New York City Freedom Bus
Freedom bus, Miami Beach
I wanted to give Atlas readers an update on the SIOA/FDI lawsuit against the city of Detroit. Despite the crying need for resources for Muslims under threat for leaving Islam, the city of Detroit refused to run our freedom campaign on the Dearborn and Detroit buses. Instead they caved to Islamic supremacism and violated their own ad guidelines of freedom of speech.
Here is guideline number one for the government agency that handles bus ads:
governmental agency that receives state and federal funds, SMART is
comply with federal and state laws. First Amendment free speech rights
that SMART not censor free speech and because of that, SMART
required to provide equal access to advertising on our vehicles.
public educator in
Dearborn, speaking on the condition of anonymity
owing to fear of retribution, said there is a climate of fear in the
Detroit area's Muslim community.
"The fear is
palpable. I know there are things I am 'not allowed' to
say. A discussion of religion with a Muslim person is often prefaced by
the statement, 'Dont say anything about the Prophet [Muhammad].' In free
society, open and honest conversation is not usually begun by a
prohibition. Threats and intimidation are just part of life here."
educator, however, said the ads
serve a positive purpose.
"This kind of campaign and Americans
support of it could assure these frightened Muslims that they have the
rights that every other American has, that they will be protected, not
abandoned or exposed to their leaders should they act upon their desire
to be free," the teacher said.
So our law suit is moving forward for freedom of speech, religious liberty and equal rights for all men (no special rights for special classes).
Anyone against these bus ads supports the death penalty for apostates. It's just that simple. These girls would have gotten on the bus.
The islamic supemacists tried to shut us down in Miami (our first city) — four hours after they went up, un-indicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR demanded they be pulled — and they were. Our ads were back up with an additional 20 buses at 50% off :)
In New York City, the little bus campaign that could became the news story of the week, with press coverage that included the NY Times, Daily News, FOX news, CBS, every one. It was a huge story overseas as well. If it were an atheist or Jews for Jesus campaign, no one would have batted an eyelash. The media storm is indicative of how sick our society has become, and how far down the rabbit hole we have crawled.
The Detroit lawsuit is big news as well — check out the Canadian press, the Washington Times, The Daily News (who calls it
"pure Muslim hate." I call it pure Muslim love).
I thought you should know we are vigorously pursuing it, and we will prevail. We will win.
is a pdf of the complaint prepared by the inestimable David
Yerushalmi, my counsel and expert on sharia law
and the courageous Thomas More Law Center, keeper of the flame..
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. It
has been served with the complaint/summons and now everything is filed with the
The Defendants will have 21 days to respond to the motion and
they will likely ask the court (we would not object) to allowing them to put off
answering or responding to the complaint until the court rules on the TRO. If
the court grants the TRO, they’ll have to post the ads and then litigate on the
Whether denying Plaintiffs the right to engage in private political and religious expression in a public forum created by Defendants based on the content and viewpoint of the
message causes irreparable harm to Plaintiffs sufficient to warrant temporary/preliminary
Click for the
Motion for TROw_exhibits_filedor the exhibits and the suit against Detroit.
I, Pamela Geller, make this declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 based on my
1. I am an adult citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of New York.
2. Robert Spencer and I co-founded American Freedom Defense Initiative (“FDI”),
which is incorporated under the laws of the State of New Hampshire. I am the Executive
Director of FDI, and Mr. Spencer is the Associate Director. Mr. Spencer and I engage in
political and religious speech through FDI’s activities, including FDI’s religious freedom bus
and billboard campaigns.
3. The State of New Hampshire incorporation documents for FDI were filed on or
about April 4, 2010, and a Certification of Incorporation dated April 5, 2010, was promptly
issued by the New Hampshire Office of Secretary of State. See a true and correct copy of the
Certificate of Incorporation attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
4. FDI’s specific objective is to go on the public relations offensive when legal,
academic, legislative, cultural, sociological, and political actions are taken to dismantle our basic
freedoms and values. One of our cherished freedoms is religious liberty, which includes the
freedom to change one’s religion without fear of retribution and harm.
5. FDI achieves its objective through a variety of lawful means, including through
the exercise of its right to freedom of speech under the U.S. Constitution.
6. One example of FDI’s exercise of its right to freedom of speech is the sponsoring
of religious freedom bus and billboard campaigns. To that end, FDI purchases advertising space
on bus lines operated in cities throughout the United States to express various political and
Case 2:10-cv-12134-DPH-MJH Document 8-2 Filed 06/17/10
religious messages. FDI’s religious freedom message states as follows: “Fatwa on your head? Is
your family or community threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got questions? Get answers!” The
message also includes the following website address: RefugeFromIslam.com.
7. Beginning on or about May 3, 2010, FDI sponsored a religious freedom message
(hereinafter “Advertisement” or “Advertising”) to be displayed on Miami-Dade County Transit
buses running throughout the City of Miami for one month. See a true and correct copy of the
Advertising attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. The Advertising ran
on the Miami-Dade County Transit buses for the full one-month period.
8. Prior to running the Advertising on the Miami-Dade County Transit buses, FDI
entered into an advertising agreement with CBS Outdoor acting as the advertising agent for the
Miami-Dade County Transit (“CBS-FDI Agreement-Miami”). See a true and correct copy of the
CBS-FDI Agreement-Miami attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference.
9. Beginning on or about May 17, 2010, FDI sponsored the Advertising to be
displayed on New York City Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) buses for a period
ending on June 13, 2010.
10. Prior to running the Advertising on the MTA buses, FDI entered into an
advertising agreement with CBS Outdoor acting as the advertising agent for the MTA (“CBSFDI
Agreement-NYC”). See a true and correct copy of the CBS-FDI Agreement-NYC attached
as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference. The CBS-FDI Agreement-NYC is
identical in form and has the identical “Terms and Conditions” as the CBS-FDI Agreement-
Case 2:10-cv-12134-DPH-MJH Document 8-2 Filed 06/17/10
11. On or about April 30, 2010, FDI entered into an advertising agreement to place
the Advertising on Detroit Department of Transportation (“DDOT”) buses with CBS Outdoor
acting as the advertising agent for the DDOT (“CBS-FDI Agreement-Detroit”). See a true and
correct copy of the CBS-FDI Agreement-Detroit attached as Exhibit E and incorporated herein
by this reference.1 The CBS-FDI Agreement-Detroit is identical in form and has the identical
“Terms and Conditions” as the earlier agreements for Miami and New York City. Pursuant to
the CBS-FDI Agreement-Detroit, FDI paid CBS Outdoor $4,801.50.
12. On or about May 7, 2010, CBS Outdoor representative Robert B. Hawkins
informed me by email that the DDOT rejected FDI’s Advertising. He did not explain why the
DDOT rejected the Advertising, but instead told me to contact Natalie Starks at the DDOT for
13. After several emails, on May 12, 2010, Ms. Starks informed me that the DDOT
refused to run the Advertising and provided no explanation. See a true and correct copy of an
email thread between Mr. Hawkins and me and then between Ms. Starks and me attached as
Exhibit F and incorporated herein by this reference.
14. After the DDOT rejection, I researched other bus lines in the Detroit metropolitan
area and learned that the Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (“SMART”)
also operates bus lines in the Detroit area. I was confident SMART would run the Advertising
for two reasons. First, SMART had previously permitted advertising promoting atheism. See
Exhibit G attached to this declaration and incorporated herein by this reference. And second,
SMART, as a governmental agency, had published its own “Advertising Guidelines,” which
1 The handwritten dates of “5/28/10” appearing at the signature lines of the CBS-FDI
Agreement-Detroit are scrivener’s errors and should have been dated April 28, 2010.
Case 2:10-cv-12134-DPH-MJH Document 8-2 Filed 06/17/10
includes the following free speech policy statement: “First Amendment free speech rights require
that SMART not censor free speech and because of that, SMART is required to provide equal
access to advertising on our vehicles.” True and accurate copies of SMART Web pages setting
forth SMART’s “Advertising Guidelines” and its “Policies and Regulations” are attached to this
declaration as Exhibit H, which is incorporated herein by this reference. The free speech policy
statement is also available at http://www.smartbus.org/Smart/mktg/advertise.aspx.
On or about May 12, 2010, I emailed Mr. Hawkins and asked him to modify the
CBS-FDI Agreement-Detroit to have the Advertising placed on SMART buses running in the
Detroit metropolitan area for the existing contract price, which FDI had already paid.
email the next day, Mr. Hawkins confirmed the request and that he had sent our Advertising
copy to his contact at SMART for approval. Our Advertising request met all of the procedural
requirements for running an advertisement on the SMART buses. See a true and correct copy of
the emails between Mr. Hawkins and me switching the Advertising from DDOT to SMART
attached as Exhibit I and incorporated herein by this reference.
16. On or about May 24, 2010, Mr. Hawkins emailed me and informed me that
SMART refused to run the Advertising. He suggested I contact Beth Gibbons of SMART, who
is his primary contact there, and he provided me with Ms. Gibbons’ email address. I
immediately emailed Ms. Gibbons and asked her: “What was it about the ad that was ‘not
approved’ and what would have to be changed? Please let me know so we can get this campaign
on the road.” See a true and correct copy of the emails from Mr. Hawkins to me and from me to
Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Gibbons attached as Exhibit J and incorporated herein by this reference.
17. I have heard nothing from Ms. Gibbons or from any other SMART representative.
The only information that I received from SMART, as relayed to me through Mr. Hawkins, was
that SMART rejected my Advertisement, and thus rejected my religious freedom message.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct.
Executed this 15th day of June 2010.
Case 2:10-cv-12134-DPH-MJH Document 8-2 Filed 06/17/10 Page 7 of 7
Case 2:10-cv-12134-DPH-MJH Document 8-3 Filed 06/17/10
Read it all.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.