Ohio: Court Rules Against Muslim Teacher Who ‘Blatantly Violated’ School Policy

Despite the fact that I am not an atheist, I agree with your point. I believe the days of religion ruling people’s lives are over, and this should be reflected in our laws. Religion (or the lack thereof) should be a personal choice, not a way to arm-twist everyone in society to pander to one belief system. Islamist parasites are very good at using every possible way to manipulate the kaffir, this includes lawfare which is used to cash in, and to force us to follow their ways and not our own.

And what’s your point exactly? Do you disagree that religion shouldn’t dictate law? Or are you just building a rickety straw man of some sort?

“Crusade against religion” – so that was your straw man. I don’t reply to those, next time try responding to what I did write.

Go and look up what a straw man is.

Christian beliefs have always dictated law. Where do you think the law came from.
Islamic beliefs are trying to destroy those laws and the democracy and freedom of choice that goes with them. Not to mention the rights of women.

Islam is not a religion. Legitimate religions don’t believe in going around killing everyone who is not a member. Islam must be banned in western nations. It is a serious threat. Do not allow anyone to refer to Islam as a religion.

Thank you!
It is a two pronged attack:
Defend democracy, with its inherent rights to defend all persons equally, support all human’s rights, ie stop all levels of Sharia! Secularisation is the only way – otherwise it is a war of religions.
Second: demand truth at the beginning of religious demands ie as I have been doing to you all.

You have no idea what I said, do you? Plus, you cannot infer that empathy is the mechanism by which we set ‘bounds’ for our children?? You really are making a strong effort to ignore logic here.

The human species had rules of behaviour long before we had mono-theisms,and even before the poly-theisms. Neanderthal, Cro-Magno, and even ape species are shown to have ritual and morality without your religion’s ‘commandments’.

And the first four have absolutely nothing to do with morality and social behaviour, just selfish authoritarian control – which is the trade mark of most religions – certainly yours and Islam.

So, your first statement of “What is wrong with telling people not to steal, murder, fornicate with everyone, covet…” is facile to the point of embarrassment.

Now, since we have your attention – give us the proof that we have been asking for, for generations, the proof of your god(s)/mythology.

The only pissing going on here is your pissing on peer reviewed, scientifically based studies from social anthropology and human psychology. High school level – feel free to open some books.

It certainly appears that you are vainly attempting to deflect to defend your staunch religious beliefs instead of trying self -reflection.

**Now, since we have your attention still- give us the proof that we have been asking for, for generations, the proof of your god(s)/mythology.

Islam is a dangerous political cult that wraps itself in the guise of a religion.
Muhammads goal was always to rule the world and as people are naturally spiritual beings, (whether we like it or not), he knew, (or rather the devil did), that having a religion and ‘god’ in his cause, (one of his own making of cause), would help his goal no end. And he was right.
If any other cult believed, taught and behaved as islam does, it would be banned in western nations – but the demonic spiritual hold (and monetary hold), this cult has on western leaders, many who claim their countries are secular, is astounding.

Islam is not a religion but a Fascistic System that uses the forms of religion as a smokescreen to conceal its true identity and act as a means of control for the uneducated, the gullible, and those who look no farther than the surface.
The Koran uses poorly translated abstracts from the guiding documents of the legitimate religions of the world as a thin veneer for the majority of the text which is a self justification for the commission of murder, rape, pillage, territorial conquest, and unbridled terrorism.

Ah, the difference is that Christianity ~has~ gone through a reformation.
The Islamists are still stuck in a 7th century mindset, even though the rest of the world has gone through a millennium and a half of introspection, self examination, and elevation of thought.
I would further point out that the Islamist mindset was a barbarous throwback even when first espoused.
There are many Cults over the centuries that have claimed to be “religions”. The line of demarcation has always been the attitude towards “non-believers”, as in those of another religion or what we now label as agnostic or theist. Islam clearly falls on the Cult side of the demarcation, so far on the cult side as to qualify as a Blood Cult in its current incarnation.
How much study of Islam have you actually engaged in? Or do you just take on face value what the mouthpieces state for the consumption of the civilized world? Are you aware that these same mouthpieces say one thing when speaking to the civilized world and something entirely different when speaking to their cult followers?
Please explain to me how any system of philosophy that spends more than half of its foundational document on instructions to lie, steal, commit rape, murder, acts of mutilation, terrorism, and the overthrow of legitimate governance in order to engage in territorial conquest can be viewed in the 21st century as anything other than a Blood Cult.

Thank you for the statement of confidence.
I’m not making the assertion based on any of the unprovable claims that are the stock in trade of the systems of philosophy that we classify as “religion”.
My opinion is based upon the content of Islams core document, the Koran.
The document was not written by their [alleged] prophet, Mohammed, who was illiterate his entire life [which is the least of his shortcomings]. The written text was compiled from the transcribed memories of people who lived at the same time as “the prophet” and outlived him long enough to have their recollections recorded by Arabic Scholars, sometimes as much as several decades later.
More than half [most scholars would state 52%] of the document are what are called “the Sword Verses”. These verses are the sort of instruction normally classified as a “terrorist manual”.
Most of he rest of the text can be traced to the Torah, the Christian Bible, and a few passages from the Vedic texts. What got transcribed into the Koran is badly shopworn and poorly recollected but still shows its pre-Islamist sources.
Islams basic premise and mode of operation is forced conversion with the actual [and often demonstrated] threat of terrorist action against any person or society that does not submit, the declaration of apostasy of anyone who attempts to leave the “religion” with a death sentence accompanying the declaration. All this while loudly proclaiming that it is a “Religion of Peace”.
The principle of lying to anyone not considered to be of the same sect [not just of the muslim faith but actually of the same faction] is not just condoned but actually encouraged if it will in any fashion advance the cause and interests of Islam. The instruction for this principle are written in the Koran. I know of no legitimate religion that doesn’t just condone but actually encourages ~lying~ as a core principle. The knowledge of this action as a basic principle of Islam makes it impossible to deal with any assurance of adherence to any contract between a non-muslim and any muslim. This is why, as Winston Churchill observed [paraphrased] commerce is sluggish and property rights are uncertain in any muslim society.
As you can see, my objections are based on principles of civil society that are integral to a safe and orderly society, not the claims that must be taken on faith.
I know of no legitimate religion that causes such strife and discord, not only within itself but in its dealings with society outside of its own “faith”.
Therefore, I classify Islam in the same category as the Thuggee Cult that plagued the Indian Sub-Continent and took so much time and treasure of the Maharajahs and British Colonial Officials to eradicate. There are examples throughout history of blood cults, some of which were the foundations of empires that lasted for hundreds of years. None of these have proven so durable or have broken out in such widespread problems for the rest of the world. Current events in Europe, Asia, and Africa [as well as the increasing levels of terrorist activity in the USA] demonstrate what a problem for the civilized world this cult locked into a 7th century and severely xenophobic mentality has become. Without concerted cooperative action such as what was required to drive the Moors out of the Iberian Peninsula the entire civilized world will remain under threat of violent attack whenever these Blood Cultist feel they have sufficient strength, they definitely have the will to perpetrate these predations at will.