Google and Facebook Take Aim at “Fake News” Sites

13

[the_ad id=”83350″]

The left-wing elites and their running dogs in the enemedia are in one of their fictional publicity campaigns they as masquerade as urgent news. Their latest terror is “fake news sites.”

There is conspiracy theory and there is conspiracy fact, and what we have on our hands is one mother of a left-wing conspiracy parading as a right wing conspiracy. You can’t make this stuff up. It’s diabolical. In the run-up to the election, I reported on a number of fake conservative new sites created by left-wing operatives in order to discredit the conservatives’ news sites. If you have a bogus conservative site, it makes a conservative site look questionable. “News sites” like the Baltimore Gazette and the National Report were dropping hoaxes for months to discredit conservatives who might pick up the story. I always understood that the objective was to taint the conservative newssphere. Sites were created by them to attack themselves and shame the right-wingers who jumped on it. This is classic disinformation. It’s always games games games… from the people who brought you Soros’ rent-a-mob to risking a few deaths, and rioting and theft and destruction in cities, etc. But I didn’t see coming what is their ultimate goal: the shut-down of free speech. They want to crush free speech, which has been in their cross-hairs for some time now.

Story continues below advertisement

If a blogger or news writer gets a story wrong, does that designate him or her, or his or her site, as “fake news”? If that’s the case, they’ll have to shut down the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, etc. They get stuff wrong all the time. Every article written about my colleagues, my work, or myself is fake. Everything they wrote and didn’t write about the Orlando mass slaughter at the gay nightclub was disinformation and deception.

If you issue a correction, does that somehow remove the fake news scarlet letter? This is all a big fat lie — it is an end-run around the First Amendment, and it’s disastrous. It is indeed true that Facebook has too much power, but banning “fake news” sites is hardly the solution. That’s Zuckerberg’s fix-it? It would be funny if it weren’t so Hitlerian. Facebook has too much power. Its news curators, mini-Goebbelians — are more frightening than Kafka’s antagonists. Facebook should be broken up like Ma Bell was. Facebook doesn’t decide what’s good and what’s forbidden. Left-wing fascists do not decide what news people can and cannot see. But that’s exactly what we are seeing on Facebook. Look at the screenshot below from today; this news story of a double honor killing was banned:

screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-9-31-43-pm screen-shot-2016-12-02-at-2-23-23-pm

 

Is there going to be some government agency who decides what’s a real news or a fake news site?

Related: Obama whines about “fake news” to fake news magazine Rolling Stone

Obama discussing launching his own media company

Clinton Chief Wanted Fake ‘Decoy’ Leaks After Email Scandal Broke

Left Press Lashes Out Against Our Free Speech Lawsuit

“Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites,” by Nick Wingfield, Mike Isaac, and Katie Benner, New York Times, Nov. 14, 2016:

Over the last week, two of the world’s biggest internet companies have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.

On Monday, those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.

Google kicked off the action on Monday afternoon when the Silicon Valley search giant said it would ban websites that peddle fake news from using its online advertising service. Hours later, Facebook, the social network, updated the language in its Facebook Audience Network policy, which already says it will not display ads in sites that show misleading or illegal content, to include fake news sites.

“We have updated the policy to explicitly clarify that this applies to fake news,” a Facebook spokesman said in a statement. “Our team will continue to closely vet all prospective publishers and monitor existing ones to ensure compliance.”

Taken together, the decisions were a clear signal that the tech behemoths could no longer ignore the growing outcry over their power in distributing information to the American electorate.

Facebook has been at the epicenter of that debate, accused by some commentators of swinging some voters in favor of President-elect Donald J. Trump through misleading and outright wrong stories that spread quickly via the social network. One such false story claimed that Pope Francis had endorsed Mr. Trump.

Google did not escape the glare, with critics saying the company gave too much prominence to false news stories. On Sunday, the site Mediaite reported that the top result on a Google search for “final election vote count 2016” was a link to a story on a website called 70News that wrongly stated that Mr. Trump, who won the Electoral College, was ahead of his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton, in the popular vote.

By Monday evening, the fake story had fallen to No. 2 in a search for those terms. Google says software algorithms that use hundreds of factors determine the ranking of news stories.

“The goal of search is to provide the most relevant and useful results for our users,” Andrea Faville, a Google spokeswoman, said in a statement. “In this case, we clearly didn’t get it right, but we are continually working to improve our algorithms.”

Facebook’s decision to clarify its ad policy language is notable because Mark Zuckerberg, the social network’s chief executive, has repeatedly fobbed off criticism that the company had an effect on how people voted. In a post on his Facebook page over the weekend, he said that 99 percent of what people see on the site is authentic, and only a tiny amount is fake news and hoaxes.

“Over all, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other,” Mr. Zuckerberg wrote.

Yet within Facebook, employees and executives have been increasingly questioning their responsibilities and role in influencing the electorate, The New York Times reported on Saturday.

Facebook’s ad policy update will not stem the flow of fake news stories that spread through the news feeds that people see when they visit the social network.

Facebook has long spoken of how it helped influence and stoke democratic movements in places like the Middle East, and it tells its advertisers that it can help sway its users with ads. Facebook reaches 1.8 billion people around the globe, and the company is one of the largest distributors of news online. A Pew Research Center study said that nearly half of American adults rely on Facebook as a news source.

Google’s decision on Monday relates to the Google AdSense system that independent web publishers use to display advertising on their sites, generating revenue when ads are seen or clicked on. The advertisers pay Google, and Google pays a portion of those proceeds to the publishers. More than two million publishers use Google’s advertising network.

For some time, Google has had policies in place prohibiting misleading advertisements from its system, including promotions for counterfeit goods and weight-loss scams. Google’s new policy, which it said would go into effect “imminently,” will extend its ban on misrepresentative content to the websites its advertisements run on.

“Moving forward, we will restrict ad serving on pages that misrepresent, misstate or conceal information about the publisher, the publisher’s content or the primary purpose of the web property,” Ms. Faville said.

Ms. Faville said that the policy change had been in the works for a while and was not in reaction to the election.

It remains to be seen how effective Google’s new policy on fake news will be in practice. The policy will rely on a combination of automated and human reviews to help determine what is fake. Although satire sites like The Onion are not the target of the policy, it is not clear whether some of them, which often run fake news stories written for humorous effect, will be inadvertently affected by Google’s change.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dale Wellman
Dale Wellman
7 years ago

The DNC/HRC campaign to elect Trump worked well. The DNC/HRC were the people who started these fake news posts. Now they are using their own propaganda as proof that fake news needs to be addressed.
I can imagine the consternation in the DNC/HRC campaign when the Reddit CEO was changing the fake pro-Trump messages to anti-Trump.

Patrick
Patrick
7 years ago

That’s another great quote Pam – “What we have on our hands is one mother of a left wing conspiracy parading as a right wing conspiracy.” Love It!

overboosted ✓ᴰᴱᴾᴸᴼᴿᴬᴮᴸᴱ
overboosted ✓ᴰᴱᴾᴸᴼᴿᴬᴮᴸᴱ
7 years ago

Google fudges its search results to favor the progressive agenda and fakebook often ignores its own computer algorithms hand picks its “trending” news based on political ideology. I doubt these companies will make fair judgments as to what is “fake” and what is not, since they are part of the problem.

Patrick
Patrick
7 years ago

No one has disseminated more fake news than Obama and his running dogs in the MSM. These subversive bastards are going to be the arbiters of truth? NOT!

AlgorithmicAnalystD
AlgorithmicAnalyst
7 years ago

Good article. Thanks Pamela!

Jackie
Jackie
7 years ago

The news stories about the election were not fake they were just WRONG!
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

soundclick.com/Globalfirm
soundclick.com/Globalfirm
7 years ago

We’re living in a gigantic fake news-company.
Everything is lie.
We work for the lie, we eat the lie, eat fake food, we live the lie.
Nothing but lies. We eat fake food, worship fake deities & wait for a fake afterlife.
It’s ALL fake.

Make America great again! is probably code for ‘It’s Islamic state again’.

The lie is like a virus or a cancer. It makes people lies.

Speaking to politicians about enslavement of Africans, they most likely will say it’s a lie & fake news although Mauritania has the largest enslaved population in percentage in the world (20% upwards): Africans enslaved by white Arab Muhammadist-conspirators.

Barack Hussein Obama saying Boko Haram who murder 100′?s of 1000’s of Africans as having “legitimate concerns” -lie (they don’t have legitimate concerns). & the next lie it’s not in the media.

George W. Bush saying Islam would be the religion of peace -lie.
(He I’ve read flew out Saudi officials (Iranians too?) who were involved in the Twin-Tower attacks).

I repeatedly read about the U.S.-Army arming Islamic State.

I even saw a documentary in which the first scientists involved claim HIV wouldn’t be proven (‘The emperor’s new virus?’).

People are so soaked up in lies, if you live by the truth you’re not normal.

Time to bring truth to normality.

We should make a mandatory, English, global TV-channel & free Facebook from the Muhammadism-conspiracy or make a new social-media site.

Thank you Pamela Geller for spreading the truth.

It’s so much lies all around, one feels good to be the truth.

Ban Islam, the Muhammadism-conspiracy & save lives & profound human rights worldwide.

Did you know: There’s slavery today of Africans in Saudi Arabia, Mauritania(25%,50%?of population), new north Sudan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen, Oman, Algeria, Lebanon, Qatar (?), Pakistan, UAE, Niger, Libya, Nigeria, Chad, Mali, Somalia & elsewhere inspired by sadist, racist slaver tyrant, inventor of slavery of Africans, mass-murderer, crucifier, genital mutilationist, clitodirectomist, child-rapist & pederast, theist psychopath who burned people alive for not praying & others to extort them, Muhammad who owned Africans as slaves & said that his deity turned Africans black, so their descendants would be slaves to Arabs & Turks (Abeed means African & slave in Arabic,) (Read more about sadist, racist slaver Muhammad at WikiIslam). & IslamicState stated they want to revive enslavement of Africans in America as I’ve read here.
Anti-African racists & Muhammadism Out of Africa!
Ban the Muhammadism-conspiracy & democracy, save profound human rights!
Help me to win the next election with my worldwide low-budget-campaign, for human rights & ecology, globally.

SP_88
SP_88
7 years ago

This is obviously a reaction to the outcome of the election. Who do they think they are kidding?
These people have been looking for a way to extend their left wing media bias to the internet for a long time. And apparently this is how they intend to do it. Once these leftist ideologues get control over what people can or cannot read about on the internet, they will use it to shut down any opposing views that go against their agenda or ideology. And the truth will be the first casualty. The internet will be nothing but fake news.
Won’t it be sad when the only way to find honest and truthful news is by searching for fake news?

Bless his heart
Bless his heart
7 years ago

Taqiyya.
Dhimini.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
7 years ago

Does CBS Snooze’s allowing its disgraced lackey Dan Rather a platform to try to “prove” former President George W. Bush’s military record a “fraud” by using forged documents qualify as “fake news”?

Geppetto
Geppetto
7 years ago

Question. Who decides what’s fake and what’s not fake and on what do they, or “it” in the case of algorithms, base these “objectively neutral” decisions? This is the proverbial slippery slope that is now magnified by the explosive growth of social media designed and controlled by young, innovative, energetic and now very wealthy entrepreneurs coming out of America’s progressive, idealogical, academic milieu who believe that they should be the final arbiters of what’s factual and what’s not.

They have become mega wealthy by virtue of the Capitalist system they criticize while proclaiming their compassion for and allegiance to their “fellow men” and feel perfectly justified in determining what their ‘fellow men” should accept as fact or fiction.

And, if not them, then who? An educated populace is the key and this is where the best and perhaps the only solution to this dilemma can be found. Unfortunately the American education system does not get even close to producing a majority of individuals capable of critical thinking which is likely why there’s such a deep concern with regard to our 1st amendment right of free speech. The direction it’s going is, you’re free to say or write whatever you want as long as it’s in line with what is currently deemed the conventional wisdom; i.e., republican/conservative very bad, democrat/progressive very good, if the latter can just get their “marvelous, uplifting, party of the little people,” message across. Maybe if they can make things up and be the final arbiters of what is or is not factual.

Wayne Ville ... a Deplorable
Wayne Ville ... a Deplorable
7 years ago

If true then that means the Google is going after the New York fish wrap and the broadcast media.

Steve
Steve
7 years ago

Oh boy big brother is looking out for you and me. Maybe they’ve been censoring wikileaks since haven’t seen much by them lately.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!