Pamela Geller, American Thinker: King Abdicates

20

At king

Destined to fail and what a pity. King lacks the courage of his convictions.

King Abdicates Pamela Geller, American Thinker

Story continues below advertisement

Congressman Peter King (R-NY) told upcoming hearings on radicalization among American Muslims, he was "not planning to call as witnesses such Muslim community critics as the Investigative Project on Terrorism's Steve Emerson and Jihad Watch's Robert Spencer, who have large followings among conservatives but are viewed as antagonists by many Muslims."

Based on this, it appears that this will be a show trial.  Between Emerson and Spencer, the whole of it is covered.  Emerson knows who all the players are and what groups and cells they are affiliated with.  He knows who everyone is and what he's doing.  For King to acquiesce in his marginalization is almost criminal.  In Spencer's case, it's just as bad.  Why wouldn't King discuss the texts and teachings of Islam that jihadists use to justify violence and make recruits?

For King not to avail himself of Emerson's knowledge and Spencer's scholarship is an astounding case of willful blindness. 

Methinks Representative King is a wee bit in over his head.  I am filled with dread and sorrow at another lost opportunity.  Doesn't King know he is going to be smeared and defamed for these hearings no matter what?  So why not achieve something?  Why not have the courage of your convictions?

The Muslim groups are worried about these hearings with good reason. "On the gonif brent a hittle" — the Yiddish axiom translated means "on the thief, the hat burns."  At the last yearly Muslim Public Affairs Council Conference (December 18, 2010), one of the questions moderator Salaam Al Marayati asked his panel concerned the future hearings of Congressman Peter King.  One of the panelists, an attorney named Angela Oh, said that any person subpoenaed should hire an attorney and that the attorney should advise the committee that the person under subpoena would not appear.  The other panelists agreed.
 
One of the other panelists, an attorney named Reem Salahi, made a lot of noise about King and the IRA.  I have the feeling that they want the media to exploit this.  The entire session was recorded and appeared on the MPAC website.

And so perhaps it is no surprise that Representative King has already conceded key points.  But why?  How could he in good conscience squander such an important, historic opportunity?

Politico said that "King aims … to call retired law enforcement officials and people with 'the real life experience of coming from the Muslim community.' Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to serve in the House and a critic of the hearings, will likely be a minority witness, according to both King and the Minnesota Democrat."

Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison is infamous for his pro-Hamas rallies and his pilgrimage to the Hajj in Saudi Arabia, paid for by the Muslim Brotherhood.  He is testifying, but Emerson and Spencer aren't?  What can King achieve?

King is going to call Zuhdi Jasser and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.  Jasser and Hirsi Ali are perfectly lovely, but to what end?  Jasser's Islam does not exist.  He does not have a theological leg to stand on.  His mosque threw him out.  Whatever he is practicing, it's not Islam, and he speaks for no one but himself.  Also, Jasser has done some strange things: in May 2009, he made a last-minute effort to quash Geert Wilders' appearance on Capitol Hill under the aegis of Senator Kyl, calling Kyl's office the morning of the day Wilders was supposed to appear and stating that while Jasser had been in the Netherlands, Wilders refused to meet with Jasser because Wilders "doesn't meet with Muslims."  That never happened, according to Wilders.
The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
god of reason
god of reason
13 years ago

Excerpt From New Book: Islam Evil In The Name of God
Go to: http://www.godofmoralperfection.net
PART 1 (PART 2/3 Next Comments)
First 2 pages of letter sent with book to every member of Congressman Peter King Committee with copy of book.
16,642 Islamic Jihad Attacks Since 9/11
Quoting Prophet Muhammad From The Holy Books of Islam:
Bukhari: V4852N220 “Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been made victorious with terror” NEVER HAS THERE BEEN A TRUER STATEMENT.
As This letter and book will demonstrate – THERE IS NO RADICALIZATION OF MUSLIM MEN. They are following EXACTLY the divine Quranic teachings of God as transmitted by Angel Gabriel to Prophet Muhammad to exterminate, murder, torture, terrorize, rape, enslave kafirs in the name of and to the greater glory of God and the Sunna of Muhammad recorded in Hadith and Sira. In Islam, these are not crimes but divine, holy acts guaranteeing accession to Paradise.
It should be noted that the figures for America would be much higher if these foiled attacks had succeeded. Since 9/11, more than 170 American Muslim men have been arrested on various jihad-related charges, ranging from bomb plots to providing material support to terrorists. More than half of those arrested are U.S.-born, and roughly one third are converts to Islam. The will to kill is there. What is presently lacking is proper application of existing technology and our luck which is running out.
Jihad by Year: (www.thereligionofpeace.com)
ATTACKS KILLED INJURED
2002 549 2,723 6,039
2003 835 3,372 6,905
2004 994 7,210 14,632
2005 1,539 7,662 12,850
2006 2,286 15,251 19,540
2007 2,649 20,172 16,013
2008 2,204 10,779 18,213
2009 1,932 9,157 18,591
2010 1,867 9,008 17,032

god of reason
god of reason
13 years ago

Excerpt From New Book: Islam Evil In The Name of God
Go to: http://www.godofmoralperfection.net
PART 2 (Part 3 Next Comment)
IT’S RONALD REAGAN TIME: SHOW ISLAM NO RESPECT:
“YOU ARE NOT US”
WHERE IS THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?
By Denying The Existence of Evil You Become An Accomplice To Evil. You Give Evil Legitimacy and Respectability. The Quran/Sharia Law are Motivating Muslim Men to Kill. Why Quran Verse 9:111is 9/11 and Ft. Hood Massacre? There are 164 Quranic Teachings of Jihad and 4,000 Teachings of Murder, Slaughter, Torture, Terror, Hate Kafirs.
Winston Churchill Greatness. Banning Sharia Law: A Moment of True History. It won’t Be The Beginning of The End for Islam But Definitely The End of The Beginning. For 11 pages of The Sheer Barbarism of Sharia Law/Jihad ( War In God’s Name) Read Pages 37 to 48.
Dear Congressman King: You cannot have successful hearings on the Radicalization of Muslims if you do not understand Islam. Indeed, you cannot fulfill your constitutional pledge to defend the United States and the Constitution if you do not understand Islam. Go to http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/2722.htm for brutality of Islam. Congressman: Ask yourself when you read this letter and book: Is this the future you want for your children? Is this what Americans fought and died for in the Second World War? Read this letter/book and you will learn the answer to the following very important questions. You will understand Islam. You can then conduct your hearings.
WHY THE IGNORING BY AMERICAN POLITICAL AND MILITARY LEADERSHIP OF THE TEACHINGS OF THE QURAN AND SHARIA LAW THAT LED TO THE MASSACRE OF 9/11 AND ARE BEING USED TO MURDER AND PLOT THE MURDER OF TENS OF THOUSANDS OF US SOLDIERS AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF US CITZENS IS CRIMINAL?
WHY THE UNITED STATES, ISRAEL AND EUROPE ARE FIGHTING THE QURAN FOR THEIR NATIONAL SURVIVAL?
WHY MOSQUES ADVOCATING SHARIA LAW AND QURAN/HADITH TEACHINGS OF JIHAD/VIOLENCE/TERROR/TORTURE MOTIVATING MUSLIM MEN TO MURDER US SOLDIERS/CIVILIANS ARE GUILITY OF ACTS OF SEDITION/
TREASON AND MUST BE SHUT DOWN? (80% OF US MOSQUES TEACH JIHAD)
WHY YOU MUST CALL ON ALL MUSLIM MEN TO DECLARE THAT THE US CONSTITUTION IS THE HIGHEST AND ONLY SOURCE OF LAW AND JOIN WITH YOU IN NOT ONLY SUPPORTING CONGRESS BANNING SHARIA LAW BUT SUPPORT AN AMENDMENT TO THE US CONSTITUTION – DECLARATION OF THE EQUALITY OF WOMEN?
WHY THE DECLARATION OF RONALD REAGAN – YOU ARE NOT US, DECLARATION OF A GOD OF MORAL PERFECTION, DEFENSE OF AMERICA: DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM ACT, AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT: EQUALITY OF WOMEN WILL DEFEAT ISLAM?

god of reason
god of reason
13 years ago

Excerpt From New Book: Islam Evil In The Name of God
Go to: http://www.godofmoralperfection.net
PART 3
READ A LETTER OF TRUE EVIL: Mohamed Atta’s Final Instructions to His Muslim Compatriots: (From The FBI) complete with Quran/Hadith teachings that Atta quoted to justify mass murder. (If you have already read this letter then re-read it because all Quran and Hadith teachings are given highlighted in red.) After reading Atta’s letter, my letter and book, your committee will understand that it is the
Quran/Islam motivating Muslim men to kill. The Quran is nothing more then a manual ordering the murdering, slaughtering, torturing, terrorizing, hating of kafirs. The kafir has the lowest status of all animal life. In Islam, these acts are not crimes but divine, holy acts.
CONGRESSMAN – THERE IS NO RADICALIZATION OF MUSLIMS. MASS MURDER/EXTERMINATION OF KAFIRS LIKE THE 9/11 / FT. HOOD /LONDON MASSACRES ARE ISLAM. THERE IS NO PEACE/LOVE IN ISLAM. ITS ALL HATE.
To truly understand the horror of Islam, read the article below – Sharia Law Lessons for 6 year olds and then Mohamad Atta’s Last Instructions to his Compatriots, the outrage of 3 American citizens sentenced to death under Sharia Law and living in hiding in the USA, and the very grave danger Islam poses to America, Europe and Israel. It will take real guts and courage to read this book. I have recommended on page 10 – four witness you will need to call so your committee can understand that it is Islam/Quran that is motivating Muslim men to kill in God’s name. Again, killing kafirs is not a crime in Islam but a holy, divine act guaranteeing accession to a virgin delight Paradise. THERE IS NO RADICAL ISLAM. ISLAM IS ISLAM.

Gerald
Gerald
13 years ago

I think the King has gone over to the enemy and in the memorable words of Churchill:“It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in,  and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invader’s hearth.”

sheik yer'mami
sheik yer'mami
13 years ago

What a clown, what a waste!

Paula Nachman
Paula Nachman
13 years ago

This is the response that I received from King’s office (via his LA):
I was surprised and disappointed to hear that Steve Emerson feels slighted and somehow believes that my committee hearing on Muslim radicalization will not be effective without him testifying and that, among other things, I am guilty of “calculated deception” and that I consider Rep. “Ellison a better friend than” Steve Emerson.
The fact is that Steve Emerson has been extremely helpful to me over the years providing information and support. I was anticipating this same level of cooperation and support in preparation for the upcoming radicalization hearing which is why my staff was in repeated contact with him and I was scheduled to meet with him this afternoon.
At no time was it contemplated or suggested to Steve Emerson that he be a witness. I determined early on that to make the most meaningful impact, the lead witnesses would be Muslims who believe their community is being radicalized and that Muslim leaders are not sufficiently cooperating with law enforcement. Law enforcement officials would be also be asked to testify. I assumed that Steve Emerson would support these hearings and provide my staff and me with information and ideas.
It is unfortunate that Steve Emerson who acknowledges that I have been “the most courageous Member of the House of Representatives in taking on the radical Islamists groups” now says I “have caved in to the demands of radical Islamists” solely because he is not going to be a witness—especially since at no time was it ever suggested he would be. Ironically, it now appears that the two most outspoken critics of the radicalization hearing are Steve Emerson and CAIR.
I have fought this issue for more than nine years against strong opposition. I will go forward with this first hearing and subsequent hearings on this vital issue of radicalization, and, as always, will accept the assistance of all Americans who want to help in this cause. Protecting our nation from Islamic terrorism is larger than any one person.
IS THIS A PISSING CONTEST between Emerson and King or what? So King caved and now Emerson says he’s keeping his research to himself?
A message to both King and Emerson:
SOMEONE NEEDS TO BE THE GROWN-UP AND IT’S ABSOLUTELY AMAZING WHAT YOU CAN ACCOMPLISH WHEN YOU DON’T CARE WHO GETS THE CREDIT.

Patti
Patti
13 years ago

Pamela you are absolutely correct, King is in over his head. Robert or you need to get on the telephone with him and talk some sense into him. He has NO clue what he is setting himself up for.

ApolloSpeaks
ApolloSpeaks
13 years ago

Once a King with courage now a jackass lacking balls wasting tax payers money on worthless hearings.

Islam is a mafia crime syndicate, death cult and a fascist totalitarian movement
Islam is a mafia crime syndicate, death cult and a fascist totalitarian movement
13 years ago

Everyone should call King to reconsider and allow both Spencer and Emerson to be at these hearings.
It’s irrelevant if King never intended to invite Emerson, he should be there anyways…why would we take away our most valuable pieces on the chess board without good reason?
“and, as always, will accept the assistance of all Americans who want to help in this cause.”
Except Spencer and Emerson, right King? Sheesh they got to you too.

Hainer
Hainer
13 years ago

It appears to be a show with no substance in the making that will result in a waste of opportunity, time and effort. If it turns out to be that way it will not only be a disservice to the American people but a betrayal.
This has all the appearance of political correctness that demands ignoring the truth and sacrificing the safety of the majority of the American people for fear of offending those who would not only do us harm but intend to destroy our entire civilization. And that is not good representation.
I have always had respect for Representative King and this is his time to prove he is what he has led us to believe and I hope he delivers.
America can no longer afford politicians who lack courage, pretend and deceive.

wtd
wtd
13 years ago

IIRC, King was compromised long ago. 2006 CNN transcript link

” In fact, I work very closely with a number of Muslims. “

arcadia
arcadia
13 years ago

What can we all do to put pressure on King to get those people such as Spencer, and Emerson on the docket to speak? King is wrong in assuming that you just go to other Muslims to share their opinions about Islam and that will expose the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, ISNA, and all those organizations that are working to subvert the government. We have a real problem here and we need to do everything we can to fix it. A demonstration, a call in? Contact ACT and other groups to unite? We need to act and Spencer & Pamela I hope will guide us.

Jeff
Jeff
13 years ago

At least start phoning mailing king and let him know what
you think of how this should be done or he should stop
wasting tax payers money in this one sided hearing that
would only give a skewed picture of spread and growth of islamic
jehadi menace…that is against the principles of US constitutions
and freedom from religious terror cult called islam.

Wri7913
Wri7913
13 years ago

It’s irrelevant if King never intended to invite Emerson, he should be there anyways…why would we take away our most valuable pieces on the chess board without good reason?
——————
In reading through all this I have to stop and think, would a good chess player make his moves known in advance and at the moment or be thinking a few steps ahead to outwit their opponent?
On the face of it, his idea is very valid and one I would have likely taken if I were in his shoes.
Step back and think about it. We all know what Muslims and their organizations desire. We are already onto them. But we are a relatively small number of people with that realization. To push Robert Spencer and Steven Emerson out there as witnesses up front and center would be similiar to telling people you’ve been abducted by aliens. They would have a hard time believing it.
Now if the testimony came from Muslims or former Muslims themselves, people will be more likely to believe those people over someone like Robert Spencer. Credentials or not, most people tend to believe someone with experience on a particular matter over someone who was “schooled” on that same matter. It is simply human nature.
If the hearings managed to get some Muslim leaders from CAIR or other Muslim brotherhood orgnizations on record as disputing the likes of Hirsi Ali, the voting public will know where they stand. Then it will be a simple matter to bring out the heavy guns who will explain further what the dangers of Islam are exactly and why they threaten our constitutional freedoms.

Xavier823
Xavier823
13 years ago

Don’t be surprised to find out that the money bags in the Republican party told King to water his investigation down.

USorThem
USorThem
13 years ago

If Spencer and Emerson are considered too incendiary then Andrew McCarthy would make an excellent witness in their place. Someone in King’s district ought to make a call with that suggestion.

k9gs
k9gs
13 years ago

Don’t have to be in his district to call.

Pamela Geller
Pamela Geller
13 years ago

Oh, so they can marginalize our best and bravest fighters like Spencer and Emerson and you go along with that?
How long before McCarthy is radioactive or Hirsi Ali or anyone willing to stand up against Islamic supremacism.
Your acquiescence is unacceptable. We will lose with that strategy.

Wri7913
Wri7913
13 years ago

If I’m not mistaken, Spencer and Emerson are already marginalized by the lamestream media. How will their appearances before this show trial change things? I don’t like the idea anymore than you do but Islamicists have already rooted themselves in the leftists organizations and publications (ie the mainstream media). I have seen them doing their best to marginalize you as well on Fox News when I watched your appearances. From what you both have stated, Islamcists are also rooting themselves in the US Congress. We all know what their goals are.
The Muslim brotherhood and all its little organizations have had 20-30 years of planning and execution to make their dreams become reality. They are pretty well rooted in America at this point whether you want to admit it or not. Exposing their plans to the light of day and what Islam is all about is enlightening people about the dangers of Islam. We’ve seen that time and again when debates about Islam are presented, the information does get out and changes people’s minds.
The fact that the hearing will happen is a pretty good sign. Finding some way to ambush the likes of CAIR, ISNA, MSA and all those other organizations in front of the American voting public would be even more awesome. Is cutting Robert Spencer and Steven Emerson out of the hearings smart? I don’t know. All I can do is voice my opinion to his office and hope he is using good judgment and has something nice up his sleeve for our side.
Ambushing him like this only serves the Islamists from where I sit.
PS. Let me tell you a story about Hirsi Ali. A while back you and Robert reported about her appearance in Seattle where the women with Hijabs came out to protest her. Do you remember that? I do. I went to the person’s website that spoke out against Hirsi Ali and debated with the woman who wrote that awful essay. I pointed out various things in the opinion piece that she wrote and basically tore her a new a-hole. The whole debate and the article ended up being removed. I guess she ended up looking so bad they trashed it rather than lose face.
Here’s a partial copy of the article she wrote. The only place I could find it anywhere online was Sheikyermami’s blog. Also I want to thank you for educating me about Islam. I have won a few battles here and there and this was one of them. I was one of the commentors who spoke out against this garbage.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali- Ethnic customs mistaken for Islam
Examiner.com 01 October 2010
By Ranyah Ghussein
It was at the Seattle Town Hall last night that the Dutch Somali self-proclaimed feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali was causing a stir. Greeted by a group of Muslim women protesters, some in Burqas, and others in traditional hijab (head dress), proceeded to hold her lecture filled with the usual anti-Islamic, hatred fueled message to all who would listen. It was a peaceful and silent protest, however, the message was heard loud and clear. Muslim women are sick of people assuming that they cover up out of oppression, tired of constantly being portrayed as the meek, weak, and abused. And absolutely fed up with all the hateful statements claiming that Islam is a religion that promotes violence against women, erroneously quoting passages out of the Quran taken completely out of context. Or citing barbaric practices associated with certain political regimes, and claiming them to be “Islamic”. The fact of the matter is that just by the mere presence of these women, making their voices heard disproves the whole argument against the religion of Islam.
Hirsi Ali who spent her perturbed childhood in the impoverished countries of Somalia and Kenya, had to endure at the age of five one of the most vicious crimes committed against women. The act of female circumcision which is not an Islamic practice, but a mere customary practice in some African countries amongst the poor, uneducated, and ill-informed parts of society. In fact, Egypt has recently launched a full fledged barrage of public service announcements denouncing female circumcision as an Islamic practice stating that even the prophet Mohammad (PBUH) never circumcised any of his daughters. And that any doctor practicing it will be punishable by law (…)

wb
wb
13 years ago

That King would pull his punches in this matter could have been predicted on two fronts:
1) His support of the perverts in the TSA violating airline passengers and the intrusive, pornographic body scanning; and
2) His aligning with the fascist gun-grabbers in the wake of the Tucson shooting, which the Left has exploited to the Nth degree as certainly as Adolf Hitler exploited the 1933 Reichstag fire, and for the same end – to destroy the opposition and position themselves for a massive power grab.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!