Like Muhammad, ISIS Calls Jewess Pamela Geller “Khanzeer” (Pig), and Threatens To “Slaughter Her”

130

Islamic scholar Dr. Andrew Bostom explains the religious motivation behind the ISIS death threat:

ISIS fatwa

Hey Fox News: Like Muhammad, ISIS Calls Jewess Pamela Geller “Khanzeer” (Pig), and Threatens To “Slaughter Her”

Story continues below advertisement

“From Muhammad, via the Koran, across space and time, as promulgated today by Sunni Islam’s 1000-year old leading teaching institution, Al-Azhar, and ISIS, alike, Jews as apes/pigs is a “sacralized” theme repeated to incite their slaughter en masse, or as individuals, such as Pamela Geller. Would that Fox News’s morally and factually bereft “pundits” understood this hideous reality.”

**

Yesterday (5/5/15) I blogged about how both CNN and Fox News (excepting Sean Hannity, entirely, and to some extent, Megyn Kelly) have chastised journalist/writer, and activist Pamela Geller for “provoking” the Garland, Texas jihadist attack on a free speech gathering, which featured cartoonist depictions of Islam’s prophet Muhammad. Last evening, Bill O’Reilly at Fox News, with popular conservative radio talk show host Laura Ingraham witlessly chirping in her agreement, doubled down on that despicable and ignorant immoral equivalence.

Here is a re-statement from my 5/5/15 blog of the pathological willful blindness underlying the ugly reactions by Fox News talking heads such as O’Reilly and Ingraham:

Over 13-years after the murderous jihad cataclysm of 9/11/2001, these news intermediaries evidence a woefully deficient understanding of the living Islamic doctrinal and historical basis for behaviors such as the thwarted Garland, TX attack. They are equally oblivious to hard contemporary data on both global, and U.S. Muslim attitudes toward such critically relevant matters as “blasphemy,” as well as what a preeminent, mainstream North American Muslim jurists association opines about “punishment” for criticism of Islam’s prophet. This professional knowledge deficit—a dereliction of journalistic duty—is manifest in their coverage of the free speech event, and/or their interactions with Ms. Geller.

The central defining feature of this deliberately self-bowdlerized conservative media “mindset”—epitomized by O’Reilly and Ingraham—is denial of Islam’s prophet Muhammad’s prototype behaviors which sanction violent jihadism, non-Muslim, especially Jew-hatred, misogyny, and lethal attacks on his—and Islam’s—critics.

Tuesday (5/5/15), ISIS released a direct threat to Pamela Geller—invoking a reference to the Koranic epithet for Jews invoked by Muhammad. Issued from the twitter account of U.S.-born jihadist Abu Ibrahim al-Ameriki, the statement included these words, referring to the failed Garland attack, and an open-ended threat:

Our aim was the khanzeer [pig] Pamela Geller and to show her that we don’t care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter.

Muhammad used the epithets “apes/monkeys” and/or “pigs,” per Koran 5:60, to characterize Jewish victims of his jihadist campaigns, notably the Qurayza tribe, whose males Muhammad subsequently beheaded. Tafsir al-Jalalayn, which remains one of the most popular, as well as the most authoritative Koranic commentaries provides this gloss on 5:60:

[5:60] ..those whom Allah has cursed and put far away from His mercy and with whom he is angry—turning some of them into monkeys and into pigs by transmogrification—and who worshipped false gods. These are the Jews…“False gods” refers to Shayṭān [Satan]. They [the Jews] worship him by obeying him. Such people are in a worse situation—because they will be in the Fire—and further from the right way (the Path of the Truth) [i.e., Islam]

Just prior to orchestrating the en masse execution of the adult males from the besieged Medinan Jewish tribe the Banu Qurayza (and distributing their women, children, and possessions as slave “booty” for the Muslims), Muhammad, according to his earliest Muslim biographer, Ibn Ishaq (d. 767-770), addressed these Jews with menacing, hateful derision: “You brothers of monkeys, has God disgraced you and brought His vengeance upon you?” Another early Muslim biographer of Muhammad, Ibn Sa‘d [d. 845], reports that Muhammad stated, “brothers of monkeys and pigs, fear me, fear me!” A third account, Al-Waqidi’s (d. 822), The Life of Muhammad, reports that as Muhammad approached the Qurayza’s fortress, he proclaimed they were “brothers of monkeys and pigs and worshippers of evil.” Following a later campaign against the Jews of the Khaybar oasis, Muhammad told those surviving his slaughter, and rapine, “As for you, I hate you more than monkeys and pigs.

Here is Ibn Ishaq’s description of Muhammad’s mass beheading of the Banu Qurayza males:

Then they [the men, including post-pubescent boys, of the Jewish tribe Banu Qurayza] surrendered, and the apostle [i.e., Muhammad] confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. Al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka’b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka’b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, “Will you never understand? Don’t you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!” This went on until the apostle made an end of them.

The historical treatment of Jews in Muslim societies since the advent of Islam—chronic oppression, punctuated by outbursts of mass anti-Jewish violence, forced conversion to Islam, or expulsion—has been consistent with such sacralized religious bigotry. Thus the dehumanizing Koranic references to Jews as apes (or apes and pigs) were used explicitly for polemical incitement to large scale, annihilationist pogroms against dhimmi Jewish communities in Granada (within mythically “tolerant” Muslim Spain) during 1066, Baghdad and its environs, proliferating into Iran, at the end of the 13th century, and southern Morocco at the close of the 15th century.

At present, there is continual, monotonous invocation by leading Muslim clerics for example from Sunni Islam’s Vatican equivalent, Al-Azhar University, of this Jew-hating motif from the Koran (and other foundational Muslim texts). Thus the late (d. 2010) Grand Imam of Al-Azhar Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi declared that the Jews were “enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs.”

From Muhammad, via the Koran, across space and time, as promulgated today by Sunni Islam’s 1000-year old leading teaching institution, Al-Azhar, and ISIS, alike, Jews as apes/pigs is a “sacralized” theme repeated to incite their slaughter en masse, or as individuals, such as Pamela Geller. Would that Fox News’s morally and factually bereft “pundits” understood this hideous reality

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
130 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LoriCJ
LoriCJ
8 years ago

A bunch of cowards for sure. A mere women puts such a dent in their supposed manhood.

Muhammed Usman
Muhammed Usman
8 years ago
Reply to  LoriCJ

10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies.

THIS IS FOR WHAT YOU SPEAK FOR BANI-QURAYZA…. READ YOUR OWN BOOK FIRST

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

This instruction was time-limited. It applied to the Canaanites, who at that time were ruthless and cruel pagans, involved in all manner of bad things–like child sacrifice offerings to their false gods, etc. By contrast, the commands of Mohammed are not based on any specific situation, but apply to everyone at all times. Don’t know if that helps… I’ll try to find out more and get back to it.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

Okay. I’m getting back to you about this. From the Torah scholars at AISH:

http://www.aish.com/atr/Waging_War_Against_Canaan.html?mobile=yes

It was, as the ancient world was, “destroy or be destroyed” — not like today. Yet G-d had Joshua contact first for peace–either by making peace with the Jewish people or by leaving. One tribe made peace. But as I remembered, the Canaanites were involved in very violent and immoral idol worship. Think about ISIS or some of the Mexican cartels, and you’ll get the picture. If you were having to confront them, it would be destroy or be destroyed. No middle ground. Yet the Canaanites were provided options, which was an incredible thing in the ancient world. Again, this is historically-dependent and not a command for all situations. For that you can study the Ten Commandments and note the difference.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Don

Also: the Israelites were not allowed to take the women as SEX SLAVES–but as household servants or workers in the fields, along with their children–and were then responsible for them and their welfare/survival.

Contrast to the pagan cultures who would capture pregnant females, rip them open alive, and cast their infants onto the rocks. Or consider the rule about not boiling a kid in its mother’s milk–what the pagans would do is to boil a kid alive it its mother’s milk while it bleated and screamed, and they would have the mother there too, who would be crying out and bleating and screaming and panicking–while the idolaters laughed and mocked and then ate the kid in front of its mother. G-d said NO to that. The ancient world was cruel and merciless. There could be no mixing of the ways.

JohnnyBowe
JohnnyBowe
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

A big difference here. Jews and Christians grew up while muslims are still stuck on an ancient pacifier of death and subjugation. It must be horrible to live in that ancient crib of yours.

Raaven Black
Raaven Black
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

And what decade are we living in?

guest
guest
8 years ago

“…both CNN and Fox News (excepting Sean Hannity, entirely, and to some extent, Megyn Kelly) have chastised journalist/writer, and activist Pamela Geller for “provoking” the Garland, Texas jihadist attack on a free speech gathering…”

The MSM needs to get real.

The very existence of kuffars in general, and Jews in particular, is sufficient provocation for jihad. They don’t actually have to do anything to offend the Muslims to deserve extermination.

treebird
treebird
8 years ago

Fox news (especially O’Reilly) showed their cowardice by criticizing the event and Pamela, Instead they should have stood with freedom and condemned the attack!

John Jones
John Jones
8 years ago
Reply to  treebird

treebird, I agree. I watch Fox news and O’Reilly all the time, and cannot belive what O’Reilly stated. I am very disappointed, and told him so.

JewJew Beans
JewJew Beans
8 years ago
Reply to  John Jones

Why surprised by BOR’s stance? Have you not watched the lame and soft interview he had with Obama? TWICE? Man is a clown, I’ve been watching Lou Dobbs on Fox Business at 7:00PM EST instead of BOR. Dobbs is a tough guy and takes no punches.

KathleenDByram
KathleenDByram
8 years ago
Reply to  JewJew Beans

❋✦✧❋✦✧Set Profit From your Home with Google Marketing@nj7:::

,,,

➨➨➨➨https://ViewpointWork32Cr0wd.com/work/care

JohnnyBowe
JohnnyBowe
8 years ago
Reply to  JewJew Beans

Spot on JJB! O’Reilly is a joke if you’re searching for true conservatism and I’m afraid those that hitch their rope to that mule are going to be very, very let down. I’m done with the Bill O’Reilly commercial.

426 HemiCuda
426 HemiCuda
8 years ago
Reply to  JohnnyBowe

A long time ago I was a fan of Bill O’Reilly he’s become soft and has become a closet liberal.

JohnnyBowe
JohnnyBowe
8 years ago
Reply to  treebird

I gave up on Bill O’Reilly a long time ago. He professes a love of the constitution with one breath and then spouts out something completely unconstitutional in the next! The best I can figure is either 1) He’s a political schizophrenic who has a conservative philosophy but guided by a liberal “feelings” mindset or 2) He feels he’s so intelligent that the founding fathers genius come second to his own epiphanies and trump the constitution.

PPs43
PPs43
8 years ago

Hey, have you noticed that the decaying bodies of jihadi muslims give off a stink just like spoiled khanzeer? God sure has a great sense of humor.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  PPs43

Couple questions…are you a vet, how do you know what they smell like, and what is ‘spoiled khanzeer’?

PPs43
PPs43
8 years ago
Reply to  famouswolf

I’ve stood downwind from enough corpses to know that stench and I’ve buried enough over-ripe feral pig remains to be able to equate the two.

Khanzeer = Pig. Read the article’s headline.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  PPs43

LOL, 10-4, I need to wake up.
Fortunately I haven’t had the experience, at least not yet. It probably smells just like dead anything, though.
I grew up in the rural South and remember the odor well enough. Dead dogs, snakes, fish, and a few other assorted critters, yes, but not a human or a hog, thank God.

Gumby
Gumby
8 years ago
Reply to  PPs43

Well that is the most interesting post of the day IMO.

BigGaySteve
BigGaySteve
8 years ago
Reply to  PPs43

That’s because we slipped some bacon bits on the body. You can take a drinking straw, cut it into pieces, melt an end, stuff it with bacon bits then melt the other & you can always be ready to send moslems to hell.

whitefalcon74
whitefalcon74
8 years ago

islam cannot stand to see the truth she talks about.they cannot stand a woman beating them down into submission! they are all scum cowards.And the media is sleeping with the devils them selves keeping quiet pathetic! traitors!!

Muhammed Usman
Muhammed Usman
8 years ago
Reply to  whitefalcon74

10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies.

THIS IS FOR WHAT YOU SPEAK FOR BANI-QURAYZA…. READ YOUR OWN BOOK FIRS

Michael
Michael
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

The world 3,000 years ago was a different place. Jews have progressed. Muslims like you haven’t.

JohnnyBowe
JohnnyBowe
8 years ago
Reply to  Michael

Oops, I said more or less the same thing before reading this Michael, I guess I plagiarized you! Sorry! lol

Michael
Michael
8 years ago
Reply to  JohnnyBowe

No problem. I haven’t copyrighted anything.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

Classic tu quoque fallacy of argumentation. Of course, pointing this out to the izlamic-nazi in question is nothing more than putting pearls before swine.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

This instruction was time-limited. It applied to the Canaanites, who at that time were ruthless and cruel pagans, involved in all manner of bad things–like child sacrifice offerings to their false gods, etc. By contrast, the commands of Mohammed are not based on any specific situation, but apply to everyone at all times. Don’t know if that helps… I’ll try to find out more and get back to it.

—-

Okay. I’m getting back to you about this. From the Torah scholars at AISH:

http://www.aish.com/atr/Waging

It was, as the ancient world was, “destroy or be destroyed” — not like today. Yet G-d had Joshua contact first for peace–either by making peace with the Jewish people or by leaving. One tribe made peace. But as I remembered, the Canaanites were involved in very violent and immoral idol worship. Think about ISIS or some of the Mexican cartels, and you’ll get the picture. If you were having to confront them, it would be destroy or be destroyed. No middle ground. Yet the Canaanites were provided options, which was an incredible thing in the ancient world. Again, this is historically-dependent and not a command for all situations. For that you can study the Ten Commandments and note the difference.

Also: the Israelites were not allowed to take the women as SEX SLAVES–but as household servants or workers in the fields, along with their children–and were then responsible for them and their welfare/survival.

Contrast to the pagan cultures who would capture pregnant females, rip them open alive, and cast their infants onto the rocks. Or consider the rule about not boiling a kid in its mother’s milk–what the pagans would do is to boil a kid alive it its mother’s milk while it bleated and screamed, and they would have the mother there too, who would be crying out and bleating and screaming and panicking–while the idolaters laughed and mocked and then ate the kid in front of its mother. G-d said NO to that. The ancient world was cruel and merciless. There could be no mixing of the ways.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman
Chippy
Chippy
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

Go back to the middle east and join the Islamic HELL

albeit
albeit
8 years ago
Reply to  whitefalcon74

Maybe the drive-bys ought to start quoting scripture! Then we would know who the bad guys truly are…

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago

Sigh. All we need to know is that islam is a deadly enemy and we have to kill enough of them to make them stop before they bring us down.
This is NOT a war with an honorable foe…they only understand one currency, that of violence and death.
The sooner we get used to that simple idea, the better our chances.
These threats…are a they a surprise for any of us, from Pamela down? Or the attempt on the cartoon exhibition?

Muhammed Usman
Muhammed Usman
8 years ago
Reply to  famouswolf

10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies.

THIS IS FOR WHAT YOU SPEAK FOR BANI-QURAYZA…. READ YOUR OWN BOOK FIRST!

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

Out of context, prick.
But you already know that, don’t you, you lying pig?

AAP Rooters
AAP Rooters
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

It’s a shame you’ve mistaken Satan’s masterpiece (The Koran) for Sacred Scripture. But that’s what indoctrination into evil from babyhood does to a person.

albeit
albeit
8 years ago
Reply to  AAP Rooters

Amen!!

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

This instruction was time-limited. It applied to the Canaanites, who at that time were ruthless and cruel pagans, involved in all manner of bad things–like child sacrifice offerings to their false gods, etc. By contrast, the commands of Mohammed are not based on any specific situation, but apply to everyone at all times. Don’t know if that helps… I’ll try to find out more and get back to it.

—-

Okay. I’m getting back to you about this. From the Torah scholars at AISH:

http://www.aish.com/atr/Waging_War_Against_Canaan.html?mobile=yes
It was, as the ancient world was, “destroy or be destroyed” — not like today. Yet G-d had Joshua contact first for peace–either by making peace with the Jewish people or by leaving. One tribe made peace. But as I remembered, the Canaanites were involved in very violent and immoral idol worship. Think about ISIS or some of the Mexican cartels, and you’ll get the picture. If you were having to confront them, it would be destroy or be destroyed. No middle ground. Yet the Canaanites were provided options, which was an incredible thing in the ancient world. Again, this is historically-dependent and not a command for all situations. For that you can study the Ten Commandments and note the difference.

Also: the Israelites were not allowed to take the women as SEX SLAVES–but as household servants or workers in the fields, along with their children–and were then responsible for them and their welfare/survival.

Contrast to the pagan cultures who would capture pregnant females, rip them open alive, and cast their infants onto the rocks. Or consider the rule about not boiling a kid in its mother’s milk–what the pagans would do is to boil a kid alive it its mother’s milk while it bleated and screamed, and they would have the mother there too, who would be crying out and bleating and screaming and panicking–while the idolaters laughed and mocked and then ate the kid in front of its mother. G-d said NO to that. The ancient world was cruel and merciless. There could be no mixing of the ways.

TJStokes
TJStokes
8 years ago
Reply to  Don

You are wasting your breath. Islam is the dark side, so full of hate and evil that they cannot reason, or be reasoned with. What saddens me is that if muslims would just put away their hate and cry out in silent prayer, in Jesus name, they would find out how quick he is to forgive them, and they would know the true power of God, and what it truly feels like to have the sins washed away.

When dealing with islam, remember that you are dealing with satan. When attempting to exorcise a demon, you must never answer them. Only ask them questions. Ask them what miracles mohamed did while he was alive. Then tell them how many Moses did. Tell them how many Jesus did. Then ask them how it is that the greatest prophet that ever lived, had epilepsy that he could not cure, did not raise anyone from the dead, nor could he make water come from a rock. Islam is a political psycosis that is full of holes in reason, that it is pathetic. Any thinking person could figure it out, even if they were raised under the barbarism.

Sifter
Sifter
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

Gee, you can cut, copy and paste 3x! Wonderful. But I agree with you, if only the Jews would march and slaughter like your copy/ paste biblical text says, why the world would no longer have a Jihad problem, now would it?

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

http://www.aish.com/atr/Waging_War_Against_Canaan.html?mobile=yes

Here’s the actual link. Don’t know why it keeps reverting in the copy.

albeit
albeit
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

God hated those lying Canaanites!!! Pretty much like the Muslims of today!!!

Chippy
Chippy
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

You are obsessed with killing but that is so normal for your type. Go and learn and understand the past and learn from it.

TJStokes
TJStokes
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

I love the hypocrisy that is Islam. So tell me Mr. hater, I mean Usman. Is this thing you speak of, laying siege and killing and such, evil? Is it only evil when others do it? Is it evil when muslims do it? Are you evil by your actions, or is it that only others are evil by their actions. Are we to forgive you, when you forgive none? Last question? And it is a serious one. According to that insane dead prophet of yours, and I wish no peace upon him or the hell he occupies, just how many evil acts does a follower of satan, or allah as you call him, have to do in order to get into heaven? Does it take 3 murders? Do you have to steal, lie, cheat, or just sing El Taquiyya all day long? Do you also know that there is another Holy book that says you will know satan because he will call himself the greatest of the “liars and deceivers”? Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe you just quoted from that book. So is that book correct? Is it Holy? Or do you just quote from it to be a smart ass?

albeit
albeit
8 years ago
Reply to  famouswolf

For every one patriotic American that dies at the hands of Muslims there will be ten of them that dies!!! I call it the ten to one rule!!!

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  albeit

That’s the way I see it.
Also, their ‘religion’ needs to die.

Muhammed Usman
Muhammed Usman
8 years ago

Deuteronomy 20:10-14New International Version (NIV)
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies.

THIS IS FOR WHAT YOU SPEAK FOR BANI-QURAYZA…. READ YOUR OWN BOOK FIRST

JewJew Beans
JewJew Beans
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

So please point out in modern history where this has happened, where Christians have beheaded Muslims or put out death penalty fatwah on the people who oppose critics. So shut up and take your deceitful taqiyya somewhere else.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Muhammed Usman

This instruction was time-limited. It applied to the Canaanites, who at that time were ruthless and cruel pagans, involved in all manner of bad things–like child sacrifice offerings to their false gods, etc. By contrast, the commands of Mohammed are not based on any specific situation, but apply to everyone at all times. Don’t know if that helps… I’ll try to find out more and get back to it.

—-

Okay. I’m getting back to you about this. From the Torah scholars at AISH:

http://www.aish.com/atr/Waging_War_Against_Canaan.html?mobile=yes

It was, as the ancient world was, “destroy or be destroyed” — not like today. Yet G-d had Joshua contact first for peace–either by making peace with the Jewish people or by leaving. One tribe made peace. But as I remembered, the Canaanites were involved in very violent and immoral idol worship. Think about ISIS or some of the Mexican cartels, and you’ll get the picture. If you were having to confront them, it would be destroy or be destroyed. No middle ground. Yet the Canaanites were provided options, which was an incredible thing in the ancient world. Again, this is historically-dependent and not a command for all situations. For that you can study the Ten Commandments and note the difference.

Also: the Israelites were not allowed to take the women as SEX SLAVES–but as household servants or workers in the fields, along with their children–and were then responsible for them and their welfare/survival.

Contrast to the pagan cultures who would capture pregnant females, rip them open alive, and cast their infants onto the rocks. Or consider the rule about not boiling a kid in its mother’s milk–what the pagans would do is to boil a kid alive it its mother’s milk while it bleated and screamed, and they would have the mother there too, who would be crying out and bleating and screaming and panicking–while the idolaters laughed and mocked and then ate the kid in front of its mother. G-d said NO to that. The ancient world was cruel and merciless. There could be no mixing of the ways.

Brock
Brock
8 years ago

I applaud your courage and unwavering defense of liberty and Western civilization, Pam. I wish we had many more like you.

John Jones
John Jones
8 years ago

Pamela, I salute you! Keep up the fight! I lost many friends and family members on 9/11. I am not a hateful person, but to me, there are no “Good” Muslims! If war comes, this time, we will throw them into the Ovens!

Tari Lee Harlan
Tari Lee Harlan
8 years ago
Reply to  John Jones

Heil Hitler!!!

John Jones
John Jones
8 years ago

Are you in Love with me or something?

Tari Lee Harlan
Tari Lee Harlan
8 years ago
Reply to  John Jones

Just calling a Nazi a Nazi

John Jones
John Jones
8 years ago

Troll Nazi!

Tari Lee Harlan
Tari Lee Harlan
8 years ago
Reply to  John Jones

Oh, so your both a troll and a Nazi, thank you for your clarification Mr. Jones.

"Knuckles"
"Knuckles"
8 years ago
Reply to  John Jones

She sure is, though I think she swings both ways.

ApolloSpeaks
ApolloSpeaks
8 years ago

ISIS DIDN’T GET VERY FAR

with Simpson and Soofi who died like dogs without killing one infidel. And thank God for Pam that these bloodthirsty savages are dead. If it weren’t for the Mohammed Exhibit they would have likely struck a busy mall, a crowded sports arena, a jam packed theater or elementary school where the security wasn’t as strong. The Mohammed Exhibit may have saved dozens of innocent citizens from death and injury; and real patriotic Americans should be thankful for it.

Click http://www.apollospeaks.com for my defense of Pam’s exhibit.

Michael
Michael
8 years ago

They need to supply Pamela’s security officers with jihawg ammo, if they can obtain it.

Sifter
Sifter
8 years ago
Reply to  Michael

Lol…or perhaps Halal hollow points

Daryl Nuccio
Daryl Nuccio
8 years ago

I was furious watching FOX News last night (except for Hannity). O’Reilly’s head is in the sand. He should have been at Brooklyn college to see how “moderate” Muslims behave. Thank you Pam for fighting for our rapidly dwindling freedom.

Bill
Bill
8 years ago

Pam said that she is willing to die for freedom of speech.

Not so fast Pam!

As George Patton said, “the object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other son-of-a-bitch die for his country.”

If that POS Obongo in the White House had any guts, ISIS would be seeing the full fury of the US military. 90,000 tons of diplomacy goes a long way:

http://media.moddb.com/cache/images/groups/1/3/2258/thumb_620x2000/90000TonsOfDiplomacy.jpg

Either we face ISIS now, or face it piecemeal while they wreak havoc everywhere including the US mainland.

James B. Schwartz
James B. Schwartz
8 years ago

If ISIS does come, they’ll find out that it’s them that will be the target. For every person they kill, hundreds of innocent Muslims will die, they will be starting a Muslin War because Americans will not trust any Muslim. When this happens, thousands of Muslims
will leave because they will fear for their lives. If they think Americans will not fight back, there are in for a very big surprise.

WhatWouldYodaDo
WhatWouldYodaDo
8 years ago

I wish that were so…Its pretty clear where most Americans stand. They seem to stand with our white house and our main stream media. They are either ignorant or cowardly.

JohnnyBowe
JohnnyBowe
8 years ago

I’m afraid you may be right. Heads in the sand until it’s too late. Scares the shit out of me.

albeit
albeit
8 years ago

Islam is all take and no give…Well there on my turf now and the time is now for a rude awakening!!

Philip
Philip
8 years ago

U.S. Media loved the “War on Women” meme. Here it actually is and some rush to appease the abuser. Typical liberal. Pathetic.
Think we need Art Contests in every “Free” State!

SolHachuel
SolHachuel
8 years ago
Reply to  Philip

Philip, not to mention the recent Brookly College event where savages called for smashing Geller’s head with a brick. THAT was not free speech; that was incitement. The cartoon event had no calls to violence. The call to violence came fromIslam and the two dead savage morons.

Philip
Philip
8 years ago
Reply to  SolHachuel

Savages being savage. Par for the course. 🙁

Walter Sieruk
Walter Sieruk
8 years ago

It was even on FOX NEWS this morning that ISIS threaten death for Pamela Geller and the news also report is that ISIS has threaten to kill anyone who supports her. With that I will not be intimidated. So I give my full support to Pamela Geller. For she is a very brave and courageous women to stand up to Islamic terrorism and to exposes its many evils.

Judi
Judi
8 years ago
Reply to  Walter Sieruk

I sincerely hope she takes precautions against these threats. Unfortunately,like Geert Wilders, she might have to employ 24hr protection.

JewJew Beans
JewJew Beans
8 years ago

Personally, I am going to donate to the unafraid “jewess” warrior Pamela Geller. We need to make sure that the funds are there for ongoing security for her and her loved ones.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago

Anyone wonder why there was no protesters? I know they tried to peddle the line that they were above all that and that they smugly ‘supported’ Pamela’s right to free ‘bigoted’ speech. Interestingly however this was not the position they took at Brooklyn College just a few weeks ago? Do you think they had warning in advance? I mean the failed jihadi’s were possibly packing explosives right?

JewJew Beans
JewJew Beans
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

They do not protest, they just kill. It’s inherent with them, based on their cult’s instructions.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  JewJew Beans

Did you see the incident at BC where Pamela attempted to give a speech? 80% of the audience were Muslim, or Muslim sympathizers, who turned up as a resulted of a concerted social networking campaign to disrupt Pamela’s talk on free speech. My point was they were happy to protest in that instance however, in this instance not one protester showed up which was in stark contrast to the preceding event. Instead they (not ISIS but American Muslims) claimed they were above Pamela’s so-called bigotry and that is why they did not ‘dignify’ the event by their presence.

Haroon Moghul, a fellow at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, opined a piece titled ‘Don’t be fooled by Pamela Geller’ in which he explained why no one bothered to protest this event because they were ‘above’ it.

I am strongly suggesting they did not protest because they were either directly warned not to or their was sufficient chatter on the street to keep them at bay. I assert this because just several weeks earlier, in Brooklyn, they were not so ‘above’ it and happy to protest at full throttle.

JewJew Beans
JewJew Beans
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

Yes, I read Moghul’s article and Pamela’s article too. And I do agree with your conclusion on why they did not protest the event. I do know about islam from history and personal experience.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

I hope you are wrong, because that implies they are getting smarter in how they carry out their attacks.
But now I think about it I think you may be on to something. No one said this war was going to be easy, I guess.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

I have to admit, I’ve wondered how the two izlamic-nazi terrorists knew the conference was over, because it seemed their attack coincided w/the end of the conference (i.e. in the expectation people would be leaving the facility). It almost seems like they had someone on the inside.

Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

There were no protests because word got out in the Moslem community that jihadis would be there, and they wanted it to go down without being implicated.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Dave

That’s precisely what I’ve been thinking then they spout a smug line in the media about being ‘above’ all that! I smell a rat!!!

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

Not only were they avoiding implication possibly but also potentially being blown up! As they say the difference between a moderate and an extremist is the moderate gets the extremist to kill for them.

Nathan
Nathan
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

My thoughts, exactly. They will protest against any and everything, all the time, until the killing has to be done. Then. Nadda, nothing…. It’s like a muslim free zone. Well it is until the AK47’s start barking. Where were the protesters at the Denmark shooting?

But it’s not organised, through the mosques. Oh no that would be islamophobic! FFS!

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

Maybe, or maybe that’s giving them too much credit. They do suicide bombs in Israel and elsewhere regardless of crowd composition all the time. They give no regard to who exactly they are killing with their bombs.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  famouswolf

I understand your point but remember this is America and they’re still largely operating in stealth mode….Muslim collateral damage may be on the cards – when the West is more cowed but right now I think that would be showing their hand to soon.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

I agree. I have posted on several sites that maybe the thing to do is provoke them to showing their hand too soon, as the art exhibit seems to have done.
I hate to say it, but I hope they do unleash the 71 sleepers in 15 cities they bragged about last night. That just might wake up the sleeping giant so it can crush them and rid humanity of their plague. It could also make 9/11 look like a schoolyard accident in comparison…assuming it’s not just talk. The sooner a tragic wake up call such as that happens the better…and it needs to be something even the sam (sorry assed media) can’t defend, excuse or cover up. Sounds like just what the country needs, unfortunately.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  famouswolf

It is a scary thought but this clash of civilizations is coming one way or another. Not because we’re looking for it but because Islam is an expansionist and violent system of political thought masquerading as a religion. Muslim non-adherents to the hard core political agenda of Islam will be swept away, along with the rest of the civil world in which they’ve found the safety to ignore the real dictates of their faith. Either that, or to save their asses they’ll become just as brutal as the so-called radicals they claim to oppose.

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago

It’s a tricky case. On the one hand, I admire Pamela’s courage in standing for a strong U.S. and Israel and Western values. I don’t doubt her sincerity or the very real alarm about the worldwide encroachment of radical Islamists, …She is right to lead the way in signaling we in the West will not back down one inch in standing up for America and Israel and for human rights. BUT .. it still seems to me that this latest gambit, the “draw Mohammed” contest, showed more guts than common sense and was irresponsible. Sorry Pamela, I love you, but if these extremist Muslims are, as you say, “savages” (and I’m inclined to agree with you there), how can you expect any reaction other than the one you got? I am NOT saying you deserved it or blaming you for the actions of others. What I am saying is, if you are living next to a sociopath, by all means live your life normally and fully, refuse to be bullied (and hire security!), but don’t expect that if you throw a party to taunt the sociopath you’re going to achieve anything other than a violent reaction. Freedom of speech is a sacred value and I intend to use mine to champion American capitalism, Israel’s right to self-defense, and yes, freedom of speech itself, and I defend your right to do what you did. I just don’t think it showed common sense. They are lunatics and fanatics or, at best, at an earlier stage of societal development and can’t even grasp much less respect the concept of “free speech.” That said, we should and must stand up to them when they are actually coming to harm us (such as by allowing the establishment of terrorist states, allowing distorted propaganda against Israel to go unchallenged, or changing the way we observe OUR religion (wearing kipas in public, etc.) On that score I am 100 percent with you. It’s the extra bit of provocation I disagree with, and that I think is what O’Reilly and Ingraham were getting at last night. It seems ridicule of religious icons is an odd place to go when there are so many other pressing issues involving Islamic domination that need to be addressed, such as treatment of women, which I know you’ve done a lot of good work on. As Jews, we don’t like it when hateful extremists in the Mideast mock and propagandize against Israel. We wouldn’t like it if they burned our Torah (well, some of us might not care but Orthodox Jews would be appalled and in our history, some have died rather than spit on or burn the Torah). And Christians like O’Reilly and Ingraham are hurt by vulgar attacks on their religious icons. Of course, we get it that such attacks must be allowed and the principle is almost absolute. But at this juncture, with all the oppression of women in many corners of the Muslim world, the slaughter of Christians, and the ongoing attacks against Israel (all of which I know you write about) attacking their sacred icons is an odd place to start educating, and it comes across more as demeaning them than standing up for what we hold dear. As Netanyahu said to Congress about Iran: “Be strong, be brave, do not fear or dread them.” But there is no need to go that extra bit and actually seek to provoke them. Also, Pamela, we need you to stay alive and well and keep doing your important work on human rights concerning the That’s just my two cents. Be safe!

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Um just being a living breathing Jew or Christian is an act of provocation to these people. They are constantly ‘provoked’ by everything that does not conform to the teachings of Islam in whichever way they see fit to apply it.

Just being a clitorally intact woman is an act of provocation, as is being a female and acting independently or being a ‘submissive’ homosexual or an atheist or or or or or THE LIST GOES ON…..

Drawing satirical cartoons has long been a sacred tradition in the West and we now have to submit to Sharia because these clowns say it’s provoking them?

They provoked us long ago when they killed the Dutch cartoonist and as far as I can see Pamela is trying to prove the point that if we keep allowing them to draw the lines in the sand we will all to soon find ourselves pushed back into the sea.

The contest was NOT and act of provocation but a RECLAMATION of a vital Western tradition that enshrines the right of free men to speak freely and critically through comedy and art.

Sifter
Sifter
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

..why, I’m perpetually offended by that..:)

Nathan
Nathan
8 years ago
Reply to  Sifter

Islam the religion of offence. By everybody!

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Sifter

Here’s an image that’s truly offensive ISIS demands female genital mutilation Islam the religion of peace….

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

Oh no anesthetic by the way…and those inhumane leftist bastards and right wing cowards would have us what? Keep our mouths shut and surrender? NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER as long as I live and breathe so help me G-D!

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

I think the case of the Danish cartoonists was different in that they are cartoonists by trade; similarly Charlie Hebdo’s cartoonists were simply doing what they do for a living (commentating via cartoons)… Whereas this event was undertaken by a journalist/commentator whose talent I believe is better utilized in exposing the human rights abuses being committed by extremist Muslims. It still seems to me that, to go out of the way to construct an event mocking Muslim religious icons–when we all know for a fact that that specific thing is what most inflames these extremist loons–is unwise and unnecessary.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Are you seriously suggesting that only employed cartoonists are allowed to make comment because it’s their job? Or should even they now cease and desist in fearful submission to the false imposition of Islamic sharia anti-blasphemy laws?

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

I am not saying anything is not “allowed.” I defend her right to have done this. It just wasn’t very sensible. Pamela had more credibility before she decided on this approach. It reminds me of that of the Texas preacher who wanted to burn the Quran. Just alienates anyone on the margins who dislikes Islamist extremism and recognizes we need to face it and fight it, but who does not want to go to war with 1.4 billion Muslims. Take a look online at almost any site–including conservative and independent ones–not firmly entrenched in the anti-jihadist movement. Public opinion –even conservative opinion–is not on Pamela’s side with this. Again, I am saying this in friendship; we are on the same side. You don’t want to recognize it, but this was a misstep. We all make mistakes and I believe the intention was good but it’s being widely misunderstood by pretty much every commentator and source outside the most ardently already informed circles. Now she’s in danger and nothing is accomplished. It wasn’t smart.

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Please don’t assume what I do or do not want to recognize. Just because I don’t see it as a misstep does not imply any belligerence or ignorance on my behalf. Furthermore, I for one do not adhere to the logical fallacy either, that the majority opinion is always the right opinion.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Melinda, of course I believe you wrote in friendship to Pamela. And I believe what you say about majority opinion. Pity.

But Pamela and Robert explained it. I like to give my perspective, what I understand:

You, I, we, we have a culture, a “Meaningful Democratic ideology” to defend. It is threathened by and in competition with a totalitarian Islamic ideology (at least followed by a big part of Muslims). Besides these 2, partly overlapping perhaps, you have divers religions/ lifestyles.

We want now and always fair competition, and in that let the best win.

But one ideology, Islam, plays false. It (or a small part of it’s adherents) intimidates, by killing cartoonists.

The big question is: Is this intimidation working or not? Pamela, Robert, many of us think that it is working; That all religions/ lifestyles get routinely “negative reactions”, but Islam is spared much more than all the others (in relevance to seize perhaps). If this is true, Islam and all Muslims do really get an unfair advantage!

If this intimidation, done by violent Muslims, indeed WORKS, the situation mankind is in changes.

Intimidation may well increase, precisely because it worked! If it does, MORE people will get murdered, not less, more pressure on freedom will pursue. In a way, the bullies are testing us. They other bullies watch closely and learn.

In the way of Pamela and Robert bullies learn that “intimidation does not pay” and that will lead to less intimidation, less murders in the long run.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Melinda, we live in a world in which it is very hard to imagine, what will happen if “intimidation” works.

I now give you an only “hypothetical” theory, something hard to imagine, but perhaps illustrative;

Suppose Scientologists, Mormons, Jehovah’s witnesses, perhaps Falun Gong, or some new sects, see that Islam is treated very carefully, that it is spared the harsh criticism, ridicule, contempt, hate-speech they themselves routinely have to endure.

Suppose some parts of the followers of these other “religions/ lifestyles” now also decide to Intimidate and suppose a few critics, opponents of them get murdered by “extremist Scientologists, Mormons etc.

And then those religions will also be much more “handled with care” and gain the unfair advantage we think Islam now has.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Melinda, in my view the Meaningful Democratic Ideology that we have and our allies, that also overlap with us; the Christians, the Atheists, Mormons, Scientologists, Jehovah’s witnesses etc. They have

a total even subconscious commitment to restraint of violence and violent members in reaction to only verbal or pictorial negative denigrating, blaspheming, hating messages directed at their tenets, books, leaders, values, laws etc.

The people in the media, politics (such as D.Trump), the majority of citizens, the people who now are alienated from Pam

That you described;
They too have total subconscious trust in the non-violent nature of all these religions/ lifestyles.

Had the people you described NOT trusted ALL followers of all other religions/ lifestyles so completely they could have feared that, pardon me, kowtowing one inch to Islamic intimidation, would stimulate the “sociopath followers of the other rel/ lifest. to also intimidate by killing and that fear would have made them stand in large majority behind Pam Geller.

So as I see it, the other religions/ lifestyles besides Islam are in a way being

PUNISHED for their total-taken for granted-adherence to non-violent reaction to non-violent provocation.

By A. All those that henceforth will send out “negative images” about these other religions and not about Islam. (example: South Park; it ridicules, denigrates all religions/ lifestyles EXCEPT Islam)
B. All those that warn against somehow “retaliating” against Islam by increasing the negative images towards it. For all sorts of reasons, primarily the “innocence” of the vast majority of Muslims (although only their feelings were hurt, not any bodies or rights)

In view of this logic I tend to think that Pam’s course, although rejected by so many, is the most wise in the long run.

Demsci
Demsci
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Melinda, consider; Now the Westerners are supposed to fight only the “extremist” Muslims, the sociopaths if you will.

But those “sociopaths” may be smarter than we think, because they see that “violent intimidation works”, They may say: “Just look at the media and politicians and Westerners, how they take care not to insult Islam too much.”

And although the “terrorists” are beyond change, can only be fought, think hard about the Muslim majority!

The Muslim majority might realize, in part, that “intimidation by the extremists WORKS” and that Islam and all Muslims prophit from it;

Islam is much less attacked, much more respectful treated by many of the media and politicians (just listen to Obama and Cameron and all those other politicians who declare how great Islam really is, right after each murderous intimidation by “extremists”.)

So the majority of Muslims might have an incentive to let the extremists go on, in secret of course, and not throw them out of the Ummah categorally.

But if murderous intimidations by extremists are all followed by peaceful “draw Mohammed” and “burn-Quran” manifestations, when ONLY the feelings of Muslims get hurt,

the Muslim majority in that case may well really DITCH the now counterproductive extremists!

That is Pam’s vision I think, it is mine anyway.

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

oh, and also alienates anyone who dislikes the degradation and ridicule of religion.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Duh, pi$$lam denigrates Christianity and Judaism in all its holy books. Furthermore, musswein have been killing Hindus, Buddhists, Christians and Jews without ANY provocation whatsoever. FU.

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago
Reply to  IronMaiden

AND possibly alienates law enforcement officials and other members of the public who realize resources have to be allocated away from protecting the general public to beef up security for events like this that are guaranteed to produce violence

IronMaiden
IronMaiden
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

She paid for her own security

Nathan
Nathan
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Wash your mouth out with soap. It will do you good.

Anything before a ‘But’ doesn’t count, so don’t use the word ‘But’. So try saying what you just said without the word ‘But’ and you won’t be able to. I rest my case.

Don
Don
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

Melinda: silencing political or social critique of Mohammad and Islam WOULD BE backing down to the Shariah– this is against Torah and common sense. The cartoons provoke because Islam is wrong. Go look at the cartoons. Unlike Charlie Hebdo material, which were in the greasy, gutter kinds of cartoons IMO, the ones in Garland were for the most part THOUGHT provoking. And that’s the point. We need to have the conversation. What do we do and where do we draw the line on Moslem aggression and control? No one questions the fact that Moslems commit violence.everyone is trying to keep them happy by obeying them. I encourage you to find the speeches at this event and stop listening to news station talking points.

Nathan
Nathan
8 years ago
Reply to  Don

Yeah, and people would have seen this, if anybody had the balls to show the actual cartoons, but they didn’t. They are still winning, because nobody showed them. 🙁

#Imissmyballs

Edit to add: showed them, the cartoons. Not their balls! 😀

Melinda
Melinda
8 years ago
Reply to  Don

I am not in favor of silencing any speech. I am offering my thoughts–in friendship–about whether I think this cartoon contest was a smart idea. Or will help the cause. I don’t think it was smart and I don’t think it will help. It has already alienated plenty of people who are otherwise allies.

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  Melinda

It’s not irresponsible…it’s strategy. We need them to show their true nature. It seems to be working.
This is not something you can stay on the fence about. You are either with them or against them. Which is it for YOU?

happytrails5
happytrails5
8 years ago

America seems to have a major case of battered wife syndrome. Where we think we must keep our abuser calm otherwise we deserve to be beaten. NO!! There is no right to never be offended, and there is no right to murder if you are offended. If your don’t like it – LEAVE.

Dan
Dan
8 years ago

Funny that the Quran refers to false gods as Satan Many Christians feel that Allah is Satan or the fallen angel of the Bible. Christians are the biggest threat to Islam

famouswolf
famouswolf
8 years ago
Reply to  Dan

Partly right. Western civilization as a whole is the threat, and Christianity is the beating heart of the West. It is a threat to them because their way of life can in no way or form compete for the hearts and minds of human beings in the long run, and they know it in their rotten hearts.
This is an existential struggle. In fifty years there will be no West or no islam. I don’t think there will be a middle ground.
I also think we are in the first stages of the worst war in human history. Brought to you by the present ‘administration’ and the cowards and fools on the left. Who knows, maybe by Satan too.

Dan
Dan
8 years ago

I think Americans should start turning off Fox news.
pamela Geller is a patriot

Tenton
Tenton
8 years ago

Not to worry, Pamela. False Islam has killed thousands who did nothing to them at all. So…the chance of being killed by so called Islamics , like ISIS is very great for all of us….even if we say nothing against them at all. All of ISIS must face International War Crimes Tribunals…no exceptions…when this so-called Caliphate of Shi Thed Baghaddi lies smoldering the the dust of our Earth. I have great respect for our American Muslims who are trying their very best to remove all the hate teachings from the Holy Quran…and there are many such as these. This is also now a strong movement among overseas Muslims around the world. Other religions should follow their example and we should remove “all hate teachings” from all of our “Religions” and “Our Philosophies as well. Thank you. Nelson Horton http://www.tenton5.com

NPanamevris
NPanamevris
8 years ago

Amm, if FOX news doesn’t want to upset the Moslem’s, then why are they airing this interview with Pamela, do they want her dead??

Alexander Scipio
Alexander Scipio
8 years ago

Alex Scipio ‏@inthisdimension · 4m4 minutes ago
The Holocaust was not about scale. Are we going to await scale to do something about islam? http://inthisdimension.com/2015/05/06/the-holocaust-was-not-just-about-scale/

StephenT
StephenT
8 years ago

I feel that the reason for all this pride, fear, ignorance and hatred is to bring an end to all religions and worship. The Muslims are going to eventually force the rest of the world to stop allowing them to exist, and at the same time this will cause the rest of the world to completely detest all religions, and any religious person will be considered as an enemy of humanity. I used to always wonder how and why the world was going to turn on all religions.

Mlady_Raka
Mlady_Raka
8 years ago

What people DON’T seem to get is that according to the Koran and the Hadiths, there are only three requirements that need to work in concert for a human to be executed by Islam… 1. You have to be alive…. 2. You have to be a ‘kafir’ or ‘infidel’ (i.e. NON Muslim) 3. You have to refuse to convert to Islam…. They need no other criteria…period. What you do or don’t do, say or don’t say, will just add to the amount of torture and pain you will suffer before you are killed… but to be killed…that’s ALL they require. And for those Dhimmi’s who think that by paying ransom monies to avert death will save their sorry behinds …KNOW THIS… NO CONTRACT (even ransom for life) is legally binding according to Islam, UNLESS it is a contract between two muslims…who happen to believe in the same brand of Islam… You all have been had, BIG time. Find out what the terms “taqqiya”, “kitman” and Hiyal means, and UNDERSTAND who you are dealing with.

And here’s some more information… “Peaceful verses” about Islam was written in the Meccan period of Muhammed’s life, when Islam did not have the upper hand yet… When he came to Medina, and he knew he could win the war against his enemies, the “Medinian” verses were written…you know…those who say “smite them above the neck”…et al. A Muslim NEVER shows his true colors unless he has the upper hand and he knows it…

When you meet a ‘moderate’ Muslim, it is one of two scenarios…

1. Either it is a ‘new convert’ who has no CLUE what is really written in the Koran and the Hadiths, and he/she himself/herself have only been exposed to the Meccan verses and think life is a bed of roses in Islam….or he has been exposed to both Meccan and Medinian verses ….believing he has a choice as to how to express himself according to the verses he reads….

or

2. It is a well seasoned Muslim who is practicing “taqqiya” and/or “kitman” in order to convert the unsuspected victim to Islam, or ‘defend’ this death cult posing as a legitimate religion….

Now here is something ELSE many of you may not have known… In Islam the NEWER verses ALWAYS SUPERCEED the older verses if they address the same topic/subject…. And guess what… the MEDINIAN VERSES ARE THE NEWER VERSION…

People are converted to Islam version 1.0 and then after some time they are ‘upgraded’ to Islam version 3.0….or as we like to term it ….they are ‘radicalized’.

At this point if they refuse to be ‘upgraded’…they are deemed APOSTATE MUSLIMS, and become a target for death by those who accepted the ‘upgrade’…

So to summarize… a Moderate Muslim is either a “Devout Muslim under cover”…or an “Apostate Muslim, and target for any devout Muslim to kill”….take your pick…

but for YHWH’S SAKE…. WAKE UP!!!!

love
love
8 years ago

Usman , you don’t even know what that means!. Muslims are swine and scum

love
love
8 years ago

Usman don’t quote from the book of the REAL GOD , YOU DON’T EVEN UNDETSAND THE MEANING OF THE TEACHING ! SHUT YOUR DIRTY MUSLIM FACE , YOU APE

Daniel Ramos
Daniel Ramos
8 years ago

People please stop calling or considering Bill O Reilly “conservative,”
He shed that veneer years ago the more he moved his show to the left.
Even Laura Ingram has taken a few a gauche steps in her comments over the years.
All the real conservatives will be just as conservative today as they were yesterday.
Everyone else is just “conservative leaning” meaning their philosophical direction can change as easily as a leaf does under the influence of the wind.

NOMASPC
NOMASPC
8 years ago

Funny thing..You can put down my God.. you can say whatever you want about Jesus too…and people do. It may make me mad but God advises us to let HIM handle the revenge so we don’t have to.. God is GOOD..we know what happens in the end. Does not matter one bit to God what people say…cause God is God perfect in all ways and by the way has the last say in all things. A god who has asked his followers to kill those who make fun of him…has very low self esteem. If you are the Creator of all that exists…you gonna get your feelings hurt all the time? I don’t think so. Seek God will He can still be found.

Robbins Mitchell
Robbins Mitchell
8 years ago

This crap is starting to get out of hand when these whack jobs take a poke at Pam right here in Texas…and I can’t have that….guess it’s time to get Excalibur out of the closet and polish up the old girl….she’s been itching for some action as it is

H. Mueller
H. Mueller
8 years ago

Pamela, you are one of the most courageous Americans I have seen in a long time. Thank you for what you are doing. The failure of the Federal government to contact you and protect you is another example of Obama’s style, that of a petty, tin pot dictator, something that is typical of an African nation, or a banana republic. He doesn’t like what you stand for, so you will not receive equal protection. Be careful, we cant afford to have anything happen to you.

RichJ
RichJ
8 years ago

I was very disappointed in O’Reilly’s statement. He fails to realize that this is a war, and at the very least to win a war you have to be rude. Actions like those of Geller have to be carefully planned but do have to happen in order to identify the enemy and kill him. I think what she did was spot on. Any Muslim who does not want to kill me because of my freedom to criticize Muhammad in a cartoon is not a target. The rest should end up the same way as those two jihadists.

H. Mueller
H. Mueller
8 years ago

What amazes is how some of the press attacks and disproves of Pamela Geller’s defense of the First Amendment. The very same Amendment that allows the press to exist.

TJStokes
TJStokes
8 years ago

Islam and uncontrolled imigration, have an answer? That answer is the second amendment. For 500 years islam has been taking over countries one by one. First they imigrate. Next they march. Then they establish their own laws. Then comes the minarets proclaiming satan to be greater than the God of Israel 5 times per day so you cannot close your ears to it. Finally the genocide starts as islam cannot tolerate others. It is all starting in America just as it has spread for 500 years. What they haven’t figured out is that in America we have the second ammendment, which means you cannot get away with killing millions of our men and taking our young children to be your sex slaves.

SRN99
SRN99
8 years ago

Cursed is their filthy paedophile fake prophet Mohammad. Piss be upon him and all his followers

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!