Imam Rauf Meets His Match

Imam Rauf Meets His Match
By Robert Spencer

 “You’re a well-intentioned man…and you want good things to happen to Americans.”

So said Bill O’Reilly to the former Ground Zero Mosque imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, last May, during a Rauf met his match in the intrepid Canadian journalist and author Michael Coren.

Coren cut through Rauf’s blandly deceptive statements about Islam’s supposed respect for Jesus Christ and Christian Scripture by pointing out the rampant persecution of Christians in the Muslim world. Then he confronted Rauf about his notorious statement on 60 Minutes shortly after 9/11, that Osama bin Laden was “made in the USA." Rauf told Coren: “That was an insensitive thing to say, and I regret having said that.” More politically correct interviewers would have let the matter go there, but Coren followed up with, “Is it true, though?” He then pressed Rauf to answer the question when the master deceiver tried to evade it; ultimately Rauf’s long-winded and cloudy answer was unmistakable in showing that he did indeed believe it was true.

Coren also refused to let Rauf get away with his oft-repeated claim that the real enemy the West faces today is not Islam, but “extremism.” “No,” said Coren, “the enemy is Islamic extremism.” Rauf, of course, would not accept this, but pressed to give an example of non-Islamic extremism, Rauf finally mentioned a colonel in the U.S. military who had called Islam an evil religion. Coren, in the heat of the discussion, immediately responded, “So what?” – and that was the most apposite response. For Rauf, as I pointed out in my own follow-up interview on the Coren show, was equating acts of violence committed in the name of Islam and justified by Islamic texts and teachings with the horror and disgust that those acts of violence provoke. He was labeling as “extremism” – which he identified as the real enemy – not only mass-murder committed by Muslims to defend and extend Islam, but also statements by non-Muslims saying that there must be something terribly wrong with Islam if it can provoke on such a large scale so much violence and hatred.

Rauf, in short, was saying that it would be just as bad to speak out against Islamic jihad violence as it would be to kill in Islam’s name. Taken seriously, his recommendations to combat such “extremism” would mean the end of all examination of how Muslims use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism, and would thereby render us mute and defenseless before the advancing jihad. His words are completely in line with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s ongoing campaign to compel the West to criminalize criticism of Islam, giving Islam a privileged status that would allow jihadists to operate without any analysis of their motives and goals that might be undertaken with an eye toward stopping them.

If Bill O’Reilly and other journalists who interviewed Rauf before Michael Coren did had done their job properly, none of this would come as any surprise. Those who know not to trust the mainstream media have long known Rauf’s true allegiances. As far back in September 2010, at the height of the Ground Zero Mosque controversy, Pamela Geller reported:

It is clear that Rauf and other mosque leaders are not as moderate as they claim to be. Rauf has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood…The Muslim Brotherhood is dedicated, according to a captured internal document, to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.” Rauf’s book What’s Right with Islam says on the copyright page that “this edition was made possible through a joint effort of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and the office of Interfaith and Community Alliance of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Funding for this project was provided by IIIT.” Both IIIT and ISNA are Muslim Brotherhood fronts, and ISNA was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding case.

The Arabic translation of Rauf’s book What's Right with Islam is disturbingly entitled A Call to Prayer from the World Trade Center Rubble: Islamic Dawa in the Heart of Post-9/11 America. This indicates that he has planned for years to spread Islam and Sharia from the site of the 9/11 attacks — belying his more recent claims that he intended the mosque to be a center for reconciliation and peace.

Rauf refused to condemn Hamas until the public outcry became too great for him to ignore. He was a prominent member of the Perdana organization, which bankrolled the jihad flotilla sent against Israel last year, on which the "peaceful" passengers were chanting a genocidal and antisemitic Islamic jihad chant.

Also, Rauf has said that “the US and the West must acknowledge the harm they have done to Muslims before terrorism can end.” He has claimed that “Western active involvement in shaping the internal affairs of Islamic societies have contributed to the creation of terrorism done in the name of Islam.” In other words, defending ourselves against jihad terrorism just creates jihad terrorism, so we should stop defending ourselves.

Rauf has carried his blame game even farther, claiming: “We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims.”

Geller also notes that Rauf "snagged more than $2 million in public financing to renovate low-income apartments" that he owned in New Jersey, but never made the renovations. Where is that money?

Where indeed? Michael Coren should invite the renowned imam back for a second interview.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?, is now available.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here

0 0 votes

Article Rating

3 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

InfidelForLife

11 years ago

I have seen that interview (on the internet) and indeed Rauf wasn’t a happy camper with all the intelligent questions. Of course he couldn’t answer. Indeed mr. Coren is a great reporter and interviewer: intelligent, polite, honest, strictly factual and inquisitive. He’s everything the majority of his ilk are not, a titan amongst dwarfs.
Not armies, not guns, not violence can accomplish what honest and intelligent reporting can do. The pen can be mightier than the sword. This is what we need in journalism and in leadership: honesty, integrity and courage.
Islam has a fatal weakness: The Truth. And the Truth shall set us free.

0

Kufar Dawg

11 years ago

“if Bill O’Reilly and other journalists who interviewed Rauf before Michael Coren did had done their job properly.” I’ll bet Bill O’Reilly did exactly what his job as a mainstream journalist depends on in the 21st century in the USA: acting as a mouthpiece for islamofascist propaganda.

0

John Kenny

11 years ago

O’Reilly’s show should be called “The No Spine Zone”.

0