Radical Imam Rauf and Daisy the Khan Propose
Second Ground Zero “Islamic Center”

10

Like a junkie without a fix, the radical Ra-oof and his shifty wife, Daisy the Con, desperate for attention, are threatening to build another Ground Zero mosque "islamic center" if the thug devleoper El-Gamal won't put them back center stage. Craving the love of the dhimmedia, Rauf and the Con threaten to build a second mosque if El-Gamal doesn't give them the limelight, again. That would mean both El-Gamal and Rauf/Daisy would be competing for jihad donations, taxpayer dollars, jiyza and public bonds.

Khan and Rauf want to turn the "Ground Zero mosque" into a Ground Zero interfaith center, one focused on inter-religious dialogue and conflict resolution more than prayer.

That's a bogus distinction without a difference.

Story continues below advertisement

I would love to know what really happened between Rauf and El-Gamal. El-Gamal is a front man for the money, "he could never have outfoxed Santino." Who is really pulling the strings?

Could New York's most controversial unbuilt house of worship already be undergoing a major makeover? According to public comments made by Daisy Khan, who along with her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, co-founded the planned Park51 Islamic community center that burned up the cable news airwaves last summer, a new plan is in the works. Khan and Rauf wants to turn the "Ground Zero mosque" into a Ground Zero interfaith center, one focused on inter-religious dialogue and conflict resolution more than prayer. But will there still be a swimming pool? Unclear, as are the chances for this Park51 shift. The property's owner, developer Sharif el-Gamal, had a major falling out with Rauf and Khan, though they still think they'll be able to negotiate with him. Both visions for Park51 have one thing in common: They each need around $100 million to even get started. In el-Gamal's case, Park51 was registered as a charitable organization with the state—which would give it the ability to solicit tax-deductible donations—but the application has been under review for six months. In the meantime, the building is just an unidentified old Burlington Coat Factory.

Doesn't the media get tired of being played? They are beyond silly, they look stupid.

Here is more from the NY Times:

Two co-founders of the plan to build a Muslim community center and mosque in downtown Manhattan have begun exploring a new, and possibly competing, project: an interfaith cultural center that they said might be located at the currently proposed site, two blocks from ground zero, or elsewhere in the neighborhood.

Daisy Khan, the executive director of the American Society for Muslim Advancement, said on Tuesday that she and her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, two co-founders whose involvement in the controversial community center plan was curtailed this year after a falling out with their real estate partner, might develop a new project that was “larger in concept” than what is now proposed at 51 Park Place.

The new project would be interfaith in character, rather than predominantly Islamic, she said, and it would include a center for inter-religious conflict resolution.

Ms. Khan’s comments, made at a luncheon held by the women’s magazine More and attended by reporters, were the first in which the couple indicated a willingness to put their names behind a different religious mission in the city.

“Once we are ready to announce our new vision, we will talk to the property owner and see if it is the right location for us,” she said, referring to Sharif el-Gamal, the real estate developer and onetime protégé of Mr. Abul Rauf’s. Mr. Gamal announced in January that Ms. Khan and the imam, who first conceived the idea of a downtown Muslim community center, would no longer speak or raise money for the planned project, known as Park51, though the imam would remain on its board of directors.

“We had the vision. We still have the dream,” Ms. Khan said. “The location is not the dream, my friend.”

A spokesman for Mr. Gamal said the developer had no comment.

Whether either alternative comes to fruition will depend on the ability of each camp to raise the estimated $100 million in public and private funds needed. Since plans for Park51 were announced last summer, and drew angry protests from some politicians and families of 9/11 victims who considered it insensitive to build a Muslim center so close to ground zero, no management staff has been hired, no members have been named to the project’s board and no money has been raised.

Park51 was registered as a charitable organization with the state attorney general’s office. But its application to the Internal Revenue Service for designation as a tax-exempt organization — crucial to its ability to solicit tax-deductible donations — has been under review for six months without a decision.

The rift between the two factions is partly personal, and partly based on differences of vision, spokesmen for the two sides have said. Mr. Abdul-Rauf and Ms. Khan initially conceived the project, which they referred to as Cordoba House, as a community center for the neighborhood grafted to a kind of world headquarters for interfaith dialogue — a place where tourists from around the globe might come to learn about other people’s religions.

Mr. Gamal, a businessman, had always favored a more down-to-earth approach, focused on providing much-needed downtown facilities like an indoor swimming pool, and prayer space for the large population of Muslims who work in the financial district.

On Tuesday, Ms. Khan said that since last summer, she and her husband had been meeting privately with family members of 9/11 victims and first responders in an effort to understand the source of some of the opposition to the original idea. She said that as a result of those meetings, the story of the 9/11 families “will be housed in our center.”

Let's review what we know about the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the initial leader of the mosque effort, and still a member of the mosque initiative’s Advisory Board. Rauf has such a sterling reputation as a moderate that both the Bush and Obama Administrations sent him on goodwill tours to Muslim countries. Yet it is clear that Rauf and other mosque leaders are not as moderate as they claim to be. Rauf has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that is dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” while those who claim he is moderate just keep telling us that he is without giving us evidence.

Rauf’s book What’s Right with Islam says on the copyright page that “this edition was made possible through a joint effort of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and the office of Interfaith and Community Alliance of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Funding for this project was provided by IIIT.” Both IIIT and ISNA are Muslim Brotherhood fronts, and ISNA was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding case.

The mosque organizers, the America Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA), have worked hard in the media to portray themselves as Islamic moderates working for peace on the exact spot where their belligerent coreligionists perpetrated murder and mayhem in the name of their religion. They claimed that the Ground Zero Mosque would offer “the opposite statement to what happened on 9/11.” Rauf has also said: “We need to take the 9/11 tragedy and turn it into something very positive.”

Something positive? For whom? Islamic jihad? How does building a giant mosque at Ground Zero address the problem of moderate Muslims not speaking out against terrorism? How does this mosque honor those who were “harmed” – i.e., brutally murdered — on September 11? Whom does a mosque at 9/11 really honor: the Americans who lost their lives, or the jihadis who murdered them?

Meanwhile, Rauf’s words and deeds suggested a more ominous reality: he was a master of deceptive, Orwellian use of language, manifesting a deep contempt for non-Muslims and full accord with the supremacist goals of the 9/11 hijackers. Rauf’s group gave this statement to the Mike Huckabee radio show:

For over a decade, the Cordoba Initiative and American Society for Muslim Advancement have worked tirelessly to build bridges with other faiths, while condemning violence, extremism, and prejudice of any sort. Our mission is to be a beacon of hope, peace, understanding and harmony to those who join us in condemning hatred and violence of any kind. Too often the question arises of why moderate, peace-loving Muslims do not speak out. We cannot think of a more wonderful expression of our religion than the Cordoba House, where American Muslims stand together with our fellow citizens to condemn extremism and terror. It is a project to honor those who were harmed on September 11th. It is a project to proclaim our patriotism to this country and to stand side-by-side all men and women of peace.

Orwell would be proud.

It’s understandable that many have greeted such words with skepticism. Even the name of the initiative – Cordoba – spoke volumes. While Islamic Spain is held up today as a proto-multiculturalist paradise, in reality non-Muslims there suffered under the discrimination prescribed in Islamic law for dhimmis, non-believers who were subjugated as inferiors and denied equality of rights. When we started calling attention to the true meaning of the name Cordoba, the name of the mosque initiative suddenly changed to Park51 – with the media lapdogs immediately falling into line. They never mentioned Cordoba again, just like that.

They ignored all the evidence of Rauf’s jihadist sentiments. Rauf has blamed the West, rather than Islamic jihadists, for terrorism on several occasions. He has said, according to Australia’s Sun-Herald, that “the US and the West must acknowledge the harm they have done to Muslims before terrorism can end.” He has also claimed that “Western active involvement in shaping the internal affairs of Islamic societies have contributed to the creation of terrorism done in the name of Islam.”

Rauf has said: “We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims.” Revealing his true beliefs, Rauf said on 60 Minutes shortly after 9/11 that Osama bin Laden was “made in the USA,” and that the U.S. was ultimately responsible for the jihad attacks of that day, because its foreign policy victimized Muslims.

The Arabic translation of Rauf’s book is a call to conversion from the pile of human remains at Ground Zero, disturbingly entitled, A Call to Prayer from the World Trade Center Rubble: Islamic Dawa in the Heart of Post-9/11 America. In line with this revealing alternate title, Rauf has stated that he wants to bring people to convert to Islam by means of this Ground Zero mosque.

Journalist Alyssa A. Lappen reports that “Rauf promoted the book in December 2007 at a Kuala Lumpur gathering of Hizb ut Tahrir — an organization banned in Germany since 2003, and also outlawed in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Tunisia, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, among other places — and ideologically akin to the MB. Both seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law (sharia), and eventually impose Islam and sharia law worldwide.” The “MB” is the Muslim Brotherhood.

In his book, Rauf supports and justifies Sharia law, and calls for restrictions on free speech in America. He has written another book that has gotten little notice: Islam: A Sacred Law—What Every Muslim Should Know About Sharia. In it he explains why God’s law is superior to manmade law, or that is, why Sharia is better than democracy:

God places a high premium on judging in accord with His dictates, and for developing a nation where laws apply to all equally, and where those who are in charge of upholding the law do not set themselves or any other group above the law—for them corruption sets in. The corruption of the individual or a society that abandons Sacred Law is amplified in one of the key Koranic passages regarding the relevance, evolution and meaning of Divine Law, (5:41-50) where Allah speaks frequently of the act of “judging.” In this passage, God criticizes previous generations who “raced toward disbelief, among those who say with their mouths ‘We believe’ while their hearts done believe;” who “altered God’s Words from their placements;” indicating somehow that they altered their divinely ordained Shari’ah, placing their own values above that which God had established. The Koran continues to describe them as “listeners of lies, devourers of ill-gotten property,” an accusation that a Muslim tries carefully to avoid incurring.

This passage is based on a section of the Koran (5:41-50) that talks about “judging” peoples. It’s clear from the context that the “previous generations” are Jews and Christians who have now become “listeners of lies, devourers of ill-gotten property.” In other words, Rauf was condemning Jews and Christians in America and arguing obliquely that America should ditch the Constitution and adopt Sharia.

Rauf describes himself almost relentlessly as a “bridge builder,” Indeed. Muslim Brotherhood theorist Sayyid Qutb explains what bridge-building means to Islamic supremacists in his jihadist manifesto Milestones: “The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people of the two sides may mix with each other, but rather only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.”

Rauf has also called Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams’ endorsement of the implementation of Sharia courts in Britain “forward thinking” – despite Sharia’s denial of basic freedoms including the freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and equality of rights of all people before the law. He has called upon Barack Obama to emphasize “the commonality of Western and Islamic values,” claiming that “if the United States lives up to the values in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and if Muslims can live up to the principles of Islamic law, then we will find we have fewer points of conflict and more common ground.” Then all will be well: “Muslims no longer will fear Western domination and the West no longer will fear Islamic expansion.”

Does Rauf really think that the devaluation of a woman’s testimony and the institutionalized discrimination against non-Muslims, both mandated by Sharia, are really compatible with the Bill of Rights? Does he really think that stoning people to death for adultery or amputating their hands for theft are compatible with the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments?

Whatever he thinks of those elements of the Constitution, he doesn’t appear overly fond of the freedom of speech. Rauf has compared the West unfavorably to the Islamic world, since the West “protects the right to say anything, no matter how insensitive or scandalous,” while Islamic cultures “balance freedom of expression with respect for elders, traditions and modesty. The idea of respect and honor to elders is deeply ingrained in their psyches.” He has criticized the Swiss ban on minarets as a restriction on religious freedom, without saying a word about the severe restrictions on non-Muslim religious practice in Islamic states such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, and Sudan.

The morphing mosque narrative

Rauf and Daisy Khan were also repeatedly deceptive about whether the Ground Zero Mosque would be a mosque at all. Initially, the Cordoba Initiative’s website stated forthrightly that it would be a mosque, and Daisy Khan said the same thing at the Community Board One meeting: “There are two hundred mosques in New York. Another one is not a big deal.”After the American people started to wake up to the implications of a mosque at Ground Zero, however, they began insisting that it was not a mosque, but a “community center.”

It is worth noting that in the Muslim Brotherhood’s document delineating its strategy for Islamizing the United States, it calls for the establishment of “centers” that will function in American cities after the fashion of Muhammad’s base in Medina. From Medina, Muhammad conquered and Islamized the Arabian Peninsula.

Mosque organizers and the mainstream media were also deceptive about the location of the mosque at Ground Zero. While Rauf called the location “iconic” and Daisy Khan spoke of a divine hand leading them to a location at Ground Zero, Sharif El-Gamal, when confronted with pressure over the mosque’s location and character as a triumphal mosque at Ground Zero, insisted that the “community center” would be “nowhere near” the World Trade Center site. One thing was obvious: the location was tremendously important to them, as they brushed aside numerous offers – from Donald Trump, New York Governor David Paterson, and others — to buy the property at far greater than market value, and move their mosque elsewhere.

The media also followed the twisting line of the Islamic supremacists regarding whether or not the project was a mosque at all. Ultimately, the Associated Press issued guidelines ordering its reporters not to refer to the project as the “Ground Zero mosque,” saying falsely that it was neither at Ground Zero nor a mosque.The other mainstream media leaders fell into line accordingly.

Rauf was a prominent member of the Perdana organization, a leading funder of the jihad flotilla launched against Israel in 2010 by the genocidal Islamic terror group, IHH.

And he was a slumlord. Despite numerous citations for fire, building, and health code violations and reports of vermin and rat and roach infestations, the Imam left his tenants to live in abject squalor and filth. He claimed he didn’t have money to hire an exterminator, but he has the jiyza to build a $150 million Ground Zero triumphal mosque on hallowed ground? Worse still, Rauf snagged over $2 million in public money to fix his apartments. He took the money, never did the renovations, and forced good people to live with vermin and dilapidation. He was also sued for mortgage fraud, settling the case in June 2008.

Rauf told the American media that money for the mosque would come entirely from Muslims here. Then he told the Arab media that funding for the mosque was coming from many Muslim countries. Also telling was the fact that despite their much-repeated commitment to dialogue, Rauf, Daisy Khan and Sharif El-Gamal ignored our invitation to conduct a public discussion with us about the mosque at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2011. This followed their ignoring my open letter of June 28, 2010, in which I wrote: “Imam Rauf, please withdraw this plan and show the world real understanding and kindness and empathy.”

This was no real surprise, however — contradicting all his stated aspirations for dialogue, Rauf told the Arabic press: “I do not believe in religious dialogue.” Rauf, Daisy Khan and El-Gamal routinely demonized their opponents. Khan referred to my “Leaving Islam?” freedom bus ads as “deeply offensive,” claiming that they were designed “to provoke” and “to polarize.”

Funny, that sounds like an apt description of the 9/11 mega-mosque. Daisy Khan made the argument against the mosque unknowingly.

Rudolph Giuliani remarked that the mosque “sends a particularly bad message, particularly (because) of the background of the imam who is supporting this. This is an Imam who has supported radical causes, who has not been forthright in condemning Islamic (terrorism) and the worst instincts that that brings about. So it not only is exactly the wrong place, right at ground zero, but it’s a mosque supported by an imam who has a record of support for causes that were sympathetic with terrorism.”

Rauf even threatened America over this project, saying that if the mosque were not built, “if we don’t do this right, anger will explode in the Muslim world….If we don’t handle this crisis correctly, it could become something very dangerous indeed.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cate
Cate
12 years ago

Muzzies refuse to get along with anyone outside their ideology. And frankly, they can’t seem to get along with anyone INSIDE their ideology, either. I hope they do try and go toe to toe. Put these three in a ring and let ’em at each other. Since they “eat their own”, they’ll wind up destroying each other, which works for me!!

Madeleine
Madeleine
12 years ago

Now they turn on each other. Yes, very peaceful indeed.
So lets see, those two,Daisy and Rauf, went at feverish pace to get the
Cordoba house up and running. They pulled every string to
get it going, stepped on every toe, insulted everyone even
remotely connected to 9/11. They used tactics to intimidate
Americans about how if we don’t support it and allow it,
the Muslim community around
the world will take it the wrong way and there will not be peace.
Now, let me ask Rauf and Daisy. With the Muslims around the
world watching, whose side do you think they are going to
take, yours or El Gamals?
Are they going to hate Gamal for not working with you or are
they going to hate you for working against Gamal?
This is a very curious question since Muslims are so touchy!

MIKE
MIKE
12 years ago

now I know this is off topic but this is the reason why we are so divided also and how the black community keeps everything divided…..I thought this wasn’t supposed to be about race anymore in this country and look what this asshole Shultz on Msnbc is doing……..A Stronger America: The Black Agenda………what the HELL is this supposed to be about that we are going to become a SHITHOLE LIKE AFRICA where they commit 100 000 genocide on each other and the black community is going to tell me how to get along and live….the black community is going to teach my kids how to be Ghetto AND gangsta and disrespectful and how to live off welfare and look for a free handout and get jobs because of my skin and race….to go around and tell every other race that you owe me……..LMFAO!!!…WHAT A BUNCH OF BS!!!hmmmmmm I wonder if they mean to be more like that asshole that shot 8 white people in Manchester CT close to where I live…..YOU KNOW the one SOLEDAD O’BRIEN WAS CHEERING FOR and propping up this guys mother and it was everyone else’s fault I love it…..BS…

MIKE
MIKE
12 years ago

actually it’s not that far off anyway it’s one and the same as far as I am concerned….black community in general stands for the muzzie occupation of this country remember what OBOWMAO said in his book….if things go the muzzie way that’s whose side I am on….look it up….

Liz Wagner
Liz Wagner
12 years ago

Sure… a place where people from around the world can learn about each other’s religions! Are they aware the world already has such a place? It’s called Israel. The Jews there are still waiting for Muslims to teach their children, and themselves, anything true or positive about Judaism. In comparison, Muslim knowledge and tolerance of Christianity is only slightly better. Still, that hasn’t stopped liberal Christian churches from conspiring with Islam’s most hateful ideologues to undermine any Jewish presence in the holy land for the last 40 years.
The only thing more absurd than an interfaith conflict resolution center built by Raufus and Khany is the certainty that a cadre of Jewish investors and non-profits are, no doubt, already lining up to throw money and support behind it.

Barry
Barry
12 years ago

The Muslonazis are always at each other throats. The war between the shitty Muslonazis who worship Emperor Ali; and the sunni Muslonazis who pray exclusively to the pervert Mohammed (piss upon him). The Ahmadiyya who believe that the Messiah came last century, and the subhuman Muslonazis who believe that Mohammed was the final prophet.
Just another reason that the satanic cockroaches should NOT be allowed to live in the West. Fuck Islam.
Price Tag Now. Make the Palestinians suffer for their Islamic crimes!

no b.s.
no b.s.
12 years ago

let me tell you what a daisy the con islamic ‘interfaith’ center means….it means that all the infidels get to hear the call to subjugation..oops call to prayer (to dominate the world) and get to be “invited” to all kinds of “cultural” events where they learn to “appreciate”…blah blah blah.
well ms. daisy the con, the jews know all about your ruse. we lived under dhimmitude in many middle eastern and north african countries. so the simplest way to say it is: F off.

livingengine
livingengine
12 years ago

This was predicted . . .

“My Prediction: Imam Rauf decided to pick a spot near Ground Zero so that there would be an outcry… and he’ll keep stringing this along until one day when he’ll do the “honorable” and “right thing”: announce that instead of an Islamic Community Center which promotes Interfaith Understanding, he’ll build an Interfaith Center devoted equally to all religions… and the crowds will cheer and people will actually be happy about an Interfaith Center… maybe for the first time ever…”
http://c5c5c5.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/the-un-meddling-with-religion-part-3/

This is an excellent book about the interfaith movement, in particular the United Religions Initiative.

“The interfaith movement, which began with the 1893 World’s Parliament of Religions in Chicago, has grown worldwide. Although this movement has been largely unknown to the public, it now provides a spiritual face for globalization, the economic and political forces leading us all from nationalism to ‘One World’.

The most ambitious organization in today’s interfaith movement is the United Religions Initiative (URI), founded by William Swing, the Episcopal Bishop of California. Investigative reporter Lee Penn, a Catholic ex-Marxist, exhaustively documents the history and beliefs of the URI and its New Age and globalist allies, the vested interests that support these movements, and the direction they appear to be taking. The interfaith movement is no longer merely the province of a coterie of little-heeded religious idealists with grandiose visions. The URI’s proponents have ranged from billionaire George Soros to President George W. Bush, from the far-right Rev. Sun Myung Moon to the liberal Catholic theologian Hans Küng, and from the Dalai Lama to the leaders of government-approved Protestant churches in the People’s Republic of China.

The interfaith movement, including the URI, is being promoted by globalist and New Age reformers who favor erosion of national sovereignty, marginalization of traditional religions, establishment of ‘global governance’, and creation of a new, Earth-based ‘global spirituality’ – in effect, a one-world religion. Therefore, the URI and the interfaith movement are poised to become the spiritual foundation of the New World Order: the ‘new civilization’ now proposed by Mikhail Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union.

Unfortunately, the URI has a grandiose agenda that goes far beyond its principal, publicly stated aim of promoting peace, tolerance, and non-violence among all religions and spiritual movements. As shown by the repeated, public speeches and writings of URI leaders and activists since the movement began in 1995, the URI and its allies propose the following:

• Squelching Christian evangelism, in the name of promoting inter-religious peace.

• Marginalizing orthodox Christians as “intolerant” and “fundamentalist.”

• Preparing the way for a new, global spirituality that can accommodate domesticated forms of all current religions and spiritual movements.

• Promoting a new, collectivist “global ethic.”

• The idea that the main goal of religion is social reform, rather than service to God.

• The idea that all religions and spiritual movements are equally true, and equally efficacious as ways to attain communion with God.

• Population control – especially in Third World countries.

• Providing a global podium and respectability for cultism, occultism, witchcraft, Theosophy, and other spiritually harmful religious movements.

This agenda isn’t written directly into the Charter of the URI. However, it is plainly evident in the public statements and actions of URI leaders and their allies.

http://www.falsedawn.us/
Check this out!

Jim Baxter
Jim Baxter
12 years ago

JEALOUSY. That’s what drives muslims. That is what produces hatred.
That’s what produces death. Death = Hell.
It is all self-chosen. So be it.
Jealousy…

karl anglin
karl anglin
12 years ago

More ranting from the
“religion of peace”.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!