News Ticker >
[ February 21, 2018 ]

Russian bots allegedly retweet Geller, Spencer, Gaffney 57 times, Josh Nathan-Kazis of the Forward goes...

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Todd Shepherd of the Washington Free Beacon’s vicious jab at Pamela Geller: “Self-described free-speech advocate”

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Anti-Trumper Sen. Jeff Flake: DACA Recipients ‘Represent the Very Best of America’

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Sweden: Religious Migrants Sex-Torture Mentally Ill Man

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Head of Iran’s al Quds Force vows to “wipe out” Israel

[ February 21, 2018 ]

France: Muslim leader tells Macron not to meddle with Islam

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Breitbart News: CPAC SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP PANEL CANCELLED

[ February 21, 2018 ]

UK: Four Muslims operated rape gang with girls as young as 13

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Nikki Haley to Mahmoud Abbas: U.S. Will ‘Not Chase You’ For Peace Deal

[ February 21, 2018 ]

Lost Phone Leads to Mob Calling for the Beheading of 17-Year-Old Pak-Christian Boy in Shahdara,...

More Judicial Tyranny: Maryland Judge May Order Trump to DOUBLE 50,000 Refugee Limit

82

These activist judges are determined to stop President Trump from protecting Americans. They don’t care how many violent jihadis come in to the United States as “refugees.” They don’t care how many Americans die. This anti-American judicial tyranny has to be stopped.

“More Judicial Tyranny: Maryland Judge May Order Trump to DOUBLE 50,000 Refugee Limit,” by Dan Spencer, RedState, March 17, 2017 (thanks to Patrick):

U.S. District Judge Theodore D. Chuang in federal court in Maryland is considering ordering the federal government to admit all 100,000 so-called refugees into the United States as authorized by former president Barack Hussein Obama despite President Donald J. Trump’s “Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States” issued on March 6, 2017, to be effective March 16, 2017 (the “March 6 E.O.”), which at Section 6(b) limits the entry of refugees to 50,000:

Sec. 6(b)  Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any entries in excess of that number until such time as I determine that additional entries would be in the national interest.

That language is very similar to that contained in Trumps first, and now revoked, executive order to protect the nation from foreign terrorist entry into the United States, which read at Section 5(d):

5 (d)  Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.

On March 15, 2017, Judge Chuang issued “an injunction barring enforcement of Section 2(c),” the so-called travel ban, contained in the March 6 E.O. While the injunction is limited to the travel ban, Judge Chuang’s decision, contains a troubling footnote on page three which reveals that the parties agreed to continue to litigate Section 6(b) of the March 6 E.O.:

On February 22, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of S 5(d) of the Executive Order, ECF No. 64, requesting that the Court enjoin a specific provision of the First Executive Order. With the agreement of the parties, the Court set a briefing and hearing schedule extending to March 28, 2017. The Court will resolve that Motion, which the parties have agreed should be construed to apply to the successor provision of the Second Executive Order, in accordance with the previously established schedule.

That’s right, Judge Chuang may, after the March 28 hearing, decide to substitute his judgment for that of the President of the United States and decide to let in the number of refugees enter the United States that the president who appointed him wanted to admit, a number which the current president has determined “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

President Trump is well within in his authority here. The law cited by cited in the March 6 E.O., Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, gives the President a great deal of authority to decide who is allowed to enter the United States:

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate…

Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

Pin It on Pinterest