Freedom of speech is the first, last and most essential freedom. The right to hold any view and to express it. It’s the most fundamental tenet of a free society. No ifs, ands, buts or sharia. Western elites are framing sharia restrictions on speech (blasphemy) under the Orwellian guise of tolerance. But what could be more intolerant than silencing the truth?
Freedom of speech includes the freedom not to agree and not to listen. Ayn Rand wrote, “The political function of ‘the right of free speech’ is to protect dissenters and unpopular minorities from forcible suppression.”
Abridging this most crucial freedom so as not to offend savages is civilizational suicide. It is the death knell for the modern enlightenment — in other words, for the West.
And if you can, please contribute to Geller Report. YOU make the work possible.
Recently the UK Law Society introduced a guide to sharia law. And in Denmark, law professor Trine Baumbach attacks the freedom of speech in the latest issue of Juristen….
It’s not just Europe. We see similar moves by the American Bar Association (here and here). The Obama administration acts in direct violation of our First Amendment and Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . . .” It’s just that simple and clear. It’s not just Obama (who declared to the UN in the wake of the 9/11 Benghazi jihad attack, “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”) or the DoJ’s vow to criminalize social postings on Facebook and Twitter that offend Muslims (our protest here and here).
The idea that speech that we don’t like would incite violent people to violence will only increase violence against anyone who says anything that the violent do not like. It’s madness. Freedom of speech and particularly political speech protects all speech, not just ideas that we like, but ideas we don’t like. If not, then who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood appointees?
“Danish magazine for lawyers: Free speech is only democratic as long as it does not provoke violent people,” By Nicolai Sennels, Jihadwatch, June 20, 2014
Recently the UK Law Society introduced a guide to sharia law. And in Denmark, law professor Trine Baumbach attacks the freedom of speech in the latest issue of Juristen (The Lawyer). Via 10news.dk, translated from Uriasposten:
Freedom of expression can be seen as an expression of democracy — but only to the extent that free speech is used for the benefit of a democratic society and its citizens. … Freedom of expression is one of the foundations of democratic societies, but only to the extent that freedom of expression is not misused to violate the rights of others or used in a way that society risks being plunged into social unrest and civil peace being threatened.
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.