News Ticker >
[ January 28, 2020 ]

WATCH LIVE NOW: President Trump unveils Middle East peace plan with two-state solution, tunnel connecting...

[ January 28, 2020 ]

Dictatorial House Democrats Move To Shut Out GOP In Matters of War and Peace—The Most...

[ January 28, 2020 ]

TRAITOR: RINO Romney Again Signals He’s with the Democrats on Impeachment

[ January 28, 2020 ]

‘Making History’: President Trump Meets with Netanyahu (and Gantz) Before ‘Deal’ Rollout

[ January 28, 2020 ]

Dershowitz: Dems Picked ‘Dangerous’ Impeachment Charges, Bolton Book Leak ‘Does Not Constitute an Impeachable Offense’

[ January 28, 2020 ]

RECORD BREAKING CROWDS: Thousands Lining Up, Camping Out Ahead Of Tuesday’s Rally In Wildwood

[ January 28, 2020 ]

Joe Biden admits Ukraine dealings ‘look bad’

[ January 28, 2020 ]

WATCH: AG Pam Bondi Lays Out Corruption Case Against Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma

[ January 28, 2020 ]

Women’s Alliance March on NYC : “Come Rise and ROAR with Us” in 2020

[ January 28, 2020 ]

CNN Mocks Trump Supporters As Subhumans Who Can’t Read, Spell

Fighting USG’s Enforcement of Sharia in America: Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer Appeal Denial of
“Stop Islamisation of America”

6

Our organizations, AFDI and SIOA, are on the front lines in America, fighting the imposition of Islamic law one lawsuit at a time. The United States government (USG) denied our application for trademark of SIOA (Stop Islamization of America) because jihadists might be offended. It is the same sharia enforcement that we are facing in Seattle, where Seattle Transit refused to run AFDI's submission of an FBI wanted poster of global terrorists because that, too, might offend jihadists. 

Here's the latest in our lawsuit against the US government's enforcement of the blasphemy laws under the sharia from our pre-eminenet fighting legal firm, the American Freedom Law Center. 

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer Appeal Denial of “Stop Islamisation of America” Trademark

Washington, D.C. (August 30, 2013) — The American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), a national, nonprofit Judeo-Christian law firm, filed its opening brief today in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, asking the court to overturn the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board‟s (TTAB) denial of the trademark application for “Stop Islamisation of
Sioa logoAmerica” and “SIOA.”

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, executive directors of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), an advocacy organization that raises awareness about the human rights abuses perpetrated by sharia-adherent Islamists, applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in February 2010 to register the trademark “Stop the Islamisation of America” to foster and provide an understanding of how to prevent sharia-based tyranny and Islamist terrorism.

The USPTO rejected FDI‟s application because it deemed that the trademark disparaged Muslims and linked them to terrorism. In its appeal to the TTAB, AFLC argued that “Islamisation” is not broadly defined as all things Islamic or even a conversion of an individual or society to Islam; rather, it is the process of implementing sharia as the law of the land into a society in order to create a sectarian political system based upon sharia (i.e., Islamic law).

David Yerushalmi, AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel, commented: “Muslims and non-Muslims alike use and understand „Islamisation‟ to be the political movement to implement Islamic law or sharia as the law of the land. It has nothing to do with religious conversion. In fact, the term, Islamisation‟ can be traced to the Muslim Brotherhood, where it is found in their own documents advocating „civilizational jihad,‟ which seeks nothing less than the destruction of Western Civilization and the establishment of a worldwide Islamic caliphate.


“Furthermore, the term is used frequently in professional and academic contexts. Therefore, „stopping Islamisation‟ and linking this doctrine to terrorism does not implicate or disparage good, patriotic, loyal Muslims in America. Instead, it is an important educational tool that raises awareness about those who seek the demise of our constitutional Republic through a sharia-based political process.”
Nevertheless, in February 2013, the TTAB affirmed the USPTO‟s denial of the trademark, concluding that the Mark is disparaging to American Muslims.

Robert Muise, AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel, commented: “There is no doubt that the TTAB used legally and factually unfounded „evidence‟ to support its position that „Islamisation‟ means all things Islamic. By doing so, the TTAB ignored the overwhelming evidence that the only public use of„ Islamisation‟ is as a description of an Islamist political agenda to replace secular democracy with Islamic religious law.”

As argued in AFLC‟s brief:
Appellants [Geller and Spencer] are sympathetic to the USPTO’s politically correct sensitivities enticing it to protect Muslims and indeed Islam itself from even the slightest hint of disparagement in the form of public criticism, especially in the post-9/11 age with global terrorism conducted daily in the name of Islam and the Arab Spring featuring the Muslim Brotherhood’s Islamisation program for Egypt and elsewhere melting into murder and mayhem. The problem with these sensitivities as applied to the denial of Appellants’ Mark is that the USPTO’s beef is not with Appellants or their Mark, but rather with terrorists who claim to speak in the name of all of Islam and all Muslims. Appellants’ Mark does not. “Stop the Islamisation of America” has a specific meaning that Muslims and non- Muslims in America and indeed throughout the West embrace if they treasure liberty and religious freedom for all. In a zeal to take on the role of parens patriae and to protect Muslims from every insult, the USPTO and the TTAB have both ignored the factual record and have simply assumed meanings and understandings of the terms of the Mark that have no factual or evidentiary basis. There is no substantial evidence to support the TTAB’s Decision or the USPTO’s denial of the Mark.

As such, Appellants ask this Court to find that the USPTO’s denial of Appellants’ Mark lacks the requisite evidentiary basis and order the USPTO to register the Mark forthwith.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest