PALIN: They Wanna Killa The thrilla From Wasilla

Sarah Palin scares the guts out of RINOs, leftopaths and freedom haters. She embodies all that good and fine and decent, and they vomit. You couldn't have written a more charismatic honorable character in a Victor Hugo novel. They will do anything and say anything to destroy this woman. They are so low, so corrupt …. their depravity continues to shock even the most jaded.

Wonkette
Goes After Trig Palin Again

It really is hard to understand why some adults feel the need to
make fun of Trig Palin, a one-year old who has Down Syndrome. Politics alone
cannot explain it. If you don't like Sarah Palin, fine, but why go after
Trig?

Story continues below advertisement

The controversy regarding the Photoshop of Trig by Alaskan blogger
Linda
Biegel is only the tip of the iceberg. Ever since Sarah's nomination, Trig
has been a target. Last fall, the popular DC-based "gossip" website Wonkette
joked how Trig must have wished he'd been aborted.
Now Wonkette has taken Biegel's Photoshop antics as an excuse to go after Trig
anew.

In a recent post,
Wonkette promoted and joked about even cruder Photoshops of Trig at the
Something Awful web forum, where people can post anonymously (examples below).
Wonkette even included one of these photoshops in its post (above right) while
mocking Trig as the "New Jesus," "Holy Infant" and "Sacred One."

All the
attacks on Trig are Sarah's fault, according to the Wonkette post, since Sarah
had the audacity to bring Trig on stage at the Republican National Convention
(where the original photo in question was taken), which Wonkette calls using
Trig as a "cheap political prop." I guess that makes the Obama kids fair game
according to Wonkette since they were brought on
stage at the Democratic National Convention.

Sarah is to blame for
all the new Photoshops of Trig, according to the Wonkette post, because Sarah
complained about Biegel:

The Virgin Palin, Our Lady of Eternal Anger, gave birth to the New
Jesus at some point last year — or not, who knows, and now Andrew Sullivan just
cares about Iran (which is a good thing!) so we’ll never find out the truth —
and ever since it has been both a Cardinal/Venial Sin and Sharia Law that no
mortal shall “desecrate” an image of the Sacred One … no one but Sarah Palin
herself, because Allah both allows and encourages the use of the Holy Infant as
a cheap political prop as long as such cruel hackery is performed by the Virgin
Palin herself.

Palin’s fury was such, when she found out some blog “on
the Internet” had combined a picture of her cradling one of her Magic Babies
together with a picture of her Jedi Master, some dingbat old radio talk-show
clown in Alaska, that she did verily send her dumbest disciple, “Brother Meg,”
to start a Jihad against the Entire Internet.

But we know what happens
when a fear-and-anger crazed Snow Witch starts a vain war she can never hope to
win: The Internet Strikes Back.

Which is to say, Palin basically poked a
stick in the world’s largest beehive filled with cheap & tireless insanity,
and the SomethingAwful.com goons have unleashed a pack of Photoshop Dogs From
Hell to make the most incredible collection of Sarah Palin Desecration Images in
the History of Time, the end.

General
Bullshit > Sarah Palin thinks photoshopping special needs babies is
appalling [Something Awful]

Here are two of the milder
Photoshops in the Something Awful forum, which are Sarah's fault according to
Wonkette:

What a riot. It takes small people to stoop this low.

[Note: Accordingly to one of the commenters, the face imposed on the photo
immediately above is that of a convicted sex offender, Brian Peppers, which
makes that Photoshop particularly sick.]

UPDATE:
Huffington Post blogger Jason
Linkins has joined Wonkette in blaming Sarah for the crude Photoshops
because Sarah complained and used the word "desecrate":

And now, all of these people that you had heretofore never heard of
are famous, because Sarah Palin wouldn't let the stuff slide. Even dumber, she
said that the photoshopping was a "desecration," which means she believes Trig
had been "divested of her sacred character." Now I think Trig Palin is an
awesome kid, but COME ON. That's a really pretentious thing for a parent to say.

Can't the Editors at Wonkette or bloggers at HuffPo check the dictionary?
Desecrate has more than one meaning, and is not limited to someone being
"divested" of "sacred character." The Merriam-Webster
online dictionary includes "to treat disrespectfully, irreverently, or
outrageously" in the definition of the term. Sounds right to me. More important,
regardless of which words Sarah used, why does that justify attacks on Trig?

As if that weren't terrible enough, Vanity Fair has a hit piece coming out  filled with lies and propaganda. Worse, they were aided by the cancerous liberals of the Republican party.

There is a struggle in the Republican party for the heart and soul of our future. The RINOs (McCain, Romney etc. vs true individualists and conservatives). You must get involved in this struggle.

The GOP wants to knock her out, for the same reasons that they don't back the formidable, courageous Lt. Colonel Allen West.

Steve wrote:

The McCain Campaign was abominable in every way imaginable — no strategy, low-quality support staff, pathetic fundraising, and a top-of-the-ticket candidate who was more interested in preserving his Beltway status than in winning the election. The low point in the campaign was when McCain essentially told the woman in Wisconsin who "feared" Obama that she had nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.

As a 3-year-speechwriter, I found it obvious that Sarah needed a topflight speechwriter/advisor (Elaine Lafferty would have been fine, and I would have done it for nothing) with her; she had no such person. Biden did. Sarah didn't. McCain clearly resented the fact that Sarah drew huge crowds . . . and he couldn't draw flies.

The GOP is trying to knock her out.

Below is to give you a taste of what is to come. There is a devastating hate piece in Vanity Fair, in what can only be a pathetic attempt at complete and total character assassination.Vanity Fair on Palin: 'It came from Wasilla' 
– reporter Todd Purdum relies heavily on quotes from unnamed McCain campaign officials.

The same shills that laud Obama for dropping a cool $100,000 on a "dinner and a show with Meesh in NYC, are aghast that Sarah spent $150,000 of donated bucks on her wardrobe for the presidential campaign. 

By the time Election Day rolled around, the staff had been serially
pummeled by unflattering press reports about the gaps in Palin’s
knowledge, her stubborn resistance to direction, and the post-selection
spending spree in which she ran up bills of $150,000 on clothes for
herself and her family at high-end stores.

The leftopaths have chutzpah!

Todd S. Purdum, Vanity Fair: NY Daily News

"Whatever her political future, the emergence of Sarah Palin raises
questions that will not soon go away," Todd Purdum writes in a long
piece that ranges from her campaign for governor to her current status
as the "sexiest and riskiest brand" in GOP politics. "What does it say
about the nature of modern American politics that a public official who
often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but
applauded? What does her prominence say about the importance of having
(or lacking) a record of achievement in public life? Why did so many
skilled veterans of the Republican Party-long regarded as the more
adroit team in presidential politics-keep loyally working for her
election even after they privately realized she was casual about the
truth and totally unfit for the vice-presidency?" …

As Palin makes her way slowly across the crowded ballroom—dressed
all in black; no red Naughty Monkey Double Dare pumps tonight—she is
stopped every few inches by adoring fans. She passes the press pen,
where at least eight television cameras and a passel of reporters and
photographers are corralled, and spots a reporter for a local community
newspaper getting ready to take a happy snap with his pocket camera.
For a split second she stops, pauses, turns her head and shoulders just
so, and smiles. She holds the pose until she’s sure the man has his
shot and then moves on. A few minutes later, the evening’s nominal
keynote speaker, the Republican Party’s national chairman, Michael
Steele, who has been reduced to a footnote in the proceedings,
introduces the special guest speaker as “the storm that is the
honorable governor of the great state of Alaska, Sarah Palin!”

[…]

In the aftermath of the November election, the conventional wisdom
among Palin’s supporters in the Republican establishment was that she
should go home, keep her head down, show that she could govern
effectively, and quietly educate herself about foreign and domestic
policy with the help of a cadre of experienced advisers. She has done
none of this. Rather, she has pursued an erratic course that, for her,
may actually represent the closest thing there is to True North. Her
first trip to Washington since the election was to attend the dinner of
the Alfalfa Club, an elite group of politicians and businesspeople
whose sole function is an annual evening in honor of a plant that would
“do anything for a drink.” Some of her handlers first said she had
accepted—though she then went on to decline—an invitation to speak at
the annual June fund-raiser for the congressional Republicans. She
created a political-action committee—Sarahpac—with the help of John Coale, a prominent Democratic trial lawyer. But just months into its existence the pac’s
chief fund-raiser, Becki Donatelli, a veteran of Republican campaigns,
suddenly quit. One person familiar with the situation told me that
Donatelli could not stand dealing with Palin’s political spokeswoman in
Alaska, Meghan Stapleton, who has drawn withering fire from Palin
friends and critics alike for being an ineffective adviser. Also with
Coale’s help, Palin formed the grandiosely named Alaska Fund Trust, to
defray a reported half million dollars in legal expenses arising from a
slew of formal ethics complaints against her in her home
state—prompting yet another formal complaint, that the fund itself
constitutes an ethical breach. Onetime supporters have become harsh
critics. Walter Hickel, 89, a former two-term governor and interior
secretary, and the grand old man of Alaska politics, who was co-chair
of Palin’s winning gubernatorial campaign, in 2006, now washes his
hands of her. He told me simply, “I don’t give a damn what she does.”

Palin is unlike any other national figure in modern American
life—neither Anna Nicole Smith nor Margaret Chase Smith but a
phenomenon all her own. The clouds of tabloid conflict and controversy
that swirl around her and her extended clan—the surprise pregnancies,
the two-bit blood feuds, the tawdry in-laws and common-law kin caught
selling drugs or poaching game—give her family a singular status in the
rogues’ gallery of political relatives. By comparison, Billy Carter,
Donald Nixon, and Roger Clinton seem like avatars of circumspection.
Palin’s life has sometimes played out like an unholy amalgam of Desperate Housewives and Northern Exposure.

Another aspect of the Palin phenomenon bears examination, even if
the mere act of raising it invites intimations of sexism: she is by far
the best-looking woman ever to rise to such heights in national
politics, the first indisputably fertile female to dare to dance with
the big dogs. This pheromonal reality has been a blessing and a curse.
It has captivated people who would never have given someone with
Palin’s record a second glance if Palin had looked like Susan Boyle.
And it has made others reluctant to give her a second chance because
she looks like a beauty queen.

Soon Palin will take a crack at her own story: she has signed a book
contract for an undisclosed but presumably substantial sum, and has
chosen Lynn Vincent, a senior writer at the Christian-conservative World
magazine, as co-author of the memoir, which is to be published next
year not only by HarperCollins but also in a special edition by
Zondervan, the Bible-publishing house, that may include supplemental
material on faith. During the presidential campaign, Palin’s deep
ignorance about most aspects of foreign and domestic policy provided
her with a powerful political reason not to submit to interviews. The
forthcoming book adds a powerful commercial reason.

Palin is a cipher by choice. When she chooses to reveal herself,
what she reveals is not always the same thing as the truth. Her
singular refusal to have in-depth conversations with the national
media—even Richard Nixon and Dick Cheney, among the most saturnine
political figures in modern American history, each submitted to
countless detailed interviews over the years—has compounded the
challenge of understanding who she really is. There has been Hollywood
talk that Palin could star in a reality-TV show about running Alaska,
but nothing has come of it yet. Recently, Palin did star in a week-long
seriocomic feud with David Letterman over some of his borderline jokes.
Meanwhile, she has begun sharing insights several times a day on
Twitter, with chipper reports on her own doings and those of her
husband, Todd, and the rest of what she calls the “first family.” “Look
forward to today’s staff discussion re: my 3rd justice appt to highest
court in 3 yrs. Supreme Court truly effects AK’s future,” reads one.
And another: “Picking up my handsome little man to rtrn to Juneau, Trig
got 1st haircut so my little hippie baby’s ready for AK sunshine on his
shoulders.”

It gets worse. Newbusters had this:

Moving on, Purdum writes:

The top McCain aides who had
tried hard to work with Palin—Steve Schmidt, the chief strategist;
Nicolle Wallace, the communications ace; and Tucker Eskew, her
traveling counselor—were barely on speaking terms with her, and news
organizations were reporting that anonymous McCain aides saw Palin as a
“diva” and a “whack job.”

This quote, irritating as it is, is merely a setup for a later assertion:

Some
top aides worried about her mental state: was it possible that she was
experiencing postpartum depression? (Palin’s youngest son was less than
six months old.)

One might ignore the jab about being a diva – after all, then-candidate Barack Obama said:

"Like any politician at this level, I've got a healthy ego."

However,
quoting anonymous sources to imply that a national political figure
may, in fact, have been mentally unstable during a campaign is beyond
any stretch of journalistic integrity.  And yet, Purdum is not content
to smear Palin with the ethereal possibility of postpartum depression:

More
than once in my travels in Alaska, people brought up, without
prompting, the question of Palin’s extravagant self-regard. Several
told me, independently of one another, that they had consulted the
definition of “narcissistic personality disorder” in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—“a pervasive pattern of
grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of
empathy”—and thought it fit her perfectly.

It is
amusing to consider the idea that random, unidentified constituents
would, unbidden, pick up the copy of the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders that they just so happened to have sitting
on the bookshelf, and wonder if Sarah Palin suffered from a mental
disorder.

For the sake of argument, however, let us simply
settle on the fact that failing to identify these people – or their
expertise in the field of psychiatric medicine – leaves this paragraph
as a near-libelous attack on the mental state of a public figure.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here