[ April 19, 2024 ]
Human rights or human wrongs. Today is the day that the UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”
Born after the ashes of World War II and established to ensure that a Holocaust would never happen again, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights will turn 70 today.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages.
Story continues below advertisement
So what happened?
The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam.
The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) is a declaration of the Muslim member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference adopted in Cairo, Egypt, on 5 August 1990, (Conference of Foreign Ministers, 9–14 Muharram 1411H in the Islamic calendar[2]) which provides an overview on the Islamic perspective on human rights, and affirms Islamic sharia as its sole source.
This declaration is widely acknowledged as an Islamic response to the United Nations‘s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted in 1948.
It should never have been adopted by a civilized world body.
The OIC, Bat Ye’or argues, is nothing less than a “would-be, universal caliphate.” It might look different from the caliphates of the Ottomans, Fatimids, and Abbasids. It might resemble, instead, a thoroughly modern trans-national bureaucracy. But, already, the OIC exercises significant power through the United Nations, and through the European Union, which has been eager to accommodate the OIC while simultaneously endowing the U.N. with increasing authority for global governance.
Bat Yeor explains:
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is a religious and political organization. Close to the Muslim World League of the Muslim Brotherhood, it shares the Brotherhood’s strategic and cultural vision: that of a universal religious community, the Ummah, based upon the Koran, the Sunna, and the canonical orthodoxy of shari’a. The OIC represents 56 countries and the Palestinian Authority (considered a state), the whole constituting the universal Ummah with a community of more than one billion three to six hundred million Muslims.
The OIC has a unique structure among nations and human societies. The Vatican and the various churches are de facto devoid of political power, even if they take part in politics, because in Christianity, as in Judaism, the religious and political functions have to be separated. Asian religions, too, do not represent systems that bring together religion, strategy, politics, and law within a single organizational structure.
The legendary human rights activist David Littman explains the disastrous Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam :
3. On 5 August 1990, the then 45 member states of the OIC adopted The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam. In this document all rights are seen as derived from Allah. The preamble states that “no one as a matter of principle has the right to suspend them in whole or in part or violate or ignore them in as much as they are binding divine commandments”.
4. At the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna, Iran, supported by several other Islamic States, pressed for the acceptance of the Cairo Declaration as an alternative to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This objective was partly achieved in 1997 when the Cairo Declaration was included by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights as the last document in Human Rights: A Compilation of International Instruments: Volume II: Regional Instruments
[…]
15. The Cairo Declaration goes further however in making this freedom subject to the Shari’ah. Under Article 22 of the Cairo Declaration a person may only express their opinion in a manner “as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shari’ah”, and freedom of expression may not be used to “weaken faith”.
16. On 18 December 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution “Combating Defamation of Religions” by 108 votes to 51 with 25 abstentions. Similar resolutions had been adopted since 1999 by the Commission for Human Rights and by the new Council. This was the first time however that such a resolution had been passed by the General Assembly. The resolution expresses once again “deep concern about the negative stereotyping of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief”. But the only religion mentioned by name is Islam. The resolution emphasizes that whilst everyone has the right to freedom of expression, this should be exercised with responsibility – and may therefore be subject to limitations, inter alia, “for respect for religions and beliefs”.17. Many delegations, however, opposed the resolution. The Portuguese delegate, speaking for the European Union, explained clearly why:
“The European Union does not see the concept of ‘defamation of religions’ as a valid one in a human rights discourse. From a human rights perspective, members of religious or belief communities should not be viewed as parts of homogenous entities. International human rights law protects primarily individuals in the exercise of their freedom of religion or belief, rather than the religions as such.”
18. Notwithstanding these objections, those opposing the resolution found themselves on the losing side of a two-to-one majority in favour.
How the Shari’ah limits Human Rights
9. Under Shari’ah law, Muslim women and non-Muslims are not accorded equal treatment with Muslim men. The Shari’ah, therefore, fails to honour the right to equality guaranteed under the UDHR and the international covenants, and thus denies the full enjoyment of their human rights to those living in States which follow Shari’ah law.
10. By limiting rights to those permitted by the Shari’ah the Cairo Declaration, rather than complementing the UDHR and the international covenants, undermines many of the rights they are supposed to guarantee. (See references 6 7 8 for additional documentation on this issue.)
Limiting Religious Freedom
11. Religious freedom is limited under the Cairo Declaration. Article 10 states: “Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to atheism.”
Since it is a generally accepted view in the Islamic world that only compulsion or ignorance would lead anyone to abandon Islam, conversion from Islam is thus effectively forbidden.
12. It is notable that under Shari’ah law in many countries apostasy and any actions or statements considered blasphemous are harshly punished, in some States by death.
13. At the 6th session of the Human Rights Council in December 2007, the European Union tabled a resolution on the elimination of discrimination based on religion or belief.
On December 14, the Pakistani delegate, again speaking for the OIC, said that differences remained in the wording of this resolution on, inter alia, respect for all religions and beliefs, and respect for national laws and religious norms about the right to change one’s religion. “Hence, we dissociate ourselves from operative paragraph 9 (a) because of its phrase ‘including the right to change one’s religion or belief’”. Yet this fundamental human right is clearly guaranteed under Article 18 of the UDHR and Article 18 of the ICCPR.
Ironically, the 70th anniversary of Universal Declaration of Human Rights highlights the “freedom of expression“. The world body now works feverishly to impose the speech restrictions under the sharia, so this focus is deceitful and absurd. The OIC has relentlessly pursued resolutions on restrictions on free speech for decades. Their latest report is a declaration of holy war against freedom of speech and ….. freedom.
The Obama administration signed on to the Cairo declaration.
Throughout her four years as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was Obama’s point-person in the administration’s collusion with the OIC. Among the most significant “achievements” of this partnership — and, from a constitutional perspective, the most appalling one — has been the adoption of Resolution 16/18. In blatant violation of the First Amendment, this provision calls on Western governments to outlaw any speech that “constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence” toward religion, on the rationale that such speech could provoke “religious hatred.” (more here)
Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration signed on to U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18, which mandates the suppression of speech that could cast Islam in a bad light — regardless of whether the speech is accurate or the negative impression it creates is justified.
Human Rights Day 2017: What Is Universal Declaration Of Human Rights
NDTV, December 10, 1017:
Human Rights Day is observed every year on 10 December – the day the United Nations General Assembly adopted, in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This year, according to the United Nations – intergovernmental organization tasked to promote international cooperation and to create and maintain international order -, Human Rights Day kicks off a year-long campaign to mark the upcoming 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a milestone document that proclaimed the inalienable rights which everyone is inherently entitled to as a human being – regardless of race, colour, religion, sex, language, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights or UDHR is the most translated document in the world, available in more than 500 languages, says United Nations.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Human Rights Day, Human Rights Day 2017, Human Rights Day 2018, December 10, 10 December, international human rights day, Human Rights Day Quotes, 10 December 2017, world human rights day, human rights day 2017 theme, international human rights day, manav adhikar diwas
Human Rights Day is observed every year on 10 DecemberDrafted by representatives of diverse legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the UDHR sets out universal values and a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations. It establishes the equal dignity and worth of every person.
“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights empowers us all. The principles enshrined in the Declaration are as relevant today as they were in 1948. We need to stand up for our own rights and those of others. We can take action in our own daily lives, to uphold the rights that protect us all and thereby promote the kinship of all human beings,” un.org says.
Human Rights Day 2017: Universal Declaration Of Human Rights
UDHR was adopted by United Nations General Assembly at its third session on 10 December 1948 as Resolution 217, when, of the then 58 members of the United Nations, 48 voted in favor, none against, eight abstained, and two did not vote.
https://twitter.com/UN/status/939722850541494272
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
18 Comments
6 years ago
What went wrong? A lethal, triple cocktail of multiculturalism + political correctness + the obsession with “diversity”. Firstly, there was the absurd (and now thoroughly disproven) policy of multiculturalism, that all cultures are equal, can co-exist peacefully, and none has the right to criticise another. Secondly, political correctness means that the world’s two most backward and violent cultures, Muslim and black African, can not be criticised as this is racist and “Islamophobic”. Thirdly, the notion that there was something inherently wrong with predominantly white, Christian, educated Western societies, and so they needed to be “enriched” and have “diversity” forced on them. That diversity coming from the non-white, non-Christian. non-educated Third World immigrant.
6 years ago
Reply to
Mike Wolff
We are witnessing White Genocide – and most White people don’t seem to realize it.
6 years ago
Reply to
Mike Wolff
Diversity is just a Communist wedge issue used to destroy White, capitalist societies.
6 years ago
So called “human rights” from start were designed as a subversion to undermine the only valid concept of INDIVIDUAL rights as first clearly designed by the American Declaration of Independence and put into practice with the Constitution of the United States. So it is no wonder that this “universal” declaration of “human rights” was eventually subverted and corrupted with that OIC “rights within sharia.” Those are “rights” of the slaves, not humans.
6 years ago
Reply to
Voytek Gagalka
“Human rights” are always being applied to White, Western societies but never to African or Asian societies?
6 years ago
Reply to
John D. Horton
Who said so? They apply (or rather should apply) universally. That they were formulated by the “westerners” during the Age of Enlightenment (while it still lasted in 18th century) it should be taken as example to learn from and not ignored by: well, because those “whites” devised them so they are worth to be dismissed. Always learn from the betters in order to avoid errors of “good-for-nothing.”
6 years ago
Reply to
Voytek Gagalka
The “Human Rights” Movement = Communist and totalitarian propaganda to destabilize White, homogeneous and capitalist societies. You will notice that Communists and other totalitarians (Islamists etc.) never apply human rights to themselves but always insist on ordering White, Western societies to conform to the Communist human rights agenda.
6 years ago
The useless abomination that is the u n, is a corrupted club of islamic old boys who are proselytizing islam, disguised as an international peace keeping force of muslim oppressors.
6 years ago
Reply to
Mahou Shoujo
Jihad comes in many disguises, the terrorists are a mere drop in the ocean.
Vast numbers of muzlims have pretended to integrate but in effect have infiltrated all our institutions.
Our stupid western leaders have allowed these chancers to exploit us at every level, local, national and international.
The enemy must be laughing their heads off at what they have managed to achieve since the turn of the century.
Muzleems are terrorists and infiltrators but also breeders who invade the west and drain us dry as it is their duty to do whatever they can depending on their circumstances.
As a revolting somali woman student once told me,
” I cannot be suicide bomber, I have five children but I can take your money”
6 years ago
Reply to
Donafugata
The socialist welfare state of the USA will be the death of White America through taxation of Whites to pay for all the children of coloreds.
Supposedly all the Somalis are in Minnesota because it had the highest level of welfare in the USA and Somalis love to be supported by White Minnesotan’s tax money.
6 years ago
Reply to
Mahou Shoujo
Only Muslims have designated improvised “prayer” areas in the UN building in New York which was never part of the original architect’s rendering of the building because the UN was supposed to focus on secular issues. The other religions don’t have any designated chapels? Talk about an Islamic takeover at the highest levels of international affairs.
6 years ago
The UN failed at the beginning and today it is a parody. They even had Saudi Arabia lead the Womens Rights Council.
D
6 years ago
Apparently the government was infiltrated by Soviet agents and communists starting with the Roosevelt administration, and the process has continued ever since.
6 years ago
the UN was truman’s dumb idea, who was oddly oblivious to the evil nature of man. it no longer serves a useful purpose for the civilized christian world. trump needs to get us out and give the land and building to a chrisitan missionary organization that actually does some good in this world
6 years ago
You are seeing the affects of Genesis where Yahuah CURSED the descendants of Ishmael. You will NEVER EVER get along with them. His DNA was altered to be a WILD MAN!
This Cairo sh it is another proclamation to stir up trouble and mayhem and stir the hornet’s nest again in the world’s supposedly only hope of the United Nations. Every other religion does NOT have this problem except for Islam.
So, let God be true and everyman a liar. Ignore this verse at your own peril.
Gen 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand [will be] against every man, and every man’s hand against him;…..
6 years ago
Human Rights Day coincides with President Trump’s decision to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem. The man has shown miraculous timing and political instinct, wouldn’t you agree?
6 years ago
“Universal Declaration of Human Rights”: Sounds like Communism: An excuse to tax Whites to death to pay for African and Asian beggars to sit around and do nothing.
