A Beacon in a Storm of Islam and Liberalism: Sebastian Kurz

Some even believe that Woodrow Wilson was the first fascist . . . .

Fascism was a nationalist form of extreme socialism whereas Trotskyism was/is a internationalist form of extreme socialism — with Leninism being somewhere in between.

So was Mussolini a totally original thinker? Not at all. Students of ancient history see Sparta as the first Fascist State and students of Marx identify Fascism with “Bonapartism” (See Appendix 3 below) — the type of regime devised by Napoleon Bonaparte and revived by his nephew Napoleon III. But Mussolini was quite intellectual and his thinking was in fact much more up-to-date than that would suggest. He was certainly influenced by Marx and the ancient world but he had a whole range of ideas that extended beyond that. And where did he turn for up-to-date ideas? To America, of course! And the American ideas that influenced him were in fact hard to miss. They were the ideas of the American “Progressives”. And who was the best known Progressive in the world at that time? None other than the President of the United States — Woodrow Wilson — the man who was most responsible for the postwar order in Europe. So Mussolini had to do little more than read his newspapers to hear at least some things about the ideas of the very influential American Progressives. And who were the Progressives? Here is one summary of them:

“Originally, progressive reformers sought to regulate irresponsible corporate monopoly, safeguarding consumers and labor from the excesses of the profit motive. Furthermore, they desired to correct the evils and inequities created by rapid and uncontrolled urbanization. Progressivism ….. asserted that the social order could and must be improved….. Some historians, like Richard Hofstadter and George Mowry, have argued that the progressive movement attempted to return America to an older, more simple, agrarian lifestyle. For a few progressives, this certainly was true. But for most, a humanitarian doctrine of social progress motivated the reforming spirit”
__________________

In the post-WW2 era, internationalism and a scorn for patriotism has become very dominant among far-Leftists, but that was not always so. From Napoleon to Hitler there were also plenty of nationalist and patriotic versions of Leftism.

That was part of what was behind the various diatribes of Marx and Lenin against “Bonapartism”. “Bonapartism” was what we would now call Fascism and it was a rival reformist doctrine to Marxism long before the era of Hitler and Mussolini. It was more democratic (about as much as Hitler was), more romantic, more nationalist and less class-obsessed. The Bonapartist that Marx particularly objected to was in fact Napoleon III, i.e. Louis Napoleon Bonaparte, nephew of the original Napoleon. One of Louis’s campaign slogans was: “There is one name which is the symbol of order, of glory, of patriotism; and it is borne today by one who has won the confidence and affection of the people.” So, like the original Napoleon himself, the Bonapartists were both very nationalist and saw themselves as heirs to the French revolution. So it was very grievous for most communists when, in his later writings, the ultra-Marxist Trotsky identified not only Fascism but also the Soviet State as “Bonapartist”. That was one judgment in which Trotsky was undoubtedly correct, however!

There have always been innumerable “splits” in the extreme Leftist movement — and from the earliest days nationalism has often been an issue in those. Two of the most significant such splits occurred around the time of the Bolshevik revolution — when in Russia the Bolsheviks themselves split into Leninists and Trotskyites and when in Italy Mussolini left Italy’s major Marxist party to found the “Fascists”. So the far Left split at that time between the Internationalists (e.g. Trotskyists) and the nationalists (e.g. Fascists) with Lenin having a foot in both camps. And both Marx and Engels themselves did in their lifetimes lend their support to a number of wars between nations. So any idea that a nationalist cannot be a Leftist is pure fiction.

Nationalism + Judeao/Christian Philosophy is what created the Western Democracies . . .
Love of country is what has enabled the USA to prosper for 100s of years.

Mussolini was a devout, committed Socialist long before he became Italy’s diktator.

“So, how many people today are aware that Mussolini, that great Fascist ogre, was in his youth an incandescent revolutionary socialist, a labor-union agitator who was jailed for his pains (Hibbert, 1962)? He was as radical as any student radical of today. Even in his childhood, he was expelled from two schools for his rebellious behaviour.

After that he became one of Italy’s most prominent Marxist theoreticians and an intimate of Lenin. He in fact first became well-known as “Il Duce” (the Leader) when he was a member of Italy’s (Marxist) Socialist Party and between 1912 and 1914 he was the editor of their newspaper, “L’Avanti”. After his split with the Socialist Party he started his own Leftist newspaper “Il Popolo d’Italia” (“The people of Italy”).

When he broke with the Socialist party in 1914, it was over whether or not Italy should enter World War I. Following Marx’s internationalist doctrines, the “Socialist” (Marxist) party was neutralist and anti-patriotic but Mussolini soon became uncomfortable with that for two reasons: 1). It had already become fairly clear even before the war that the workers were nationalistic and patriotic rather than class-conscious — so the Marxist vision of the workers of the world uniting regardless of nationality was just not going to happen. And all that was thoroughly confirmed when the mainstream Leftist parties of the various European countries lined up behind their respective national governments in World War I. So it was nationalism and patriotism rather than class-struggle that would most move the workers. And, as the aspiring leader of the workers, Mussolini had to follow that! 2). Mussolini correctly foresaw that the Austro/German forces would not win the war and therefore wanted Italy to join the Allied side and thus get a slice of Austrian territory at the end of the war. Italians had suffered many humiliations at the hands of the Austrians and there must have been very few Italians who did not share Mussolini’s desire to seize historically Italian territory from them. Like many Leftists then and since Mussolini did not have any principles that he allowed to stand in the way of a grab for power.”

Original translation of The Manifesto of the Fascist Struggle, published in The People of Italy on June 6, 1919.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2004/06/25291/#loIc5epjERywIPpr.99

“From the days of Marx onward, there were innumerable “splits” in the extreme Leftist movement but two of the most significant occurred around the time of the Bolshevik revolution — when in Russia the Bolsheviks themselves split into Leninists and Trotskyites and when in Italy Mussolini left Italy’s major Marxist party to found the “Fascists”. So from its earliest days Leftism had a big split over the issue of nationalism. It split between the Internationalists (e.g. Trotskyists) and the nationalists (e.g. Fascists) with Lenin having a foot in both camps. So any idea that a nationalist cannot be a Leftist is pure fiction.

And, in fact, the very title of Lenin’s famous essay, “Left-wing Communism, an infantile disorder” shows that Lenin himself shared the judgement that he was a Right-wing sort of Marxist. Mussolini was somewhat further Right again, of course, but both were to the Right only WITHIN the overall far-Left camp of the day.”

http://ray-dox.blogspot.ca/2006/06/this-is-expanded-version-of-article.html

“Was Hitler a nationalist? ”
Of course he was . . . he believed he was leading the master race and would create a 1000 year Reich. But also believed in German expansion.
And a quote from Hitler himself:
“Stalin and I are the only ones who envisage the future and nothing but the future. Accordingly, I shall in a few weeks stretch out my hand to Stalin at the common German-Russian frontier and undertake the redistribution of the world with him. “

A nationalist is a citizen and a Patriot . . . someone who loves their country . . .

As I have pointed out to you many times . . . Socialism/marxism/fascism is the problem.
ALL despotic regimes, whether National or International have a large Marxist component.

ISIS are mooohamedans . . . following their insane prophet.
Mussolinin was a Socialist . . . socialists are marxists . . .

Trump is a Patriot . . . an American Patriot who could be America’s last best hope.

ALL the Despots of the 20th Century came from the Insane LEFT . . . 100s of millions died and today in our public schools children are being programmed with marxist dogma. You just have to listen to them for a few minutes to see they are back in the 1930s.
Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.

What happened to the Party of JFK?
If he spoke today as he did in 1959 he would be called a radical right-winger by todays Marxist Democraps !

“the Austrian Hitler was neither and therefore would not meet the definition.” ? ? ?
Hitler was a SOCIALIST !

Islam and Fascism are fellow travellers . . .

“In 1941, Haj Amin al-Husseini fled to Germany and met with Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Joachim Von Ribbentrop and other Nazi leaders. He wanted to persuade them to extend the Nazis’ anti-Jewish program to the Arab world.

The Mufti sent Hitler 15 drafts of declarations he wanted Germany and Italy to make concerning the Middle East. One called on the two countries to declare the illegality of the Jewish home in Palestine. Furthermore, “they accord to Palestine and to other Arab countries the right to solve the problem of the Jewish elements in Palestine and other Arab countries, in accordance with the interest of the Arabs and, by the same method, that the question is now being settled in the Axis countries.”1

In November 1941, the Mufti met with Hitler, who told him the Jews were his foremost enemy. The Nazi dictator rebuffed the Mufti’s requests for a declaration in support of the Arabs, however, telling him the time was not right. The Mufti offered Hitler his “thanks for the sympathy which he had always shown for the Arab and especially Palestinian cause, and to which he had given clear expression in his public speeches….The Arabs were Germany’s natural friends because they had the same enemies as had Germany, namely….the Jews….” Hitler replied:

Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jews. That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine….Germany would furnish positive and practical aid to the Arabs involved in the same struggle….Germany’s objective [is]…solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere….In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative spokesman for the Arab world. The Mufti thanked Hitler profusely.2”

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-mufti-and-the-f-uuml-hrer

Today the Socialist left in America is welcoming the MB and their many fundraising supporters.

WHY MUSLIMS ARE THE NEW NAZIS
http://conservativevideos.com/muslims-new-nazis/

MUSLIMS IN THE WHITE HOUSE:

It checks out with Google and Snopes…

Did you know that we now have a Muslim government?

John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia .

Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.

Hillary Clinton’s top advisor, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt .

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.

Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim. Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.

Obama’s Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim.

Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.

And last but not least, our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama.

One more time . . . Patriotism and luv of country is NOT fascism . . .

The insane left hurls the “fascist” charge at everyone they disagree with . . . none of them has clue one about real history . . . and when you point the Truth out to them the come unhinged!
Closest thing in America to fascism today is the DNC !

Hitler was a nationalist only to the point of his vision of the “Master Race” of Germans.
He himself did not fit the blue eyed, blond hair, athletic ideal German.
There is also some connection to the Occult in the SS, read something about Hitler’s connection to this years ago.

I got banned from f’book years ago for telling it like it is . . . leftists go nuts when you tell them the true history of Israel and the so-called palestinians . . .
Today, two things threaten the Western Democracies . . . Islam and the recycled marxist socialist idiocy.

Christians have something to fear. Muslims are not tolerant of their hosts.
The Sharia is not a coexistent concept. Islam means submission. They invaded.
Now they will breed toward domination. Insidiousness is a larger threat to nations than war.

Make your mind up, Izzy. Cannot be both. But as your Christian love and understanding leads you to loathe any other than your own mind set, makes little difference, does it ? What says “I’m not discussing this with you, you don’t agree with me ” “You don’t think the way I do, so I’m going to block/ ban/ ignore you —or call you ugly names ” ? Not just snowflakes. Strange,never read about J.C. saying that. Luke 9 :49-50.

There is no defense of islum shrubbette, it’s all evil, totalitarian, fascist and antisemitic — no matter how desperately you and your fellow muslum scum try to cover that fact up.

Implicit fallacy of argumentation employed: false equivalence, because fundamentally Christianity was peaceful and tolerant — as evinced by the actions and deeds of the Jewish carpenter who practiced what he preached and who not only never had anyone killed for any reason whatsoever, but stopped violence being done in his name.
Nice try shrubette.

There is no non-fundamental islum shrubette. Unlike Christianity there is no reformed, protestant islum — it’s all the same Jew hating, fascist, totalitarian bullshit — as evidenced by every last f’ing muslum state on the face of this planet today. If there was any reformation in islum it’s already happened shrubette and the gates of itijihad have long been closed.
Your fantasy islum doesn’t exist — except in your exceedingly delusional mind.

Moving the goalposts eh? Fundamentally Christianity was peaceful, islum never was and isn’t.

Buddhists killing muslums is called resistance — because wherever the f’ing muslums have power over Buddhists they universally persecute them.

The only faith you seem to have is in good muslums. Why don’t you put your faith in good muslums to the test and move to ANY muslum state? Because the untested faith is worthless…

You deserve the boot heel of islum on your neck.