A year ago, a Jewish writer attacked me for saying that Obama was not pro-Israel. Now that he has been president for 100 days, how has that worked out? Here is what they wrote about me in May 2008 — yeah, I'm the "crazy, inexplicably popular blogger"...lol:
would try to fulfill her service to Israel by smearing a better and
truer Zionist than she could ever be, exclaiming: "JEWICIDAL JIHADI
BENDS OVER, SUBMITS DEMANDS [sic] ISRAEL." And there's more! "Atlas" — as she preposterously calls herself out of some deeply confused homage to a failed novelist-cum-failed philosopher who actually was
a Jew who loathed Judaism — wants to let us know that in addition to
all his jihadi faggotry, Goldberg is also a "self-loathing" "jihadi" …..
There's more. How amusing to read this exposing Obama's anti-semitic allegiances, alliances, friendships, funding etc.
call him a Kapo if she actually knew anything about Jewish history, is
— you guessed it — explaining to the goyim that "Mr. Obama is
actually more pro-Israel than either Ehud Olmert or Ehud Barak…[t]o
say nothing of John McCain and President George W. Bush…." To which
"Atlas" responds, staying classy, "Obama is more pro-Israel than Hitler
It goes on and on in its condescending, sophomoric rhetoric. So here you have a leftist Jew deriding a proud zionist for fighting for Israel. Read the article. How does a schmuck like Koffler sleep nights selling out his own beleaguered people? At the time I did respond here: Loosey Jewcy Attack. But I think it a worthwhile exercise to read this fool's post and then review what has actually happened one year later.
Here are just a few highlights from the jihad sympathizing president's first 100 days:
Obama's National Security Adviser James Jones told a European foreign minister that Obama is planning to build an anti-Israel coalition with the Arabs and Europe to compel Israel to surrender Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to the Palestinians. (more here)
Middle East policy the Obama administration has announced has been
antithetical to Israel's national security interests. From President
Barack Obama's intense desire to appease Iran's mullahs in open
discussions; to his stated commitment to establish a Palestinian state
as quickly as possible despite the Palestinians' open rejection of
Israel's right to exist and support for terrorism; to his expressed
support for the so-called Saudi peace plan, which would require Israel
to commit national suicide by contracting to within indefensible
borders and accepting millions of hostile, foreign-born Arabs as
citizens and residents of the rump Jewish state; to his decision to end
US sanctions against Syria and return the US ambassador to Damascus; to
his plan to withdraw US forces from Iraq and so give Iran an arc of
uninterrupted control extending from Iran to Lebanon, every single
concrete policy Obama has enunciated harms Israel. (Glick here)
military aid to Israel. Under new Pentagon guidelines, the Ministry of
Defense must give a detailed accounting of how it uses every item it
purchases with US aid money. As a consequence, the Defense Ministry
issued new instructions to the IDF that from now Israel's purchases
from the US will be limited to defensive armaments and systems aimed at
preserving its "qualitative edge" against its enemies." (more here)
In another shocking blow to Israel, the Obama administration
has announced reversal of an important policy toward Israel, one that
weakens that nation's ability to survive in its hostile neighborhood.
long as Israel was thought to possess nuclear weapons, enemies might be
reluctant to try to destroy Israel. During the 1973 War, it was rumored
that the mere threat of Israel resorting to nuclear weapons led to a
massive resupply effort by America and to the willingness of Israel's
enemies to agree to a truce. Surrounded by numerically superior nations
— and an Arab world that can afford to buy the best weapons from
around the world — the rumored possession by Israel of an atomic
bomb(s) has probably warded off further warfare and bloodshed. Every US
administration has acquiesced in this policy, seeing it as a sensible
of a nation that rose from the ashes of the Holocaust and one that was
surrounded by neighbors promising to commit another. There have been
winks and nods, even going back to the Kennedy years, about Israel's
Now that policy has finally been threatened — not by the raft of
traditional enemies and international organizations that have always
advocated that Israel sign the agreement, but by the Obama
US House speaker Newt Gingrich on Sunday blasted the Obama
administration for setting itself on a collision course with Israel and
endangering the Jewish state, ahead of his address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
"They are systematically setting up the most decisive confrontation
that we've ever seen," the leading Republican politician told The
Jerusalem Post, referring to news reports about the administration's
approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Hagmann appeared on Israel National Radio's Weekend Edition with host Tamar Yonah.
When questioned about the possible abandonment of Israel by America, Hagmann
told Yonah, "The Obama administration is no friend to Israel, is no friend to
the Jews in America and is no friend to democracy or freedom in America. …Just
by his very appointments, we can see him filling positions of power with people
who are anti-Semitic, who want to see Israel essentially dissolved as a nation,
if not by diplomacy, then certainly by war."
In his report, the unnamed intelligence source told Hagmann, “I have every
reason to believe, based on what I’ve seen at my level of [security] clearance
especially over the last several years, that Israel will soon be completely on
their own… or worse.” He explained this would happen “when our administration
provides more support to Arab countries [with] financial and military aid,
undercutting Israel’s defense efforts all while pushing Israel to succumb to the
pressure of unreasonable demands designed to end with their political
annihilation as a nation.”
The intelligence officer explained that the turnover of American policy
towards Israel could occur through a manner that he dubbed 'malicious
intelligence," which Haggman defined as information that is taken from its raw
form. It then is morphed into something else to promote different interests,
"where intelligence and politics meet and often collide,” he said. A method
“that has been molded and massaged to advance the agendas of a select few,” he
In the case of the relationship between America and Israel, he noted, malicious
intelligence is being used to turn over the U.S. to a more anti-Israel
policy and forge ahead with a more pro-PA or pro-Islamist one.
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here.
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.