Eric Holder: Black Panther Case Demeans “My People”

26

His people? But but but but I thought we were all his people. But but but I thought we were all the messiah's little children.

Eric Holder: Black Panther Case Demeans “My People” Hat tip Kenny Solomon via Gateway

Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) accused the Justice Department of failing to cooperate with a Civil Rights Commission investigation……

Story continues below advertisement

“When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia—which was inappropriate, certainly that…to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people,” said Holder, who is black.

You disingenuous hypocritical lying sack of racist sh……

You're the A.G. of The United States for God's sake ! Straw-man arguments and completely unrelated comparisons are beneath first-week law students.

Your resignation should have been demanded on the spot for making that statement.

Indeed. But America is off stage right – the coup

"Obama has Violated His Oath of Office" in Racist Dept of Justice Decision to Drop New Black Panther Party Voter Intimidation Case and Mandate DOJ Policy: "No Voter Intimidation Cases Will Brought Against Black Defendent Where the Victim is White"

 The Black Panther voter intimidation case was dropped even though the case had already been won. Post-racial? No, post-American.

Obama_black_panther

First, the backstory. In March of 2008, The Black Panther Party endorsed Barack Hussein Obama for President on Obama's campaign website.

That following election day in November, in a glimpse of what America would suffer from an outlaw, thug administration, the Black Panthers were blocking the doorway at a polling place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and engaging in voter suppression and intimidation. I was live blogging it here.

One of the panthers said "the black man was going to win the White House no matter what."

Brandishing a night stick, and swinging it menacingly, the police were called – one of the black panthers and his night stick were moved.

Do you think little old white ladies would want to walk past the black panther with a night stick.

Watch the actual video here.

Rick Leventhal was harassed; video here.

The following  May( 2009), in an astounding violation of our voting rights as a nation, Obama's Department of justice dropped the charges against the weapon-carrying Black Panther thugs.

Today Meghan Kelly interviewed J. CHRISTIAN ADAMS, FORMER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LAWYER, the whistleblower at the Department of Justice. This is part II. It is shocking. You must watch this:

 

 

Here is part of the text but watch the video. If you do nothing  else, watch it.

Partial text:
 J. CHRISTIAN ADAMS, FORMER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LAWYER: Well, people were standing in front of the polls with weapons in Philadelphia on the day that President Obama was elected in 2008. The Justice Department brought a case in January under the voter intimidation statutes against the New Black Panther Party, the individuals who organized the deployment and the folks with the weapons in Philadelphia at the polls.

MEGYN KELLY, "AMERICA LIVE" HOST: Ok, and so the guy we see banging the baton, he was one defendant. The guy next to him who was said to have been saying intimidating things, he was a defendant. The New Black Panther Party was a defendant and the head of it was a defendant.

ADAMS: That’s right, all four.

KELLY: Ok, and what was basically the heart of the case against them.

ADAMS: Yeah, this 1965 Voting Rights Act protects voters from voter intimidation. You’re supposed to be able to go vote without somebody with a weapon shouting racial slurs at you like these folks were doing in Philadelphia.

KELLY: What were they saying?

ADAMS: Well, they said, “You’re about to be ruled by the black man, Cracker”. They called people “white devils”. They menaced, they tapped their baton. They tried to stop people from entering the polls.

KELLY: Is there any question in your mind that that violates the law.

ADAMS: No, nor anybody that worked on the case. It’s the easiest case I ever had at the Justice Department. It doesn’t get any easier than this. If this doesn’t constitute voter intimidation, nothing will.

KELLY: And you had, you had not just that video tape, which we’ve all now seen, but you had witness testimony from some credible witnesses who were there.

ADAMS: That’s right Bartle Bull; he’s a long time Robert F. Kennedy civil rights activist, worked in Mississippi in the '60s. He said it was the worst case of voter intimidation he has ever seen in his 40 years of practicing civil rights laws.

KELLY: So it was clear to you a case needed to be brought.

ADAMS: Slam dunk. I mean, nobody thought there was any doubt that this was the clearest case of voter intimidation that I’ve seen since I’ve been practicing law.

KELLY: All right, so when the case was originally filed, who was at the top? Was it President Bush or was it President Obama?

ADAMS: It was President Bush. It was January of 2009.

KELLY: Ok. So the case gets filed, you become the lead attorney on this case.

ADAMS: But there were other attorneys working on it. Five attorneys in all worked on this case, in the voting section: Chris Coates, Bob Popper, Spencer Fisher and Grace Chung Becker who authorized it, she was the assistant attorney general during the Bush administration.

KELLY: And Chris Coates, his name is going to come up later. He was your boss?

ADAMS: That’s correct.

KELLY: And how many years had he been at DOJ?

ADAMS: He’s a voting rights giant. He’s been practicing voting rights law since 1976. He’s literally one of the greatest voting rights attorneys in the history of the country. And he was the, really the lead on this case.

KELLY: And there was no doubt in his mind this case needed to be pursued?

ADAMS: There was no doubt in anybody’s mind, at least not the people who were working hard on the case there was no doubt.

KELLY: Ok, so you bring the case against these four defendants. The two guys we see on camera, the party and the head of the party. And what happens next?

ADAMS: Well you cruise along. The defendants didn’t even appear, they didn’t even answer, the just ignored the charges.

KELLY: They didn’t bother to defend it in any way?

ADAMS: No, it’s like ignoring a speeding ticket. They just blew it off. They didn’t show up for court, they didn’t file any papers, they didn’t do anything.

KELLY: So you get something that’s called a default judgment, meaning a judgment because they didn’t bother to defend it and the judge says to you at the Department of Justice, OK, write up an order and tell me whether you want to make this final essentially.

ADAMS: Yeah, the court had already found and entered the fault against the defendants. It was done. All we had to do is tell the judge what we wanted for punishment.

KELLY: OK, but instead of doing that, something changed at the Department of Justice. What happened?

ADAMS: Well, the case was dismissed on May 15. All the charges were dropped against three of the defendants and the final order against one of the defendants was a timid restraint.

KELLY: So, the only person who wound up facing any punishment was the guy with the baton. And instead of having a permanent injunction, which is what you guys wanted, never let this guy near a polling station to do this, to do this kind of thing again, he got what?

ADAMS: He’s stopped from appearing at the polls with a weapon only in the city of Philadelphia and only for a couple more years.

KELLY: And the other three defendants?

ADAMS: Nothing. They’re dismissed from the case completely.

KELLY: Ok, so what happened at the Department of Justice to get you to the point where you literally snatched defeat from the jaws of victory?

ADAMS: Sure, well what happened was, and it’s been testimony. We were ordered to dismiss the case. I mean we were told drop the charges against the New Black Panther Party.

KELLY: Who told you that?

ADAMS: Well, the testimony has been that Steve Rosenbaum and Loretta King, two political officials at the Department ordered the dismissal of the case. Of course that was the first story. Eventually it was revealed that there were more people involved. But originally Steve Rosenbaum and Loretta King, two political appointees did.

KELLY: And did you personally speak with Mr. Rosenbaum and Ms. King about the dismissal of this case?

ADAMS: No. Chris Coates and Bob Popper did. Two other attorneys.

KELLY: Ok. And what was your understanding based on those discussions about their reasons.

ADAMS: Well, you know the Department has said that the facts and the law don’t support going forward on the case. Now, obviously that’s false. Anyone with eyes can see that the facts and the law would support this case. Uh, there’s video. Take for example Jerry Jackson; he’s the tall Black Panther. He’s also a Democratic elected official from the city of Philadelphia.

KELLY: The one without the baton.

ADAMS: That’s right. There is sworn testimony in front of the Civil Rights Commission that Jackson tried to stop people from going into the polls. Witnesses testified that he tried to block them from entering the polls, yet they dismissed the case against him.

KELLY: So, but what was the reason? That’s what I’m trying to get at. You, the trial attorneys, the career lawyers at DOJ said we have a victory. We think this case has merit. And you were told what?

ADAMS: Dismiss the case. That the facts and the law don’t support this. I can’t explain it.

KELLY: What was really going on?

ADAMS: Well, I mean, there is a pervasive hostility to bringing these sorts of civil rights cases. I’ve worked on other ones at the Justice Department. I’ve worked on cases in Mississippi. I’ve represented both black victims of racial discrimination and Hispanic victims and in this case a white victim of racial discrimination. There is a pervasive hostility within the civil rights division at the Justice Department toward these sorts of cases.

KELLY: Do you believe that the DOJ has a policy now of not pursuing cases if the defendant is black and the victim is white?

ADAM: Well, particularly in voting. In voting that will be the case over the next few years, there’s no doubt about it.

KELLY: There isn’t?

ADAM: None, I mean, instructions were, if you had all the attorneys that worked on this case I am quite sure that they would say the exact same thing. And that other attorneys gave instructions that the voting section would not be pursuing these sorts of cases.

KELLY: Who specifically has issued that mandate?

ADAMS: Well, you know, there’s some things I’m not going to reveal as far as who they are. They know who they are. They’ve said that if somebody wants to bring these kind of cases that’s not going to be done out of the civil rights division. If a U.S. attorney wants to do it, that’s up to them, but it’s not going to happen out of the civil rights division.

KELLY: Let me ask you this. Is it somebody or is it several people in positions of power?

ADAMS: Yeah, it’s a political appointee. It’s a political appointee.

KELLY: You have said that after the dismissal of the New Black Panther’s case that a mandate was issued that no more of these cases brought against black defendants would be brought. Is that the case?

ADAMS: That’s what I just said. Look, this is an administration that campaigned on transparency. They campaigned on restoring integrity to the Justice Department and they also claim they’re going to be post-racial. On all three of those they flunked the test on the Black Panther dismissal. None of these things came through.

KELLY: Now before these. You said these were political appointees who made the decision basically. Loretta King and Rosen- this guy Steve Rosenbaum, right?

ADAMS: Correct.

KELLY: Ok. The Department has said they are not appointees. These are career Department of Justice lawyers and so it wasn’t politics in the mix in making this decision.

ADAMS: Yeah. Obviously that’s false. Under the vacancy reform act they were serving a political capacity. This is one of the examples of Congress not being told the truth, the American people not being told the truth about this case. It’s one of other examples in this case where the truth simply is becoming another victim of the process.

KELLY: Now, I want to get to what was said to Congress. And what was said to the US Commission on Civil Rights in a minute, but I want to ask you: when you were arguing, when the career, when the trial attorneys were trying to convince these two political attorneys to let the case go forward, you’d already won, saying don’t reverse our victory essentially.

ADAMS: Yeah

KELLY: There was a meeting. And these lawyers would later testify, the political lawyers would later come out and say that they reviewed all the evidence, the Department of Justice has said they looked at all the evidence and they made a decision based on that evidence the case couldn’t go forward. You say there is evidence that they did not review the facts of this case and even the briefs of this case.

ADAMS: Yeah. It’s obviously false that they knew all the evidence. They, uh, Steve Rosenbaum hadn’t even read the memos which detailed all of the facts and the law. Before he started arguing against the case the mind was made up. And it was so derelict and so corrupt that Chris Coates actually threw the memo at Steve Rosenbaum and said how dare you make these arguments without even knowing what’s in the briefs?

KELLY: So, your boss, the guy that had been a career DOJ lawyer, voting rights lawyer, throws the memo, throws a brief at the head of this guy Steve Rosenbaum?

ADAMS: He very passionately believed in the merits of this case and very much opposed corruption of this sort. And he was angry.

KELLY: What was the response? I mean that’s an extraordinary story.

ADAMS: I don’t know, I wasn’t there.

KELLY: But this came to you from Coates.

ADAMS: Correct.

KELLY: And you have no doubt that it occurred.

ADAMS: There’s no question that it occurred.

KELLY: So what — do you know the explanation from Rosenbaum from this other woman Loretta King as to why they hadn’t bothered to read the briefs at the DOJ on this case and why it should go forward?

ADAMS: Uh, they will probably deny that they didn’t read it, but you can’t explain something like that.

 

Then watch Bartle Bull's reaction. Bartle is a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. He gave a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick. Mr. Bull's testimony was not considered and he was not contacted by the Department of Justice. (hat tip Before its News)

"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi … I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location." ~ Bartle Bull

Posted by Pamela Geller on Thursday, July 01, 2010 at 08:42 PM in Comments (29) ShareThis

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | Tweet This! |

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kenny Solomon
Kenny Solomon
13 years ago

Thanks for putting this up on your site Pamela.
I saw that article on Jim Hoft’s place (Gateway) and simply freaked out.
Mr. Holder, your people are Americans – Black, White, Brown, Yellow, Red and even purple with pink polka-dots if you look hard enough. All 360+ million of us.
……and Rep. Culberson, sir, you’ve dropped the ball and it’s still real close to your side. Pick it up and take it to every single camera in DC and start bouncin’ it high and hard. Get the rest of the so-called Republicans on the committee to join you and call Col. West while you’re at it. I know for a fact he has ‘a special place in his heart’ for AG Holder. 😉
Cheers !
Kenny Solomon
Israel Survival Updates
Follow I.S.U. On Twitter

S. Wolf
S. Wolf
13 years ago

It is a coup alright..
‘The Obama-Democrat Left has mounted the first successful counter-revolution — against the American Revolution — in our history. Using an incessant series of attacks by a fifth column, the intent of the counter-revolution is to eradicate the effects of the American Revolution.’
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/02/modern-manifesto.html
Time to shove back, hard.

Bohemond1096
Bohemond1096
13 years ago

In post Soetorro America only whites can be racist.

johnl
johnl
13 years ago

This is the same Holder that did not identify himself as a black man when he addressed a crowd stating that “Crime is not a black problem but belongs to all the races”. [This is after black teens killed another black teen outside a crime-ridden neighborhood, which was shown on you-tube]. Instead of being honest and helping the country by stating that violence is a major black problem, he denies race. In the case in Philadelphia, he prejudices race. Our AG is a race-baiter, marijuana semi-legalizer, and anything else that helps destroy Western traditions.

Mister Grady
Mister Grady
13 years ago

If Republicans are too clueless and feckless to use this against Obama now and in the next election, they are every bit as useless as I’m afraid they are.

Jew Lover
Jew Lover
13 years ago

Would it be OK if a white AG said “my people” regarding KKK members at a polling place?
Should African-Americans, AG Holder included, be guilty of hate crimes for hating the Ku Klux Klan?
Should Jews be guilty of hate crimes for hating the Nazis?
Should Infidels be guilty of hate crimes for hating Islam?
If we cannot hate evil, what can we hate?

Jew Lover
Jew Lover
13 years ago

…continued.
Do good and evil, love and hate, right and wrong exist?
Moral relativists and multiculturalists often say, “Who are we to judge?”
If we DO NOT JUDGE, then it is impossible for good and evil, love and hate, right and wrong to exist.
We MUST JUDGE to know good from evil, love from hate, and right from wrong.

Is hatred of a vegetable, a color, a shape, or an animal considered a “hate crime?”
Is hatred of a belief system that allows/condones/requires atrocities such as child rape, sex slaves, amputation, beheadings etc. a “hate crime?”
Why would “hate crimes” exist against things (beliefs and Islam) and people (Muslims) that wish to enslave us, torture us, persecute us, kill us, yet not exist for things such as colors, shapes, vegetables etc. that can do us no harm?

Elaine
Elaine
13 years ago

Kenny, “His People”? — It has never made sense to me why blacks always call themselves “AFRICAN Americans.” Aren’t they “AMERICANS”? Seems they WANT to hold onto dividing themselves from Other Americans. Holder’s “MY PEOPLE”? I am so sick of this!
All of us came from somewhere and have various backgrounds. What if I called myself and
“Irish, Indian, Scotch American”? This is getting very very old; and lets us see that the STILL want to divide themselves away from the Majority of Americans like they are special. They are NOT.
There were black slave owners: http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
White Slavery Did Exist:
By Michael A. Hoffman
When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary “indentured servitude” or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The “convicts” transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000.
The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master’s silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of WHITE slaves who were worked to death in this country (U.S.) from the early l7th century onward.
Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were White slavesand they were America’s FIRST slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were. This slavery was even hereditary. Whitechildren born to White slaves were enslaved too.
Whites were auctioned on the block with children sold and separated from their parents and wives sold and separated from their husbands. Free Black property owners strutted the streets of northern and southern American cities while White slaves were worked to death in the sugar mills of Barbados and Jamaica and the plantations of Virginia.
The Establishment has created the misnomer of “indentured servitude” to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early Americacalled themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called “custom of the country,” as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.
In George Sandys laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved “forever.” The service of Whites bound to Berkeley’s Hundred was deemed “perpetual.” These accounts have been policed out of the much touted “standard reference works” such as Abbott Emerson Smith’s laughable whitewash, Colonists in Bondage.
I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Blackenslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more “servitude” on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery.
[…]
Before British slavers traveled to Africa’s western coast to buy Black slaves from African chieftains, they sold their own White working class kindred (”the surplus poor” as they were known) from the streets and towns of England, into slavery. Tens of thousands of these White slaves were kidnapped children. In fact the very origin of the word kidnapped is kid-nabbed, the stealing of White children for enslavement.
According to the English Dictionary of the Underworld, under the heading kidnapper is the following definition: “A stealer of human beings, esp. of children; originally for exportation to the plantations of North America.”
The center of the trade in child-slaves was in the port cities of Britain andScotland:
“Press gangs in the hire of local merchants roamed the streets, seizing ‘by force such boys as seemed proper subjects for the slave trade.’ Children were driven in flocks through the town and confined for shipment in barns…So flagrant was the practice that people in the countryside about Aberdeen avoided bringing children into the city for fear they might be stolen; and so widespread was the collusion of merchants, shippers, suppliers and even magistrates that the man who exposed it was forced to recant and run out of town.” (Van der Zee, Bound Over, p. 210).
White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. A White slave would be confined to a hole not more than sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship’s stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease which would sweep through the “cargo” of White “freight” chained in the bowels of the ship.
Ships carrying WHITE slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger, “Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [White] servants at certain times equaled that for [Black] slaves in the ‘middle passage,’ and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves.” Salinger reports a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for Black slaves on board ships enroute to America compared with a death rate of 25% for White slaves enroute to America.
[…]
Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of White slaves, “The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death.”
Marcus Jernegan describes the greed of the shipmasters which led to horrendous loss of life for White slaves transported to America:
“The voyage over often repeated the horrors of the famous ‘middle passage’ of slavery fame. An average cargo was three hundred, but the shipmaster, for greater profit, would sometimes crowd as many as six hundred into a small vessel…The mortality under such circumstances was tremendous, sometimes more than half…Mittelberger (an eyewitness) says he saw thirty-two children thrown into the ocean during one voyage.”
“The mercantile firms, as importers of (White) servants, were not too careful about their treatment, as the more important purpose of the transaction was to get ships over to South Carolina which could carry local produce back to Europe. Consequentlythe Irish–as well as others–suffered greatly…
[…]
A study of the middle passage of White slaves was included in a Parliamentary Petition of 1659. It reported that White slaves were locked below deck for two weeks while the slaveship was still in port. Once under way, they were “all the way locked up under decks…amongst horses.” They were chained from their legs to their necks.
Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin – “Slavs.”
Moreover, in the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed WHITE children as young as six years of age!
They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. (Small) hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks.
WHITE children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, eight and ten year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920 >>>>>>
[…]
Today much of what we see on [television] are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths (80%) of theWhite slaves sent to Britain’s sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year.
[…]
The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of “Affirmative action,” “minority set-asides” and proposed “Reparations to African-Americans” will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of “the sons of toil.”
Full article here: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html
Dominate Jewish Role in Slavery
If YOUTUBE removes this video (as they often do), go here instead.
Black Pastor Talking Sensibly About Racial Taboos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2YTY25TH1E

john jay
john jay
13 years ago

pamela, friends:
in 2012 it is stand and fight, and assert yourselves, or be run off the streets.
in wisconsin, the unions are being told by ranking democrats & union officials, not to be afraid to spill a little blood in the streets in order to control them.
well, you must be willing to spill a little blood as well, yours in defense of your liberty, and that of the left to assert your liberty. if we are not willing to do so, then we will be pushed from the streets and our rights to assemble and speak will be taken from us.
thomas jefferson said that the tree of liberty needed watered by the blood of patriots and of tyrants every generation.
thomas jefferson was pretty smart.
my friends, prepare yourself intellectually and physically for a bruising confrontation as to whose vision of america controls our future, and our political lives.
hell, i haven’t been in a fight in 25 years. but, after the first whack, you don’t even feel it, it is just go out and enjoy. this is the attitude you have to cultivate, in my view, if we are to avoid being prevented from speaking and assembling.
this will disrupt if they can. we have to confront them, and fight them.
john jay
milton freewater, oregon usa

Jew Lover
Jew Lover
13 years ago

JJ – Yes Sir. I agree.
Better to die standing on your feet fighting for freedom than to live on your knees begging for life.
“Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say “what should be the reward of such sacrifices?” Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”

Chris
Chris
13 years ago

The warnings went out. The truth was posted and passed around but no one would listen except for a few. It was a choice between a closet socialist and a far left exteremist. Those who were brainwashed and felt “white guilt” jumped ointo the anti American lies and rode them to the ballot box. Hence we elect3ed a man who we knew very little of. (refering to where is his birth certificate, the gov of Hawaii cannot find it and there is support for the bill in Hawaii to prove citizenship in the 2012 election lead by democrarts).
Racists and extremist have been given positions of power over the Constitution, Tsars that are unconstitutional are running the show. A shadow government exisits and we are allowing it.The radicals of the sixties have seen their fear come to fuitition. Hypercritically it is they who created it and support it.
The argument for support of abortion can easily be made as the Greatest Generation left this country with a legacy of self centered, better then thou hippies. A generation that knows nothing of self sacrifice, only the victem card. A generation that knows nothing of true racism but would have the world believe that they are victems of racism.
Shame , shame , shame on them for their lack of self respect and lack of a moral center.

billwhit1357
billwhit1357
13 years ago

I am so happy that I have never purchased a weapon since the registration laws went into effect, so I don’t have to worry about Obama, Holder, and the rest of the UnAmerican Cess Pool in this administration can’t confiscate what they don’t know about or can’t find. All Patriotic Americans should start stocking up on ammo, canned food, and water. Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better and Obama and his henchmen are not going to give up without a fight. That’s fine, if it comes down to it, the Patriotic Right has the hardware to take care of whatever they want to throw at us. I actually don’t think any military officer, who is worth a damn, would order his troops to attack good Americans, which would be what this worthless peice of trash, Obama, would do, no doubt about it! Praise God that most soldiers are Conservative and Patriotic!
Bring it on, Obama, you and your Union Thugs will lose bigtime!

Dagny Taggart
Dagny Taggart
13 years ago

During the ’08 election cycle, as many of us were carrying signs awaiting Sarah Palin’s arrival, there was a counter protest group also awaiting her arrival. Several of them were loud and went out of their way to literally “get in our faces” as we did our best to ignore them. It reminded me of how they roll. Apparently, I had forgotten. I remember now, and am prepared to stoop to their level. We, as a whole, are a civil, well-mannered people. Although I abhor violence, and certainly am not proposing we commit violence, I am forewarning all who read this wonderful blog that we will have to stoop to their level and “get in their faces”- no matter how repugnant that may sound. It’s the only thing they understand. If there is no push back, they will assume they have won. That’s how bullies roll. Get used to it, and act accordingly.
This PSA has been brought to you by Dagny Taggart. 🙂

PsychoCheese
PsychoCheese
13 years ago

The point being that any “African American” who is still pissed, 150 years after the fact, about “slavery” and their ancestors being kidnapped and forced into the bellies of ships to be brought to the USA as slaves- well, regardless of what ignorant hate filled professional victocrat clowns like The New Black Panthers, Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, et al have to say, they are indeed FREE now to do whatever they wish and go wherever in the world they want that is better than the “evil” USA, and they then would not have to consider themselves hyphenated Americans.

PsychoCheese
PsychoCheese
13 years ago

And of course the President of the United States of America has a problem with race… he’d like us all to forget that he is not “black” but is mixed-race.

BARB
BARB
13 years ago

Doesn’t make me confident in the justice system. This is bogus!

Mac-101
Mac-101
13 years ago

The worst thing about this is The President has numerous slave holders in his family tree on his mothers side and since his father claimed to be an Arab in Kenya his tribe was major slave traders in the not so distant past. While I had 5 direct forefathers fight in the Civil War to Free the Slaves. Does he or I more responsible for slavery? Neither, The Past is the Past, but Race Pimps can’t let it be!

Beagle
Beagle
13 years ago

Just imagine a white person saying the same thing if the facts were reversed: white guys intimidating black voters in the same way wearing uniforms (say skinheads) and the white AJ said he couldn’t prosecute due to the narrative and impact on “my people.”
It would be a hundred days of national soul-searching and above-the-fold stories about institutional racism being alive and well.

karl anglin
karl anglin
13 years ago

Eric Holder demeans America!

ARNOLD CARL TAPP
ARNOLD CARL TAPP
13 years ago

>>> THE TRUTH IS OUT <<< HOLDER CONVICTED HIMSELF AND ADMITTED THAT THE BLACKASS PUSSYCATS ARE " HIS PEOPLE " . THIS ASSHOLE SHOULD BE FIRED, ALONG WITH obummer.

dittoheadadt
dittoheadadt
13 years ago

Where in the AG’s quote is the word “demean?” It’s nowhere to be found. It’s in the story, and in the headline, but Holder (a man who I despise as AG) did NOT say the Black Panther case demeans his “people.”
What’s wrong with you people? Can’t you read? Can’t you follow a logical progression of thought and words???
What Holder said was that comparing what the Philly people endured to what the people in the 60’s South endured does a “disservice” (NOT “demeans”) to the people (NOT just blacks, but whites, too) who had to endure what was thrown at them in the South in the 60s while they tried to get the right to vote for African Americans (“my people” in Holder’s words).
He took umbrage at comparing the people who suffered in the South in the 60’s while trying to win enfranchisement for blacks to the people who suffered in Philly at the hands of the Black Panthers. THAT is what he said. It’s not MY interpretation. It’s his ACTUAL words. Go back and read them. THAT is what he said does a “disservice” to blacks (“my people”). I have yet to see the word “demean” attributed to him in fact. I’ve only seen it bandied about by just about every blog and website around…but NEVER have I seen it inside a Holder quote.
Honestly, people, you have serious problems with reading comprehension.
I despise the Left and Obama (my license plate says “NOBAMA”) and Holder and this whole crew, but THIS issue has been TOTALLY misrepresented and misreported. Good grief. If we’re going to attack the Left, we ought to be smart enough to recognize the issues that exist and those that don’t.

Madeleine
Madeleine
13 years ago

“no voter intimidation case will be brought against a black
defendent where the victim is white.” That statement all by
itself is more than transparent. “My people” if he meant the
black slaves, the ones who suffered slavery or those who lived
in segregation, that would be one thing. Although it would be very
doubtful that anyone could find a 150 year old corpse hanging
around polling places, let alone find one even slightly threatening.
You see those who might deserve any sort of reperation would not be
the guys standing in front of a Philadelphia polling place, wearing
black and carrying bully sticks and calling white people devils.
I think the place to look when trying to find slaves with possible
grievences is about 10 feet under, pushing up daisy’s.

When*Pigs8Fly
When*Pigs8Fly
13 years ago

“BLACK PANTHER CASE DEMEANS “MY PEOPLE”
Then I guess “your”people had better learn to obey the law and “your” people had better get equal treatment under the law (which they aren’t they are being pampered).
I’m sick to death of this racist government that panders to blacks, or anyone for that matter.. There has been a noticeable increase in black on white attacks. So much so that I am keeping a file of it. This is what happens when the government panders to one group. Great “hopey/changey” way to bring the races together eh?

Telly
Telly
13 years ago

Several of thee posters here I suspect to be latent racists. And one I believe is a neo-nazi revisionist.
The article I read was about the civil rights era, not slavery in America. Some people just assumed that black-thinking is all about slavery. If someone complains to you about slavery, ask that person what they are doing about the slavery (usually called human trafficking) that exists today. Being descended from slaves should not be a benefit. I am descended from slaves, at least as far as I know. The truth is that the slave/master/plantation imagery is harming the black community. But at the same time some people are trying to use their shared history against them. This is the core of anti-Semitism. Are these the same people who call Jews Nazis?
Back to the civil rights thing: there has to be a point in time where the civil rights era is officially over. After that we can move on to treat abuses proportionately as they arise. The reason this wont happen in the near future is not solely because of the black leadership, who will be out of work, but also an unknown number of white-liberals who perpetuate the cycle of poverty and government dependence.
If you would like to know more about this subject read Thomas Sowel’s work on economics and world history (including the history slavery around the world).
This is Pam’s blog so she calls the shots. But it is my opinion that racist comments have no place here. They do not help any cause and they certainly are not encouraging to black kid who are defining their own political identities. Not to mention they are helping people like Holder in power.

marcia
marcia
13 years ago

OMG….”My people”, was he talking about Americans, men, bald guys, fellow department of justice workers? He could not have possibly been eluding to the fact that he’s BLACK, that might indicate that he is showing bias in a case in which he has already made a correlation between the Black Panthers and HIS personal affiliation with being black and should recuse himself from any further cases of black people since he can not disconnect his personal feelings.

Radegunda
Radegunda
13 years ago

Dittoheadadt, do you know what quotation marks mean? The words “my people” are put in quotation marks above, whereas the word “demean” is not. The notion of demeaning is an interpretation, which people are permitted to make.
I heard a long clip of Holder addressing the matter, and it’s fair to conclude that he believes the historic efforts of black civil rights activists are demeaned by any comparison to the effort to protect the voting rights of white people.
It’s also clear that Holder is lying when he says the DOJ does not make decisions on racial grounds. At least one of his subordinates has said explicitly that civil rights law is not meant to protect white people’s rights.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!