News Ticker >
[ December 10, 2018 ]

OHIO: ISIS Supporting Muslim Plotted Attacks on Two Synagogues “To Inflict Mass Death” “To Kill...

[ December 10, 2018 ]

Scalise: ‘Every Single Day’ at Least 10 Known Terrorists Are Captured Trying to Cross Our...

[ December 10, 2018 ]

Former Bosnian Muslim commander arrested on war crimes charges

[ December 10, 2018 ]

Social Media: Recruiting grounds for terrorists

[ December 10, 2018 ]

Google Approves App For Muslims To Report People Who Commit Blasphemy

[ December 10, 2018 ]

Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner proclaims December 9 “CAIR-TEXAS, Houston Day”

[ December 9, 2018 ]

Sunday Night Art

[ December 9, 2018 ]

This Is Why Illegals Storm the Border: Census Confirms 63 percent of ‘Non-Citizens’ on Welfare,...

[ December 9, 2018 ]

WATCH British journalist expose jihadist “Palestinian” Authority official

[ December 9, 2018 ]

TERROR ALERT: Jihadis are plotting a devastating CHEMICAL WEAPONS attack in Britain and could launch...

“Whose jihad is more truthful?” Ask the Millions of Victims of Jihad

The fact that there are millions who are not waging bloody jihad does not negate that there are millions who are and that we are in their sights. Our ads do not concern peaceful people, which is evident. The ads serve to combat the propaganda (as evidenced in this Daily News piece) that disarms the American people in what promises to be a lengthy, bloody, ghastly war.

Truth is not relative.

Truth is truth. Truth is the recognition of reality. It is not a theory or a malleable thing that one can twist and mold to suit one’s ends. It is what it is. Aristotle said, “A is A.” Indeed, a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. And jihad by any other name (or ad) would still count millions of victims.

Truth is the product of the recognition (i.e., identification) of the facts of reality. Man identifies and integrates the facts of reality by means of concepts. He retains concepts in his mind by means of definitions. He organizes concepts into propositions—and the truth or falsehood of his propositions rests, not only on their relation to the facts he asserts, but also on the truth or falsehood of the definitions of the concepts he uses to assert them, which rests on the truth or falsehood of his designations of essential characteristics. (Ayn Rand)

As for Hamas-CAIR’s “my Jihad” ads, nowhere and at no time has CAIR recognized the genocidal tenets of jihad; nor have they instituted programs to combat jihad recruitment or the teachings that call for holy war.

Screen Shot 2014-12-08 at 1.14.11 PM

Whose jihad is more truthful?

Anti-Islamic ads on Chicago transit from the American Freedom Defense Initiative (top), and ads from the “My Jihad” campaign (bottom).

Daily News, December 7, 2014

COMING TO a SEPTA trolley, bus or train-stop near you: Anti-Islamic advertising, courtesy of the far-right group American Freedom Defense Initiative.

At least, that may be where we’re headed, after a judge’s decision last week seemed to clear the way for the AFDI to expand its transit ad campaign beyond New York City, where it’s currently assaulting eyeballs on Metro Transit Authority buses and trains.

Back in September, the AFDI filed a lawsuit against SEPTA that accused the transit agency of violating the group’s free-speech rights when it refused to sell ad space to AFDI.

SEPTA had argued that the ads presented false information about Islam; attorneys for the agency then lined up an expert on Islamic studies to argue as much.

But their use of the expert was shot down last week by Judge Mitchell Goldberg. He ruled that “political speech does not lose First Amendment protection simply because the listener believes that it is false or disagrees with the message it advances.”

If it did, think of the political bloviating we’d be spared during campaign seasons. Or, to push the truth-in-advertising argument, other ads whose claims are ridiculous.

Remember the old Tastykake ad, which described the pastries as “a world of fun”? I love Tastykakes as much as the next butterscotch krimpet addict. But even I used to think, “A world of fun from one small, sugary snack? A whole world? Really?”

So now it’s back to court for both sides, says attorney David Yerushalmi, who represents the AFDI. Opposing arguments will be heard and maybe, by Christmas, Goldberg will make a final decision about whether the AFDI’s ads have the right to jostle for space among all those SEPTA ads for Lundy Law, Geico and the iPhone 6.

The AFDI will win this, I’m betting, as it did in New York City. As well it should. Free speech is free speech. Even if we dislike what it says or implies.

For example, there’s an ad that the AFDI doesn’t like. It’s part of something called the “My Jihad” ad campaign, which seeks to “take back Islam from Muslim and anti-Muslim extremists alike.”

How? By expanding the definition of the word “jihad” to mean “struggling in the way of God – the way of God, being goodness, justice, passion, compassion, etc. (not forcible conversion as wrongly claimed by some),” according to the website myjihad.org.

The MyJihad ads depict self-described Muslims stating that their personal jiahds are to “bring democracy to Egypt” or “build institutions that will lay down the channels of good in society” or “to be understood and to understand.”

The ads are quite moving and hopeful. But the AFDI, not surprisingly, thinks they’re a crock that need to be counter-balanced by ads with quotes from Muslim extremists whose “personal jihads” call for the killing of Jews and non-believers.

Says Yerushalmi: “My client responds only to criticism of Israel or to the promotion of peaceful jihad. When [Sharon Geller, AFDI’s outspoken president] sees those ads, she responds” with ads of her own.

Court cases similar to the one being waged in Philly are being litigated in Boston and Seattle, whose transit agencies have also refused AFDI’s ads. Other cities, like Chicago and Tampa, eventually decided to accept no ads of a political nature – including those “My Jihad” ads – rather than give equal time to AFDI.

“That’s fine,” says Yerushalmi. “All we’re asking these agencies to do is to stop discriminating against the AFDI when it comes to running political ads. If they won’t run our ads, they shouldn’t run the others.”

Philly apparently is following this easy-way-out lead.

In October, SEPTA’s board voted to no longer accept political advertising on its buses, subways and kiosks. So when Judge Goldberg soon reconvenes for a final hearing, he may decide the “jihad vs. jihad” issue is moot.

At least on our public transit.

Elsewhere it will rage on, as it has for generations past and for our own children and their children – and, sadly, for generations to come.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest