News Ticker >
[ August 20, 2019 ]

UK Grants Asylum to ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Doctor

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Paraguay recognizes Hamas, Hezbollah as terrorist organizations, Brazil to follow

[ August 20, 2019 ]

President Trump’s Greenland New Deal vs. Democrats’ Green New Deal socialistic scheme

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Liberals Launch Plan To Rename New York’s Iconic 5th Ave After Worst President in US...

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Washington Post Runs Glowing Profile of Libyan Jihadi Sanctioned by US Treasury for Rocket Attacks...

[ August 20, 2019 ]

India: Over ten thousand rally in support of Israel

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Turkish government destroys more than 300,000 books

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Watch Unhinged Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib hold press conference to bash the Jews

[ August 20, 2019 ]

The Chinese Claim The Uighurs Were Forced To Accept Islam — Are They Wrong? (Part...

[ August 20, 2019 ]

Self-hating Jew Has a Meltdown on CNN, Justifies Palestinian Suicide Bombings

Clinton Pollster: Trump’s Support Is ‘5 Or 6 Points Better’ Than Polls Suggest


“The media echo chamber has, I think, made it more difficult for people to express their political views, especially to live interviewers.”

Yes, and even though the enemedia was so wildly wrong about the 2016 election, they still haven’t learned their lesson, and remain as leftist and elitist and out of touch as ever.

“Clinton Pollster: Trump’s Support Is ‘5 Or 6 Points Better’ Than Polls Suggest,” by Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, April 28, 2017:

A top strategist on Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign and a longtime Clinton pollster says that President Trump’s approval rating is at least 5 or 6 points higher than polls currently show.

Writing at The Hill, Mark Penn says that polls showing that Trump has a 40 percent approval rating are the result of what he calls a “polling bubble.”

“Surveys taken from the perches in New York, Washington and Los Angeles may be obscuring rather than illuminating many of the underlying views and trends of the American electorate,” writes Penn, who started polling for Bill Clinton in 1994.

“While Trump is no FDR when it comes to forming a political coalition, a fairer reading of the polls and the election results shows his performance is probably 5 or 6 points better than is being touted and that his base of support with which he won the election remains intact.”

Penn offers several theories about why Trump’s poll numbers are artificially deflated.

Polls are moving in the direction of surveying all U.S. adults rather than past and future voters, he says. That shift picks up groups that are more likely to oppose Trump, such as illegal immigrants and young people. Trump’s numbers are also underestimated because respondents are hesitant to admit they support the former real estate mogul.

“Most polls have moved away from voters or likely voters to U.S. adults with no screen for registration or even citizenship,” Penn writes in the op-ed, also noting that polls frequently focus “on storylines and narratives critical of Trump.”

He says that major network polls survey “U.S. adults,” a much broader category than people who voted in the November election or who plan to vote in 2020.

“The non-voters include 11 million undocumented aliens and a lot of folks who liked neither candidate and stayed home, as well as younger people who have lower rates of participation. These polls should not be confused with the views of the American electorate.”

Penn then conducts a rough calculation of Trump’s actual support based on November voting tallies and recent favorability polls.

“If you look just at the past voters, Trump is holding his base,” Penn writes, pointing to a recent Washington Post poll that found 94 percent of Trump voters approve of the job he is doing.

“That would be 43.1 percent of the voting electorate,” Penn says.

“Trump then conservatively gets 10 percent approval from the remaining voters (30 percent from voters to other candidates and 8 percent among Clinton voters) which would give him another 5 percent or about 48 percent approval among the group that voted in the last election.”

“That’s a more realistic assessment.”

Penn also points to a phenomenon that many pundits now believe was at play during November’s race.

“The media echo chamber has, I think, made it more difficult for people to express their political views, especially to live interviewers,” Penn says….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email

Pin It on Pinterest