News Ticker >
[ May 26, 2019 ]

Federal judge who blocked Trump’s border wall donated $20K to Obama

[ May 26, 2019 ]

Huge Protest Jihad-Rep Ilhan Omar at Designated Terror-Group CAIR “Fundraiser”

[ May 26, 2019 ]

Christian persecution ‘at genocide levels,’ media maintains sharia-compliant silence

[ May 26, 2019 ]

Islamic Court Acquits Two Muslims Convicted of Burning Christian Couple to Death in Pakistan

[ May 26, 2019 ]

Swedish Government wants to ban ancient Viking symbols, claiming they “constitute incitement to hatred”

[ May 26, 2019 ]

Crimes during Ramadan 2019 – day 21: Jihadis kill 2007, wound 1177

[ May 25, 2019 ]

Memorial Weekend Cinema: From Here to Eternity

[ May 25, 2019 ]

How the shrieking harpy party was calmed by thoughts of the Holocaust

[ May 25, 2019 ]

President Trump says he will confront Loser Theresa May over Britain’s role in ‘spying’ on...

[ May 25, 2019 ]

Islamic CRACKDOWN: Dozens arrested for going to private yoga class in Iran

Pamela Geller, American Thinker: Islamic Supremacists Envision a Takeover of the Internet

9

Islamic Supremacists Envision a Takeover of the Internet Pamela Geller,  American Thinker

It was hardly noticed at the time, but its consequences could be catastrophic.  Late last September, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which assigns internet domain names, approved a huge change in the way it operates .  Europe and North America will now have five seats on its Board of Directors, instead of ten, and a new "Arab States" region will have five seats as well.

At icann

How big a deal is this?  ICANN at the same time took a reference to "terrorism" out of its Draft Applicant Guidebook.  Why?  Because Arab groups complained.  And so now jihad terror websites can grow and prosper, as ICANN has removed its own ability to police them.

This has been a long time coming.

Back in October 2009 , I warned of a seismic transformation in internet regulation and free speech.  Under the transnational-happy Obama administration, the U.S. relinquished control of the net at that time.  ICANN ended its agreement with the U.S. government.

If not America, who?  Now we know the answer to that.  The new agreement gave other countries (including dictatorships and rogue nations) and the U.N. the ability to set internet use policies.  At the time, I wrote, "[W]atch for Sharia law to find its way into this."

Well, that didn't take long.  The ICANN action in September gave the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) and other unfriendly nations a prominent internet role — something they never could get during the administration of George W. Bush.

The OIC has already effectively used the UN to push its censorship agenda. But the UN is virtually toothless when it comes to the United States. However if the Muslim world can dominate ICANN the way it dominates the UN General Assembly, then free speech on the internet is dead.
In practice, the new arrangement makes it much easier for Muslim countries to dictate what stays on the internet and what doesn't.  The removal of the material about "terrorism" was just muscle-flexing; there is much more of that kind of censorship coming.  If this stands, anti-jihad sites like my own site AtlasShrugs.com and the JihadWatch.org site run by my colleague Robert Spencer will likely lose their domain names.  It will become harder and harder to find the truth about jihad activity, or any resistance to it, on the internet or anywhere else.

Why is this necessary at all?  Why should the U.S. relinquish control of its own invention?  The internet was our extraordinary gift to the world.  We kept it free.  And now, like some depraved drunk, we are tossing it away and relinquishing control to the vultures and destroyers.

The new "net neutrality" rules approved last week by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will just make that easier as well.  Columnist Jonathan Gurwitz explains:

Net neutrality is anything but neutral. It takes the operation of the Internet away from the heterogeneous and diversified interests of the private sector that has created it and concentrates it in the hands of an unelected and unaccountable board of political appointees atop a federal bureaucracy.

"Few proposals in Washington have been sold employing such deceptive language – and that's saying something," observed James G. Lakely, the co-director of the Center on the Digital Economy for the Heartland Institute, a free-market think-tank.  "But few public policy ideas can boast the unashamedly socialist pedigree of net neutrality."

Read the whole thing.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.


Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Contribute Monthly - Choose One

Have a tip we should know? Your anonymity is NEVER compromised. Email tips@thegellerreport.com

Pin It on Pinterest