AFDI Pro-Israel bus campaign: Hamas-CAIR’s sharia petition to stop the ads in accordance with the blasphemy laws

You’d think that all those peace loving Muslims who believe that “jihad” means inner struggle would be in favor of any effort to condemn violent jihad done against innocent civilians.

CAIR said, “We don’t feel comfortable boarding buses that label an entire community savage.’
********************************************************************************************
GOOD!!!!!
Then WALK you evil Jew hating S. O. B.
Or maybe you can ask Aladdin to borrow his magic carpet.
Or maybe you can go to hell where you belong.

Their law permits them to kill their wives and daughters for wearing “Western” clothes, but does not allow them to be called savage? How civilized is that?

The ad clearly equates Jihad with savagery, and equates only Jihad with savagery. If a Muslim is offended, he must be admitting he is a Jihadist. Since Jihadists are terrorists in the popular lexicon, and since terrorists are not welcome in the USA, then anyone feeling offended should be deported, right?
Makes sense to me.

@Fitna
On your last point I agree w/you entirely. There’s no middle ground between
islamofascism and freedom/liberty/equality because islam is a
totalitarian, supremacist, antisemitic, xenophobic (at least to any and
all unbelievers) ideology. Anyone who says differently is either ignorant,
dumb or corrupt.

There is nothing racist about critiquing “Palestinian” policy and culture.
The “Palestinians” are a hodge podge of white Nazi war criminals (“al-Husseini”, “al-Arian”); black slaves (“ibd”, “Abdullah”); white Ottomon imperialists (“al-Turki”); and assorted fellaheen from Babylon (“al-Iraqi”, “al-Basri”, “al-Kurdi”), North Africa (“al-Misri”, “al-Liby”) and Asia. They are not a race.
What unites them, then? Their policies and culture. Lets look at their policies: The “Palestinians” – ‘Southern Syrians’ as they were then known – supported the Nazis, and their imam spent the war years in Berlin where he designed the Shari’ah-compliant death camps at Auschwitz (Haj Amin al-Husseini). The “Palestinians” – racial purity obsessed ‘Arab nationalists’ then – supported the Communists, and their Pope (Yassir Arafat, permanent co-President of the OIC who had far more theological import over the Ummah than the vicar of Rome has ever had over Catholics) was an agent of Moscow. The “Palestinians” – soldiers of Allah this time ’round – supported the jihad, not just the dancing on the streets on 9/11, but survey after survey which shows that virtually every Mohammedan in “Palestine” advocates crimes against humanity. Al-Qaeda attacked on 9/11 to be pro-“Palestinian”. So much for their foreign policy.
Let’s look at “Palestinian” culture. Intolerant. Irreverent. Lazy. Misogynist. Imperialist. Summud (antonym of innovative). Regressive. Homophobic. Deeply racist and anti-Semetic. Incredibly violent. Anti-human rights. Anti-American. Anti-globalist.
Essentially, in the big moral questions of the 20th and 21th Century – both foreign policy and domestic – the “Palestinians” have chosen the side of Evil. And there’s nothing racist about saying so.
There is nothing racist about critiquing “Palestinian” policy and culture.

Look at the twitter address: “volksmenner @volksmenner”. That’s Dutch, hence a European. Not surprising then that this person is a complete imbecile. Only a complete imbecile would call supporting the only real democracy in the Middle East “racist”; only a complete imbecile would protest against those that try to protect our freedoms and rights from Jihadis.
Oh yes, this must be a European.

Vandalizing the ads is a destruction of property crime. Surely video cameras at the bus stops will identify the quilty ones. Moreover, that CAIR is publically calling for people to vandalize these ads is aiding and abetting a crime. They too should be arrested and when convicted they should be deported. It is interesting however that the muslims identify themselves with the word savage and not with the word civilized.

I would list myself as among those not entirely comfortable with the wording of the advertisement. Not that it is wrong- but it may not be the best way to present a message.
The ad also is unnecessarily harsh and alienating. I’m not concerned about being harsh and alienating toward jihadis and their sympathizers. But I think the wording may turn away “moderates” who may be opposed to the jihadi’s agenda- particularly those who have not read “Atlas Shrugged” and are unfamiliar with Objectivist rhetoric.
As such, Pamela may be preaching to the choir while presenting her message in a way to dissuade the congregation from attending church. Perhaps a better way to look at this is to ask, “Would this advertisement set up barriers to the future Nonie Darwish’s of this world”? I would wonder what Nonie thinks about the wording of this ad.
Finally, I think to lump savages in with a bunch of mass-murderous thugs driven my a religiously inspired hate gives a bad rap to savages throughout history (and pre-history). After all, one definition of “savage” is “a person belonging to a primitive society”.

“We don’t feel comfortable boarding buses that label an entire community savage.” This is so COOL! We can be safe from these savages by posting these ADs everywhere they like to attack! Too bad is probably just another lie on their part.

Интересно, прикольно, супер