Add this to scores of other Muslim cells of child sex trafficking and rape rings.
Hundreds of 11- and 12-year-old girls. Stolen. Drugged. Raped. Bought
and sold by scores of Muslim men. This is just the latest in a long
line of Muslim sex-slave gangs.
"These men were enjoying the sex slaves allowed by the Qur'an (men may
enjoy 'what your right hands own,' 4:3) and Islamic law from among unbelieving women" (here).
UK: Yet another Muslim sex slavery gang jailed (thanks to Jihadwatch)
The Qur'an allows for the owning of sex slaves:
If you fear that you will not act justly towards the
orphans, marry such women as seem good to you, two, three, four; but if
you fear you will not be equitable, then only one, or what your right hands own; so it is likelier you will not be partial. (Qur'an 4:3)
This verse is the basis for Islamic polygamy, allowing a man to take
as many as four wives, as long as he believes he is able to “deal
justly” with all of them. But justice in these circumstances is in the
eye of the beholder. Ibn Kathir says this the requirement to deal justly
with one’s wives is no big deal, since treating them justly isn’t the
same as treating them equally: “it is not obligatory to treat them
equally, rather it is recommended. So if one does so, that is good, and
if not, there is no harm on him.”
The verse goes on to say that if a man cannot deal justly with
multiple wives, then he should marry only one, or resort to “what your
right hands own” – that is, slave girls.
The Qur'an commentator Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this practice, and longs for the good old days:
During Jihad (religion war), many men and women become war
captives. The Amirul Mu’minin [leader of the believers, or caliph – an
office now vacant] has the choice of distributing them amongst the
Mujahidin [warriors of jihad], in which event they will become the
property of these Mujahidin. This enslavement is the penalty for
He goes on to explain that this is not ancient history:
None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been
abrogated in the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not
have slaves is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war). Their
wars are fought by the instruction of the disbelievers (kuffar) and are
halted by the same felons. The Muslim [sic] have been shackled by such
treaties of the disbelievers (kuffar) whereby they cannot enslave anyone
in the event of a war. Muslims have been denied a great boon whereby
every home could have had a slave. May Allah grant the Muslims the
ability to escape the tentacles of the enemy, remain steadfast upon the
Din (religion) and engage in Jihad (religion war) according to the
injunctions of Shari’ah. Amen!
This is by no means an eccentric or unorthodox view in Islam. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011
that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that as they waged jihad warfare
against infidels, Muslims would take slaves. He clarified what he meant
in a subsequent interview:
…Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels….Spoils,
slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and
infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over
countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement
on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue
of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are
distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children,
wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold
slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk
al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a
verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been
abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market,
look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but)
she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman,
nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no
disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go
to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Right around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti activist and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out
in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women,
emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the
parameters of Islamic morality.
…A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex
slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam
permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth….I brought up
(this man’s) situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a
question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and
what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim
nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the
religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of
“Is this forbidden by Islam?,” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the
contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The
free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But
the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from
the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the
sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and
that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
While the savage exploitation of girls and young women is an
unfortunately cross-cultural phenomenon, only in Islamic law does it
carry anything approaching divine sanction. Here is yet another human
rights scandal occasioned by Islamic law that the international human
rights community and the mainstream media cravenly ignore.
"Telford gang is jailed for sexually abusing girls," from the Shropshire Star, May 10 (thanks to Alan of England):
Seven men were jailed after a series of complex court cases,
the reporting of which has been banned until now while legal battles
We can reveal details of those court cases following a hearing in the
High Court today in which a judge upheld a decision that another man
accused of child sex abuse offences was not mentally fit to be retried.
The man, Noshad Hussain, 23, was cleared of trafficking a girl, 14,
at a trial last year, but the jury was unable to reach a verdict on four
charges of engaging in sexual activity with her.
Today’s High Court ruling brings to an end a three-year investigation into a child prostitution ring in Telford.
Youth workers first raised the alarm when teenage girls in
Wellington, some as young as 13, started telling them the same stories
about men they were seeing.
The subsequent police investigation, dubbed Operation Chalice,
revealed details of a network of men from the Muslim community who
targeted young and vulnerable teenage girls.
After West Mercia Police’s investigation into suspected under-age sex
and child prostitution, seven men were finally convicted in cases
stretching over two years.
Four experienced judges have heard distressing evidence from four
young women, who were aged 13 to 16 when they were abused during a
two-year period between 2007 and 2009.
The leading players in the abuse were brothers, Ahdel and Mubarek
Ali, of Regent Street, Wellington, who received long jail sentences
after an eight-week trial.
Ahdel Ali, 25, known as Eddie, was given a 26-year extended sentence –
18 years’ immediate custody with an additional eight-year period on
licence after release.
His 29-year-old brother, Mubarek Ali, known as Max, was given 22
years, 14 years’ immediate custody and eight years on licence, for seven
offences – four of controlling child prostitution, causing child
prostitution and two offences of trafficking in the UK for the purpose
of prostitution, involving two of the victims. Both men were made the
subject of lifelong Sexual Offences Prevention Orders.
Also convicted were Mohammed Ali Sultan, 26, of Victoria Avenue,
Wellington; Tanveer Ahmed, 40, of Urban Gardens, Wellington; Mohammed
Islam Choudhrey, 53, of Solway Drive, Sutton Hill; Mahroof Khan, 35, of
Caradoc Flats, Kingshaye Road, Wellington, and Mohammed Younis, 60, of
Previously at Atlas:
Muslim Gang Rapes, Brutalizes Kidnapped
13-Year-Old over 4 Days: 'You treated her like a piece of meat' Judge's
fury as he jails Muslims who forced her to be their sex slave
in UK: Muslim men in child trafficking sex ring, attacked vulnerable
girls as young as 11 for sex, subjecting them to assaults that were
"perverted in the extreme"
Child Sex Trafficking Ring gang-raped, bought and sold young infidel
girls aged 11 to 16 for 8 years, branded 'M' for Muhammed on buttocks
of Muslim men ‘groomed girls as young as 11 for sex, trafficked them
across the UK and attacked them with meat cleavers and baseball bats’
- Girls, 14, 'groomed and raped at drug den by Muslim gang who treated her with contempt'
of members of the Luton Sikh community protest police failing to
investigate Muslim sex attack on a young non-Muslim girl
Ignored Victims of Muslim Child Sex Trafficker who recruited
non-Muslim child "prostitutes"; Detective: "the worst case I've ever
had to deal with in my 22 years of service"
- Groups decry bogus "Asian" label
- Govt Minister: "Britain Needs Open Debate" about sex grooming gangs … what about root cause?
- Another Muslim Gang Busted in "Second Child Sex Ring" of young non-Muslim girls
- More Muslims Jailed for Raping, Grooming Tween girls, 40 More Sought
- British Judge: "Targeted because they were not part of your community or religion": Judge blasts sex gang
Child Sex Trafficking Trial: Nine Muslim men guilty of exploiting
non-Muslim schoolgirls for sex and prostitution after plying them
with vodka and drugs
Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.