SPLC Repeatedly Violated Tax Exempt Status During 2016 Elections

13

The SPLC, traffickers in blood libel and incitement to murder, is a hate group that the left counts on to smear, defame and destroy those who are brave enough to oppose its totalitarian agenda. This Soros-funded opposition research smear machine has produced numerous libelous “reports” designed to destroy the most effective anti-jihad voices and mandate that our our voices are never heard.

And they are funded by Nazi collaborator George Soros. So it’s no wonder that they violated their tax-exempt status and campaigned hard against President Trump.

“Complaint: Liberal ‘Hate Monitoring’ Group Repeatedly Violated Tax Exempt Status During 2016 Elections,” by Joe Schoffstall, Washington Free Beacon, April 5, 2017:

Story continues below advertisement

An immigration reform group filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service today alleging that a liberal ‘hate monitoring’ organization violated their tax-exempt status on nearly 50 occasions throughout the 2016 elections.

The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), the D.C.-based legal affiliate of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), filed the legal complaint with the IRS alleging that the Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit organization that monitors “activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists,” engaged in prohibited activities during a “flagrant, continued and intentional campaign” against Donald Trump and other Republican candidates this past election cycle.

“The IRS grants a special ‘501(c)(3)’ tax classification to certain ‘charitable’ and/or ‘educational’ organizations (both of which the SPLC purports to be) that operate within strict public service guidelines,” FAIR said in a press release. “Under the regulations, however, activities such as promoting or opposing certain political candidates for public office are absolutely not permissible communications for these types of privileged organizations. In other words, no electioneering – taking positions in favor of, or against, any active candidate for public office.”

Dan Stein, FAIR’s president, said the SPLC used their website to openly try to discredit then-candidate Donald Trump by alleging on numerous occasions that Trump was not worthy of voter support. The group used “opinion-based smears and innuendos” to engage in “activity masquerading as ‘teaching tolerance.'”

“According to IRS rules, organizations are not deemed educational, for instance, if their ‘principal function is the mere presentation of unsupported opinion’, if they ‘fail to provide a factual foundation for the viewpoint or position being advocated’ or they lack a ‘full and fair exposition of the pertinent facts'” which “permit an individual or the public to form an independent opinion or conclusion,'” the release says. “Educational organizations must be organized and continuously operated for instructing the public on subjects useful to the individual and beneficial to the public. FAIR notes the SPLC, however, made numerous sweeping, opinion-based statements about the current president during his 2016 campaign, accusing him of being ’embraced by right-wing extremists,’ ‘helping drive mainstream interest to racist memes’ and manufacturing a “climate of fear’ which might ‘ultimately lead to hate violence.”

Examples of the activities that SPLC engaged in throughout the election cycle include:

On July 6, 2016, the SPLC Intelligence Report featured a lengthy thirteen-page “report” by SPLC staff member Stephen Piggott, titled, “Hate in the Race,” and subtitled, “A remarkable level of vitriol has characterized the Republican contest for president.” The article contained at least 41 distinct unlawful and highly negative statements attacking then-Republican Party candidate and nominee Donald Trump or his campaign staff and supporters, and fourteen similar distinct unlawful statements attacking former Republican Party candidate Ted Cruz.

On May 11, 2016, a Hatewatch project article titled, “Donald Trump’s Continuing White Nationalist Problem,” by SPLC staff member Stephen Piggott, linked Donald Trump to what the SPLC styles “white nationalists.” The term is not defined, but it is intended to discredit Mr. Trump as a presidential candidate.

On May 6, 2016, after Donald Trump was proclaimed by the national media to be the presumptive Republican nominee, the Hatewatch project published an article by SPLC contract writer David Neiwert, titled, “Right-Wing Extremists Hail the Ascension of ‘Emperor Trump’ as GOP Nominee.”

On October 2, 2015, the SPLC Hatewatch project published “How the Candidates, the Haters, and the Media Have Cooked Up a Perfect Storm of Islamophobia,” by SPLC contract writer David Neiwert. The article mainly focused on Trump’s comments and positions. According to the article, Trump has “demonstrated how the fires of bigotry . . . keep escalating.”…

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago

More talk about democrat crime, but, will there be any action? Or will this be another exercise in rhetoric?

Collin R. Hinrichs
Collin R. Hinrichs
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Unfortunately, probably just another exercise in rhetoric.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
7 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

The SPLC didn’t commit a crime though if one goes by a literal reading of the relevant statute.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
7 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Of course the didn’t, the letter of the law is the only thing that matters. shari’a is good for you.

Politically Accurate
Politically Accurate
7 years ago

Simple solution. Revoke the KKKPLC’s charitable status so that donations by regressive retards don’t earn a tax receipt. This will hurt the KKKPLC’s bottom line.

Oh, and prosecute the listed directors of the KKKPLC to the fullest extent of the law.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
7 years ago

Criticizing a candidate is not the same as endorsing the opposition. The complaint should be in the garbage as the SPLC did nothing illegal.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
7 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Of course Mahmoud, we believe you!

Grant Woodside
Grant Woodside
7 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

If you are tax exempt should you not be politically neutral?
Also, constructive criticism is completely different
Than blatant, agenda motivated smear campaigns

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
7 years ago

Good!
Now let’s see some indictments !!
comment image

Lia
Lia
7 years ago

Senators Chaffetz, Cruz, & Gowdy (in alphabetical order), please check this out?

Robert Kahlcke
Robert Kahlcke
7 years ago

The SPLC, ACLU, CAIR and Democrats are all operatives of the Democrat-Islamic-Communist Terrorist Organization.
I believe that if you give them enough rope they will hang themselves. “BLUE LIVES MATTER”
God Bless America, God Bless Pamela Geller and God Bless President Donald J. Trump

pogee
pogee
7 years ago
Reply to  Robert Kahlcke

Just read an article that used the term, “Islamo-leftists.” I love it, and plan to use it from now on. If anyone reading this likes it, I recommend you/they/we all use it continuously. These totalitarian-socialist-commie demo/progresso-Rats need to be tagged and have it stick to them, like Tar Baby to Brer Rabbit (or is that too white-privileged, politically-incorrect racist?).

Robert Kahlcke
Robert Kahlcke
7 years ago
Reply to  pogee

Thank you, I believe using the term ” Democrat-Islamic Terrorist Organization” makes them more angry but I could be wrong.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!