News Ticker >
[ February 15, 2019 ]

Muslim suspect in murder of Jewish teen: ‘I wanted to kill a Jew and be...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Syracuse University: Anti-Israel Organizers Endorse Terrorist Group Hamas

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Muslim Researcher Mohamed Gad El-Zoghby: We Should Erect a Statue of Hitler Because of What...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Address Records Show Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) Still Lived With Her First Husband Throughout Marriage...

[ February 15, 2019 ]

Bernie Sanders Called Ilhan Omar to Offer His Support After Her Jew-Hating Tweets

[ February 15, 2019 ]

BBC in full sharia mode: “Salman Rushdie radicalised my generation”

[ February 15, 2019 ]

In Jew-hating Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Minnesota district, police deal with gangs, tight-lipped Somali Muslim...

[ February 14, 2019 ]

“I did it for my daughter,” says woman arrested for headscarf protest in Iran

[ February 14, 2019 ]

US Ambassador Grenell blasts Germany for celebrating 40th anniversary of the Iranian Islamic Revolution, a...

[ February 14, 2019 ]

CNN’s Jake Tapper attacks Trump’s response to Rep. Ilhan Omar over anti-Semitism

DRAIN THE SWAMP: Taxpayers Fund Lawyers To Defend HIGHLY PAID Federal Managers Under Fire

5

Corruption is so deeply entrenched in Washington, and there are so many arrangements like this one that line the pockets of lobbyists and attorneys at taxpayer expense — the swamp is in dire need of draining. This is what President Trump was elected to clean up. He has to defeat the corrupt establishment, or it will be more entrenched and powerful than ever.

“Taxpayers Fund Lawyers To Defend Highly Paid Federal Managers Under Fire,” by Luke Rosiak, Daily Caller, April 16, 2017:

Taxpayers are forced to cover much of the costs of defense attorneys for highly-paid federal managers facing termination or criminal charges, thanks to a cozy deal engineered in part by a law firm whose lobbyists helped draft and gain passage of legislation requiring it, The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group (TheDCNF) has found.

Lobbyists for the Washington, D.C., law firm Shaw, Bransford & Roth (Roth) — which earns its money representing federal employees who are being disciplined — “proposed” and secured passage of the obscure bill Congress passed in 1996, according to the website of a group connected to the firm. That bill requires taxpayers to pay for legal insurance for management-level employees.

Roth lawyer Anthony Vergnetti then left the firm to launch the Federal Employee Defense Services (FEDS), just such a legal insurance business that, Vergnetti acknowledges, primarily steers clients to Roth when they have insurance claims, and profits off their premiums when they don’t.

Roth got its legislative sway by operating through the Senior Executives Association (SEA), which is ostensibly an organic group representing managers, but which is actually founded and run by the law firm’s partners and employees, as TheDCNF showed last year. SEA collects dues from members and pays lobbyists from Roth to conduct legislative advocacy, according to lobbying disclosures.

SEA’s website says it “proposed and secured legislation” requiring taxpayers to pay for the insurance in 1996. As a result, “Agencies are required to reimburse executives, managers and supervisors for up to one-half the cost of their liability and legal defense insurance,” it says. “SEA endorses Federal Employee Defense Services.”

The idea was pitched to Congress as protecting managers from personal lawsuits for simply doing their jobs, like firing a subordinate who then wants revenge. But in all but “very rare” such circumstances, the insurance isn’t needed because “DOJ does represent or hire private counsel to represent federal employees in civil suits for acts or omissions that occur within the scope of their employment,” FEDS acknowledges.

The main function of the insurance, then, is to protect employees who are accused of misconduct. The insurance covers “legal defense up to $200,000 for any disciplinary or judicial sanction proceeding or administrative investigation into alleged misconduct from any act, error, or omission committed by a federal employee,” according to FEDS. The insurance also provides lawyers in criminal cases.

Having the insurance gives employees little reason not to contest any and all discipline regardless of merit–bogging down the appeals system to the extent that in-limbo employees are often on paid leave for months, while generating business for lawyers.

FEDS entices employees to purchase coverage by recounting on an “endorsements” web page a litany of anecdotes that mock investigators for pursuing waste, fraud and abuse, and gloat that lawyers — Roth is virtually the only firm mentioned — got them off on the charges.

Among the examples is Paul Prouty, a top General Services Administration executive official who was fired as a result of an unnecessary and extravagant employee conference in Las Vegas. Prouty seemed to scoff at the idea that people should care about wasteful spending.

“I was accused of wrongdoing as part of the GSA ‘scandal,’” he wrote. “Mistakes were certainly made,” but “I was the lucky one — I had professional liability insurance from FEDS. As part of that, I immediately received the wise counsel of Tony Vergnetti with FEDS.

“Even better, he led me to the brilliant lawyers at Shaw, Bransford and Roth. After nearly three years and over $200,000 worth of legal fees, I was vindicated by MSPB — twice. GSA was forced to reinstate me with back pay, benefits and interest and they were obligated to pay my legal fees.”

FEDS’ website  quotes SEA president Bill Valdez saying SEA “exclusively” endorses FEDS because it “performed a review” of its policies. Carol Bonosaro, its past president, also said she “exclusively” endorses them. FEDS’ other top endorsements come from Roth partners. None disclose the formal and informal connections between the three firms.

In 2006, two firefighters burned to death while waiting for a helicopter that was late. “Federal investigators found that poor judgment and numerous violations of safety standards”— including by firefighter Rick Hafenfeld — “led to the deaths.”

Hafenfeld appeared baffled why anyone would feel the need to hold someone accountable. “The focus was to assess blame and hold employees accountable in order to protect the perceived integrity and reputation of the organization and its upper management, as well as to appease outside stakeholders such as the media and Congress,” he lamented on FEDS’ site.

The father of one of the dead firefighters longed for justice and closure. “Who was in charge of Shane and Jeff that day? Who didn’t put the watch up? We still don’t know,” he said.

Hafenfeld crowed that “if it were not for outstanding legal representation provided by my professional liability provider, I am not so sure the results would have been as positive.”

Vegnetti, who left Roth in 2007 to found the insurance firm, told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s (TheDCNF) Investigative Group he has no financial stake in Roth, nor do the law firm’s partners in the insurance company, and neither receives referral fees.

Roth is “our lead panel counsel,” but “I’m not going to tell you” how often the company steers business to any other lawyers. Because of his connection to the firm, “I’m acutely aware of the quality of representation you’ll get at [Roth],” he said.

He would not say how much money in premiums taxpayers paid to FEDS each year….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest