, was arrested twice in 2017 for incitement of a riot, resisting arrest, and assaulting a police officer, arguing that the restraining order was an attempt to further stifle Worden’s First Amendment rights after the College Republicans invited several controversial speakers to campus.

[RELATED: Student op-ed blasts Berkeley for protecting free speech]

“By ruling that she did not demonstrate good faith in filing the restraining order, the court recognized the frivolous nature of Felarca’s actions,” Meuser remarked. “The award of attorney fees should send a strong signal that she cannot abuse the court system to silence speech.”

The press release also notes that the University of California, Berkeley’s efforts to block speakers invited by the school’s College Republicans chapter are the subject on an ongoing federal lawsuit.

“This marks the second time in two months that Felarca and her lawyers have been ordered by an area court to pay the attorney fees of their opponents for filing legally and factually unsupported claims in court,” Dhillon commented. “True victims of harassment/stalking/assault need the courts to be available to them as a priority, not clogged with fabricated claims pursued in bad faith.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PhillipNagle
PhillipNagle
6 years ago

If attorneys were involved, charges should be brought against them and they should be disbarred.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  PhillipNagle

Have attorneys been disbarred for representing clients in frivolous lawsuits?

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago

Several years ago, an attorney-at-law was disbarred for bringing a frivolous liability suit against Upjohn and Company. However, most normally fines are ordered and, rarely, does it even progress to the point that the court holds a member of the bar to civil contempt. Yet, disbarment has occurred as the result of bringing a frivolous lawsuit.
Federal Rule 46(b)(1)(B) states that a lawyer who “is guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the court’s bar” may be disciplined or disbarred.
.
Perhaps the most common form of sanctions imposed against opposing counsel occurs under Rule 11, a federal rule that enables judges to penalize lawyers who violate the provisions contained therein. For example, Rule 11 requires the attorney signing pleadings to certify that the signer’s knowledge, information, and belief were “formed after reasonable inquiry,” that the pleading or motion is “well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose.” Thus, under Rule 11 an attorney is required to engage in additional investigation before signing the pleading
.
Sanctions are also appropriately imposed against lawyers under federal law — title, 28, section 1927 — for conduct that, viewed objectively, manifests either intentional or reckless disregard of the attorney’s duties as officers of the court.
So, the answer is “yes”.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

Very good break down. Also you could say common sense comes into play here too. Any attorney who takes a case that any reasonable person would deem frivolous, should be either penalized, or disbarred. They are obviously letting greed get in the way of professionalism.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Hi, sanatashandler. But, it is very rare. There is a balance between advocate and officer of the court … and greater weight is given to advocate. To go after a lawyer .. for a court to do so … unless a lawsuit is brought against that attorney-at-law .. and even then, even a simple sanction is scarcer than hen’s teeth.

mztore
mztore
6 years ago

very good. The answer is gonna be nope, nada. IF the fine ever gets paid, she ain’t gonna spend a dime. Anyone check to see if there is a go fund me page for her?

mztore
mztore
6 years ago

nope – nada

Steve Kalmbach
Steve Kalmbach
6 years ago

I’ll bet all of your “supporters” will probably abandon you now that there is fine that will have to be paid because you violated someones free speech. I can hear it now “Yvette Felarca” who? And yet they were blindly following along with her when she tried to stop free speech because she did not agree with it.

Necrophage
Necrophage
6 years ago
Reply to  Steve Kalmbach

Are you kidding? $11000 is pocket change for Fellatia’s commie handlers. She won’t have to pay a dime of it.

allangen
allangen
6 years ago

Kudos to Troy Worden for bringing a suit against this vile commie piece of work. There’s a lesson in this. Don’t let them bully us, fight back. Hate and stupidity is all they’ve got. Make them understand that every vile act of intolerance and anger will be greeted with push back. Establish firmly that there will be pain and cost associated with their dementia.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago

Felarca and her fellow travelers in BAMN …need to learn that the California courts are not their personal plaything to use and abuse at will by filing baseless and vexatious lawsuits,”

Golly, who knew?

Berkeley sustains and encourages this kind of totalitarian trash.

Thorsten
Thorsten
6 years ago

‘… Hitler youth(?, under 18 yrs.)’

antifa, new SS in town

Jackie Puppet
Jackie Puppet
6 years ago

I wonder if Yvette (or someone) will start a GoFundMe campaign to pay the bills, and if they’ll be honest about where the $$$$$ would go…

CentralCaliGal
CentralCaliGal
6 years ago
Reply to  Jackie Puppet

How can she pay this, out of her welfare?

Necrophage
Necrophage
6 years ago
Reply to  CentralCaliGal

She is a state employee who almost certainly has leftist connections with deep pockets. Not only will she not have to pay this fine, she will retire in a few years with a full state pension. How’s that for justice?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Good, it is time for society to amass huge counter attacks against those trying to use law fare to force submission and repression of Americans institutional rights.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago


Ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!
$nowflakes being sued into oblivion,…. PRICELESS !!!

comment image

Necrophage
Necrophage
6 years ago

$11000 is hardly oblivion. She won’t have to pay a dime of it.

Guadalupe Miguel Franchesco
Guadalupe Miguel Franchesco
6 years ago

That huzzy should be thrown into prison where many butches are waiting.

famouswolf
famouswolf
6 years ago

One quick strike right under the jutting chin would solve a big problem and be a start.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

Yes, YES! One small victory for Republicans/Freedom of Speech advocates, etc. All the rest of the Antifa pond scum should have the same treatment given to them

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
6 years ago

LOL!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago

Notice how far leftist organizations and nation states have titles that belie their composition and philosophies. ANTIFA embodies fascism instead of opposing it, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, a.k.a. North Korea, is anything but, and the same holds true for the Democratic Party in the US.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago

There’s quite the linkage between the DPRK and the United State’s Democrat Party. Franklin D (the “D” stands for “demonspawn”) Roosevelt created North Korea … over the vehement objections of Sir Winston Churchill.

Larenzo1
Larenzo1
6 years ago

Felarca’s mouth looks like a pug bulldogs ass

Ruger 1
Ruger 1
6 years ago

comment image
Well this is Great News!!!! Couldn’t of happen to a Nicer B_tch!!!!comment image

Dagonet
Dagonet
6 years ago

Send her away, illegal, send her back, criminal, lock her up.

Ichabod Crain
Ichabod Crain
6 years ago

This may have the appearance of justice, but it is far from it. The former president of the Berkeley College Republicans spent ten times that defending himself from her false legal claims.

Joseph111
Joseph111
6 years ago

finally, a California court gets it right!
.
(never thought I’d see the day!)
.

Stephen Honig
Stephen Honig
6 years ago

I’m surprised she won with 98% liberals in the land of Oz.

Poppey
Poppey
6 years ago

She looks like another racist anti white hate monger to me.

Necrophage
Necrophage
6 years ago

This is a pathetic judgement. This amount is not even really punitive compared to the trouble this creature has caused.

glenda lafont
glenda lafont
6 years ago

What a woman Pamela is.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!