Pamela Geller, WND: Cain, Not Able

Agree, and the big hat tip, at almost every interview Cain seemed to tweak his words just a little bit more. Not the little stuff, but the major issues, economy, islam,and was not informed at all on terrorism or world events. One might think he was/is a plant to take votes away from the front runner.

Unfortunately i think the Paul bots will jump on this article at some point. That said,there isn’t a chance in hell Cain was put in as a plant. The facts just don’t add up. I’m not sure who advised him on this one but they probably should have just let it be and waited for the firestorm to blow over. Sometimes they do.
Thorny issue. If you say mosques can be shut down then you’re treading on the Constitution. I would have advised Mr Cain to say it’s a local issue that will be decided between the people of Tenn and the courts. I disagree w/ Christine totally on the rest of her comment.As for as the other major issues Mr Cain has stayed right on message.
Cain becomes Cair? Now come on. That’s a real stretch. He’s damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t so it’s probably in the campaigns best interest to re focus on economic issues and stay away from this one.
Herman Cain is a good man & will make a great President.IMHO he’s just a tad naive when it comes to the attack dogs in politics.The assertion about him being a plant is just nonsense.

Prepare to see this play out again and again with every major contender who speaks the truth about Islam.
We’re screwed.

And what would a candidate have to do to prove himself sufficiently anti-Muslim to garner Geller’s support? Bludgeon a Muslim kid with a bowling pin on video? Perhaps it was brought home to him that statistically, a greater percentage of blacks have committed rapes, murders and robberies than have Muslims even been interested in “jihadism”. That by his rhetoric, if there should be no Muslims in government, then doubly so there should be no blacks.

Everyone needs to remember these:
http://keelynet.com/humor/norights.htm
Once you have those down, then you understand that the Bill of Rights DOES NOT APPLY to personal relationships. The Bill of Rights is about controlling government intrusions NOT about controlling interpersonal relationships. If I want to restrict your freedom of speech, I can just as you can restrict mine.
Have you read your Qur’an lately? Any change in the commands to kill infidels? Not in mine.

@Ibrahim Syed
I wonder if strawman arguments count as an instance of Al Taqiyya or Kitman?
Of course when you’re a muslime baboon defending islamonazism fallacies of logic
are about all you have to defend your faith of hatred.

I wish Mr. Cain had said that
the fight against slavery was
led by Christianity, not Islam.

Anyone who criticizes Islam based on the written histories of Islam as well as contemporary socio-political scenarios in Islamic countries around the world is not stereotyping Muslims or Islam.
They are the Muslim historians who gleefully documented the barbaric atrocities committed by Muslims wherever Islam gained its hold since 7th century A.D.
Muslims do not apologize for their historic crimes against humanity, rather forcefully defend their actions based on Islamic Shariat.
When Saudis and Egyptians flew aeroplanes into American buildings by following the commands of al-Qu’ran, nowhere on earth Muslims apologized to any non-Muslim for Islamic jihad committed by their fellow Muslims.
Muslims, in fact, take immense pride and satisfaction in killing non-Muslims by blowing themselves up with bombs. Al-Qu’ran says, those Muslims who slay and are slain in jihad against non-Muslims will go straight to Islamic paradise.
Muslims love nothing but paradise.
Therefore, it is not at all surprising that, following the footsteps of Ronald Wilson Reagan who started Islamization of America over 3 decades ago, Herman Cain or any other Republican contender for presidency today will simply lie back and forth to voters to win election.