Can we even ask if Muhammad never existed?

5

JWHeaderAS3

Can we even ask if Muhammad never existed?
By Robert Spencer

Did Muhammad exist? The question startles most people, either because they have taken for granted that he did, or because they are aware that asking such questions can get you killed. My new book, Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins, came out just weeks after New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman published his latest book, Did Jesus Exist? Asked when we would apply the same critical eye to the Qur’an that he has trained upon the Bible, Ehrman replied: “When I no longer value my life.”

Story continues below advertisement

And there’s the rub: is it even possible in the Free West today to ask questions regarding the historical support for the Islamic account of the life of Muhammad without drawing threats to one’s life and attacks on one’s character? When one Islamic scholar, Suliman Bashear, taught his students at An-Najah National University in Nablus that the Qur’an and Islam were the products of historical development rather than being delivered in perfect form to Muhammad, his students threw him out of the window of his classroom. A scholar who has done groundbreaking work on the text of the Qur’an publishes under a pseudonym, Christoph Luxenberg – an understandable precaution in light of the threats he regularly receives.

Ehrman, for his work questioning the historicity of the New Testament records of Jesus Christ, receives no threats, and is lauded in academia. By contrast, Religion Dispatches has already published a piece claiming that my book on Muhammad will win praise only from the “Islamophobia industry” – implying that the book is in itself a manifestation of hatred and bigotry.

Certainly many Christians have regarded historical-critical investigations of the Gospels as attacks on the Christian faith, and even as attempts by the critics themselves to justify their own unbelief. Yet the Catholic Church and other Christian bodies have also embraced the historical-critical method, and have long since ceased to see it as a threat to their faith. Dozens of books have been written about whether Jesus Christ really ever existed at all, and if he did, what manner of man he was.

Islam is also a faith rooted in history. It makes historical claims. Muhammad is supposed to have lived at a certain time and preached certain doctrines that he said God had delivered to him. The veracity of those claims is open, to a certain extent, to historical analysis. Whether Muhammad really received messages from the angel Gabriel may be a faith judgment, but whether he lived at all is a historical one.

Islam is not unique in staking out its claims as a historical faith or in inviting historical investigation. But it is unique in not having undergone searching historical criticism on any significant scale. Both Judaism and Christianity have been the subject of widespread scholarly investigation for more than two centuries.

The higher criticism transformed the Christian world, changing the course of several major Christian communions and radically altering how others presented the faith. Similarly, investigations into the origins of Judaism and the historical material contained within the Hebrew scriptures have affected the Jewish tradition. In Judaism as in Christianity, traditions developed that rejected literalism and reevaluated numerous elements of traditional orthodoxy. Reform Judaism, like the liberal Protestant denominations, generally rejected traditional understandings and the literalism that underlay them.

Yet Judaism and Christianity still live, and in many areas they thrive. They have survived the challenge. Can Islam survive the same historical-critical challenge?

No one knows, for it has never received this treatment on nearly the same scale. Yet why should Islam and its leading figure be exempt from the scrutiny that has been applied to other religions? Have political correctness and the fear of violent Muslim retaliation advanced so far in the West that the freedom of speech and the search for the truth must be curtailed?

Maybe. We will see in the coming weeks, in the reaction to my raising the question of whether the enigmatic figure of Muhammad is a historical one. The reaction will reveal in microcosm the health of the freedom of speech and freedom of inquiry in these politically correct days.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?, is now available.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jake Neuman
Jake Neuman
11 years ago

ALLAH IS NOT GOD
ALLAH (of the Quran) NEVER EXISTED. Muhammad AKA Allah.
FREE PDF BOOK DOWNLOAD AT http://www.islamreform.net
In his excellent new book “Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins” Robert Spencer has questioned the very existence of Prophet Muhammad. We can state to a certainty of 100 million trillion percent that Allah (of the Quran) never existed – that Muhammad never met the Angel Gabriel, never received one word from Allah – that not one word of the Quran is from God – that The Quran is fraudulent, Muhammad was no prophet of ANY God – that Sharia Law is not the divine constitution of God – THAT ISLAM S TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT.
For free download of PDF book: ALLAH IS NOT GOD. ALLAH (of the Quran) NEVER EXISTED. ALLAH AKA MUHAMMAD: MURDERER, TERRORIST, TORTURER, RAPIST, CHILD MOLESTER.
ONLY A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION IS GOD.
THE DESTRUCTION OF ISLAM WITH JUST ONE WORD
GO TO: http://www.islamreform.net/new-page-151.htm
For article: JESUS VERSUS MUHAMMAD go to http://www.islamreform.net/new-page-93.htm
MANKIND HAS A CHOICE BETWEEN 2 DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT GODS: A “GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION”™ VERSUS ALLAH (the ANTIGOD) of the Muslims:
A GOD OF ALL PEACE, LOVE, MERCY AND GOODNESS (A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION™) OR AN EVIL ALLAH (the ANTI GOD) OF EXTERMINATION, GENOCIDE, ASSASSINATION, MURDER, HATE, TERROR, TORTURE, BRUTALITY, SLAVERY, RAPE.
AND 2 DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT PROPHETS
Jesus Christ was a true Prophet of peace and love, goodness and mercy. Prophet Muhammad was a true prophet of extermination, murder, slaughter, rape, terror, torture, hate, slavery, child molestation. These are crimes against humanity. These are crimes against God.
ISLAM IS A TOTAL RENUNCIATION OF GOD. THE GREATEST CRIME AND SIN EVER COMMITTED BY MAN AGAINST GOD.
THERE IS NO MORAL EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY/JUDISM AND ISLAM. CHRISTIANS ARE SANCTIFIED BY THE BLOOD OF CHRIST RECEIVED AT HOLY COMMUNION. MUSLIMS ARE SANCTIFIED BY THE BLOOD OF MURDERED KAFIRS GUARANTEEING ACCESSION TO A VIRGIN DELIGHT PARADISE.
Jake Neuman is the author of “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason” and Prophet Muhammad (AKA ALLAH): Monster of History. The Teachings of The Quran are The Teachings of A Psychotic and That Psychotic Was Prophet Muhammad: Murderer, Terrorist, Torturer, Rapist, Child Molester (free download) at http://www.islamreform.net His book ISLAM — EVIL IN THE NAME OF GOD™ was banned in Malaysia.

JewishOdysseus
JewishOdysseus
11 years ago

How is the news enemedia not putting Robert Spencer in exactly the same position as Galileo? He has an important question based on evidence, or lack of evidence, he posits the question, he examines the evidence…”STOP THE INFIDEL!”
See, the crime is ASKING THE QUESTION, refusing to adopt the faith of The Powerful Ones…the answer, or how compelling (or non-compelling) is really irrelevant, for their purposes.
Wouldn’t Russia have been much better off if the Czar had remained in power?
Wouldn’t the 3d World “countries” have been much better off if they had remained colonies?
Wouldn’t black Americans be much better off if we never had the welfare state and afirmative action?
…a few other questions that get you condemned FOR ASKING THEM, who cares that the answer is obviously “yes.”
BRAVO TO ROBERT SPENCER for his courage, diligence, and scholarship!

JewishOdysseus
JewishOdysseus
11 years ago

Ooops, typo, meant to write:
See, the crime is ASKING THE QUESTION, refusing to adopt the faith of The Powerful Ones…the answer, no matter how compelling (or non-compelling) is really irrelevant, for their purposes.

PB-in-AL
PB-in-AL
11 years ago

So much for Ehrman’s “intellectual convictions”.

CGW
CGW
11 years ago

PLEASE HELP.
Albert Lea, MN pediatrician advocates Female Genital Mutilation:
PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION:
http://www.change.org/petitions/fire-dr-hatem-elhagaly-and-revoke-his-certifications

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!