22 Rohingyas Muslims posing as refugees arrested in Bangladesh for alleged role in massacre of Rohingya Hindus

64

Muslim supremacists and their leftwing lapdogs in the media are furiously at work spinning the popular and despicable lie of Muslim victimhood in Burma. The Israelis have suffered horribly as a result of the big lie — so have the Filipinos, Thais, Africans, Russians, Europeans and Americans. The strategy works — disarming freedom loving peoples with accusations of mythical “islamophobia,” all the while destroying freedom and societies in which they invade.

Exclusive: 22 Rohingyas posing as refugees arrested in Bangladesh for alleged role in massacre of Rohingya Hindus

October 7, 2017 Times Now (thanks to Singh):

Amid a raging debate over the deportation of Rohingyas from India, Times Now’s exclusive investigation has revealed why Centre has taken the stand it has.

Story continues below advertisement

22 Rohingya Muslims, who were posing as refugees, have been arrested in Bangladesh, Times Now has learnt. The 22 people are allegedly linked to the massacre of Rohingya Hindus in Myanmar.

The same forces are believed to have attacked Bangladeshi forces earlier and Pakistan’s deep state is believed to have trained this group of 22 Rohingyas.

Watch the exclusive report for more details.

Process of sending Rohingyas back to Myanmar underway, hints Bangladesh minister

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
64 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Perrie Campbell
Perrie Campbell
6 years ago

The video you posted explicitly states that the Muslims were attacked first, and that this is retribution on the Hindus. I’m in no way defending the massacre, but I’m not sure what you think this is proving.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Preemptive strikes are necessary, on occasion.

Lynn D
Lynn D
6 years ago

Considering that muslims have slaughtered 80 million hindus ( the partition of India – 70 years ago)..Is it any wonder that if the hindus had the upper hand they would take them out first.. Besides that, The Rohingya Muslims have been slaughtering buddhists in Myanmar (Burma) for years now.. That is why a pacifist religion like Buddhism finally said “Enough” and chased them out of Myanmar.. We all know mussies are the world media’s ‘pet people’ and so anything terrible they do is not generally reported…. But we all got the stories about how “brutal’ the buddhists have been on the Rohingya mussies… Most of it was a load of crap.

Michelle
Michelle
6 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

I see no human rights problems in removing violent invading muslims as by so being they disqualify themselves from being regarded as human. A mere glance at their 1350 years of violence illustrates this. Muslims ONLY respect the power of grater violence and this has always been so.

Bikinis not BurkasD
Bikinis not Burkas
6 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

Afghanistan was once Buddhist, they let the lovers of the necrophilic fat white dwarf in and now they are all dead, no wonder Myanmar are using their brains and learning from history that the West refuses to do and complains about Buddhists not wanting to be victims of Quran 8:12.comment image

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

Lynn, Buddhists are not pacifists, at least in the sense that some Christian sects claim to be. That is a Western fantasy, or at least a naive projection onto a foreign culture. Buddha taught non-violence, not pacifism.

Say, did you know Quakers have a bit of a tradition of serving in the US Marine Corps? Most famously, Gen. Smedley Butler.

Craig
Craig
6 years ago

When one loves their country, they tend to support it in any way. Quakers (the old ‘Friends’ religion) are no different. So, I must ask…what branch of the service were you in?

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  Craig

Like I’m going to answer your questions. Btw, Quakers are still more formally called Friends- it’s not an ‘old’ name, or a particularly old Protestant denomination.

Lynn D
Lynn D
6 years ago

Non violence, pacifism. There is not a huge distance between them. However, thank you for pointing that out to me… Still it is a telling fact that non violent Buddhists are chasing Rohingya mussies out of their country.. Now they are not doing that because suddenly they decided that they didn’t like them.. They have had years of systematic brutality from the Rohingyas..

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

A strict pacifist will not use violence to protect his own life or those of his family. I consider the difference between such people and those who resort to violence or force only when a viable alternative is lacking to be enormous.

BTW, I have asked some Quakers what they would do if a burglar entered their home with the intent to harm their family. When pressed, they admit they would try to call police, sometimes while noting the complexities of the ethics of emergencies. It seems not to occur to them that many other people live their lives merely one step from a life-threatening emergency.

Lynn D
Lynn D
6 years ago

Once again, thank you for pointing that out to me…

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Fcku muslums. Long live a Burma free of muslum colonialism/imperialism!

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Amen to that!

marlene
marlene
6 years ago

The muslims terrorized them with threats first. A pre-emptive strike was called for.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago

I took it as someone attacked the Moslems first, but I didn’t understand that it was Hindus. I suspected the Myanmar army. Did I mi-understand?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

muslim terrorists should be hunted down and shot on sight, there is no end to them, they get more violent every day.

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Agree. but who will ? Bangladesh may but what about other Left/Liberal loon run countries ?

sweden in attempt to reduce muslim immigrants agreed to allow only children.

And now Muslim invaders posing as unaccompanied refugee children (24 – 44 years olds) threaten to kill Swedes if not allowed to stay http://bit.ly/2pLFV6i

And Left/Liberal loons are to afraid to deport them . Can it get more ridiculous ?!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Give the swedes a while, they will still outdo themselves in stupid, yet again.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Bangladesh hunt down muslum terrorists? Bangladeshi muslums slaughtered 2.5 MILLION Hindus in the 1970’s! For which there has been no compensation or justice served to the families of the victims (the prosecution of one f’ing muslum cleric notwithstanding). Hindus are regularly persecuted by the Bangladeshi muslums up to and including murder.

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Agree.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Long live the Hindu Nationalist Party!

Anon
Anon
6 years ago

The reasons why Rohingyas are the most unwanted people in the world is slowly coming to light. They are crude savages that breed like rats and are in danger of overwhelming the local population in Rakhine until the Burmese army steps in to expel those that swarms in illegally from Bangladesh.

Michelle
Michelle
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon

you described most muslims

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  Michelle

I would say ALL muslims. Stealth muslims are no better.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  marlene

I would say ALL Muslims.

Then I know Muslims who are better human beings than you are.

Craig
Craig
6 years ago

Wow. You really have shown what a useless POS cowardly democrat you are.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  Craig

Craig, you are a jackass.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Anyone jackass is orders of magnitude morally superior to a muslum apologist cum sympathizer Flaccid Flower.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Then move to a muslum state d!ckwad and find out for yourself how wrong you are.

American 1st.
American 1st.
6 years ago

Are you a Muslim?

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  American 1st.

Why would you ask such a totally mis-directed question? I suppose I can’t hold against you that you may not be able to put my comments in perspective, and so have no sense of what I stand for, but your question simply is not a rational response to anything I have said. But, in answer to your question, no I am not a Moslem.

American 1st.
American 1st.
6 years ago

It was just a question and it was based on the tone of your comments. It was not intended as anything more than a simple question.

I used to be married to a Muslim man from Bangladesh and your tone reminded me of his. I realize too that sometimes, things appear different in writing than they do by direct contact.

I don’t like to make assumptions, therefore I asked you directly.

OverIt
OverIt
6 years ago

Anybody who worships a paedophile rapist/murderer has, at the very least, a lack of judgement.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago

Who are you talking to?

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon

There is no such people as Rohingya — they’re nothing but Bangladeshi muslum parasites. They’re a fabricated people.

David
David
6 years ago
Reply to  Anon

This is why Bangladesh’s idea of a separate island for them is practical. Their population will be naturally constrained by the capacity of their island.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  David

No one owes the muslum hawse holes anything — especially anyone Buddhist. Let the “Rohingya” go back to their muslum pigsty state and rot.

Alleged-Comment
Alleged-Comment
6 years ago

LOL! BUSTED!!

Let the punishment fit the crime.

Bikinis not BurkasD
Bikinis not Burkas
6 years ago
Michelle
Michelle
6 years ago

From his sexual preferences he also was micropenile (small penis) and had a thing about domination (AKA rape) as otherwise he could not function. Everyone is allowed her/his sexual preferences in private but this scumbag has skewed a whole tribe into imitating his abnormal preferences and spewed them onto the world.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  Michelle

Michelle, I don’t know that Mohammad’s sexual preferences were all that unusual in 7th century Arabia. Unfortunately, he embedded them in his “religion”.

Craig
Craig
6 years ago

allah was the name of the male goat mohammed liked to rape. There is a famous painting of mohammad raping that goat.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Craig

Flaccid Flower probably is more intrigued by muhamMUD’s sucking the penises and tongues of little boys.

BEVERLEY HUGHES
BEVERLEY HUGHES
6 years ago

According to the mainstream press these people are innocent of any wrong doing and are being ethnically cleansed by bigots. The lying lazy media at it again, In London Saturday there was a march by the Football Lads Alliance protesting our government inaction against terrorism and 30.000 or more men marched silently through the streets and lay wreathes on Westminster bridge without any trouble at all. Media silence on a day that rival football fans all stood together to protest our young and old people dying on our streets. Disgraceful. YouTube has the evidence.

Michelle
Michelle
6 years ago

The Left and The MSM are as guilty as the muslims and many of us will NOT forget nor forgive when the reckoning comes.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Bangladesh arresting muslums for slaughtering Hindus? Gee, what about those 2.5 million Hindus slaughtered in the 1970’s Bangaldeshi muslum bastards?
If the Bangladeshi scum send their fellow muslum vermin to Myanmar the Buddhists should send them back to Bangladesh in body bags.
As for Rohingya muslums? They’re a made-up people, just like the Paleswine.

David
David
6 years ago

I didn’t know there were Rohingya Hindus, thought they were all Muslims. Are they all racially Bengali?

I suppose Burma would not mind keeping the Hindus. But one way or another they have to get rid of the Muslims. Bangladesh seems to have a workable solution with a separate island for the ones they don’t want. In that part of the world, things grow easily and one can live from the land, and from fishing.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  David

Yes, Rohingyas are all Bengali. Most Burmese refer to Rohingyas either as Muslims of Rakhine State or as Bengalis.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

How dare you quote this brave woman you f’ing muslum apologist worm.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

What an idiotic comment. It come out of you from both ends, doesn’t it, guttersnipe.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Look in a mirror muslum apologist worm, it flatters not.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  David

There was a ugly, nonsensical civil war on Sri Lanka between Buddhists and Hindus. Nonsensical because there is an enemy that has slaughtered both groups in huge quantities and continues to persecute and slaughter them to this day.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

civil war on Sri Lanka between Buddhists and Hindus.

And whe was this alleged civil war? I wonder if an ignoramus like yourself is mis-reprinting the civil in Sri Lanka between Sinhalese Buddhists and Tamil Moslems is what you think you babbling about. Details, details, in your puerile mind, no doubt.

Liatris Spicata
Liatris Spicata
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Tamils are overwhelmingly Moslem. At very least, you misleadingly characterized the war, you foul-mouthed jackass.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

A muslum apologist calling me a jackass? It’s a compliment scumbag.
Do you grab your ankles when you bend over for your muslum masters?

Duchess of Pork
Duchess of Pork
6 years ago

Liatris you make many challenging and pertinent points on this site but you’re wide of the mark on the Sri Lankan civil war. The Tamil Tigers who launched the insurgency against the Sinhalese Buddhists in 1983 were majority Hindu fighting to create an independent Tamil state. The later inter-ethnic conflict between Tamil Hindu and the minority Tamil Muslims was a spin-off to the main insurrection but a pointer to the lesson that Muslims will always side with their own.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Thank you for the interesting history lesson. I never knew about the later muslum conflict between Tamil muslums and Hindus.

Duchess of Pork
Duchess of Pork
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Had to brush up on the history a bit myself as so much is written by muslim apologists who, as you know, will always seek to portray the muslim as victim. Although most Sri Lankan muslims did not support the insurgents, the friction between Hindu and muslim in the Tamil militant groups emerged early, was intensified by ethnic cleansing in the northern province when the Tamils sought to create an independent state and was purposefully stoked by the Sri lankan (majority Buddhist) military. The subsequent enmity between the three groups has endured with sporadic eruptions every few years. The situation has parallels in Burma.

Craig
Craig
6 years ago

The entire world will be muslim if people allow these fake ‘refugees’ to continue infecting their countries.
Accepting these muslim ‘refugees’ (which are always military-aged men) is nothing more that a world islamic caliphate by immigration. Muslims did not have to fight a war or, really, do anything. Just show up and the country to be invaded and taken over, blithely accepts you and pays for your existence.

OverIt
OverIt
6 years ago
Reply to  Craig

Not only YOUR existence, either. Also the existence of all the wives you choose or import, plus any number of offspring that you spawn with all of them. All at the invaded country expense, and while the invaded country passes more and more laws that inhibits the rights of the native population to protest at having to pay for their own demise.

American 1st.
American 1st.
6 years ago

Bangladesh will most likely do nothing as they are a Muslim country. They used to be moderates but have been overpowered by Radical Islamist and are becoming more like Pakistan which foments terrorism, especially against any and all non Muslims.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!