Countering Muslim Disinformation

3

Countering Muslim
Disinformation


By Robert Spencer

JWHeaderAS3

According to Islamic supremacist hate groups such as the
Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), no one would have
any problem with Islam if it weren’t for bigoted non-Muslims who irresponsibly
“link Islam to terrorism” – and this link, they claim, gives rise to acts of
violence against Muslims. Hamas-linked CAIR and its allied groups have for
years now been pumping out disinformation designed to “clear up misconceptions”
about Islam and set the record straight. On its website Hamas-linked CAIR says
that it was established in order to “promote a positive image of Islam and
Muslims in America,” and declares that “we believe misrepresentations of Islam
are most often the result of ignorance on the part of non-Muslims and
reluctance on the part of Muslims to articulate their case.”

Story continues below advertisement

However, the cure offered by American Muslim groups may be
worse than the disease. All too often these groups construct a “positive image
of Islam” out of smoke and mirrors. Instead of dealing forthrightly and
constructively with the concerns and questions that non-Muslims have about
Islam’s relation to jihad terrorism, Islamic supremacist groups in the U.S. are
more interested in throwing sand in our eyes.

A quintessential example of this is a publication of the
International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a Muslim Brotherhood group: “Q
& A on Islam and Arab Americans,” which originally ran in USA Today and circulates widely. It’s a
handy compendium of many of the chief claims that Islamic supremacists make in
order to lull non-Muslims into complacency and confuse them regarding the
nature of the jihad threat.

1. Islam means peace.
The flyer notes that “the Arabic word for ‘Islam’ means ‘submission,’ and it
derives from a word meaning ‘peace.’” Indeed, in Arabic, Islam and salaam
(“peace”) share the same linguistic root, but this in itself is virtually
meaningless. All sorts of words share the same roots, and can still have quite
divergent meanings — such as the English word love and the related Sanskrit word lubh (lust). Noting the derivation of the word Islam in this brief information flyer can only be an attempt to
lend credibility to oft-repeated claim that Islam is a religion of peace. But
that idea glosses over Islam’s doctrines of war and subjugation, with the IIIT
does not address and pretends do not exist.

2. “Jihad does not
mean ‘holy war,’”
says the IIIT. “Literally, jihad in Arabic means to
strive, struggle and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept
that includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to
improve the quality of life in society, struggle in the battlefield for self
defense or fighting against tyranny or oppression.”

This was a precursor to Hamas-linked CAIR’s deceptive and
misleading “#MyJihad” campaign, which attempts to convince non-Muslims that
jihad is about making friends and getting exercise. To its credit, the IIIT
goes farther than Hamas-linked CAIR by mentioning the battlefield, and in this
it is more accurate than CAIR’s preposterously innocuous farrago. Islamic
theology distinguishes between the “greater jihad,” which involves “struggle
against evil inclinations within oneself,” and the “lesser jihad,” which is hinted
at here as “struggle in the battlefield for self defense or fighting against
tyranny or oppression.” Still, left unmentioned is the fact that throughout
history, Muslims have not stopped at self-defense or fighting against tyranny. One
manual of Islamic law — certified as conforming “to the practice and faith of
the orthodox Sunni Community” by Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, the most
prestigious and influential Islamic institution among Sunni Muslims worldwide —
calls jihad “a communal obligation” to “war against non-Muslims.” It is an
obligation to make war upon “Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians” until they “become
Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax,” and to fight “all other peoples
until they become Muslim.”

3. Islam condemns
terrorism
. The “Q & A” asserts that “Islam does not support terrorism
under any circumstances. Terrorism goes against every principle in Islam. If a
Muslim engages in terrorism, he is not following Islam. He may be wrongly using
the name of Islam for political or financial gain.”

This is a problem of definition. Islamic spokesmen routinely
refer to the actions of Israel and the U.S. as “terrorism,” but to those of
Hamas and Hizballah as justified acts of “resistance” against “oppression.” For
example, the late Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar,  Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi, was a foe of
terrorism of such renown that President George W. Bush quoted him at the United
Nations in late 2001 as saying that “terrorism is a disease, and that Islam
prohibits killing innocent civilians.” But Tantawi also called suicide bombing
“the highest form of Jihad operations,” and added that “every martyrdom
operation against any Israeli, including children, women, and teenagers, is a
legitimate act according to [Islamic] religious law, and an Islamic
commandment.” His understanding of what constituted “terrorism” was quite
different from that of most Americans.


4. “Islam is a
religion of peace, mercy and forgiveness.”
This assertion is stated but
left unsupported in the IIIT piece; elsewhere it is often buttressed with
quotations from the Qur’an. One verse in particular is often invoked to make
the claim that Islam teaches peace and mercy: “That was why We laid it down for
the Israelites that whoever killed a human being, except as a punishment for
murder or other villainy in the land, shall be looked upon as though he had
killed all mankind; and that whoever saved a human life shall be regarded as
though he had saved all mankind” (5:32).

This verse is adapted from the Talmud and even in the Qur’an
is laid down as an instruction to the Jews, not to all people. And it also
stipulates exceptions: “except as a punishment for murder or other villainy in the land” — and these are particularly
troubling in light of other Qur’anic teachings:

“Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle. Those who follow him are
ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another” (48:29).

“Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and
deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate” (9:73).

“The true believers fight for the cause of Allah, but the
infidels fight for the devil. Fight then against the friends of Satan” (4:76).

“When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield, strike
off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly”
(47:4).

“When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever
you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for
them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to
go their way. Allah is forgiving and merciful” (9:5).

“Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were
given [i.e., Jews and Christians] as believe neither in Allah nor the Last Day,
who do not forbid what Allah and His Apostle have forbidden, and do not embrace
the true Faith, until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued”
(9:29).

“Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to
those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and
surely, Allah is able to give them (believers) victory” (22:39).

And on and on. Muslim apologists today condemn virtually any
quotation of such verses as quoting “out of context.” Yet they never explain
what would be the proper context of such exhortations to hatred and violence,
or why, if they only applied to Muhammad’s time as is often claimed, they are
enshrined in the book that is supposed to be applicable for all people at all
times. Nor do they explain why so many Muslims worldwide today misunderstand
them — by taking them at face value.

5. Islam is tolerant
of other beliefs.
Islamic apologists like to quote Qur’an 2:256, “There is
no compulsion in religion,” in support of the idea that Islam is a broadly
tolerant faith. It has become a commonplace of discussions about Islam today
that the great Islamic empires of old were tolerant of Jews and Christians to
an extent that non-Christians were never tolerated in medieval Christendom. “It
is a function of Islamic law,” says the IIIT article, “to protect the
privileged status of minorities. Islamic law also permits non-Muslims to set up
their own courts, which implement family laws drawn up by minorities
themselves.”

It is true that Islamic law, the Sharia, allows “the People
of the Book” (primarily Jews and Christians) to practice their religious
beliefs in an Islamic state; however, the “tolerance” granted to Jews and
Christians is severely circumscribed. Islamic law dictates that the
“protection” (dhimma) agreement
between Muslim rulers and Jewish and Christian subjects “is only valid when the
subject peoples: follow the rules of Islam…(those involving public
behavior and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the
subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the
rules of their own religion among themselves); and pay the non-Muslim poll tax
(jizya)” (Reliance of the Traveller,
o11.3a, b).

The jizya is a
special levy on non-Muslims, whose higher tax rates contributed much to the magnificent
Islamic empires of old. It is not the Sharia’s only restriction on non-Muslims:
according to classic Islamic law, non-Muslims in an Islamic state “are
distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); are
not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum” [the standard Muslim greeting, “Peace be
with you”]; must keep to the side of the street; may not build higher than or
as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is
not razed; are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, . . . recite the Torah
or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays; and
are forbidden to build new churches” (Reliance
of the Traveller
, o11.5).

There is indeed no “compulsion” in any of this: Jews and
Christians are not forced to become Muslims. But there is also no dignity or
respect.

6. Islam respects
Christianity
. The IIIT flyer correctly informs readers that “Islam teaches
that Christians and Muslims are both ‘people of the book.’ By that it means
that the two religions share the same basic beliefs articulated through the
Bible and the Koran. The main difference between Christians and Muslims is that
Muslims do not believe that Jesus was the Son of God.”

Yet although the Qur’an states that “nearest among them in
love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, ‘We are Christians,’” (5:82),
it also claims that Christians are under Allah’s curse: “The Jews call ‘Uzair
[Ezra] a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is
a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of
old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the
Truth!” (9:30).

7. Islam respects
Judaism
. In its treatment of Judaism, the IIIT flyer replicates its
language regarding Christianity: “Islam teaches that Jews and Muslims are both
‘people of the book.’ By that it means that the two religions share the same
basic beliefs articulated through the Torah and the Koran. The main difference
between Jews and Muslims is that Jews do not believe in prophets after the
Jewish prophets, including Muhammad and his teachings.”

Yet we have just seen that the Qur’an places Jews under
Allah’s curse. This idea recurs in the Qur’an, which also says that Allah
turned the Jews into detested beasts: “Say: ‘O people of the Book! Do ye
disapprove of us for no other reason than that we believe in Allah, and the
revelation that hath come to us and that which came before (us), and (perhaps)
that most of you are rebellious and disobedient?’ Say: ‘Shall I point out to
you something much worse than this, (as judged) by the treatment it received
from Allah? Those who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath, those of whom
some He transformed into apes and swine, those who worshipped evil; these are
(many times) worse in rank, and far more astray from the even path!’” (Sura 5:60).
It also says that the Jews are the worst enemies of the Muslims (5:82).

8. Muhammad was a man
of peace
. “This is his message,” says the American convert to Islam Hamza
Yusuf in PBS’s documentary, Muhammad:
Legacy of a Prophet
: “spread peace, feed people food, and do some
devotional practice and you will enter paradise without any trouble.”

Spread peace? Yet Muhammad was a man of war, participating in
78 battles, all but one of which were offensive. He himself said: “I have been
commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is
no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his
property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.”
(Sahih Muslim 30)

As the American people learn more and more about Islam,
Islam’s image problem is getting worse, not better. One principal reason for
this may be the dissonance between the loud and repeated claims of Islamic spokesmen
in the United States and the facts that Americans are learning about Islam. If
the IIIT, Hamas-linked CAIR, and other Muslim groups really want to educate the
American people about Islam, they would acknowledge and deal squarely with the
questions that are really in people’s minds: does Islam provide a justification
for terrorism? Have the dozens of groups that preach and perpetrate violence in
the name of Islam all around the world really “hijacked” the religion? If they
are using the Qur’an to justify their actions, what are moderate Muslims doing
to forestall this kind of interpretation of the sacred book of Islam?

By ignoring such questions, Muslim advocacy groups in the
United States have only made matters worse, giving non-Muslims good reason to
suspect their intentions and honesty. The next time American Muslim spokesmen
decry Islam’s image problem, in all fairness they should point fingers not at “Islamophobes,”
but at themselves.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York
Times bestsellers The
Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
and The
Truth About Muhammad
. His upcoming book, Not Peace But A Sword: The
Great Chasm Between Christianity and Islam
, will be available in March.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tommy mc donnell
tommy mc donnell
11 years ago

i wonder how many of our politicans CAIR has bribed.

Guy Macher
Guy Macher
11 years ago

I expect to hear libtard outrage, soon! Kidding. Those gutless wonders think Muslims won’t hurt them come the final days. Wake up, LIBTARDS!

Shane
Shane
11 years ago

Islam has never been a religion of peace, and it never will be, as its founder, Muhammad, was a violent man who treated women like chattel. Muslims consider Muhammad to be the perfect role model for Muslims, so Islam can not become a peaceful religion.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!