Leading U.S. Muslim jurist: Female genital mutilation an “honor” in Islam

12

“Circumcision is obligatory (O: for both men and women. For men it consists of removing the prepuce from the penis, and for women, removing the prepuce (Ar. Bazr) of the clitoris.” Sacred Islamic  Reliance: page 59, Umdat al-Salik  (“Reliance of the Traveler”), a manual of Islamic jurisprudence certified as “reliable” by Egypt’s very own Al-Azhar University

But Obama’s U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released this “fact sheet” about clitoridectomies (female genital mutiliation.)

“Although many people believe that FGC is associated with Islam, it is not. FGC is not supported by any religion and is condemned by many religious leaders,”

Story continues below advertisement

“No religious text requires or even supports cutting female genitals. In fact, Islamic Shari’a protects children and protects their rights.”

Muslims in America are practicing clitoridectomies.

At least some Muslims justify it based on religious freedom and, in at least one state in which anti-FGM legislation is currently working its way through the legislative process, one legislator reports receiving a phone call from a Muslim constituent urging her to oppose the legislation as ‘a conspiracy against the Muslim community.’ ”(more here.)

We successfully beat back and defeated a sharia-compliant proposal by the American Academy of Pediatrics to change a longstanding policy concerning the practice of clitorectomies in Islamic culture. The American Academy of Pediatrics suggested that American doctors be given permission to perform a “ceremonial nick” on girls from Islamic countries.

Legislation has been bouncing for years; tell your state legislators and your congressman to support it: Legislation on Female Genital Mutilation in the United States

Fight back: Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance

How is it that Dr. Hatem al-Haj, a fellow at the American Academy of Pediatrics and a leading Muslim jurist, misunderstands Islamic law so severely as to think that this purely cultural practice has something to do with Islam? Surely it can’t be that the mainstream media and Islamic leaders in the U.S. have been lying to us, and FGM really is justified in Islam, could it? Naaah.

“AMJA Senior Committee Member: Female Genital Mutilation Is ‘an Honor’ per Islam,” from Translating Jihad, April 27 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A couple of weeks ago I posted a translation of a paper by Association of Muslim Jurists of America (AMJA) senior committee member Dr. Hatem al-Haj, PhD, MD, in which he warned American Muslims against working in law enforcement in our ‘infidel’ nation (see here for more details). Now in my latest translation, Dr. al-Haj explains why female circumcision is recommended and even ‘an honor’ for women….

Below is my excerpted translation of the 41-page Arabic-language paper by Dr. Hatem al-Haj entitled “Circumcision of Girls: Jurisprudence and Medicine” (see the original here and here):

The ruling on circumcision: Scholars have differed on the ruling on circumcision. They have agreed on its legitimacy for both sexes, but beyond that they have differed. Some–most famously the Shafi’ites–believe that it is obligatory for both sexes. Some believe it is obligatory for men only, and some believe it is recommended for both. At the very least it can be said that for women it is an honor, and for men it is sunnah [i.e. it is in accord with the tradition of Muhammad].

There are many hadiths on circumcision, some of which will be presented here along with the commentary of some scholars:

From Abi-Hurayra, who attributed it to the Prophet: “Five (acts of) al-fitrah [Islamic law or way of nature] are circumcision, shaving pubic hair, plucking armpit hair, trimming fingernails, and clipping the mustache.” Also from Abi-Hurayra: “The Messenger of Allah said, ‘Abraham was circumcised when he was 80 years old’.”’ Allah said: “So We have taught thee the inspired (Message), Follow the ways of Abraham the True in Faith” [Qur’an 16:123]. Also recorded in a hadith is the saying of (Muhammad) to a man who converted to Islam: “Remove your infidel hair and be circumcised.”

Muhammad also said regarding circumcision: “If you touch the two circumcisions, you must wash.” Here is evidence that women were circumcised, and therefore any of the hadiths on circumcision which do not specify men or women, can be assumed to apply to both.

From Sa’id bin Jabir: “Ibn ‘Abbas was asked, “How old were you when the Prophet (PBUH) died?” He replied, “At that time I had been circumcised. People (in those days) did not circumcise men until they reached puberty.” From the hadith of Umm ‘Atiyah–who used to circumcise girls–the Messenger of Allah said to her, “Reduce it, but do not remove too much, because it is more beautiful to behold and better for her husband.” This is the most explicit evidence in the hadiths of Muhammad for female circumcision being legitimate and even recommended. From Ibn ‘Abbas, attributing it to the Prophet: “Circumcision is sunnah for men and an honor for women.” This was narrated by al-Bayhaqi, and its attribution is weak.

Ibn al-Mundhir narrated from Abi-Barza: “We asked the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) about an uncircumcised man making pilgrimage to the Ka’aba. He replied, ‘No, not until he’s circumcised’.” This was considered a weak hadith by Ibn al-Mundhir and others.

There’s no doubt that among these hadiths there are those which are sound but do not explicitly command or urge women to become circumcised. There are also those which are met with disagreement by scholars, and these hadiths are more explicit in confirming the legitimacy of female circumcision. But the hadiths on the laws of al-fitrah which mention circumcision–and these are sound–do not mean that it is done on men only and not women. It is certain that circumcision includes both men and women, as is clearly stated in the hadith about touching the two circumcisions.

Below are words from scholars on the ruling on circumcision:

The Hanafis: Al-Zayla’i said: “The general ruling is that circumcision is sunnah, and is one of the trademarks of Islam. In fact, if the people of Egypt or some land decided to abandon its practice, the Imam would make war against them, for it cannot be abandoned except by necessity… Female circumcision is not sunnah, but it is an honor for men because it is more pleasing during sex” [ellipses in original].

The Malikites: From al-Kharshi’s brief summary of Khalil: “Its ruling (i.e. circumcision) is that it is sunnah for men, and it cuts off the foreskin. It is recommended for women, and is called khifad [reduction].”

The Shafi’ites: From [Asna al-Mutalib]: “Circumcision is obligatory (at puberty). The reasoning for this is the saying of the Almighty: “So We have taught thee the inspired (Message), Follow the ways of Abraham the True in Faith” [Qur’an 16:123]. In Abraham’s religion, circumcision was present. Also in the two Sahihs: “He was circumcised when he was eighty years old.” In Sahih Ibn Hibban, and in al-Hakim it was said 120 years, and it was also said 70 years. Also it was narrated by Abu-Dawud: “(The Prophet) (PBUH) ordered a man who converted to Islam to be circumcised.” They said that since he cut off a member which could not be replaced, it had to be obligatory like cutting off the hand. Since the man was injured during the process, he feared it. If it were not obligatory for him, then it would not have been permissible. This is unlike the circumcision of little boys, crazy people, and those who cannot endure it, because the first are too young to be required to do anything, and the last are harmed by it.” Al-Nawawi said in al-Majmu’: “Circumcision is obligatory for our men and women. This was stated by many of the salaf, as al-Khatabi relates. Ahmad was one of those who said it was obligatory. Malik and Abu-Hanifa said that it was sunnah for everyone. This was related by al-Rafi’i. He also related that (circumcision) is obligatory for men and sunnah for women. These were the two approaches of Shadhan, and of the sound and famous school of thought which was penned by al-Shafi’i, in which the multitude of scholars declared that circumcision is obligatory for men and women.”

The Hanbalis: From Ibn Muflih’s Furu’ [body of rules and regulations for man’s behavior]: “(According to Ahmad), circumcision is obligatory on all but women, for whom it is recommended. Our Shaykh said, ‘It is obligatory because cleanliness and prayer are obligatory’.” Ibn Qudama said: “Circumcision is a duty for men, and for women it is an honor, but it is not obligatory. This has been stated by many scholars.” Ahmad said: “The man is more difficult, because if the man is not circumcised, then the skin dangles over the [penis] and cannot be cleaned. But the woman is easier.”

The al-Mawsu’a al-Fiqhia (“The Encyclopedia of Jurisprudence”) summarizes scholars’ opinions on circumcision as follows:

“The ruling on circumcision: Scholars differ on circumcision as follows: First, the Hanafis and Malikites–and very rarely the Shafi’ites–hold to the opinion of what Ahmad said, that circumcision is sunnah for men but not a duty. It is one of the acts of al-fitrah, and one of the rituals of Islam. If the people of a particular land decided together to abandon its practice, the Imam would make war against them, just like if they abandoned the call to prayer. This also represents what the Malikites think about circumcision of women. Hanafis and Hanbalis consider female circumcision to be an honor and not sunnah. It is said by some Hanafis that it is also sunnah for [women], and some say that it is recommended. … Second, the Shafi’ites and Hanbalis, as is also stated by Sahnoun from the Malikites, believe that circumcision is a duty for both men and women. … Third, this is written by Ibn Qudama in al-Mughni, that circumcision is a duty for men, and for women it is an honor but not a duty” [ellipses in original].

Assessment

It appears that for male circumcision the most correct view is that it is obligatory, owing to the saying of Muhammad to the man who converted to Islam: “Remove your infidel hair and be circumcised.” This was obligatory–there was no alternative.

Regarding women, perhaps the most correct view is that it is recommended, however there is consensus that it is (at least) legitimate. Muhammad also endorsed it, as was narrated in the hadith of Umm ‘Atiyah, who used to circumcise girls. He said to her: “Reduce it, but do not remove too much, because it is more beautiful to behold and better for her husband.” He also said, “If you touch the two circumcisions, you must wash.” This shows that female circumcision was prevalent during his day, and he did not repudiate it. Nor did he stipulate anything else regarding female circumcision.

Perhaps the saying that it is (only) recommended is due to the pain women must go through to carry out the acts of al-fitrah, such as circumcision, as stated in the sound hadith. But as we mentioned, this is not evidence of it being confined only to men. The term circumcision was used for both men and women during Muhammad’s time. But it is clear that performing circumcision must be preferable to not performing it, especially when one considers that circumcision includes both pain and revealing one’s nakedness. Thus if there was no benefit to it, the Messenger of Allah would not have agreed to it. However there is still no evidence for making it obligatory. The fact that the Messenger of Allah agreed to it despite the pain and discovering one’s nakedness is not evidence for making it obligatory. Instead, this is evidence for preferring the action over not doing it, as we stated. (Muhammad’s) command to Umm ‘Atiyah is not a command to all women to (be circumcised), but rather he was regulating its practice. He was not telling her not to do it, he was telling her not to go too far and injure the women.

His command to the man who converted to Islam does not apply to women. Even though the principle is that “women are men’s sisters”, and women are often included when addressing men and vice versa, that only applies when there is no reason to differentiate between them. Here the issue is different for men and women. The man’s foreskin could trap urine at the end of it and affect his cleanliness. The issue is not the same for women. Therefore it is appropriate for this to be stressed more for men, and this is apparent in the words of scholars and the works of the ummah.

I have summed up the words of Muhammad and of scholars to show that circumcision is legitimate, and that the principal issue in the study is the limits of circumcision.

Print Friendly and PDF

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
fern
fern
11 years ago

o/t
Today’s ‘Taqqiya Numpty Tweet of the Day’: “there were no domes in the West until Europeans had come into contact with the Muslim world.”

prestigio
prestigio
11 years ago

why don’t we honor all moslem men
by cutting off their penises and testicles

CGW
CGW
11 years ago
Auntie Izlam
Auntie Izlam
11 years ago

“prestigio” Where do I sign up to help out?
“CGW” Done.

Polymath
Polymath
11 years ago

This should be declared the crime it is of assault,abuse,sexual abuse, and mutilation.Any doctor, or person who participates must be prosecuted.It is barbaric to do this to little girls- and without anesthesia. For males, it is a completely different story and serves to preserve the male’s health.
The other is to enslave. It is intolerable. A child of 5, or 6, who hugs a teacher,
can be arrested by the police. However, there has to be a movement to protect all children,once and for all, not only from pornographers, and sexual abuse, but from TSA representatives,incompetent social service workers, teachers who are inferior and
abusive in reality, etc.

bb
bb
11 years ago

Mutilating kids is not an honor, it is child abuse. Maybe their demon honors it the way the Aztecs got some corn for the most beautiful young girls who were sacrificed. These people are not right in the head. People who aren’t brainwashed by their cult need to put a stop to this, especially in Amercia. Why can’t DYFS be called in on these parents to harrass and terrorize them the way they do to ordinary Americans?

donna
donna
11 years ago

FGM is an extremely depraved and barbaric act committed by depraved and sociopathic individuals who serve demons when they commit such horrific things such as this.
It should be criminalized in ALL western countries, their children should be taken away from them and raised in homes that truly honor little girls for the beautiful little creatures God Almighty made them to be. God knew what He was doing when He placed the clitoris in the human female, but in a culture where only MEN are allowed to enjoy sex it stands to reason they would demand the removal of the only organ in anatomy that is soley dedicated to the pleasure of sex, it has no other purpose. How incredibly sick, depraved, arrogant and SINISTER this practice is, it’s straight from HELL~!~!

Betty
Betty
11 years ago

let pass a law to cut the penis and the pair that hangs down off. these nut cases and see what they think? then they can be a slave to the women. for the next 1400+ years what you say girls? good idea? go for it.

bb
bb
11 years ago

This seems like a religion based on the pain and suffeirng of women. Some people derive spiritual power from the suffering of others. They are satanists and psychopaths usually. Now meet Islam of today. I have a feeling it wasn’t always this crazy or how would Muslims have lasted this long. Mohammed is a rotten role model, but they want to emulate him in every way.
This cutting off of womens genitals is the men cutting off their noses to spite their face. If they really wanted to control women, letting feel more for them would make them more slaves to them. Ha ha. I feel bad for these women though. It must be horrible to be just used as an inucbator rather than as a partner in a union.
I hate the influence of this religion and culture. You see men today more and more bleittling and blaming women for their own faults. They stare and glare at wome more than ever, not just with lust but with scorn mixed in for even causing the lust. If you don’t wear a bra, you are treated like some outcast street whore. What happened to women’s lib and burn the bra? They want to burn you now for not wearing the bra, and a tighter and more concealing one at that.
Fight the abuse of women on every front. Don’t let the dirty men get away with this or the cockamamie women who go along to get along. Women have enough pain and suffering in their lives with periods and childbirth. Throwing out the only good feelings is like just locking them in another cell of emotional sterility the way the burka locks them in an aesthetic dungeon.
DYFS needs to go after these people, not like they will, but that is what they are supposed to do. I don’t think circumcision is even good for boys, but this is not even on that same level socially and spiritually.

Mitzzrael
Mitzzrael
11 years ago

Religion is a problem, a very big problem. ¬¬ I regret million times for these poor women. I refuse myself to give any kind of support for a religion like Islam. No way, definitely. ¬¬

Dalit
Dalit
3 years ago

Why is the question, does it reduce or even eliminate sexual pleasure for females, never answered?. But I guess the answer is obvious.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!