CPAC-Snaps: The Passing Parade

I had been reading your website, and am so disappointed that you chose to shoot down Orly TAitz when it was a marvelous opportunity to get the whole question out into the open. But, apparently you too ascribe the “birther” appellation to her.
“Birther” is a term dreamed up by the Alinsky people. It follows the rule of ridiculing the opposition.

The Birther issue is not nonsense. Technically, “natural born citizen” in previous cases disqualifies people like Obama, who have a parent who is a non citizen, and people like Obama, who were adopted and renounced their citizenship via adoption of the second indonesian step father. Not to mention the Connecticut SSN connection for someone who never lived there. Of course, the birth certificates released were all bogus. Water under the bridge? Perhaps. But the Constitution is clear about putting people in office who have clear conflicts of interest, or who have no allegiance to this country in the first place. The “unwelcome” fall into many valid, if not “controversial” categories.

Article 1, section 8 paragraph 10 of the Constitution, states that offenses against the law of nations can be enforced by Congress, the Law of Nations is the source of ” Natural Born Citizen” and it says ” A citizen born to Citizens” is a natural born citizen, Congress can throw the bum out tomorrow if they had the courage. This would be the fastest way to rid America of this taqqiya President.
If we do not religiously enforce all of the Constitution we will lose the precious work that God guided the founders to create.

As usual, the KOS is a work of fiction.

Pamela: very surprised and sorry you did not support (or you put down or disowned) Orly Taitz, whose thesis about Obama’s probably unconstitutional presence in the White House is of great relevance to your struggle against Islamic infiltration and takeover.

SRO! WOOT!!!
I’d have been there — except for my husband’s situation. I am his sole caregiver and couldn’t arrange coverage here at home on short notice.
God bless you and Robert, Pamela.

It is a waste of time.

The primary reason we (conservatives) are in the miserable position we are in today is because conservatives (Republicans) circled the wagons around a man who betrayed virtually every fundamental conservative principle including, “know your enemy.” We did not hold George W. Bush accountable. Bush lied about the enemy non-stop (assuring Americans our enemies “blaspheme the name of Allah” and are “traitors to their faith, trying in effect to hijack Islam itself,” etc. Conservatives (except for one or two) said NOTHING. Nada. Because Bush consistently lied about the enemy, is it any wonder Americans elected a man with deep sympathies for our enemies?

I can’t even begin to say how much this pained me.
Pamela, I have always held you in the highest regard and consider you to be the top patriot of our time. You are very treasured American hero to me. But I can’t imagine how or why you would not have fully supported Orly Taite and why you said this thing to her, even going against her publicly. Like you have been, Ms. Taite is similarly a ‘lone voice in the wilderness’, who’s work is important and valuable and EXTREMELY RELEVANT right now. The fact that she is asking very pertinent questions about Obama’s eligibility and his fraudulent birth certificate,soc.sec. card (or natural born status), and the fact that she is seeking the TRUTH is exactly why she has been roundly marginalized and berated and ignored by not only those on the Left, but sadly, apparently those on our side as well. I expect to see this from the enemedia, shutting questions like hers down. But you, too?!
Why is there such fear of exposing the lie that is Obama and why is there such an aversion to revealing the truth about him, or even simply posing the question? Is getting back into CPAC’s good graces that important to you? I would think, of all people, you would have been on board with Ms. Taite, as what she is pointing out so closely relates to the things you have pointed out about Obama, goes to his agenda, comports with his nefarious associations and influences, etc. All the things you go into at length in your book, “The Post American Presidency”.
Let me put it this way: If Obama’s fraudulent status doesn’t have anything to do with the subjects you and the panel were discussing at that meeting yesterday, NOTHING does!
Moreover, I find it pitifully ironic, that the very reason of Bannon’s “Uninvited” Panel, was to let voices be heard that were shut out of CPAC because of the Establishment’s fear, their political correctness, their utter contempt for the truth, and their subsequent attack on free speech. You guys did the same thing to Orly Taite.
And Taite is right. It DOES show a lack of integrity on Bannon’s part. Period. Despite all the boos and jeers directed at Ms. Taite from the hypocrites in the audience. And yes, even despite what you said, Pamela.
I have seen Bannon on FOX many times and he has denigrated and ridiculed anyone who even broaches the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility, calling them (as the LEFT DOES, by the way), “Birthers”. What a nice little tactic to marginalize and shut someone up who might be saying something you don’t like or don’t want them to say!
Kinda like calling someone a “racist, Islamphobic, anti-Muslim bigot”, huh?
How grievious.

Ok Bezelel, so you don’t like Orly Taite’s ‘style’. However, she is not wrong and gets strong points for substance.
And perhaps she is ‘distraught’ because she keeps gettin torn down, trashed and ignored. Obama’s eligibility, or in this case, lack thereof, is everything. Do you realize that if we had men of conscience and courage in congress there would have already been a hearibng on these things? And when Obama is found to be(because he is) Constitutionally ineligible, that every piece of crap legislation that he has signed becomes null and void?
Talk about cleaning house! In one fell swoop, we can oust this usurper be wel on the way to ridding Washington of the Muslim Brotherhood and every other anti-American influence that seeks to thwart our constitution and our way of life.
Think about it.

Why worry and obsess about technicalities about Obama’s forms when you’ve got cultural and political annihilation facing the country? Your house is on fire and you’re worried about whether the pictures are lined up perfectly on the wall? Put out the fire for Pete’s sake.
Clearly Obama is hiding something but he is surrounded by people who know what he is hiding and they’ve helped him cover up the politically damaging details. They don’t believe they are significant or important enough to disqualify him. Does it change the dirty fact that he is obviously hiding something? No, of course not, but all politicians and public figures lie and conceal the truth.
After all the Bush families’ connections to Saudi money what more can you say about the divided loyalties of the political elites? Why the heck do you think Bush lied so enthusiastically about Islam?
Flashback: “The links between the House of Bush and the House of Saud are deep, overlapping and notoriously opaque: the Saudi investment in the Carlyle Group, the private equity firm whose rainmakers include George Bush Senior; the Saudi bankrolling of Poppy’s presidential library; the lucrative contracts the Saudis doled out to Halliburton when Dick Cheney was at the company’s helm. The main law firm retained by the Saudis to defend them against the 9-11 families is Baker Botts — as in James Baker, the Bush family consigliere. And, of course, there’s oil, the black glue connecting all these dots.
In short, the Bushies have profited mightily from a relationship with a foreign government that can be indirectly, perhaps even directly, implicated in the September 11 attacks and other terrorist incidents and that has been the driving force behind a worldwide jihad.” http://prospect.org/article/bushs-saudi-connections

As supporters of the Constitution, we do not get to “cherry pick” which ones are worthwhile or those seeming to be “wastes of time”. When you start picking away at our rights and protections and safeguards, you are weakening the foundations it was established upon.

Constitutional issues are never a waste of time.

I am reluctant to critique Orly on anything, I wish her success but not at the expense of the concerted effort. We have snakes in the camp!!!!! That’s why Orly has been getting tripped up.What I would love to see is effectiveness for our side.How do we get there from here?

Oh my gosh, Pamela, that black & white dress is just GORGEOUS on you!
Wow!

Pamela, I can keep posting as long as you keep deleting it . . . I present yet again my comment.
What I am “doing” at the moment is sending you an email to say that yes, I agree with so much of what you do and have done and to say Thank You, but on this you are wrong.
“Stop writing me to excuse really bad behavior” – the ONLY bad behavior here rests with you and the panel. I am SO glad that Orly showed up and took this panel to task.
You mentioned to another writer that “I know the issue better than you”. Well, Orly knows this issue better than YOU do. I wish you would contact Orly Taitz and speak to her about your mutual concerns. I strongly suspect that her statement and questions pertain more directly to your nine topics than any statements or questions asked at the meeting and I think you know that as well as I do. It just astonishes (and concerns) me (greatly) that you of all people would not pick up this ball and run with it when such a perfect opportunity presented itself.
Inappropriate???
If the moderator’s delicate feelings were hurt by having his integrity called into question then tell him to get over it and move on – there are strong feelings and much at stake here, but, for Pete’s sake this is THE conversation that needs, needs, needs to be had now! It is screaming to be had NOW and you say it’s not appropriate? Nothing is more appropriate right now. Nothing!
How can one not start questioning peoples integrity?

Here’s an interesting place to start concerning strict adherence to the Constitution for those who think that was of paramount importance for the Uninvited Panel: what is the meaning of “natural born citizen.” ( see: http://www.federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined/ ) Was John McCain actually eligible to run for President, because he was born in Panama? That question was never actually settled but had he won his election would he have been allowed to be President? Probably yes. The panel could have easily spent two hours discussing that, not to mention whether Obama’s parents ever were legally married or even who his father was, and then go on to the legal requirements and procedures of submitting cases to the Supreme Court, as Orly Taitz has done.
Taitz should have created her own panel to discuss that massive set of issues. I thought it was quite bizarre and rude of her to accuse someone of lack of integrity for not choosing to wade into that complicated subject with so many other subjects already on the table.

William makes valid points and asks honest questions. To call him an ‘ass’
as you have done Betzazel, is sophomoric, weak, and reveals that you couldn’t deal honestly
with what he is rationally stating. Calling him an ass because he showed some persistence
in making his case? good gravy….
It’s stuff like this, stuff like Taitz being thrown under the bus, the fact that we eat and beat up
our own and REFUSE to come together which is why the Left and the anti- American contingent
is defeating us handily.
Congratulations, smart guy.

Most of you caught at least some snippets of the CPAC farce, but what was missed was an exchange between Orly Taitz and the “uninvited” panel at CPAC that Breitbart Blog sponsored.
Let me see if I’ve got this right: Obama is a Muslim who is doing his very best to destroy our country. He has weakened the economy, our military, has weakened us in every possible way, including having an Attorney General and the head of Homeland Security that are pro-Muslim and, as such, allow Muslims to immigrate (infiltrate) us from the White House to every other aspect of American life, especiallyowning movie studios, television and radio studios, and advertising agencies coast to coast. Obama is the key Muslim dictating and controlling our demise into Sharia Law. Because of these plain and clear facts, one would naturally assume that everyone, at every opportunity, would go after Obama and his fake BIRTH CERTIFICATES, stolen Social Security number, doctored Selective Service Registration, and everything else that the lying bum is hiding from us. Attack the head of the snake!
Well, yes, of course, one would think so, expect and hope for, but, as the speaker said, “Breitbart is not a Birther site.” Oh really? What are Breitbart and Atlas Shrugs other than shills for Obama and his Obots if you accept Obama’s frivolous, fake and fraudulent documents? Don’t want to talk about it? Not the forum, not the time, too embarrassing, maybe somebody will say the dreaded “racist” word?
Let me tell you: we know about Muslims, we know about the “honor killings,” we know about Sharia Law, we know about the lies, the murders, the deceits, AND we know the key to our survival is our Constitution.
“We’re not a Birther site” will go down in the annuals of history as the biggest cop-out, the flimsiest excuse, the most asinine reason to run from the Truth as I’ve ever read about or seen. They want to discuss Muslims shoving Sharia down our throats but, whatever you do, don’t mention that Obama is a Muslim who just happens to be Constitutionally unqualified to hold the office of President. Oh, no, let’s not have the Constitution get in the way of anything here.
Disgusting the way Orly was dismissed. Check out the video. Yes, not only did CPAC go down in flames, but so did Breitbart and Atlas Shrugs. For shame. I would have thought that they’d embrace Orly, get on the bandwagon. But they failed the test, they failed themselves, and they failed America.
OPOVV
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.

Most of you caught at least some snippets of the CPAC farce, but what was missed was an exchange between Orly Taitz and the “uninvited” panel at CPAC that Breitbart Blog sponsored.
Let me see if I’ve got this right: Obama is a Muslim who is doing his very best to destroy our country. He has weakened the economy, our military, has weakened us in every possible way, including having an Attorney General and the head of Homeland Security that are pro-Muslim and, as such, allow Muslims to immigrate (infiltrate) us from the White House to every other aspect of American life, especiallyowning movie studios, television and radio studios, and advertising agencies coast to coast. Obama is the key Muslim dictating and controlling our demise into Sharia Law. Because of these plain and clear facts, one would naturally assume that everyone, at every opportunity, would go after Obama and his fake BIRTH CERTIFICATES, stolen Social Security number, doctored Selective Service Registration, and everything else that the lying bum is hiding from us. Attack the head of the snake!
Well, yes, of course, one would think so, expect and hope for, but, as the speaker said, “Breitbart is not a Birther site.” Oh really? What are Breitbart and Atlas Shrugs other than shills for Obama and his Obots if you accept Obama’s frivolous, fake and fraudulent documents? Don’t want to talk about it? Not the forum, not the time, too embarrassing, maybe somebody will say the dreaded “racist” word?
Let me tell you: we know about Muslims, we know about the “honor killings,” we know about Sharia Law, we know about the lies, the murders, the deceits, AND we know the key to our survival is our Constitution.
“We’re not a Birther site” will go down in the annuals of history as the biggest cop-out, the flimsiest excuse, the most asinine reason to run from the Truth as I’ve ever read about or seen. They want to discuss Muslims shoving Sharia down our throats but, whatever you do, don’t mention that Obama is a Muslim who just happens to be Constitutionally unqualified to hold the office of President. Oh, no, let’s not have the Constitution get in the way of anything here.
Disgusting the way Orly was dismissed. Check out the video. Yes, not only did CPAC go down in flames, but so did Breitbart and Atlas Shrugs. For shame. I would have thought that they’d embrace Orly, get on the bandwagon. But they failed the test, they failed themselves, and they failed America.
OPOVV
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.