Pamela Geller, Breitbart: Sarah Palin Jumps the Shark

“You snakes! You brood of Vipers!” If Jesus can do it why can’t Trump and I do it too?

BTW, that Jesus quote was addressing hypocrites. You called Trump names too…while you were calling him and I out on same—just sayin’.

Nice deflection and forfeiture. I comment on Breitbart and a few other Drudge links, but don’t use other social media. Remind me what that has to do with you being a hypocrite? Friend.

Trump/Wall/SCOTUS Liberty 2016!

Forgive me for missing your reply, I was occupied by interesting characters, elsewhere. I saw your up-vote and decided to tone it down a bit.

We live in an upside down world, where good has become bad and bad has become good—Right is wrong and Left is now right! I firmly believe that Trump is the only candidate on the people’s side (except maybe Carson). I feel everyone/everything else is Establishment/Media manipulation and that Cruz is their pièce de résistance. I may be wrong, but I feel that Trump’s love of America and desire to stop the anti-American schemes is genuine. He is very flawed (probably less than the Establishment puppets), but I believe he will build the wall, terrorize our enemies for our security and improve or economy, through tariffs and sound business practices, evaporating debt and bringing back jobs. I also believe all the evil of the world is set against him (and Palin), because he’s mucking up the global anti-Christian/anti-Conservative plan. I think there will be many, many assassination attempts, but I’m praying he succeeds.

Thanks for your time 🙂

1a. We don’t have a wall because borderland owners sued the Bush administration to prevent the Eminent Domain seizures—along an international border! Either the land owners were profiting from drug and human trafficking or more likely they were asked by Bush to stop his own promise to the people.

1b. Why on Earth would Bush do that? Well, Bush entrusted his momentous North American Union scheme (SPP) to Heidi Cruz, et al., on the CFR. Bush’s now-failed SPP was an open borders Globalist scheme to create an EU-style union, sovereign over America (just as the EU has grown from an economic combine to a sovereign proto-Socialist Union). Bush lied about the wall, just as everyone but Trump is currently lying about the wall, if they even mention it. http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102

2. Heidi Cruz helped write Globalist, border-less policy (SPP) for Bush, that she fully endorsed. She was even part of Bush’s trade policy team, earlier on. SPP was the precursor for TPP (Amer-asian Union). Heidi may have even helped write TPP, since her company, Goldman Sachs, heavily lobbied the Senate (200K) for TPA/TPP passage. Based on Ted Cruz’s TPA flip flop and questionable comments seeming to support TPP, it’s safe to assume Ted and Heidi are of one mind on Globalist Constitution-killing policies. Setting a “more perfect Union” above our Republic is a direct assault on the Constitution—Ted should know better! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uInF9eK3nvo

3a. Trump is Reagan 2.0. Both were Democrat entertainer divorcees and Reagan was certainly not a Conservative (’86 amnesty). No, both are/were Populists. Phyllis Schlafly agrees, in her comparison of Reagan and Trump. Stop deifying Reagan as Conservative, when it’s just a gimmick for Establishment RINOs to assume his mantle—they hated Reagan!!!

(Side Note: Bush41 was the worst! He was the Establishment’s insurance policy against Reagan. Bush41, the former CIA head, entered into a transfer of powers agreement with Reagan, days before Reagan was shot. John Hinkley Jr. was apparently a CIA-connected friend of the Bush family and Bush41’s oldest son had dinner plans with Hinkley’s brother, during the assassination attempt! Sorry Jody Foster, Hinkley probably just wasn’t that into you!)

3b. Trump is a Reagan Populist, Who’s running to stop the Globalist/Marxist assault on America—part deux!

4a. Why do you think Palin abandoned Cruz? She probably realized there’s something fishy about Cruz’s Goldman Sachs/Citibank loans! They weren’t properly disclosed to the FEC, but were shared with the Senate—hiding in plain sight! The loans are excused as automatic loans on margin accounts, that weren’t even up to Goldman Sachs.

4b. The problem lies in the repayment thereof. Were the loans repaid anonymously? Did the banks or a third party briber pay them off anonymously? Heidi Cruz is a Goldman Sachs VP and beneficiary of the loans. I’m sure Palin smelled a rat, especially since Ted Cruz was sent to Washington to fight the same big Globalist banks. Ignore title and scroll down to the dirty loans: http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/17/donald-trump-abc-interview-with-george-stephanopoulos/

5. For all of Cruz’s kabuki theater championship of Conservatism, he has very little legislation to show for the fight. I thought Conservatives don’t hand out participation awards?

6. Cruz’s spox tried to preempt Palin’s endorsement of Trump, questioning her judgement—the same woman who effectively propelled Cruz to the Senate. Glenn Beck even attacked Palin back around October, as a warning to stay away from Trump! Isn’t it more appropriate to question Junior Senator Cruz’s Conservatism, especially considering his significant, Bush43, Globalist Establishment connections?

7a. Cruz does get nasty! He indirectly put out a lying hit piece saying Trump took a poor old lady’s home—never happened! Cruz’s spox then lied on national television saying, “And a widow in Atlantic City lost her home over eminent domain, which was driven by Donald Trump.” Wat!!! The woman refused to sell. Trump legally moved to acquire the home for fair market value, up to 5mil. The woman persevered and then later just up and moved to California! The subsequent sale of the home was not to Trump, nor nearly as lucrative. Was the sweet little old lady just too greedy?

7b. I believe the dishonest ad is still playing nonstop in Iowa, cloaked by Cruz’s Super PAC—Snake! Also, Genn Beck, the propaganda arm of the Temple of Moronai, has basically gone out and called Trump Hitler! Your guy is as dirty as his plausible deniability. You’ll know him by his fruits around him.

8. You’re so full of it, I may have to rhetorically rev it up again, crazy! What are you?

What is this language of Progresso? You realize that’s a euphemism for Globalist/Marxists right? I’m not a Marxist.

I am a Schlafly Conservative. Go to Eagle Forum and you can become an Eagle too! She single-handedly stopped the ERA. She is now focusing on stopping Levin’s Article V Con-Cons that are being hijacked by Soros and the Establishment to get their grubbies on our founding document. Check it out here: http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html Levin’s a traitor and so are Beck and Cruz, with their Trojan Horse Illegal pandering—it’s sick!

I’m not a poser and I’m not using stilted language to sound smart, either (Poseur?) You’re the one who lied above and said Trump was on the Board of Goldman Sachs. If anyone speaks the Progresso language it’s you.

Yeah, I bet you’re one of the infil-traitors that’s trying to mutiny the Eagles for Cruz. I also bet you didn’t consider that Mark Levin is Cruz’s staunchest supporter, but also a traitor for Article V Con-Cons, that Globalist/Marxists have been trying to push since ’86 when Phyllis exposed their Constitution-killing plot. Here’s the evidence against Levin’s treachery: http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/concon.html & specifically http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/column/plotting-to-rewrite-the-constitution.html You see, the Establishment and Leftists currently want Article V to force balanced budgets on the states, but they won’t cut spending, so this amounts to tax hikes…doesn’t sound very Conservative to me. Then they plan to use Article V for other schemes until they get their hands on the US Constitution and essentially unwrite it. How can you be a house divided and support Levin supporting Cruz, when the Eagles should be fighting him? I bet I’m closer to the Eagle than you, laurel.

Laural, Cruz’s wife crafted the North American Union! Do you know what that means? TPP is the Amer-asian Union and she probably crafted that too, because she’s a Goldman Sachs VP and Goldman Sachs lobbied the Senate (200K) for TPP. Do you know what Jeff Sessions says about TPP? But Cruz called Sessions mistaken, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uInF9eK3nvo Frankly, Cruz’s answers are shaky for someone who’s wife wrote similar policy if not this very policy (SPP/TPP). These aren’t lies, like calling Trump a Goldman Sachs board member, so how do you explain them away? Are you informed? Do you just not care? Hello?

Next, “Trump owns a lot of shares” of Goldman Sachs? How many? Is it part of a managed diversified portfolio? Do you understand the difference between shareholder and puppet? Clearly Trump is not controlling Cruz through Goldman Sachs, so your maniacal puppet master picture of Trump holds no water. But I wonder who is controlling Cruz through Goldman Sachs—who has a lot of shares?

Wrong! http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=poseur

poseur(n.) “one who practices affected attitudes,” 1866, from French poseur, from verb poser “affect an attitude or pose,” from Old French poser “to put, place, set” (see pose (v.1)). The word is English poser in French garb, and thus could itself be considered an affectation.

So you are a poser for using poseur, poser! 🙂

Listen, Laurel, you’re all talk and no substance. You don’t like Trump because your “Conservative” betters have demonized him to you, but you can’t see that all those same “Conservatives” are aligning with the Establishment and Leftists to remove him. This means all those “Conservatives” are fake and you have been taken in. Cruz, Huckabee, Santorum, Beck, Levin, Savage, Ingraham, National Review, everyone at Fox. What’s with Geller Rush, Sowell and Gohmert piling on? Then there’s absolutely everyone on the Left going after Trump! Some of the Conservative celebrities may just be deceived, like you, but most likely they’re willingly aligned with Globalist/Marxists for wealth, prestige and/or ideology. You cannot trust politicians or political pundits, even when they claim to be Conservative or even your Conservative betters!

Summary of your reply:

Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, wishing death to a stranger on the internet.

Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem, bold-faced lie about quote, ad hominem, the quote you bold-faced lied about (Goldman Sachs controls Cruz. You lied and claimed Trump was on the Goldman Sachs Board. He is not. This implied Trump was controlling Cruz through Goldman Sachs, or that Trump generally controls Goldman Sach’s Globalist attempts to destroy the Constitution, including TPP. You have also stated that Trump is an authoritarian and Obama on steroids, among other charges, which proves my statement, “your maniacal puppet master picture of Trump,” to be reasonably construed from your own words. You claimed it “had nothing to do even remotely with what [you] said,” but my previous sentence clearly relates your words to my statement. Do better).

Ad hominem, Obsession with telling people, “I told you so!” Ad hominem. (Compound ad hominems are only listed once.)

Note: You shouldn’t be suffered as a member of Eagle Forum (if you even really are one), because you’re furthering outright mutiny, by supporting the Cruzs—clear SPP/TPP enemies of the Republic. This also makes you an enemy of the Republic, with or without your knowledge. Don’t be disdainful, laurel. Someone needs to teach you discernment, objectivity, avoidance of duplicity, humility and obeisance to the Conservative legends that have fought so hard to sustain the liberties you enjoy.

A throw away comment by a throw away commenter.

You claimed projection, now explain it. I’m not the one turning on Phyllis Schlafly after grafting off her life’s work, just to push your Goldman Snakes puppet. How do you feel about Mark Levin’s Article V treachery?

You call me a troll, but for someone obsessed with shallow definitions, you don’t even know the basic meaning of internet troll. Disagreeing with you and your lies and putting up with your abusive language, when you threaten me for “attacks” is not trolling, though it shows what a hypocrite you are.

Let’s see how prideful you are in peddling your ignorance, Laural. You’re nasty enough I imagine you’ll hold out for some time yet.

Cruz is a fake evangelical vote-splitter and you damage Conservatism by being deceived and willfully deceiving others. Stop it!

Etymology dictionaries are necessary for crossover words from other languages, to fully understand the word’s context. Using the French version is what a poser would do. You should strive to improve your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.

I posted 4 links, so you should also consider honing your communication skills, before further embarrassing yourself.

All your base are belong to us.

1. Proved you correct? How’s that?

2. Your Straw Man argument is puny. Yes, the definition was tenable, but that’s not why you shouldn’t have used it. You are literally a poser for using it, as clearly defined, etymologically. I never questioned the validity of your word choice, only recommending that you not use a word which literally reflects its connotation back onto you. You clearly cannot remember the premises of arguments and you’re intellectually dishonest—hence your Straw Man argument.

3. You are crass. I defeat all your arguments.

4. I never said I was a member, hon…only that I’m closer to the Eagle than you. Now explain how I am authoritarian, totalitarian or bullying. Calling you out on your lies, Cruz’s lies, your idiocy, crassness and defeating your weak arguments is none of those.

5. I can post thoughtful, intelligent, well-reasoned arguments that destroy yours, all I want. As far as this conversation goes, your delivery is emotional, crass, unusually verbally abusive, repetitive, desperate and forceful. One wonders if you aren’t the authoritarian, totalitarian bully you project onto others.

6. Another forceful dismissal from weakness, misunderstanding of terms and then a truly nonsensical statement about my life? I think you should look at YOUR life and YOUR choices. I bet falling for a charlatan like Cruz hasn’t been your most gullible moment, you simpleton. Run along now, Laurel, the snake-oil salesman is at the door, but it’s late so I wouldn’t let him in. You probably will, though, ’cause you’re so naive.

I’m not screaming and not breaking any community rules. Your threats are in vain. In the odd chance that Geller bans me for my opinions, I’ll just redouble my efforts to have Robert Spencer distance himself from her.

You see, If Trump doesn’t win, Hillary will. Cruz has no chance and is clearly faking, since Establishment Fox News is trying to push him on us. Case in point is National Review’s evil scheme launched on Megyn’s show, earlier.

The Establishment plan is to track Cruz and others with Trump, so he can’t win any primaries by a majority. Then Jeb will be chosen as the brokered candidate.

This will lead to Hillary’s coronation and she’ll solidify TPP (when it’s inevitably passed) so hundreds of Millions of Shafi’i girl-cutting muslims will pour in from Malaysia/Indonesia, as Obama promised them, recently in Malaysia.

Geller may or may not be aware, but I believe her actions will directly lead to the islamization of America. TPP is the twin of the EU and all of Europe’s muslim invasion issues will be brought here, intentionally. Christian Conservative dilution is the goal.

P.S. You lied above about Trump being on the Board of Goldman Sachs. If you get me banned I’ll repeatedly inform Geller, by email, that I shouldn’t be banned in lieu of a proven liar. You should be ashamed of your self! You lie and then threaten my speech when I call it out. You caution me on language and “attacks”—really? Who do you think you are?

Lame

Most of your reply is throwaway filler. I suggest revising it. You should make statements with clear points and not be so wordy and vague. “Read this article and refute it,” would be adequate. This is not to say you can’t pepper ad hominems and innuendo for effect. Just do it smartly.

1. What am I maybe trying to reinvent? Speak up, man!

2. The article equates Cruz’s filing with the Senate with filing with the FEC. I believe filing with the Senate was “hiding in plain sight.” Your article then details other instances of “hiding in plain sight.” However, how did Cruz pay the loans back? Were they paid back anonymously? Where are the records of repayment? I feel that the FEC nondisclosure (shown in my above comment link) was intended to prevent Tea Partiers from questioning the guy they sent to Washington, to fight special interests and the very same big banks. I believe it was deception.

3. As far as being an ordinary margin loan, the involvement of Cruz’s wife, as Goldman Sachs VP, is anything but ordinary. Consider for a moment, that the margin accounts were used to get the money from Goldman without causing a ruckus about unusual personal loans from big banks, during an election. The money was the same either way. The big question is who paid and how were they paid off? Why not just sell the collateral and avoid the loan process altogether? Cruz’s income doesn’t appear sufficient for repayment. What are we missing here?

4. “Liberal” is a euphemism for Marxist. Do you call Cockroaches hug-a-bugs? Stop it! I personally question Heidi Cruz’s involvement with Bush’s SPP, CFR, Goldman Sachs, Goldman sach’s involvement with TPP, TPP’s development from SPP and Ted Cruz’s TPA flip-flop and TPP support. These are major red flags and so this loan funny business, undisclosed to the FEC, makes me wonder who paid off the loans and why. You’ve done nothing to allay my very real concerns about Cruz’s credibility and integrity.

But you engaged me in conversation…

That is called the tl;dr internet defense. It’s popular among Millennials with ADHD; however, my reply was essentially 4 paragraphs and half a page. The length was required to adequately rebut your hasty pronouncements and provide constructive criticism for your poor composition and word choice. I refuted you, point by point, and can’t be blamed for your lack of focus. Did you graduate high school? There’s no time like the present!

Your pathetic dismissal and ad hominem = forfeiture and utter defeat. Good bye.

Cross party appeal? I was a registered NY Democrat in 2008 and today I support Cruz.

Amen!

“Resistance is futile!”

John obviously has our best interests at heart.

ROFL

It is not a secret that Cruz is hated by Senate and Congress. We don’t need another Obama, but a president who can unite and get our representatives working together for the best interests of the people they represent…like ‘Reagan was able to do.

You haven’t got the facts on your side. Your best option in this Vietnam you’ve gotten yourself into (for the sake of a man who wouldn’t comp you a free bucket of ice in one of his hotels) is to declare victory and go home. Or double up on your meds.

DJ ‘The Don’ Trumpkin is an avowed crony capitalist who has prostituted his principles and by his own account bought politicians like Hillary Clinton. Who is really in control, the john or the pimp selling our Republic to the highest bidder? You know what that makes the taxpayers and average citizens in Trump’s world, don’t you? Thats right, it’s our tax dollars and Constitutional rights that Hillary is pimping and Donald is buying.

Cruz has fought Donald’s kind his whole career and won.

Trumpkin depends on investment bankers to fund his projects, without them he would be unable to operate. He is completely at their mercy unless, as he has in the past, he defaults on his financial obligations. Ironic that you would suggest that I intended to say ‘intends’ rather than ‘depends’ and then question how I could know what anyone intends. Self-awareness training would help you there.

Donald has made so many ‘great’ deals with the Muslims, He loves the Muslims. But you can trust him to keep out Muslim immigrants, unless a Saudi trillionaire offers him another ‘deal’. I’ve forgotten more about Islam than you know. For instance the relevant concept vis-a-vis Muslim immigration is hijrah.

You are a study in projection my adiposely cephalic interlocutor.

As I said, you haven’t got the facts on your side. In response you presented none. Instead you posture.

Because you can’t defend the Trumpkin against the charge of being an avowed crony ‘capitalist’ you instead feign that I accused him of ‘cronyism’. “Crony Capitalist” has a specific meaning. You should learn it because it is what the man you are shilling for proudly asserts about himself:

Crony capitalism is a term describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, or other forms of state interventionism.

Every time Trump paid off Hillary for preferential treatment he was buying our tax dollars and Constitution for cheap.

Cruz fought crony capitalism as Solicitor General of Texas and as Senator. If the crooked pro-amnesty politicians and their billionaire backers (including Trump) had successfully rammed through their Gang of Eight amnesty bill, millions of illegals would be on the path to citizenship and Donald would have no issue to run on. Odd that the man who was for amnesty when Ted was against it now is the voice crying most loudly against (while supporting touchback) amnesty. As for TPP Cruz voted against it, Obama promoted it, Donald Trump had nothing to say about it until he decided to run for President.

Since your “Paragraph 4” is mostly just cut and paste, here is the cut and paste response to your identical attempt at silly deflection:

Rechristening four bankruptcies and skipping out on $4.7 billion in unpaid debt as “chapter 11 restructuring processes” is so ‘intellectually dishonest’ it is honestly funny! Donald defaulted on debt $700.000.000 greater than his net worth. That is a -14.89% financial success rate. If he ever decided to do the decent thing and repay the creditors he stiffed he would be indigent.

Perfect for a country ~$18,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.

So you “read Robert Spencer” and “know of Tours, Lepanto and Vienna” and have apparently confused a school of Sunni jurisprudence with a branch of Islam. I am unimpressed. As for TPP Cruz voted against it, Obama promoted it, Donald Trump had nothing to say about it until he decided to run for President. Donald Trump is the one who has betrayed the values of crony capitalism and influence shopping to curry favor with the easily influenced. Ted Cruz stands firm for the values of the founding and the Constitution as he has his whole career.

You should avoid trying to ape the vocabulary of others as it will get you into trouble. Toffee is actually a pleasant smelling confection made of sugar and butter, malodorous mean unpleasant smelling. ‘Git’ seems like an insult born of projection as I am clearly more articulate and knowledgeable than you. Did you really mean to call me hemophagous or did you mean hematophagous? “Cretinous” and “Prat” are of course pure projection on your part. But the repeated references to ‘intellectual dishonesty’ along with your frequent citing of the Conservative Treehouse and its professed “attack anyone other than Trump to thwart Jeb! strategy” seems like psychological confession.

Trump is going to make you cry. Dump him before he makes a bigger chump out of you.