Hugh Fitzgerald: Erdogan and Kurdish Independence

35

The Turkish sultan, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is furious. The Kurds of Iraq dared to hold a referendum on independence on September 25. 72% of the eligible voters — which included non-Kurds living in Kurdish areas — took part. An astonishing 93% of them voted for independence. Erdogan doesn’t think the Iraqi Kurds, or any Kurds, anywhere have a right to independence. Erdogan now claims — did you really expect him to behave otherwise? — that the whole referendum business has been a “Mossad plot.” His proof? That some Kurds waved Israeli flags during the vote.

The Kurds are the largest ethnic group in the world without a state of their own, but as far as Erdogan and all other Muslim rulers are concerned, that counts for nothing. All their sympathies and support for independence are lavished on a group of Muslim Arabs who since 1967 have been re-invented as a distinct people — the “Palestinians” — who, it is claimed by Arabs and Muslims, are deserving of a state, on territory originally allocated by the League of Nations to be part of the Mandate for Palestine, the very territory intended for the Jewish National Home which, in turn, was to lead to the creation of a Jewish state. The Muslims, both Arabs and Turks, see no paradox in fighting for an invented people while they deny, at the same time, political independence for a real people, the 35-45 million Kurds. The “Palestinian people” are, by ethnicity, religion, language, and folklore indistinguishable from the Arabs living in Jordan (and from many other Arabs besides), they have the full backing of the twenty-two existing Muslim Arab states, and their cause is promoted at the U.N. as if they really were  a separate people. Meanwhile the Kurds, who possess their own distinct language, ethnicity, and culture, are denied the right, anywhere, to their own state, no matter what its dimensions.

Erdogan has threatened an “ethnic and sectarian” war in response to the referendum. “Ethnic” one can understand — the Turkish army has been used to suppress the 18-20 million Kurds within Turkey during many decades of low-level insurrection in eastern Anatolia.”Sectarian” implies a Sunni-Shi’a aspect to this insurrection-and-suppression, but since Turks and Kurds are both mainly Sunni, with some Shi’a among both peoples, it’s hard to see what could be straightforwardly “sectarian” about the Turkish campaign against the Kurds.

Story continues below advertisement

Erdogan characteristically accuses the Kurds of being responsible for causing a war that he alone has threatened. He deliberately ignores the fact that the referendum called for the use only of “peaceful means” to win independence. If the Kurds dare to insist on a state of their own, they will have “dragged the region into war.” In Erdogan’s topsy-turvy world, if the Turkish army carries out a campaign against the Iraqi Kurds, it’s because the Kurds started it. How could the Kurds “drag” the region into war? By allowing themselves to hold a peaceful referendum on independence, all the while forswearing any use of violence. For Erdogan, enraged, cannot accept Kurds anywhere declaring themselves for Kurdistan: how dare these Kurdish war-mongers hold this vote, who if they follow through on secession from Iraq, would thereby be practically forcing the Turks to go to war? Erdogan is reminiscent of Hitler in 1938, when the furious Fuhrer accused the Czechs: if they continued to repress the “Sudeteners” (the ethnic Germans in the Sudeten lands of Czechoslovakia) instead of letting them join the Third Reich, they would be starting a war.

Erdogan didn’t just threaten war, but announced a campaign intended to cut Iraqi Kurdistan off at the knees. It will be “left in the lurch,” he warned. Kurds are no longer be able to export any oil through Turkey. They would “go hungry,” he warned, because the Turkish trucks that brought food to northern Iraq would stop coming. Iraqi Kurdistan would be under permanent siege. Of course, any such attempts to smother the nascent Kurdish state would only harden the resolve of the Kurds both in Iraqi Kurdistan, where there are six million of them, and even more importantly, in Turkey, where there are twenty million of them. Attempts by the Turkish military to suppress the Kurds through violence will only increase the clamor among  Kurds everywhere for greater rights, and the desire for possible adhesion to the new state, still fighting for its life, in Iraqi Kurdistan.

What Erdogan might have done, if he weren’t Erdogan, and thus a hysterical peddler of conspiracy theories (claiming Mossad was deeply involved in the Kurdish vote because of a handful of Kurds waving Israeli flags), would have been to calmly suggest that Turkey does not object to the referendum’s result, and if the Kurds in Iraq decide to declare an independent state,  Turkey would not oppose this. For Erdogan, were he not his limited self, might understand that the existence of such a state would lessen, rather than heighten, the moral claim of Kurds elsewhere to states of their own which might then unite in a single Kurdistan. He could declare that “of course” the Kurdish people deserve to politically express themselves through an independent state, and that it makes sense to have that state arise in Iraqi Kurdistan, where “the Kurds have suffered the most.” Just imagine the reaction to Recep Tayyip Erdogan if he were to utter those six unexpected words: “where the Kurds have suffered the most.”

And meanwhile, he could add, “we in Turkey value our Kurdish citizens, do not wish them to leave, and will gladly meet with their representatives  to hear any legitimate complaints, and hope to make them even more desirous of remaining in Turkey through legislation that improves their social and economic condition. We need more government aid for both Turks and Kurds, in rural Anatolia, and I intend to supply it. And that period, when the Kurdish culture, language, identity, were insufficiently respected, when Kurds were not even called Kurds, is over. Of course, we want to insure that our Kurdish friends in Iraq will work with us on this, rather than creating unnecessary difficulties. We will not tolerate attempts from outside Iraq to embroil Turkey’s Kurds in adventurism abroad. For our part, we want to ensure that the Irbil-Ceylan oil pipeline continues to operate, and that nothing untoward happens to disrupt that overwhelmingly important source of revenue for Iraqi Kurdistan, nor to force us to end shipments of food and goods of all kinds to the new state of Kurdistan. Finally, if any Kurds in Turkey want to move to that new state, we will of course help them in that effort, though we shall be sorry to see them go. Turkish territory, of course, is non-negotiable.”

This is the kind of thing that no one would expect from Erdogan; it’s completely out of character. But it just might have a chance of decreasing the appeal, for the Kurds in Turkey, of trying to join an independent Kurdistan, either through territorial secession (which would bring on full-scale war with the Turkish military), or by moving from Turkey to the new Kurdish state. The new and unexpected conciliatory tone might dampen enthusiasm for leaving, or seceding. Meanwhile, the interruption or cancellation both of Kurdish oil exports through Turkey, and of Turkish food and goods now exported to Iraqi Kurdistan could be lifted as a goodwill gesture to the new Kurdish state, though those measures could, it will be tacitly understood, at any moment be re-imposed. In choosing to interpret an independent Kurdistan in Iraq not as a threat, but as an option for those Kurds now in Turkey to move to if, despite this new-found Turkish generosity, they insist on living in a Kurdish state, Erdogan will have seized the high ground, and outflanked the Kurdish diehards.

Unfortunately, Erdogan has given no sign of being capable of feline subtlety, of the iron hand in the velvet glove, of being fortiter in re, suaviter in modo.  Still, the Middle East has recently seen some strange sights. It has seen an Egyptian ruler collaborating closely with Israel against Hamas. It has seen Saudi Arabia’s rulers quietly collaborating with Israel on intelligence matters concerning their common enemy, Iran. It has seen the two most ruthless regimes that seemed as if they would remain in power forever, those of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and of the Al-Assads in Syria, disappear (in Iraq) and decompose (in Syria). It has seen the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council turn furiously on one of their own, tiny Qatar. Why can’t Erdogan surprise us by displaying a seeming sweet reasonableness, born of necessity, toward the Kurds?

If Erdogan were to make this offer, designed to placate the Turkish Kurds sufficiently so that they will want to remain in Turkey, while he repeats his willingness to help those who so desire to settle in the new state of Kurdistan, while making clear there will be no surrender of Turkish territory, he is more likely to keep Turkey intact than if he tries to smother in its cradle a nascent Kurdish state in northern Iraq. For if Turkey were for the second time to thwart the Kurdish dream of an independent state (the first time being in 1923, with the Treaty of Lausanne), Erdogan’s troubles with the Kurds, and not only in Anatolia, will be beyond anything that the Turks have yet encountered from their largest, and most restless, minority.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Once more and again there will be a repeat of genocide that is so popular among turks when slaughtering Kurds. And, of course after it is over, the angst fill hand wringers will spew the well worn “never agains”.

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I have never had too much of a problem with Muslims killing each other. If you think Kurds are our ‘allies’ you may be right… at least till next week.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

The Kurds are muslims and will remain so, however, there is a possibility that they will be a valuable check and balance in that very unstable part of the world.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

And from what I’ve read, many Kurds seem to support Israel and love America!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

There is a need for a real international diplomatic service in America. The shameless partisan amateur act of the obimbo administration displayed a total naivety and ignorance of reality, both foreign and domestic.

Kalambong Kalambong
Kalambong Kalambong
6 years ago
IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

And they are being persecuted by their muslum brothers already.

Kalambong Kalambong
Kalambong Kalambong
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Unlike other races, the Kurds are not ‘strong moslems’

Many of them Kurdish moslems understand that they are moslems because their ancestors were forced to convert into islam – and deep inside they resent what happened to their ancestors

Hence, in the Kurdish culture (and I’ve been in Kurdistan) there is an ‘unofficial rule’ of ‘keeping one’s eye shut’ when Kurds convert from islam into other religions (like Christianity and Judaism)

Of course, like any others races, there are Kurds who are very ‘STRONG MOSLEMS’ and they work for the Turks to kill their own Kurds whom they deemed ‘not moslems’

Fortunately those ‘strong kurdish moslems’ are minority, few in number

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

LOL, this is nothing but the old “moderate” muslum lie reaffirmed.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

Really? Try telling this Kurdish Christian convert your lies:
‘Life in Kurdistan had been very bad for the convert as well. He said he was arrested and beaten for preaching in the streets.

“In
the mosque the imams talked about me, and my father, and my little
brother, who became a Christian too… The imam talked about us – ‘they
are kafir [unbelievers], they have to die,’ from the stage, into the
mosque microphone. My father [a Muslim] was filled with shame,” he said.
“They were taught bad things about us in the mosque: ‘The Christians
are kafir.’ Of course, they [also] say you are slaves to Israel, to the
American people.”’
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/lauretta-brown/kurdish-christian-reports-receiving-death-threats-muslims-french-refugee

More:
http://www.christianheadlines.com/blog/religious-ethnic-minorities-face-persecution-in-kurdistan.html

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago

There are also other ancient Christian minorities in Iraq, such as the Assyrian people (whose presence there predates that of the Arabs themselves).

taxpayer22
taxpayer22
6 years ago

Koran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.”

famouswolf
famouswolf
6 years ago

Mixed feelings about this. I like it when moslems fight each other.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
6 years ago

ask the armenians what happens when the turks pursue an “ethnic” war

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

Um, the muslum Kurds were enthusiastic participants in that genocide pal.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

if so, screw em

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

I didn’t even know myself that the muslum Kurds were involved until a few years ago. It’s as if history is being re-written.

wilypagan
wilypagan
6 years ago

Free Kurdistan! Trump should get behind the Kurds and rip Erdogan a new one. We don’t accept Turkish thugs beating protestors on American streets.

bandonbeachbum
bandonbeachbum
6 years ago
Reply to  wilypagan

Trump has said repeatedly that he was opposed to Bush’s war in Iraq as I certainly was to the point of protesting in the streets of Portland Or. before Shock and Awe hit Iraq. Recently, I heard Trump say that he wouldn’t get between Erdogan and the Kurds. Obviously he is trying not to get us in deeper in the Middle East.

wilypagan
wilypagan
6 years ago
Reply to  bandonbeachbum

Good point. The last thing our country or our service members need is another interminable overseas adventure.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago

Kurds are strong people.
They should have their own country.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago

Don’t know about that.
Under Obama that would be true.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

The SS slaughtered the SA and that fact didn’t make them the “good” guys.

GandalfsTrouserpress
GandalfsTrouserpress
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Well, the SA were better than the SS in my opinion.
Both probably went to Hell.
But not every German was a monster.
My father had a workmate whose life was saved by a German medic at Dunkirk.
He became a POW and survived the war
Although the Kurds are Sunnis, it looks like they value their freedom more than their religion. It seems they supported the Yazidis to some extent. ….
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/10/17/yazidis-caught-kurdish-peshmerga-iraqi-army-independence-dispute/

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago

The Yazidis are actually Kurds ethnically, according to some sources, just with a non-Islamic religion. The Kurds themselves are turning back to older faiths such as Zoroastrianism:
http://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/210920163

GandalfsTrouserpress
GandalfsTrouserpress
6 years ago
Reply to  R. Arandas

Anything but Islam will be fine with me.
Thanks for the link, a good bit of news.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

“The SA were better than the SS in my opinion.” Have you reached the nadir of moral equivalence? Or nirvana?

GandalfsTrouserpress
GandalfsTrouserpress
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

If the SS murdered the SA then that would indicate that they were worse.
Just an opinion – not a fact.
I know what the SA did.
Bullies and Jew baiters but not genocide merchants until after the death of Rohm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung
Nirvana? – their second album was OK. 🙂

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

I find it hard to believe no one in the SA killed Jews and/or dissidents in Nazi Germany.

GandalfsTrouserpress
GandalfsTrouserpress
6 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

It doesn’t seem to have been SA policy until the death of Rohm and the ascendancy of the SS, according to the Wpedia account.

GandalfsTrouserpress
GandalfsTrouserpress
6 years ago

Kurdish women fighting ISIScomment image

James Stamulis
James Stamulis
6 years ago

The Kurd’s deserve their own country far more than the Palestinians ever did.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
6 years ago

If anyone here thinks a muslum Kurdistan will be a free, democratic, tolerant democracy of some kind please go over to Iraqi Kurdistan now and try publicly debating the vile, violent, Jew hating, fascist, totalitarian nature of islum. Go ahead, put your faith in the good Kurdish muslums to the test!

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago

At least the Kurds are more pro-American than most Arabs are, and they have also helped much more against the Islamic State as well.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!