Noisome: offensive to the senses and especially to the sense of smell; highly obnoxious or objectionable. That’s what this unsigned editorial in the Times of London calls me. But if anything smells, it is this editorial itself. It reeks of elitism even as it calls for my being allowed into the UK, and has no substantive criticism of my work, but only heaps ill-informed and inaccurate abuse upon it.
Please contribute to our legal fund to fight the ban here.
Pamela Geller is an obscure American blogger with
insanitary opinions. She and an associate called Robert Spencer sought
entry to Britain last month to attend a rally by the far-right English
Defence League. Theresa May, the Home Secretary, intervened to ensure
that they were barred.
Obscure: yes, so obscure that Theresa May thought me such a threat that it was worth the trouble to ban me from entering the country.
An associate called Robert Spencer: see the elitism and ignorance wrapped in arrogance. Robert Spencer is a bestselling author who has advised the FBI, the CIA and the US military on Islam. If the Times hasn’t heard of him, it only shows how obscure they are.
Insanitary: So unclean as to be a likely cause of disease. Yes, and that disease is the truth.
Geller is planning legal action to overturn
the ban. It would be a good thing if she succeeded. Her propaganda is
inflammatory and her opinions are ignorant and absurd. But ministerial
fiat to deny someone entry for expressing offensive views is a bad
Propaganda, inflammatory, ignorant, absurd, offensive: the Times can’t pile the smear words on quickly enough. And what is behind them? A willfully ignorant head-in-the-sand unwillingness to face the reality of jihad and Islamic supremacism:
The toxic character of Geller and Spencer’s opinions is
beyond argument. They advance preposterous conspiracy theories about a
supposedly malign incursion of Islam in Western societies. Their
language has ominous echoes of the notorious anti-Semitic fabrication The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,
but applied to Muslims. Geller defends Radovan Karadzic, now on trial
at the Hague, and denies the documented facts of the genocide of Muslims
at Srebrenica in 1995.
The Muslim Brotherhood declared in a captured internal document that their goal in the U.S. was “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” and we’re advancing preposterous conspiracy theories? The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was a fabrication; this document is real.
The Times says I defend Karadzic, but actually, I have posted a piece that said quite clearly: “I am not defending Radovan Karadzic…” Is what the Times is doing here journalism?
Anyway, as for Srebrenica, I quoted information from former
BBC journalist Jonathan Rooper here:
The premise that Serbian forces executed 7,000 to 8,000
people “was never a possibility,” according to former BBC journalist
Jonathan Rooper, who investigated on site and through official records
over many years the events which followed the capture of Srebrenica, and
whose findings are presented in the upcoming report of the Srebrenica
Research Group. He noted that by the first week of August 1995, 35,632
people had registered with the World Health Organization and Bosnian
Government as displaced persons, survivors of Srebrenica, a figure which
was later referred to [in] an Amnesty International report and the
report of the Dutch Government.
Rooper noted that the International Committee of the Red Cross and
The New York Times reported that about 3,000 Muslim soldiers who fought
their way across Serb held territory to Muslim lines near Tuzla, were
also survivors. The ICRC confirmed that these soldiers were redeployed
by the Bosnian Army “without their families being informed.” The figure
of 3,000 soldiers who survived was also confirmed by Muslim Gen. Enver
Hadzihasanovic, who testified at The Hague. These figures made it clear
that at least 38,000 Srebrenica residents survived out of a population
of 40,000 before the capture of the enclave. Around 2,000 Muslims who
fled with the 28th Division were killed, most by fighting, but also
hundreds executed by paramilitary units and a mercenary group.
As Spencer says: “None of this information is consistent with the claims that there was
a genocide of Muslims there, and it comes from a former BBC journalist,
the World Health Organization, the Bosnian Government, the
International Committee of the Red Cross, the New York Times, and Muslim
General Enver Hadzihasanovic. Perhaps some challenge can be made to
these claims, but it is a legitimate discussion that needs to be had,
rather than waving away Pamela Geller as some hate-filled genocide
denier, which is the purpose of the inclusion of Srebrenica in the
Leftist/Islamic supremacist dossier on her.”
Geller and Spencer’s aim is to spread
discord. That makes them unwelcome visitors, serving a noisome cause.
But the criterion for barring entry should be more stringent than mere
demagoguery. The previous Labour Government imposed a ban on Geert
Wilders, the Dutch anti-Muslim politician, on similar grounds. He
managed to overturn it on appeal. The judges ruled wisely. Preserving
free speech is more fundamental to this country’s ethos than maintaining
Inflaming tensions is not the same as inciting
violence. Banning campaigners because their views may provoke violence
is wrong. It gives an incentive to opponents to create disorder. The
better course is to allow extremists to discredit themselves by the
brutishness of their sentiments. And in that field at least, Geller is
The Times is defaming me in numerous ways, and it is I who am brutish? This is brutish journalism.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.