U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rules AFDI Islam ad is political
Geller: opinion is “tortured and twisted.”

14

Leaving islam ad BUS
The Wall Street Journal on the Sixth Circuit Court's ruling that Islam is political, hence our "Leaving Islam?" bus ads designed to help Muslims in danger cannot run on Dearborn buses:

"When the Side of a Bus Isn't a Public Space" Wall Street Journal, October 28, 2012

Does the First Amendment protect our right to say what we want in advertisements on the side of a city bus? Yes and no.

Story continues below advertisement

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday
that a Michigan transit authority could bar from the side of its buses
an advertisement that read: "Fatwa on your head? Is your family or
community threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got Questions? Get Answers!
RefugefromIslam.com"

The group behind the ads, the American
Freedom Defense Initiative, had sought in 2010 to place them on the
buses in Michigan's four southeastern-most counties, but the authority
refused, saying the ads violated a policy against political
advertisements
and offensive speech. AFDI sued, claiming First Amendment
violations.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth
Circuit said that the side of the bus wasn't a public forum because the
transit authority involved, the Suburban Mobility Authority for
Regional Transportation, or SMART rejected all political ads. Once
SMART established that the space on the buses was a nonpublic forum, it
could ban political speech,
as long as it did so in a "reasonable and
viewpoint-neutral" way, the court said.

SMART General Manager John C. Hertel said the transit authority was pleased with the decision.

In an email, Pamela Geller, AFDI's executive director, called the opinion "tortured and twisted."

Ms. Geller said the ad was religious,
not political, in nature.
The group plans to ask the Sixth Circuit to
rehear the case, she added.

Over the summer, a federal court ruled
that New York transit authorities violated AFDI's First Amendment rights
by refusing to put up an ad that reads: "In any war between the
civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man."

U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
ruled that the exterior of buses was a public space, because the New
York Metropolitan Transit Authority accepted both political and
commercial advertising. Thus, MTA couldn't restrict AFDI's political
speech.

—Joe Palazzolo

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rick
rick
11 years ago

I like know how they found it offensive to offer safe haven to those leaving an religion. If islam is political then it deserve to lose any tax-exempt status.

RCCA
RCCA
11 years ago

For the Muslim, after all, criticizing their religion is a political act so for them the fatwa ad was a political act. How long before Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation, or SMART revises their guidelines and rejects all ads which defame or criticize religion? Or would that be too obvious?
If they don’t watch out, we will be speaking about Islam as a political system, not a religion. That aught to really scare the American public.

Hellbat44
Hellbat44
11 years ago

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY OF LIBERAL AMERICANS!!
Our country is divided between blue states and red states and anyone who supports the blue states just doesn’t get it! They don’t get that Islam is at war with us; they don’t get that Obama has been an abject failure and is destroying our country; they don’t get that activists like Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Geert Wilders, and many, many other brave patriots are actually fighting on the front lines every day to protect and defend OUR Constitution and American way of life!!
Here it is just two days away from the most important election since WWII and all polls nationwide are showing a statistical dead heat!! 48% Obama and 48% Romney!!! This tells me that almost half of Americans don’t have a clue!! Their attitude seems to be: National debt off the charts? No problem! Downsizing our military? No problem! Apologize to Islam all around the world? No problem! Turn America into a socialist/communist state? No problem! Run unemployment up, up, up? No problem! Alienate our friends and allies abroad? No problem! Continue to allow the infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood and all of their front organizations (CAIR, MSA, NAIT, MANA, ISNA, ICNA, BAMA, NAIF, just to name a few) not only unimpeded but eagerly assisted? No problem!! It it goes on and on…
Liberals and all of those who support Obama are, just like Obama, are quislings to their own country! Treason! Sedition!
If Obama gets re-elected after all that he has done, you can kiss America goodbye.

Hellbat44
Hellbat44
11 years ago

Oh, did I forget Bengazi????!!???

InfidelForLife
InfidelForLife
11 years ago

America, what have you wrought?

Frank Vosler
Frank Vosler
11 years ago

These judges are helping aggressor Islam to silence America’s defenders. This is a struggle for the very life of America and the Liberals (including many judges) are on the side of treason — probably unwittingly in most cases. Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.

jen
jen
11 years ago

Let ’em call it political. They have now set a precedent that says we can never accept sharia law or judgements in our court system, as it is not a religous system, as with the Jews, but A POLITCAL system. It also clears the way for turning down nearly any request to be treated differently on the basis of religious requirements — time for prayer, special dress, holidays, etc. — because it has been established that they do not have any more special rights than a communist of a libertarian, for that matter.

Kufar Dawg
Kufar Dawg
11 years ago

@Jen
I’d like to believe that were true, but somehow I don’t think that’s the way it’ll pan out. Criminalizing criticism of islam as hate speech is just around the corner because islam is fascism.

Luchadora
Luchadora
11 years ago

Well, if Islam is political, then maybe the U.S. Constitution should no longer protect it as a religion.

Kevin Stroup
Kevin Stroup
11 years ago

Place an ad on the side of the buses that says:
“Whatever happened to the First Amendment in this country?”
“Since when do we let bureaucrats determine what opinions are allowed?”

Larry S.
Larry S.
11 years ago

I’d like to understand the rational behind the court’s decision that this ad constitutes “political speech”. It certainly speaks much more to religious difference than a political one. Of course, like the Circuit Court, the world of Islam draws no distinction between the political and religious spheres.
I rather doubt that if this ad were directed toward the Church of Scientology, or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, or the Wiccans, that the Circuit Court would have ruled it “political”. If I am correct in that surmise, why the difference for Islam?
Can AFDI entertain the idea of appealing to the Supreme Court? I would hope some of the heavy hitters on the right (e.g. the Institute for Justice) would assist if AFDI goes that route, but it might require the support of individuals.

KKKK
KKKK
11 years ago

what does the Sixth Curricet Court thin kti is? your bus adds are NOT offensive; they are simply truth-telling about the fact of islam regarding apotasty. everyone knows islam requries the death penality fo apotasty.

Hellbat44
Hellbat44
11 years ago

Posted by: Kufar Dawg | Monday, November 05, 2012 at 01:19 AM “Well, if Islam is political, then maybe the U.S. Constitution should no longer protect it as a religion.”
Kufar Dawg is absolutely on to something here! Islam is mostly a political ideology masquerading as a “religion.”
Islam is waging a stealth jihad (political) campaign against America (and the West in general) using our own First Amendment protection of (religion) as a shield!
Even within Islamic core ideology, the small “religious” component (Mecca) of Islam has been abrogated to the much larger political (Medina) component. So, even the Muslims agree and know that political Islam always takes priority!
Even though Islam is a dualistic ideology (two contradictory things can be true at the same time), any rational person can see that Islam is really a totalitarian supremacist political ideology that does not deserve protection under our First Amendment.

Diane
Diane
11 years ago

Pamela’s Dreamteam won’t fail us now–those good guys are saving the FREE WORLD!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!