News Ticker >
[ March 29, 2020 ]

Trump eyes massive expulsion of Chinese spies

[ March 29, 2020 ]

Cuomo: ‘New York State Is Basically Bankrupt’

[ March 29, 2020 ]

CNN, MSNBC Hasn’t Written a Single Word About Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe...

[ March 29, 2020 ]

WATCH: ‘You f***king dog’: Shocking moment Muslima who was pulled over for speeding SPITS in...

[ March 29, 2020 ]

Muslim Terrorist Gets 10 Years For Biological Attack With Ricen Bomb

[ March 29, 2020 ]

Kennedy Center lays off entire orchestra hours after receiving $25 million taxpayer bailout

[ March 29, 2020 ]

Biden Says We Must ‘Believe All Women’ – Except The Woman Who Accuses Him

[ March 28, 2020 ]

Saturday Night Cinema: Pandemic

[ March 28, 2020 ]

De Blasio: Synagogues and Churches That Defy His Restrictions Will Be Closed Permanently If Necessary

[ March 28, 2020 ]

Trump phones Netanyahu to congratulate him that he’ll form, head next government

Roger Kimball: Free Speech Dies in UK


Kimball has an excellent op-ed over at PJ Media:

“U.S. Bloggers banned from Entering the UK.” Roger Kimball, June 27,2013

That’s how a BBC headline
broke the news that authors Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer were
denied entry to the country that gave the world the Magna Carta.

"Blogger,” you see, is an insinuating term. Not quite a term of
abuse, but still a word that imparts diminishment. Who are you going to
believe, asked Dan Rather when
questioned about his — as it turned out, fraudulent — story about
George W. Bush’s military service: me, Dan Rather of CBS, or some
blogger sitting in front of his computer in his pajamas?

Good question, Dan! Why don’t you think about that in your
ignominious retirement and get back to us — or, on second thought, don’t
get back to us. Just think about what a preening fool you made of
yourself before even CBS had had enough and cashiered you.

Geller and Spencer are both, in different ways, prominent critics of
Islamism — i.e., of that strong current of militant Islam that seeks to
spread the intolerant ideology of Islam in the West through the
imposition of sharia in Western countries. You might agree with their
views, and then again, you might not.

That’s hardly the point, is it?

A spokesman for the Home Office welcomed the ban on Geller
and Spencer, explaining: “The UK should never become a stage for
inflammatory speakers who promote hate.” Hmm — “who promote hate.”
Query: do Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer “promote hate”?  Or is that
just a rhetorical epithet employed by ideologues bent on advancing a
certain politically correct agenda in order to stifle criticism?
Another question: what is a “hate crime”? Is a crime more of a crime
because it was committed by someone who dislikes the victim? Or is it
like the term “social justice,” a piece of rhetorical legerdemain
intended to lend gravity to a noun by the act of prefacing an
emotionally charged but irrelevant adjective?)

The point is that the metabolism of liberal democracy depends upon
the free exchange of ideas, which means, in part, a vigorous circulation
of competing ideas. No less a figure than John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty,
pointed out: “He who knows only his own side of the case knows little
of that.” There is plenty to criticize in Mill, heaven knows (and I’ve
done my bit
to criticize him), but he was surely right that liberal democracy
depends in part upon fostering the “collision” of competing ideas.

The irony of the situation is rich. Geller and Spencer speak out
against the intolerance of Islam. Got that? They speak. They lecture.
They write books. Spencer’s written a shelf of them. Geller was behind a
campaign to place “defeat jihad” posters in New York subways. One of
the reasons they were traveling to the UK was to participate in a
commemorative ceremony for Drummer Lee Rigby.
Remember him? He was the chap who, last month, was walking down a
street in Woolwich when two Muslims ran him down in a car and then
stabbed and hacked him to death with knives and a cleaver. Like the Earl
of Strafford, their motto was “thorough.” When these partisans of the
religion of peace got through with him, he had to be identified by dental records.

Geller and Spencer are denied entry to the UK. Quoth a government
spokesman: individuals whose presence “is not conducive to the public
good” may be denied entry by the Home secretary. He explained: “We
condemn all those whose behaviours and views run counter to our shared
values and will not stand for extremism in any form.”

That pretty much covers the waterfront, doesn’t it? Disagree with me and I’ll have you named an enemy of the state.

Read the rest here.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email

Pin It on Pinterest