[ April 20, 2024 ]
Photo: Ambassador Stevens being paraded through the streets of Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012
The war in the information battlespace escalates and targets innocent civilians in service to violent jihadists who are free to murder, riot, burn and destroy in order to further their supremacist goals of instituting the sharia and its blasphemy laws across the world. The media has been working furiously since the outset of the jihadist attacks and subsequent anti-freedom riots to link counter jihadists to the slaughter: Listen to my phone call with the Newsweek reporter : Click here
Story continues below advertisement
This is the enforcement of sharia, just as brutal and unforgiving as it is in Muslim countries. The media's complicity in targeting freedom of expression, freedom of conscience and freedom of speech is savage. They are putting a fatwa on the heads of free thinkers. Intellectual terrorism. (Emphasis below is mine)
Hi Pamela…I'm a reporter for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
and have seen reports that you are somehow tied to Mr. Abdelmashi of
Media for Christ. Need to explore this with you.Best,
Lou Kilzer
Reporter
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
The AP (Associated Press) outed the Muhammad filmmaker after tracing his cell phone. The film maker is being hunted down like an animal and may face jail on trumped-up charges in order to satiate the murderers who attacked our country on 9/11/12 in Libya and Egypt. Jailing the filmmaker is more sharia enforcement in America. Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance
Film maker behind anti-Muslim video 'could be sent back to jail' The Telegraph
The man behind the anti-Islamic film that sparked violent unrest
in the Middle East could be sent back to jail for violating his
probation by distributing the movie.
VOA retails Islamic supremacist hate propaganda, links Muhammad film to "Islamophobia industry" Jihadwatch
The mainstream media is
focusing like jackals on the Muhammad video, endangering the lives of
the innocent people who produced the video, and pressing on the basis of
the video for restrictions on the freedom of speech.But as I've been saying, the video did not provoke the riots. The
riots were orchestrated and planned long in advance, to get the Blind
Sheikh freed — and to intimidate the West into destroying the freedom
of speech.And now the VOA piles on, repeating Islamic supremacist propaganda
about the so-called "Islamophobia industry," without ever mentioning, of
course, that "Islamophobia" is a word that Islamic supremacists use to
intimidate people into being afraid to stand against the advancing
jihad."Anti-Islam Film Linked to 'Islamophobic Industry,'" by Jerome Socolovsky for VOA News, September 14 (thanks to David):
Experts say "Innocence of Muslims", the film that incited
rioting in the Middle East, is the product of a well-financed vocal
minority that has been fomenting anti-Muslim sentiment in the United
States since the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States.Muslim Brotherhood and Leftist organizations in the U.S. are far, far better financed than any counter-jihad organization.
Haris Tarin of the Muslim Public Affairs Council in
Washington says the movie, which mocks Islam's Prophet Muhammad, was
produced by what he describes as a hate-mongering "industry" in the
United States. "This industry that's developed here sees Islam as the
problem," he said.Horror of horrors! Racism and bigotry! Of course, no one could have
gotten such an idea from Amine Mohamed El-Khalifi, the would-be
jihad/marryrdom suicide bomber at the U.S. Capitol; Naser Abdo, the
would-be second Fort Hood jihad mass murderer; Khalid Aldawsari, the
would-be jihad mass murderer in Lubbock, Texas; Muhammad Hussain, the
would-be jihad bomber in Baltimore; Mohamed Mohamud, the would-be jihad
bomber in Portland; Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square jihad
mass-murderer; Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, the Arkansas military
recruiting station jihad murderer; Naveed Haq, the jihad mass murderer
at the Jewish Community Center in Seattle; Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar,
the would-be jihad mass murderer in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ahmed
Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh, who hatched a jihad plot to blow up a
Manhattan synagogue; Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be Christmas
airplane jihad bomber; or the many others like them who have plotted
and/or committed mass murder in the name of Islam and are motivated by
its texts and teachings, all in the U.S. in the last couple of years.
No, if anyone thinks "Islam is the problem," it must be because of a
well-financed "Islamophobia" industry!Tarin says it was created after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington 11 years ago.
Pamela Geller is a spokeswoman for Stop Islamization of America.
Websites like hers have flourished on the Internet and other media,
according to a report last year by the Center for American Progress
research organization.Yes, and so? SIOA is dedicated to the freedom of speech, the freedom
of conscience, and equality of rights of all before the law — all
denied by Sharia. So who is the hater — the one who defends those
rights, or the one who works to subvert them?At a religion newswriters conference last year, Faiz Shakir,
co-author of the report titled "Fear Incorporated," presented his
findings."Fear Incorporated is the small network of actors in this country
who've been building an effort over the past decade to try to propagate
baseless conspiracy theories that cast aspersions on all Muslims in
America," he explained.Unfortunately for Shakir, it was not the "Islamophobes," but the
Muslim Brotherhood, that declared that its work in America was
"eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and
sabotaging its miserable house.Shakir says they have received tens of millions of dollars
in funding from anti-Islamic groups. "So it pays to be an anti-Muslim
hater," he added.Wildly exaggerated. The report said that a large number of groups had
received $42 million over ten years — and even that was an inaccurate
figure. Divide it by all the groups and all the years, and it was well
under a million per year per group — a figure dwarfed by the Center for
American Progress's $50 million annual budget.Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik's notes suggest he was inspired by anti-Islamic rhetoric from America.
Here we go again. Breivik cited many, many people, including Barack
Obama, John F. Kennedy and Thomas Jefferson — who are never blamed for
Breivik's murders. Also swept under the rug is the fact that Breivik’s
manifesto is ideologically incoherent: So far was he from being a
doctrinaire counter-jihadist that he wanted to aid Hamas and ally with
jihad groups. Brevik’s real inspiration for his violence was, by his own
account, Al Qaeda, as becomes clear in his manifesto when he spends 25
pages quoting extensively from the Qur'an and other Islamic sources. So
far was he from being a doctrinaire counter-jihadist that he wanted to
aid Hamas and ally with jihad groups. I am no more responsible for
Breivik than the Beatles are for Charles Manson."It's a transatlantic activity," said Jocelyne Cesari, a
political scientist at The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced
International Studies here in Washington. "I have noticed the same
topics, the same arguments, and the same figures actually circulating
between Europe and the U.S."Cesari cites Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who two years ago joined
protests against the construction of a mosque near the site of the
destroyed World Trade Center in New York. She says Islamophobia is a
European invention."And all this popular imagery of the prophet [Muhammad] as being an
anti-Christ, the prophet as being a sexually obsessed person, all these
kinds of things are not new. You can read them even in medieval times,"
she noted.Cesari warns that extremists on both sides are feeding off each
others' negative stereotypes and warns that it could get a lot worse
unless more moderate voices prevail.Cesari is just another compromised pseudo-academic, the likes of
which American universities hire by the pound these days. Note her
reference to "extremists on both sides" — an increasingly common theme
equating murderous jihadists with those who call for resistance to those
jihadists. It is a particular favorite of the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.
But it is no less nonsensical for being repeated all over.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
22 Comments
11 years ago
The media have sold their souls to Islam. Instead of blaming the GUILTY, the media are blaming INNOCENTS!
The Muslim rage and never-ending violence has nothing whatsoever to do with the movie which has been out for months. Muslims very specifically started their attacks on 9/11 to commemorate their slaughter of our cherished 3,000 on 9/11. When our cherished 3,000 were murdered by the followers of Islam, Muslims celebrated with great delight and joy in America, Britain, and countries around the world.
In Berlin, Germany, Turkish Muslims sent hundreds of bottle rockets into the air to celebrate the murder of innocents
11 years ago
The anti-freedom, infidel-hater media are devoid of all ethics.
The Islam-adoring Western media doesn’t care and DOESN’T PROTEST when the Muslim world shows movies of terrible lies and horrifying blood libels against Jews. Western media DOESN’T PROTEST that Middle Eastern Muslim media constantly spew forth dreadful blood libels against Jews. Or that Hitler’s Mein Kampf is a best seller in the Muslim Middle East.
Our Western media have sold their souls. They are silent about the non-stop atrocities and constant barbaric murders of non-Muslims by Muslims.
Our Western media wickedly aid and abet the global jihad waged against non-Muslims.
11 years ago
“It’s a transatlantic activity,” said Jocelyne Cesari, a political scientist at The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies here in Washington.
“And all this popular imagery of the prophet [Muhammad] as being an anti-Christ, the prophet as being a sexually obsessed person, all these kinds of things are not new. You can read them even in medieval times,” she noted.
————————————————————
Does she mean they made offensive B-movies that was the cause of mass slaughter, looting and invasions Muslim committed even then?
Can’t she hear how she contradicts herself! It is simply unfathomable that they still can’t connect the dots!
11 years ago
This is another Brievik moment for the enemedia.
They will use this an another attempt to silence and even kill their competition and political opponents
11 years ago
excerpt from an opinion by:
Geoffrey R. StoneEdward H. Levi Distinguished Service Professor of Law, University of Chicago
Terry Jones and the First Amendment
Posted: 09/14/2012 1:10 pm
“In 1952, the Supreme Court of the United States finally put the matter to rest in Burstyn v. Wilson, holding in a unanimous decision that
“it is not the business of government in our nation to suppress real or imagined attacks upon a particular religious doctrine”
or to protect
“any or all religions from views which are distasteful to them.”
The First Amendment, the Court declared, renders any such government action unconstitutional. Religions and religious figures, like political parties, politicians, businessmen, and other members of society are fair game for criticism, condemnation and even mockery.
The second argument one might make for punishing those who condemn Islam and mock Mohammad is that such speech causes serious harm because those who are offended by the speech will react to it in violent ways. In order to prevent the violence, the government must prohibit the speech. The Supreme Court has long wrestled with this problem. When can the government silence a speaker because his speech will upset or anger others and provoke a violent response?
The Supreme Court first addressed this question more than 60 years ago in Cantwell v. Connecticut. Newton Cantwell (a Jehovah’s Witness) was proselytizing in a heavily Roman Catholic neighborhood in New Haven, Connecticut. Cantwell stopped people on the street and played them a record that included an attack on organized religion in general and on the Roman Catholic Church in particular. Because several listeners were incensed and came close to starting a fight, Cantwell was arrested, charged and convicted of inciting a breach of the peace. The Supreme Court unanimously held that Cantwell’s speech was protected by the First Amendment, reasoning that, at least in the absence of a clear and present danger of grave harm, the government could not constitutionally punish the speaker.
Now comes the hard case. Suppose Cantwell’s speech had in fact triggered a fight, in which several people were injured. Could he then constitutionally be punished for playing the record?
There are two important objections to punishing Cantwell in this situation. First, even though these particular listeners reacted violently, many others would not have done so. Suppose he had played his record to fifty groups of people before anyone reacted violently. Would it make sense to punish Cantwell because in the fifty-first instance the listeners were violent?
Second, suppose we do conclude that Cantwell could be punished because the fifty-first group reacted violently. If Cantwell’s opponents know that by acting violently they can get the government to punish Cantwell for saying things they don’t like, they have every incentive to act violently in the future. This would create what has been called “the heckler’s veto.” That is, it would turn over to a speaker’s opponents the power to have him criminally prosecuted for his speech.
Apply this to the current situation, and the implications are obvious. If we punish American citizens for engaging in otherwise constitutionally protected speech in order to prevent foreign terrorists from engaging in violent acts, then we cede to those very terrorists the meaning of the First Amendment. That doesn’t sound very promising, does it?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/terry-jones-and-the-first_b_1884662.html
11 years ago
“Islamophobia is a European invention”
Jews of Khaybar, once in modern day Saudi Arabia, unavailable for comment.
At this point you have to be full retard (a la Tropic Thunder) to not have some concerns about Islam.
11 years ago
I learned Muhammed was “sex obsessed” by reading the canonical sahih ahadith at the USC-MSA website. YMMV.
11 years ago
11 years ago
CLD,
Blood libel means Jews supposedly making matzoh out of blood, if I’m not mistaken.
Given my premise, your comment makes no sense. And your concern for the safety of another human being who *gasp* made a crappy movie is noted.
11 years ago
seriously…?
Carney: Anti-Islam Video Completely to Blame for ‘Unrest’
Alana Goodman | @alanagoodman
White House spokesman Jay Carney just held a press briefing that was equal parts absurd and horrifying. […]
Carney continued to repeat — almost as if he were trying to convince himself — that the riots are purely a reaction to a low-budget anti-Islam Youtube film. Nothing to do with the anniversary of the September 11 attacks. Nothing to do with anti-American sentiment. Nothing to do with support for al-Qaeda or Islamic terrorism.
“Let’s be clear: these protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region,” said Carney. “We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack.”
“The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that many Muslims find offensive,” added Carney. “It is not a response to 9/11.”
And it continued on like that for the rest of the briefing:
“The unrest around the region has been in response to the video.”
“What we have seen is unrest around the region in response to a video that Muslims find offensive.”
“We are working to ensure that our diplomatic personnel and our diplomatic facilities are secure as we deal with the response to this video, which we believe is offensive and disgusting.”
“The cause of the unrest was a video. And that continues today, as you know, as we anticipated. And it may continue for some time.”
“The reason why there’s unrest is because of the film. This is in response to the film… this is not a film that the United States government had anything to do with. We reject its message and its contents we find it both reprehensible.”
“My point was simply that we are responding to and coping with and dealing with…unrest brought about by this offensive video.”
“The unrest we’ve seen is a reaction to a film with which the U.S. government has had no involvement, which we’ve denounced as offensive. As I said yesterday, it can be difficult to see in some countries why the U.S. can’t simply eliminate this expression…but as you know…it’s one of our fundamental principles.”
“We find the video reprehensible and disgusting…This video has nothing to do, has nothing to do with the American government. It has nothing to do with who we are or what we believe.”
Even if the video fueled the protests, how did a low-budget Youtube film that nobody had heard of before last week get dubbed into Arabic and distributed around Muslim countries? The answer is fanatical Islamist leaders who used the film to incite outrage on the anniversary of the September 11 attacks.
And if you believe the video was the sole drive behind the protests, then why were U.S. flags replaced with the flags of al-Qaeda? Why were terrorists groups reportedly involved in organizing the protests weeks in advance — before the film even came to light?”
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/09/14/carney-anti-islam-video-completely-to-blame-for-unrest/
11 years ago
Given the fact that no one can or should control the internet, there is no way for the Islamists to enforce Sharia. There will be, therefore, unending attacks on Western interests wherever the Jihadis exist. At one point, some US administration will realize this and emulate the Israeli example of building a “wall” i.e. fortifying our embassies and vital interests such as sea lanes, pipelines, refineries etc. and withdrawing from areas we can not protect. A strong defense in this case is the best offense.
11 years ago
Check this out from Daily Mail yesterday:
“Meanwhile, further details have emerged about the Benghazi attack – Mr Stevens and information technology specialist Sean Smith were killed during an attempt by U.S. forces to evacuate staff from a safe house, Libya’s Deputy Interior Minister Wanis Al-Sharif said.
U.S. consular staff were moved to the safe house after an attack on the consul building, which also claimed the life of former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, 42.
A plane with U.S. security units arrived from Tripoli to evacuate other staff but militants discovered the location of the safe house, he said.
‘It was supposed to be a secret place and we were surprised the armed groups knew about it. There was shooting,’ he said.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202409/Safe-house-Ambassador-died-Marine-guard-body-missing-hours-Full-scale-chaos-surrounding-Libyan-killings-revealed.html
Considering Obama’s little clan has been infiltrated with the Muslim Brotherhood, why are they surprised?
11 years ago
People, the film had nothing to do with this savagery. They have now been attacking UK and German embassies. What they got to do with the film? Nothing.
11 years ago
Those who are supposed to be the vanguard of American liberties have become the biggest traitors.
11 years ago
Having seen the above pic, I can say that the man is already dead not because failure respiration medical. The hand seems protect him from something direct to his head and those eyes open. The blood coming from the nose. He must be get fatal blow on his stomach or chest.
No one die inside smokey room with open eyes, non red eyes, with mouth shut down. Ask all firefighters over the world, they will said similiar as my opinion.
He died for the torturer. He woukd said ” Jesus, forgive them because they don’t know what are they doing”. Jesus love you. You fight for Libya peace but die on their hand too.
Give thanks to all islam on the world because they let islamist radicals overcome their religion
11 years ago
They are just willing to stick hated people in jail for whatever reason. It is like with the George Zimmerman affair. Though he was within his rights to use lethal force, they want to charge him with murder to appease a stirred up mob of people who hate America anyway. Now it is happening again with this filmmaker being framed and brought up on some mysterious charges, just to show the mobs that he is being put in jail. There is a war against the American way of life. If we lose America like the Middle Eastern and African people lost their nations, we are going to get stuck with what they have, Muslim totalitarian sharia lawlessness.
I hear rumors that the fimmaker is some sort of criminal, that his name, Sam Bacile, is really a pseudonym, that two Copts helped produce the movie, and that it was financed by 100 American Jews. Maybe the film was really made by the CIA. Who knows? There is no information on the filmammker. They say he is in hiding in California. Hiding from what? Are mobs going to chase him down the street with hatchets? Does he even exist? Maybe this was all created to give an excuse to riots on 911 to further depress the American people on the national day of mourning.
I think that the film is so poorly made and acted that it might just be a tool to stir up the radicals. A lady who acted in it said she was told it was a historical movie about the mid-east and was a Christian movie. Then they dubbed in anti-Islamic things afterwards and now she wants to sue them. She is scared that she will be attacked now so she could be making this up, or maybe they did trick actors into making it. She said she answered an ad in the local paper for actors.
Who releases clips for thirteen minutes on youtube but never puts out the movie? Where is this movie? If they show the clips, they should show the whole thing. If it is real, the director should get it on youtube ASAP, or else he might be in jail before anyone gets to see it.
If he really is Israeli, maybe he should just head on back to Israel. It is probably safer for him there. This country is looking for people to lock up. Israel is looking to stay the same.
11 years ago
Aussie News & Views: Muslim Insurgents Sydney Riot latest Video and Pictures
http://aussienewsviews.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/if-you-know-who-this-muslim-criminal.html
Muslim Insurgents rampage through Sydney Central Business District planned attack against Police Shoppers and By Standers
11 years ago
Wealthy men without visible means of support are known to police. Nakoula most likely was an informant for a shadowy intelligence agency. His probation officer was told to look the other way, while Nakoula followed instructions. He most likely will disappear in a federal lockup to prevent him from ratting out his network.
11 years ago
Talking about using the same arguments– Imam Rauf made this very same claim on the Sean Hannity show some months back, comparing the Fla. pastor who wanted to burn korans to jihadi suicide bombers. He argued that these ‘extremes’ were feeding off each others’ hatred and making the world more dangerous.
Ms. Cesari’s statements are more pathetic attempts to get all who don’t agree with her, and her fellow multiculti types, to shut up out of fear. Did the pastor have a murderous temper tantrum when he was called every name in the book for his opinions? How many mosques were burned? Any dead muslims dragged through the streets?
IMHO, that closes that case.
11 years ago
Talking about using the same arguments– Imam Rauf made this very same claim on the Sean Hannity show some months back, comparing the Fla. pastor who wanted to burn korans to jihadi suicide bombers. He argued that these ‘extremes’ were feeding off each others’ hatred and making the world more dangerous.
Ms. Cesari’s statements are more pathetic attempts to get all who don’t agree with her, and her fellow multiculti types, to shut up out of fear. Did the pastor have a murderous temper tantrum when he was called every name in the book for his opinions? How many mosques were burned? Any dead muslims dragged through the streets?
IMHO, that closes that case.
11 years ago
@f. s.
It’s hard to believe the HuffPo published an op-ed like that. Usually they’re all about white-washing islam and obfuscating the truth about its ugly, genocidal, violent and antisemitic ideology. The writer is still an equivocating asshole though, he indicts Christianity for blasphemy punishments inflicted hundreds of years ago while ignoring the fact the islamonazi bastards have done and are now enforcing blasphemy laws in ALL their various islamonazi pigsties and that people have been killed for blaspheming islam in islamonazi states in the 21st century. The death penalty is the prescribed punishment for blasphemy in Soddy Barbaria, yet the writer makes no mention of that factoid.
11 years ago
@Michael Fine
I don’t know if I buy into your idea that “no one can or should control the internet”. The internet is a man-made tool as such it can be unmade and/or controlled with sufficient, totalitarian effort. IT professionals aren’t going to be standing up to people with guns.
