Congressman Wolf Demands FBI Punish Agents For CAIR Contact


Finally, pushback against the systemic infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood terror proxies in the US government. Not everyone is on the jihad payroll.

Join Congressman Frank Wolf in demanding punishment for conspiring with the enemies of the United States. Call your congressman.

We want hearings on infiltration of the USG by the Muslim Brotherhood. Read the Inspector General’s report here.

Wolf Demands FBI Punish Agents For CAIR Contact IPT, September 19, 2013

On a day when the Council on American-Relations (CAIR) issued a report accusing its critics of bigotry, a Justice Department investigation reminds the public why CAIR does not merit the public’s trust.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz found a series of incidents in which FBI field offices knowingly engaged in outreach activity with CAIR
despite a 2008 policy banning non-investigative cooperation with the Islamist group.
Only a summary of the report has been released publicly. The rest is considered classified, but has been made available to Congress.

The ban on interactions with CAIR, first reported
by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, resulted from an FBI investigation into a Muslim Brotherhood-created Hamas-support network in the United States.

Internal documents seized by the FBI show that CAIR and its founders, Omar Ahmad and Nihad Awad, were a part of that network known as the Palestine Committee. Both men appear on a telephone list of Palestine Committee members (Awad is listed under a pseudonym “Omar Yehya), and CAIR is listed on a meeting agenda listing the committee’s branches.

“[U] ntil we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS,” an FBI official wrote in 2009, “the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner.”

But several FBI field office agents-in-charge balked at the policy,
the Inspector General’s report finds, and the FBI’s Office of Public
Affairs repeatedly offered field offices conflicting information.
Despite a series of electronic communications explaining the CAIR ban –
it does not apply to criminal investigations or civil rights complaints –
issued from August-December 2008, and despite a mandatory meeting for
Special Agents in Charge (SAC) of field offices, the head of the Los
Angeles FBI office told his agents to ignore FBI headquarters.

“[W]e will decide how our relationship is operated and maintained
with CAIR barring some additional instruction from FBI Headquarters,”
the Los Angeles SAC wrote.
“Please instruct your folks at this time that are not to abide by the …
[policy] but that their direction in regards to CAIR will come from the
LA Field Office front office.”

In a scathing letter
to new FBI Director James Comey, U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., called
the violations “intolerable” and demanded punishment for those
responsible, including “separation from the FBI.”

Wolf is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee’s subcommittee
responsible for the FBI’s budget. He noted that the investigation only
focused on incidents involving three field offices – Chicago,
Philadelphia and New Haven, Conn., so the depth of the problem still is
not known.

The Los Angeles SAC, Wolf added, exhibited “unacceptable and insubordinate behavior from a senior leader of the FBI.”

“Despite repeated efforts to communicate the policy to the field,”
Wolf wrote, “this was undermined by conflicting guidance being
inexplicably offered by the bureau’s Office of Public Affairs as well as
outright violations from several field offices.”

That’s what happened in New Haven, the report finds. As the IPT reported
in 2011, officials in the field office helped organize a community
outreach program knowing that two local CAIR officials were involved.
Rather than hold to the FBI policy, they agreed to conceal their role in
organizing the event. In addition, the Inspector General found, the
Office of Public Affairs advised the field office that the interaction
was okay.

In 2010, Attorney General Eric Holder was asked
whether there was any “new evidence that exonerates CAIR from the
allegations that it provides financial support to designated terrorist

“No,” said a written reply from Holder.

Then-FBI Director Robert Mueller publicly reaffirmed the policy in two separate appearances before Congress a year later, saying “We have no formal relationship with CAIR.”

“There should have been no confusion about this policy,” Wolf wrote,
“given the bureau guidance, Congressional direction and media coverage
surrounding this directive.” Horowitz seemed to agree. He faults the FBI
for failing to provide “effective oversight to ensure compliance with
the policy.”

In addition to avoiding interaction with a bad actor, the ban on CAIR
contact is meant to prevent the group from touting its connections with
law enforcement as a way to enhance its image. That’s exactly what
happened in Philadelphia in 2010, the Inspector General’s report found. A
local CAIR official was invited to an FBI “Citizen’s Academy” program
despite the FBI policy’s specific reference to the program as off-limits
to CAIR representatives.

“A few days later,” the report said, “CAIR-Philadelphia posted an
article on its website describing its participation in the training
program, with a link to the FBI’s website.”

While it boasted about FBI contact in this case, CAIR officials more often disseminate a message of fear
to Muslim Americans, portraying FBI agents as ruthless and corrupt –
willing to do anything to set up innocent Muslims. One CAIR chapter
urged Muslims to “Build a Wall of Resistance” from the FBI and not cooperate in criminal investigations.

The policy did not come out of the blue. Awad, picked up on FBI
recordings of Palestine Committee meetings, remains CAIR’s executive
director. He has never acknowledged his relationship with the
Hamas-support network, and therefore, never disavowed it. In a 2003
deposition, he claimed not to remember whether he attended a weekend-long Palestine Committee meeting in Philadelphia called to discuss ways to “derail” American peacemaking efforts between Israel and the Palestinians. The group also talked at length about how to deceive Americans by hiding their Hamas support.

Those are among the things that make the FBI question “whether there
continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS”
and bar interaction between its agents and the group. Perhaps the
Inspector General’s report will prompt field office officials to stop
ignoring their own leaders and the information gathered by their fellow


Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Pin It on Pinterest