Then-President of Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Islamic Declaration ……

I thought it might do some good to provide more background on the whitewash of the jihadist history of Bosnia and who and what the players were at the time of the US deployment of troops to fight for the Muslims there. Alija Izetbegović served in the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina until 2000. During that time, the US and NATO went into Bosnia to fight for jihad and kill non-Muslims.

Read his manifesto. He is as fundamentalist as Bin Laden, though Western apologists and dhimmis were only too happy to provide cover:

British author Noel
Malcolm asserted that the Serb nationalist interpretation of
the Declaration was false propaganda and offered a more benevolent
reading of the declaration.^[7]
Explaining that it was "a general treatise on politics and Islam,
directed towards the entire Muslim world; it is not about Bosnia and
does not even mention Bosnia" and that "none of these points can
be described as fundamentalist."

Story continues below advertisement

At the time of the U.S. intervention, he was widely reputed to be a "moderate." His Islamic declaration was swept under the rug. Stephen Suleyman Schwartz of the Center for Islamic Pluralism had a photo on the CIP website of himself praying at Izetbegovic's grave. But it has become increasingly clear that the agenda of that Declaration is gradually being implemented in Bosnia.

The Real Srebrenica Genocide: The mass murder of Serbs in Srebrenica and Gorazde from 1992 to 1995 by Alija Izetbegovic’s Islamofascist terrorists (warning graphic link)

The following are excerpts from the book "The Islamic Declaration" ("Islamska deklaracija"), written by Mr. Alija Izetbegovic, current President of Bosnia-Herzegovina. The book was reprinted by "BOSNA", Sarajevo, 1990, 127 pages.

QUOTE:

"… Do we want the Muslim nations to cease moving in circles, to stop being dependent, backward and poverty-stricken;
we want them to once again with a sure step climb the road of dignity and enlightens and to become masters of their own fate;
we want the springs of courage, genius and virtue to come forth strongly once again;
then we must show the way which leads to that objective:
The implementation of Islam in all fields of individuals' personal lives, in family and in society, by renewal of the Islamic religious thought and creating a uniform Muslim community from Morocco to Indonesia. …"

page 3

"… A nation, and an individual, who has accepted Islam is incapable of living and dying for another ideal after that fact. It is unthinkable for a Muslim to sacrifice himself for any tzar or ruler, no matter what his name may be, or for the glory of any nation, party or some such, because acting on the strongest Muslim instinct he recognizes in this a certain type of godlessness and idolatry. A Muslim can die only with the name of Allah on his lips and for the glory of Islam, or he may run away from the battlefield. …"

page 4

"… Muslim nations will never accept anything that is explicitly against Islam, because Islam here is not merely a faith and the law, Islam has become love and compassion. He who rises against Islam will reap nothing but hate and resistance. …"

page 17

——————————————————————————–

"… In perspective, there is but one way out in sight: creation and gathering of a new intelligence which thinks and feels along Islamic lines. This intelligence would then raise the flag of the Islamic order and together with the Muslim masses embark into action to implement this order. …"

page 18

——————————————————————————–

"… The shortest definition of the Islamic order defines it as a unity of faith and law, upbringing and force, ideals and interests, spiritual force spiritual community and state, free will and force. As a synthesis of these components, the Islamic order has two fundamental premises: an Islamic society and Islamic authority. The former is the essence, and the latter the form of an Islamic order. An Islamic society without Islamic power is incomplete and weak; Islamic power without an Islamic society is either a utopia or violence.
A Muslim generally does not exist as an individual. If he wishes to live and survive as a Muslim, he must create an environment, a community, an order. He must change the world or be changed himself. History knows of no true Islamic movement which was not at the same time a political movement as well. This is because Islam is a faith, but also a philosophy, a set of moral codes, an order of things, a style, an atmosphere – in a nutshell, an integral way of life. …"

page 19

——————————————————————————–

"… The first and foremost of such conclusions is surely the one on the incompatibility of Islam and non-Islamic systems. There can be no peace or coexistence between the "Islamic faith" and non- Islamic societies and political institutions. … Islam clearly excludes the right and possibility of activity of any strange ideology on its own turf. Therefore, there is no question of any laicistic principles [secularism], and the state should be an expression and should support the moral concepts of the religion. …"

page 22

——————————————————————————–

" Islam contains the principle of ummet, i.e. the tendency towards unification of all Muslims into a single community – a spiritual, cultural and political community. Islam is not a nationality, it is above nationalities. …"

page 27

——————————————————————————–

"… The upbringing of the nation, and especially the mass media – the press, TV and film – should be in the hands of people whose Islamic moral and intellectual authority is undisputed. …
… Islamic renewal cannot be initiated without a religious, and cannot be successfully continued and concluded without a political revolution."

page 32

——————————————————————————–

"… Establishing of an Islamic order is thus shown as the ultimate act of democracy, because it means the implementation of the deepest desires of the Muslim nations and common man. One thing is certain: no matter what a part of the rich and the intelligence wants, the common man wants Islam and living in his Islamic community. …"

page 33

"… In the struggle for an Islamic order all methods are permitted, except one – except crime. No-one has the right to smear the beautiful name of Islam and this struggle by uncontrolled and excessive use of violence. …"

page 37

——————————————————————————–

"… Islamic order may be implemented only in countries where Muslims represent the majority of the population. Without this majority, the Islamic order is reduced to authority only (because the other element is lacking – the Islamic society), and may turn into violence. …"

page 37

——————————————————————————–

"… the Islamic movement should and must start taking over the power as soon as it is morally and numerically strong enough to not only overthrow the existing non-Islamic, but also to build up a new Islamic authority. …"

page 43

——————————————————————————–

"… Pakistan was a general rehearsal of introducing Islamic order under modern conditions and on the present stage of development. …
… The conclusions from the twenty-odd year of Pakistan's existence are clear enough. They are:
First, the struggle for Islamic order and a general reconstruction of the Muslim society can be successfully conducted only by experienced and seasoned individuals, aligned into a staunch and homogenous organization. This organization is no political party from the arsenal of the Western democracy; it is a movement based on Islamic ideology and with clear moral and ideological criteria of belonging;
Second, the struggle for an Islamic order today is a struggle to implement the essence of Islam, and this means that in practice one must ensure religious and moral upbringing of the people and provide for basic elements of social justice. At this time, forms are of secondary importance; and
Third, the functions of the Islamic republic are not to primarily declare equality of all men and brotherhood of all Muslims, but to struggle for some of these high moral principles in practice. The awakened Islam should in every community take into its own hands the flag for a more just social order and to clearly state that in struggling for Islam another war is being declared as well, the one against ignorance, injustice and poverty, a war without compromises and setbacks. …"

pages 45-46

"… In one of the thesis for an Islamic order today we have stated that it is a natural function of the Islamic order to gather all Muslims and Muslim communities throughout the world into one. Under present conditions, this desire means a struggle for creating a great Islamic federation from Morocco to Indonesia, from the tropical Africa to the Central Asia. …"

page 46

——————————————————————————–

"… Panislamism always came from the very heart of the Muslim peoples, nationalism was always imported stuff. …"

page 49

"… But, under the leadership of Zionists, started an action in Palestine which is not only inhumane and ruthless but also short-sighted and adventuresome. This politics takes in account only temporary ratio of power and forgets about overall ratio of power between Jews and Muslims in the world. This politics in Palestine is a provocation to all Muslims of the world. Jerusalem is not only a question of Palestinians, neither is it a question of Arabs only. It is a question of all the Muslim nations. TO KEEP JERUSALEM, THE JEWS WOULD HAVE TO DEFEAT ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS, AND THAT – THANK GOD – IS OUTSIDE THEIR POWER."

page 53

——————————————————————————–

"… We would like to distinguish between Jews and Zionists, but only if Jews themselves find strength to find the difference. We hope that the military victories, which they had against quarrelling Arab regimes, (not against Arabs or against Muslims) will not blur their minds. We hope that they will eliminate confrontation which they made by themselves, so the new road is open to a life on the common ground of Palestine. If they, though, continue on the road of arrogance, which is more likely, then for the whole Islam movement, and FOR ALL MUSLIMS THERE IS BUT ONE SOLUTION: TO CONTINUE TO FIGHT, TO STRENGTHEN AND BROADEN IT, FROM DAY TO DAY, FROM YEAR TO YEAR, NO MATTER THE VICTIMS AND NO MATTER THE TIME it may last, until they are forced to RETURN EVERY INCH OF THE OCCUPIED LAND. EVERY NEGOTIATION AND EVERY COMPROMISE ON THIS FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE FOR OUR BROTHERS IN PALESTINE WILL BE A TREASON WHICH MAY DESTROY THE VERY CORE OF THE MORAL SYSTEM OF OUR WORLD.
These are not new laws of our new Islam politics toward Christians and Jews, not new laws dictated by the new political situation. They are just the practical conclusions taken from the Islamic recognition of Christians and Jews which come right from the Qu'ran (Qu'ran, 29/45, 2/136, 5/47-49)

pages 53-54

END

BOSNIA’S PRESIDENT Islamic Declaration 1970
The basic facts of just what caused the conflict in ex-Yugoslavia are, still, not presented to the general public in the West…
To understand Bosnian Muslims one should understand their leader: self proclaimed "President of Bosnia", Mr. Alija Izetbegovic.
A few (very few) articles were written in the western media about the fact: THE LEADER OF BOSNIAN MUSLIMS IS THE LEADING FIGURE IN THE ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST WORLD.
"Islamic Affairs Analyst" (IAA) publishes reports about Islamic world, since 1935.
IAA is published 4 to 5 times a year, in Great Britain…
With the beginning of the civil war in Bosnia, in 1992, they wrote:
Excerpts from issue of IAA entitled

"MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISM IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA"
published in 1992:

(Quote:)

There is a great reluctance in the West to recognize that the fighting in Bosnia is a resurgence of the conflict between Islam and Christendom which shaped five centuries of Balkan history.
Disbelief in the West regarding Muslim fundamentalism in Bosnia stems from several causes, among which there is a pervasive, compulsive, complacency which holds that things can never be as bad as they seem, hence European officialdom refused to believe that Hitler meant what he wrote in Mein Kampf.
President Alija Izetbegovic's Islamic Declaration, first published in 1970 when it earned him a prison sentence, demanded a fully-fundamentalist Muslim state in Bosnia without non-Muslim institutions or any division between religion, politics, and economics. The book was republished in 1990 in Sarajevo (by Mala Muslimanska Biblioteka). It scathingly attacks Attaturk's reforms and holds up Pakistan as a model to be followed.

…. ….

Traditionally, Bosnians were among the most militant in the Muslim world. A ruling minority, they were proud of being the spearhead of the jihad into Europe, part of the two-pronged drive along Sava and Danube with Rome as its final objective. Occupation by the Habsburgs in 1878 caused some of them to emigrate, but others waited for fate to redeem them.

(end quote)

The story continues. Only fifty years ago Serbs were subject to genocide in Bosnia. The geographic district, under Nazi occupation, was part of Nazi Independent State of Croatia…

For over 15 years the Encyclopedia Britannica article included the following statement when talking about WWII in Yugoslavia:
"…IN BOSNIA… THE CROATIAN FASCISTS BEGAN A MASSACRE OF SERBS WHICH, IN THE WHOLE ANNALS OF WORLD WAR II, WAS SURPASSED FOR SAVAGERY ONLY BY THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF POLISH JEWS"
One can find the above quote in all versions of Britannica from 1971 till 1987.
And who welcomed and assisted the Nazi Croats in slaughtering the Serbs? Bosnian Muslims!
Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Edition 1990, Volume 2, Pages 706 and 707, entry
Hajj Amin Al Husseini <- The main Hitler's supporter among Palestinian Arabs…

(Quote:)

It so happened that Husseini made his contribution to the Axis war effort in his capacity as a Muslim, rather than as an Arab leader, by recruiting and organizing in RECORD TIME, during the spring of 1943, BOSNIAN MUSLIM BATTALIONS in Croatia comprising some twenty thousand men!
These MUSLIM VOLUNTEER units, called Hanjar (Sword), were put in WAFFEN-SS, fought Yugoslav partisans in Bosnia, and carried out police and security duties in Hungary. THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE MASSACRE OF CIVILIANS IN BOSNIA and VOLUNTEERED TO JOIN IN THE HUNT FOR JEWS IN CROATIA… The Germans made a point of publicizing the fact that Husseini had flown from Berlin to Sarajevo for the sole purpose of giving his blessing to the Muslim army and inspecting its arms and training exercises.

(End quote)

A photograph, on page 704, shows al-Husseini inspecting Muslim troops in Bosnia.

Much more on that here.

Today, Muslims and Croats – united in hatred of Serbs, are once again at task of slaughtering Serbs. Having no knowledge of the history of the region, and having no sense of shame, "democratic" West is supporting the union (and the slaughter).

Extensive quotes from the book were also presented in French periodical "FIGARO", on August 26, 1992 under title: "L'ORDRE ISLAMIQUE" SELON ALIJA IZETBEGOVIC
See also:

• British: "The daily telegraph" May 11, 1992: "Conflict could lay foundations for Islamic state in Europe"
•  Canadian: "Globe and Mail" October 17, 1992, page A10: "Media reports from Bosnia: A mixture of Outright lies, Staged events and untold stories".
• "Jerusalem Post", August 11, 1993, text by Yohanan Ramati, Director of the Jerusalem Institute for Western Defence: "Don't cry for Bosnian Moslems"
• British: "Sunday Times", August 30, 1992 , page A1: "Arabs join in Bosnia battle"
• American: "Newsweek", October 5, 1992, page 52: "Help from holy warriors (Inside a secret military camp: how mujahedin fighters are training Bosnia's Muslims"
• "The European", February 4, 1993: "How Iran is arming Bosnia's Muslims"
• London: Times, October 21, 1994: "Disciples of holy war answer call to fight and die (The presence of Mujahedin fighters from around the world on Bosnian battlefields is unnerving the West)"
• Washington Times, June 2, 1994, page 1: "Iranians move into Bosnia to terrorize Serbs"
  Washington Post, May 13, 1994: "Iran ships material for arms to Bosnians"

Islamic Fundamentalism now has a stronghold in the heart of Europe… Serbs have been expelled from Sarajevo, a city they founded more than thousand years ago.

The goal: the Islamisation of Muslims. Our methods: to believe and to
struggle here
and here
and here.

UPDATE: Read this In the context of the "Islamic Declaration,"

Robinson spent three days in the nation's capital interviewing
people he thought might be helpful to his defence, including former Canadian
Maj.-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie, who led a United Nations peacekeeping operation
in Bosnia in 1992, and James Bissett, the former Canadian ambassador to
Yugoslavia, Bulgaria and Albania from 1990 to 1992. Both men witnessed first
hand the horrors of the civil war, which lasted from 1992 to 1995.
A lot of
what the lawyer heard will not please a lot of people, particularly those
who blame the Serbs and, in particular, Karadzic for the horrors of that time
and place.
"Gen. MacKenzie was probably the most outspoken United Nations
official about the fact that the Muslims were shelling their own people in order
to get international opinion on their side," Robinson said Tuesday.
"Essentially they created disasters or massacres and blamed them on the
Serbs. Some of those (massacres) Karadzic is charged with committing
himself."
At the time he spoke to the Citizen, Robinson had yet to
interview Bissett. However, the ambassador earlier told the Citizen that
there is "a lot of evidence to indicate that Muslim leaders killed their own
people." As for Karadzic, he said: "I don't know if he is a war criminal,
but I do know he did his damnedest to prevent the
war." 
……….

MacKenzie refers to such incidents in his 1993 book,
Peacekeeper: The Road to Sarajevo, in which he recounts telling then French
president François Mitterand, who visited Sarajevo in June of 1992, that while
"the majority of the blame" for the violence "rests with the Serbs," the Bosnian
Muslims were usually the first to break any ceasefire…..
In 1992, the
Bosnian Muslims, Serbs and Croats signed a peace agreement, the Lisbon
Agreement, but then, by some accounts, former U.S. ambassador Warren
Zimmermann subsequently met the Bosnian Muslim president Alija Izetbegovic and
told him that if he withdrew from the agreement and unilaterally declared
independence, the United States would support him. The Americans, so the
story goes, were trying to currying favour with the Muslim world after the 1991
Gulf War. Izetbegovic was encouraged to think that he would be establishing the
first Muslim nation in the heart of Europe. ….
Before the 1992 civil
war, Bosnian Muslims were bringing in experienced Muslim fighters, including
some who had fought against the Russians in Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden is
known to have been in Bosnia, along with fundamentalist Muslims from Iran, Saudi
Arabia and Afghanistan.
At the time, as Robinson put it, the U.S. "took
the position that the Bosnian Muslims were the good guys and the Serbs were the
bad guys. 
"It was a huge miscalculation by the United States. They
should have put their support behind Karadzic. He was an anti-communist
dissident, democratic and the Serbs had a long history of supporting the
(western) allies and fighting against fascism. They basically backed the wrong
horse. We're paying the price for it now. We see some of the same people now
in Afghanistan and Pakistan were in Bosnia." "The benefit of MacKenzie's
testimony is that he is courageous enough to say that, in fact, the Muslims were
involved in killing their own people."
……………….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here