News Ticker >
[ October 19, 2018 ]

Bird and Diz on an open thread

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Jewish Leaders Join in Slamming Twitter’s Hypocrisy

[ October 19, 2018 ]

RACIST Black Lives Matter Says You Have to Be Antisemitic to Not Be Racist #BLM

[ October 19, 2018 ]

100 Islamic State Terrorists Caught in Guatemala as Central American Caravan Erupts in Chaos at...

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Meet the anti-Trump Democrats who are friendly to terrorists

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Antisemitic Muslim Minnesota Democratic Lawmaker Faces Fraud, Bigamy Charges with Her Own Brother

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Swedish Jewish politician’s house burned in antisemitic attack

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Muslim Child Rape and Sex Trafficking Gang Jailed for 221 Years

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Sharia Law in Florida Court: Islamophobia is Employment Discrimination

[ October 19, 2018 ]

Italy’s Salvini Deports Muslim Migrant Who Wanted to Kill ‘White Tourists’ and ‘Christians’

Wall Street Journal in support of anti-jihad ads
“Call a Terrorist a ‘Savage’? How Uncivilized”

31

Despite the army of sharia enforcers in the media and the Islamic supremacist thugs, the voices in support of freedom are getting louder and louder:

"Call a Terrorist a 'Savage'? How Uncivilized" William McGurn, Wall Street Journal, October 1, 2012 10:12 pm

An anti-jihad message is 'hate speech' by today's topsy-turvy standards.

"In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad."

So reads an advertisement that went up a week ago in New York City
subway stations. Sponsored by Pamela Geller's American Freedom Defense
Initiative, the ads were meant to provoke, and they did. Denunciations
poured in, activists plastered "racist" and "hate speech" stickers over
the ads, and an Egyptian-American activist even got herself arrested
after spray-painting one poster pink.

Establishment opinion quickly rallied to a consensus. As the
Washington Post put it, while the words could be read as "hateful," "an
offensive ad" nonetheless has the "right to offend." A rabbi summed up
the media orthodoxy in the headline over her column for CNN: "A right to
hate speech, a duty to condemn."

Columnist Bill McGurn on the reaction to a
New York City subway ad that urges people to "support Israel" and
"defeat Jihad." (Photo: AP)

Certainly that's one way to read this ad.
Then again, most Americans probably read it the way it is written:
Israel is a civilized nation under attack from people who do savage
things in the name of jihad. Whatever the agenda of those behind this ad
might be, the question remains: What part of that statement is not
true?

Ah, but the use of the word "jihad" inherently indicts all Muslims,
say the critics. There are millions of peaceful Muslims for whom jihad
means only a spiritual quest. So why do so many people associate jihad
with murder and brutality?

Might it be because violence is so often the jihadist's calling card?
Might it be that some of these killers even incorporate the word jihad
into the name of their terror organizations, e.g., Palestinian Islamic
Jihad? That may not be the exclusive meaning of jihad, but surely it is
one meaning—and the one that New York subway riders are most likely to
bring to the word.

The same goes for "savage." Exhibit A is Oxford's online dictionary,
which defines a savage as "a brutal or vicious person." There are
innumerable Exhibit Bs, but let me invoke one of the most powerful.

This is a Reuters photo that ran on the New York Times front page for
Sept. 1, 2004. It shows an Israeli bus after it had been blown up by a
suicide bomber. Neither bloody nor gory, the photo is nonetheless deeply
disturbing, because it shows the lifeless body of a young woman hanging
out a window.

The Times news story added this detail about the reaction to that
attack. "In Gaza," ran the report, "thousands of supporters of Hamas
celebrated in the streets, and the Associated Press reported that one of
the bombers' widows hailed the attack as 'heroic' and said her
husband's soul was 'happy in heaven.' " What part of any of this is not
savage?

Two years ago, Time magazine ran a cover photo of an 18-year-old
Afghan woman whose nose and ears had been cut off by the Taliban. This
weekend, an al Qaeda-affiliated jihadist group in Kenya threw grenades
into an Anglican church, killing a 9-year-old boy attending Sunday
school. In light of these atrocities, "savage" seems profoundly
inadequate.

The point is that what makes someone a
savage is not the religion he professes. It's the actions he takes.
Notwithstanding the many Jews and Christians who have been attacked,
those bearing the brunt of this savagery are innocent Muslims who find
themselves targeted—at their mosques, in their markets, at a wedding
reception—simply because they belong to the wrong political party or
religious tradition.

The people of Libya appear to understand this better than the
president of the United States. The Libyans know that a civilized
society is one where the strong protect the weak. In July they voted for
such a future when they rejected Islamic radicals in their first free
elections since toppling the dictator Moammar Gadhafi. The Libyans'
problem is that the extremists are better armed and better organized
than their elected government, which leaves the strong free to prey upon
the weak.

Back home in America, amid all the gooey indignation about how the
subway ads are hate speech but must be defended, the idea seems to have
taken hold that the beauty of the First Amendment is that we get to
insult each other's religions. Certainly that's sometimes the price of
the First Amendment. Its glory, however, is as the cornerstone for a
self-governing, free society whose citizens know that someone saying
something disgusting about your faith is no excuse for murder.

What a curiosity our new political correctness has made of our public
spaces. Let your sex tape loose on the Internet and be rewarded with
your own TV show; photograph a crucifix in a jar of urine and our
museums will vie to exhibit it; occupy someone else's property and you
will be hailed by the president for your keen social conscience.

But call people who blow up, behead and mutilate "savage"—and polite society will find you offensive.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest