Is law enforcement investigating this mosque? Or are they just taking the imam’s word for it that these jihadis didn’t learn any of their lust for violence and hatred at that mosque? Is the FBI too busy conducting “outreach” at this mosque to look into what is being taught there?
“Texas Shooter’s Imam Warned Members to ‘Be Careful’ of FBI Informant,” by Lee Stranahan, Breitbart, May 7, 2015 (thanks to Christian):
The imam of the Phoenix, Arizona, mosque attended by Texas terror shooter Elton Simpson gathered members years ago to warn them about a potential danger in their midst–but it was not Simpson he warned them about. According to a recent New York Times article, the imam warned others in the mosque that he was concerned that an FBI informant had infiltrated the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix.
Imam Mahmoud Sulaiman was correct: Dabla Deng was an FBI informant who had been assigned to gather information on Elton Simpson, who had raised concerns through his connection to a convicted terror supporter.
The Times makes clear that the Phoenix mosque was more concerned with the FBI than a potential terrorist:
At the mosque they both attended, the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix, Mr. Deng stood out. Usama Shami, president of the mosque, said the young Sudanese man came to his attention because he did not seem to care much about Islam. He asked few questions about Islamic rituals and rarely engaged with others.
“He claimed to be a convert,” said Mr. Shami, an engineer of Palestinian heritage, “but he wasn’t interested in learning the faith, and that raised our suspicions.”
Mr. Sulaiman called Mr. Shami and other members of the mosque and warned them to be careful around Mr. Deng, saying he was probably an informant and out to get someone, Mr. Shami recalled.
The Times provides no explanation regarding why the imam would warn others at the mosque to “be careful” around an FBI informant.
Instead, the article notes that “many Muslims” oppose common law enforcement techniques like informants to combat terrorism:
In case after case, given the perplexing task of sorting out the talkers from the real terrorists, the FBI has relied on informants to tease out a suspect’s intentions. It is a tactic that many Muslims sharply criticize, saying it divides the community and undermines trust in law enforcement.
The Times claims the case against Simpson “fizzled.” The main evidence was Deng’s recorded conversations where Simpson talked about traveling to Somalia to fight with al-Shabaab. Ultimately, Simpson was convicted of lying to the FBI, but not of any terror-related crimes. The FBI also failed to place him on a no-fly list.
Even after the attempted mass murder on Sunday, officials at the Arizona mosque that both killers attended still blamed the FBI and oppose the use of informants:
When mosque leaders learned that Mr. Simpson had not been sent to prison, they figured that “the FBI had done their due diligence, that they thought he was fine and wasn’t a danger to our society,” Mr. Shami said. In retrospect, he said, “They probably were mistaken.”
But even after Sunday’s shootout, which underscored the urgency of FBI efforts to identify dangerous people in the community, mosque leaders have not changed their opposition to the use of informants like Mr. Deng.
The article closes with a story about mosque President Usama Shami calling other recent attempts to use informants as “disappointing” and asking about the FBI: “If they think there’s someone else at the mosque who is a potential threat, why not work with us?” Of course, such cooperation would make the mosque itself an informant.
The Times report echoes a story of Simpson’s conviction published in a local Arizona publication, the Arizona Muslim Voice, which stated that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) “sent out media alerts to advise our community to use caution when speaking with the FBI.” They did not send similar alerts warning of potential terrorists infiltrating the mosque.
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email email@example.com
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.