Enemy in the White House: Obama caught off mic promising to give Putin everything after his re-election

14

Is Jake Tapper the only objective reporter left in the whole of the mainstream media? This is another bombshell by the traitor to his adopted country. Once again he is abandoning our allies and relinquishing American sovereignty to our enemies by covert executive fiat.  No surprise here, as this was meticulously documented in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's war on America. Read it.

Expect the enemedia to gloss over this executive act of sabotage.

Obama meets Putin.bbmp

Story continues below advertisement

Obama to Putin: I'll Surrender America After Re-election Jake Tapper

Jake Tapper of ABC News reports that an open microphone caught President Barack Obama telling outgoing Russian President Dmitri Medvedev that he would be prepared to yield to Russian demands on missile defense after his re-election, but needed more "space" until then.

The two leaders were meeting in Seoul, South Korea, and Medvedev immediately promised to relay Obama's message to incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin:

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

President Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

President Obama has repeatedly backed down on missile defense in the face of Russian demands, most famously abandoning American promises of cooperation with Poland and the Czech Republic in 2009. 

Republican opponents warn that Obama will follow an even more radical course in his second term than his first, because he will no longer face the same electoral pressures that saw his party lose control of the House of Representatives in 2010.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
armaros
armaros
12 years ago

Obama is also giving away oil rich Islands off Alaska to Putin
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/obamas-giveaway-oil-rich-islands-to-russia/
“I can see Russia from my back yard” … and getting closer.

Bob
Bob
12 years ago

Nice video, did Obama just finish reading the book, “Kiss, Bow or Shake Hands”? The video of bowing deeply to the Saudi King is famous. Where is there a video of PBO kissing Putin on the cheek, a la Jimmy Carter kissing Brezhnev?

Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel)
Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel)
12 years ago

ObaMao’s silent and ceaseless mantra must be “Stay in character! Stay in character!”.
Wait until he is re-elected. He will be giving the farm away so openly, with nothing to lose, the libtards will have to tie themselves in knots to construe him as anything other than a traitor.
His ultimate legacy will be gutting our national security. Our enemies will likely think it’s now or never time, wondering if they’ll ever get a better chance to attack us than late in his second term.
He’s going to pull a Jimma Carter on us for sure, but Carter only had one term and was just stupid, whereas ObaMao has eight years of conscious betrayal to foist on us. Is there another Reagan waiting in the wings to put America back together when he’s gone? I seriously doubt it.
Marco Rubio will be four years older. Maybe he can run. But I think we’ll really need to suspend the constitution under martial law by then and start rounding up traitors. Screw presidential politics. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
It would take twenty or thirty fifty years to restore our country by “democratic” means and we’d need the approval of our enemies to pull it off. No thanks.
A nice coup d’etat would work for me.

Shishka Bob
Shishka Bob
12 years ago

There’s every reason to think that the Republicans will retake the Senate in November. And they will probably maintain their advantages in the Congress as well. SO–
If the conservative lobby gains full control of the Congress this November WE will have the authority to remove Owhats-his-face from office if he gets re-elected; God help us. (And unfortunately, he will almost certainly as George Soros is buying off the constituents of the electoral college like he did in 2008). And I have little doubt that a real Republican-majority Congress will act to remove him from office as fast as they can.
Bye Bye Bastard!

armaros
armaros
12 years ago

“A nice coup d’etat would work for me.”
Well….in case you missed, there was one in 2008

D. Sanchez
D. Sanchez
12 years ago

Posted by amarosa:
“Obama is also giving away oil rich Islands off Alaska to Putin”
FTFA:
Author’s addendum, Feb. 17, 2012: This is not a new issue. In fact the Bush and Clinton administrations are directly at fault for the same inaction.
Next time read your own source material before vomiting your ignorance all over the internet.

Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel)
Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel)
12 years ago

Amaros, I thought Bush I was a coup d’etat, and especially Bush II. I still can’t figure out why self-styled conservative patriots just went along for the ride.
As far as I’m concerned, Obama is just a continuation of the dismantling of our nation and our freedoms toward the goal of re-establshing feudalism. Welcome to one-party rule. The king is dead; long live the king!
Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel)

chilipalmer
chilipalmer
12 years ago

To D. Sanchez regarding Bush, Clinton and oil fields, is your statement meant to close discussion on this topic? If previous administrations did certain things it doesn’t make them right. Before wide availability of the internet a president could sell out the country but not as many of us would know about it. Even with the internet, the business dealings of presidents are considered none of our business. I’m always glad to be informed that earlier presidents were as bad as Obama but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be aware of how the executive branch behaves and what we might wish to do about it. The term ‘vomiting ignorance’ sounds like you wish to silence dissent.

blindreason
blindreason
12 years ago

Is this the same missile defense technology that liberals decades ago insisted would never work?

non ame
non ame
12 years ago

The real problem isn’t obanga the communist destroyer, it’s the entirety of the USGOV.
There isn’t a single GDF employee there who isn’t a communist, muslim, or isn’t fully compromised. They’re just going to ride their fatass federal jobs & bennies until the country bombs, and go to work for the new Soviet afterward.
Who do we call to arrest the open, naked, communist & traitor in the WH? Holder? the FBI? The CIA? DoD? Congress? Wait and hope Mittens isn’t Bush II?
There’s no resistance, the country formerly known as America bent over and took it; the communists won.

Michael Teuber
Michael Teuber
12 years ago

“President Obama has repeatedly backed down on missile defense in the face of Russian demands, most famously abandoning American promises of cooperation with Poland and the Czech Republic in 2009. ”
Apparently Alaska also.
The Audacity of Obama’s Intentions Revealed
by Sarah Palin
“There is a place here in Alaska where, on a clear day, you can see Russia”
@ Coprophagic Embouchure
“Author’s note: This is not a new issue. In fact the Bush & Clinton administrations are directly at fault for the same inaction. …it is within the President’s power [to] stop this giveaway. State Department Watch, …has confronted each administration & is currently confronting the Obama administration – and has been met by silence.
-From the author, 2010 Alaska Republican Senate candidate Joe Miller’s , own site.
It would be, uh, problematic to go back in time and keep previous administrations from giving away resource rich islands, which they did not actually give away. The only option is to prevent the Obama administration from doing so, as they still may.

joy52
joy52
12 years ago

Who wanted and would be happy to hear Obama saying he could do more after the election? His base. The same as who wanted and would be happy to hear Obama criticizing Netanyahu. His base. I think Obama knows when a mic is hot and says what he wants to get out. If you like what Obama is doing then his statements would make you happy. Obama does not care about people who would never vote for him, anyway. I think that is the reason for the Trayon comments. It is a form of African-Americans for Obama. I’m just surprised Jackson and Sharpton are letting themselves get used again so soon. Jackson, for one, had Obama’s number.
I also think the purpose of the teleprompter has always been to control what Obama says, so he did not reveal himself too early.
Hey, I predicted that Romneycare would be Romney’s Achilles heel, that needed to be framed as a state’s right.
Never take your eye off the people behind Obama.

alyn21
alyn21
12 years ago

Giving in to the Russians proves one thing. Obama is not a muslim , he is a Liberal.
This is classic Liberalism giving in to the enemy. Muslims don’t do that.
Whether it be Neville Chamberlain in England, Pierre Trudeau in Canada or Jimmy Carter is the U.S. the pattern is still the same.
BHO will sell us out to whichever dictatorship is the strongest.

bb
bb
12 years ago

You can’t really trust anyone at the top. I don’t think we owe it to Russia to get rid of our weapons. On the other hand, maybe Obama will want to give our weapons away to weaken our country to be more easily picked apart by Muslims and corporate fascists. That however, will be giving power to Russia, which may or may not be on the Muslims side, depending on their own interests. So Obama, being a loyal Muslim, may or may not keep any promises he makes.
Every country must have weapons out the wazoo, wether known about or not. The decision to use the weapons is what matters, not how many there are. With all of the massive weaponry of the US, our soldiers seem to be being picked off one by one with homemade bombs. The whole weapons issue seems like a smokescreen to me.
Having the heart to fight is what makes a warrior, not the weapon he uses.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!